. >> caller: this is david pilpel. in addition to the discussion at the last commission meeting only vaccinating staff and the impacts that might have and perhaps will hear an update on that later, i understand that working in the office is going to be required starting soon. thus, some stuff who have been working remotely from home and elsewhere and some cases other states are going to be leaving city service very shortly. i wish them well. great work for the city for many years. it's a big loss. this requirement for people to work in the office when they can work effectively from home which unnecessary impediment. people who can work from home should be allowed to work from home. finally, i thank and appreciate acting general manager michael carlin for his significant efforts leading the city and the staff and all kinds of things these past 11 months. which have been incredibly challenging. so thank you to him and to the rest of the staff for all their extraordinary work 24/7. as for the previous caller mentioned lis

. >> caller: this is david pilpel. i too will be interested in more detailed presentation if 1 can find a way to get that to me, i like to see that and the presentation that was made today. i think it was a good solid presentation and discussion. i'm not sure it matters to anyone, for what its worth, i have great confidence in mark blake and rest of the city attorney team in terms of bond issues and disclosures and all of that. i think the last question that you were discussing related was fairly asked

good morning, david pilpel. so on this item as relates to the communication-based train control on the judah, i'm skeptical of the benefits of the control system on the surface portion of the entire muni metro system. i'm opposed to three-car and judah trains on the surface and i urge you to prohibit operation of three-car trains on the surface of the n judah as a condition of approval of this item or any subsequent items related to the judah or the communication-based train control system. i question and would urge you to ask what is the likely impact to passengers from construction of this proposed communication-based train control infrastructure. will that require bus substitutions for one or more days, weeks, months, while that infrastructure is built in the street or wherever that is to be built? and finally, i understand that m.t.a. is developing a written rail service plan to discuss the future of muni metro as it relates to level of service, coupling, uncoupling, capacity, fleet, facilities, et cetera. i

good morning, david pilpel.tes to the communication-based train control on the judah, i'm skeptical of the benefits of the control system on the surface portion of the entire muni metro system. i'm opposed to three-car and judah trains on the surface and i urge you to prohibit operation of three-car trains on the surface of the n judah as a condition of approval of this item or any subsequent items related to the judah or the communication-based train control system. i question and would urge you to ask what is the likely impact to passengers from construction of this proposed communication-based train control infrastructure. will that require bus substitutions for one or more days, weeks, months, while that infrastructure is built in the street or wherever that is to be built? and finally, i understand that m.t.a. is developing a written rail service plan to discuss the future of muni metro as it relates to level of service, coupling, uncoupling, capacity, fleet, facilities, et cetera. i urge you to calendar th

it's david pilpel. i reviewed this issue. i appreciate what president walton just reviewed. i appreciate that you recessed the meeting and fixed the problem. i appreciate the clerk and everybody. on the motion on page 3, the last two lines i had couple of minor suggestions. page 3 lines 24 and 25, i believe should read, the clerk of the board of supervisors is directed to place such a motion on the agenda of the next meeting of the board of supervisors. it would change the wording to such a motion and insert the word before board of supervisors. i support what you doing. thank you very much. >> clerk: thank you. do we have another caller in the queue? >> there are no further callers in the queue. >> clerk: thank you. >> president walton: seeing that we have no other speakers, public comment on item 64 is closed. please call the roll on the motion. >> clerk: on item 64. [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: this motion carries unanimously. for our public, i wanted to announce that prior to our recess, we called the consent agenda items 1-10. they were voted

it's david pilpel. i reviewed this issue. i appreciate what president walton just reviewed. i appreciate that you recessed the meeting and fixed the problem. i appreciate the clerk and everybody. on the motion on page 3, the last two lines i had couple of minor suggestions. page 3 lines 24 and 25, i believe should read, the clerk of the board of supervisors is directed to place such a motion on the agenda of the next meeting of the board of supervisors. it would change the wording to such a motion and insert the word before board of supervisors. i support what you doing. thank you very much. >> clerk: thank you. do we have another caller in the queue? >> there are no further callers in the queue. >> clerk: thank you. >> president walton: seeing that we have no other speakers, public comment on item 64 is closed. please call the roll on the motion. >> clerk: on item 64. [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: this motion carries unanimously. for our public, i wanted to announce that prior to our recess, we called the consent agenda items 1-10. they were voted

. >> caller: this is david pilpel. i too will be interested in more detailed presentation if 1 can find a way to get that to me, i like to see that and the presentation that was made today. i think it was a good solid presentation and discussion. i'm not sure it matters to anyone, for what its worth, i have great confidence in mark blake and rest of the city attorney team in terms of bond issues and disclosures and all of that. i think the last question that you were discussing related to continuing disclosure obligations, i think that was fairly asked and answered. but there are additional responsibilities not just when there's an issues being considered, annual disclosure obligations. there may be some additional requirement. i really don't know what the materiality standard is, i assume there's some -- there may be some disclosure obligation. i'm sure the p.u.c. is complying with all of that. again, i have great confidence in the team at p.u.c. finance, city attorney team and outside counsel on this. thank you for l

it's david pilpel. i reviewed this issue. i appreciate what president walton just reviewed.ting and fixed the problem. i appreciate the clerk and everybody. on the motion on page 3, the last two lines i had couple of minor suggestions. page 3 lines 24 and 25, i believe should read, the clerk of the board of supervisors is directed to place such a motion on the agenda of the next meeting of the board of supervisors. it would change the wording to such a motion and insert the word before board of supervisors. i support what you doing. thank you very much. >> clerk: thank you. do we have another caller in the queue? >> there are no further callers in the queue. >> clerk: thank you. >> president walton: seeing that we have no other speakers, public comment on item 64 is closed. please call the roll on the motion. >> clerk: on item 64. [roll call vote] there are 11 ayes. >> president walton: this motion carries unanimously. for our public, i wanted to announce that prior to our recess, we called the consent agenda items 1-10. they were voted on unanimously. we also took items 11-

it's david pilpel.n this item, i am deeply engaged in the mta muni 2022 network plan and preparing a detailed comment letter. the board of supervisors passed their resolution. file number 210820 seeking a restoration plan for the end of year. that plan is due by september 30th. i'm looking forward to seeing this in writing and not just by power point. there are both macro and micro issues here, all with fiscal operational and policy implications. please post or send me the ridership chart that director heminger discussed and the transit riders letter that was referred to. there have been a few efforts like a comprehensive operational analysis in the late 1970s that was implemented in phases between 1979 and 1983 and adjusted throughout the 1980s and 1990s. and more recently the transit effectiveness project between 2005 and 2007. i would describe that as something like a comprehensive operational analysis. those are the two that i could point to that have occurred in my lifetime. considerations here sho