david pilpel again. can you hear me. we hear you. >> excellent i made initial comments on refuse rates last week and intend to submit more comments when i can. to chair mogannam point about residential versus commercial rate, over time i think we should have similar rateings for the same rates for the same service. it seems to me that if someone is getting, for example. a 32 times 3 -- service with 32 gallon black or gray and blue and green service at a single family home versus a small business, i don't know on westportal or elsewhere, that the service is the same or similar. the costs are the same or similar. and that is the rates should be the same or similar and there should not be a process for these residential and commercial. i think this will take time and that deals with costs of service and requires analysis. anyway that was on that question of commercial versus residential. as to bruce robertson's presentation on impound account; i believe the impound account funds allocated to city departments through the rat

. >> thank you, david pilpel for your comments. do we have more callers >> that completes our queue >> no more comments public comment is now closed. >> i would take this and i think look forward to the budget conversation even though it may be tough. i think you have folks on the body this are irrelevant the supervisors are well versed on the city budget's past and i think we look forward to work with the pair and city diameters but i think this i agree that it is a tough, dire situation. i agree with supervisor walton that -- create more deficit make the upcoming budget conversation that much harder. i think that direct knows this. thank you and colleagues i would like to make a motion to file this hearing and i need a second. >> mr. clerk call the roll y. on this motion the hearing heard and filed by chair chan seconded boy safai. vice chair machine man. >> aye. >> member safai. >> aye. >> member ronen. >> aye. why member walton. >> aye >> chair chan. why aye. why we are 5 aye's >> the motion passes call item 2. >> item 2, a hea

>> good morning, david pilpel. i spoke on this 3 weeks ago the last time it was at this committee. to sum rise an update my comments i think there are existing way in law, policy and practice to limit public comment had necessary. i think that this motion is unnecessary at this time. i machine torthe situation and revisit it as needed. not heard enough about the resources needed to continue conducting hybrid meetings at the board of supervisors. i understood well was a presentation if the city add administrator's office it is posted on the wieks we have not seen that presentation before the committee yet. and in any event i would continue this item to the call of the chair here in committee. i would not forward this to the full board with or without recommendation. and i'm available to discuss this issue at any time. thank you very much for listening. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> yes, hello this is pete warfields head library user's association. library users to have [inaudible] and po box 1 upon 705. san francisco, california. >> i agree very much with every prior speake

david pilpel. i am impressed with the mayor's 3 appointise today and i support their appointment. i think they will serve our city limp i think you will have a more difficult time with the board appointments given the number and i will leave that to you. >> i support the 3 mayors nominees today. thank you for listening. >> thank you. can we have our next caller. >> good morning. i'm one it make [inaudible]. the [inaudible] board of supervisor's [inaudible] i heard talk about the mayor's candidates. hello. this is public comment and you can make your comment regarding the appointments however this is in the a time for question and answers. >> correct. good. yes thank you very much. good morning i'm francisco community member also work for the approximate [inaudible] of the leather street community services and part of the latina [inaudible] need's assessment mittee. it important for us to name tracie mixon and ja neta johnson. i he to interrupt we are not on this item yet. we are >> if you don't mind wit to item 6 we'll be happy to accept your comment at that time. okay. double che

. >> thank you, david pilpel for your comments. do we have more callers >> that completes our queue >> no more comments public comment is now closed. >> i would take this and i think look forward to the budget conversation even though it may be tough. i think you have folks on the body this are irrelevant the supervisors are well versed on the city budget's past and i think we look forward to work with the pair and city diameters but i think this i agree that it is a tough, dire situation. i agree with supervisor walton that -- create more deficit make the upcoming budget conversation that much harder. i think that direct knows this. thank you and colleagues i would like to make a motion to file this hearing and i need a second. >> mr. clerk call the roll y. on this motion the hearing heard and filed by chair chan seconded boy safai. vice chair machine man. >> aye. >> member safai. >> aye. >> member ronen. >> aye. why member walton. >> aye >> chair chan. why aye. why we are 5 aye's >> the motion passes call item 2. >> item 2, a hea

>> good morning, david pilpel. i spoke on this 3 weeks ago the last time it was at this committee. to sum rise an update my comments i think there are existing way in law, policy and practice to limit public comment had necessary. i think that this motion is unnecessary at this time. i machine torthe situation and revisit it as needed. not heard enough about the resources needed to continue conducting hybrid meetings at the board of supervisors. i understood well was a presentation if the city add administrator's office it is posted on the wieks we have not seen that presentation before the committee yet. and in any event i would continue this item to the call of the chair here in committee. i would not forward this to the full board with or without recommendation. and i'm available to discuss this issue at any time. thank you very much for listening. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> yes, hello this is pete warfields head library user's association. library users to have [inaudible] and po box 1 upon 705. san francisco, california. >> i agree very much with every prior speake