. >> i want to go back to the reproductive rights for a moment it feels to me, david, that the actual roetrimester, the notion that there is a point in which the state has an interest. talk to me. is row a sufficient decision for us to continue to rest reproductive rights on? >> row had promised but the problem sit was cut back in 1992. casey was the supreme court case that allowed a lot more restrictions from the state. it was basically the supreme court saying that you can do things that are burdensome on women's rights as long as they're not unduly burdensome and ever since k.c., we've seen the courts and lower courting be more receptive to infringement rights. so kc is really opened up the floodgates and with justice kennedy who's seen as a swing vote, he's seen as proving it. it's really troublesome what kc has allowed. >> so as much as we talked in the last hour in the way in which democrats can't hold themselves completely together to have a clear strategy, in the case of women's reproductive rights, i've got to say. giev tot agree with nancy, this was the moment when on the left y