let's speak to professor david scholz who teaches criminal law in minnesota.he sentence? 3 . ., , , professor, what do you make of the sentence? �*, . ., , , ' professor, what do you make of the sentence? �*, . . , , ' ., sentence? it's clearly be the 12 and a half year — sentence? it's clearly be the 12 and a half year presumptive _ sentence? it's clearly be the 12 and a half year presumptive sentence. l a half year presumptive sentence. nowhere near i'm going to argue the maximum the family wanted. again, you have to read the memorandum to see the justification out there. but it is certainly an upward departure from what the presumptive minimum or provided to you in our presumptive sentence would be. we talked about this before, whether this is a sentence that the public will perceive as fair and just, that's a really good question here. again, based upon what i presume will be factors that he outlines in that memorandum, is going to explain why the four aggravating factors merited an additional ten years as opposed to saying the presumptive or why he wasn't