froms answering questions commerce and david schweikert t -- congressman david schweikert. i am pimm fox. joining me is betty liu. michael mckee and police in a problem with it -- romowitz. lisa: where are all the other congressmemn? pimm: i know that there was an , ahange between keith republican from pennsylvania, and he was putting up a variety of charts that seem as though chair yellen pointed out were not for the right timeframe. we have received a discussion on what year-over-year means when talking about earnings or any other metric and he moved on to another slide. [laughter] he exited the room when his time expired. having said that, anything substantive that you have heard from yellen that stands out? lisa: no. she is getting her gold award for absolutely saying nothing. they are asking some of the questions and some of them are hitting out what the market is wondering. if they do think the economy is growing at the extent that they do and they have been saying and they are so positive on the economy, why is there some doubt on whether they are going to hike rates

be joined by the science committee's former environment subcommittee chairman representative david schweikert who sponsored the original version of the secret science bill in 2014. the amendment requires the environmental protection agency to base its regulations on publicly available data that can be verified. why would the administration want to hide this information from the american people? we must make sure that federal regulations are based on science that is available for independent review. many americans are unaware that some of the e.p.a.'s most expensive and burdensome regulations such as its po posed climate and ozone rules are based on underlying data that not even the e.p.a. has seen. this amendment ensures that the decisions that affect every american are based on indently -- independently verified research instead of on secret data hidden from the american people. that's called a scientific method. this amendment also assures that the e.p.a. science advisory board is able to provide meaningful, balanced and independent assessments of the science behind the e.p.a. regulation. t