interesting listening to david sherborne who said no-one i david sherborne who said no—one would believey the uk, so a reference perhaps to other newspapers. but back to prince harry and finally, how important in your view... if and finally, how important in your view... , ., and finally, how important in your view... ,, and finally, how important in your view... i., . and finally, how important in your view... ., , view... if you look and the daily mail website _ view... if you look and the daily mail website you _ view. .. if you look and the daily mail website you will— view... if you look and the daily mail website you will not - view... if you look and the daily mail website you will not find, l view... if you look and the daily i mail website you will not find, you will struggle to find any mention of thisjudgment against their this judgment against their competitor. thisjudgment against their competitor. itjust shows what thisjudgment against their competitor. it just shows what a cartel of cover—up is going on in the british press. and that's why prince harry and many others feel

prince harry's lawyer , david sherborne, harry's lawyer, david sherborne, read out a statement earliers not just about hacking, it is about a systemic practice of unlawful and appalling behaviour followed by cover ups and destruction of evidence , the shocking scale of evidence, the shocking scale of which can only be revealed through these proceedings. >> the court has found that mirror group's principal board directors , their legal directors, their legal department, senior executives and editors such as piers morgan clearly knew about or were involved in these illegal activities . activities. >> as james cleverly says, the government must and will do more after a migrant died and another was left in a critical condition following the sinking of a boat in the channel, the home secretary described the incident as a horrific reminder of the people smugglers brutality . the people smugglers brutality. the french coastguard was alerted just after 1 french coastguard was alerted just after1 a.m. french coastguard was alerted just after1 am. to reports of a boat carrying migrants sinking a

uh, david sherborne , prince harry's sherborne, prince harry's lawyer, also said that prince harry'slled on the metropolitan police and prosecuting authorities to investigate , bringing charges investigate, bringing charges against the company and those who broke the law, now mirror group newspapers, in response, has apologised unreservedly for historical wrongdoing . but historical wrongdoing. but prince harry's fight against the british press is far from over. yes, he's won against mirror group newspapers , but he has two group newspapers, but he has two separate um uh , law cases or separate um uh, law cases or court cases going through the high courts against associates newspapers and news group newspapers, both of which deny the allegations that were expecting trials for them in the new year. cameron what do you think? >> uh, prince harry means when he says the mission continues ? he says the mission continues? booths. that's in the statement that was, uh , read out by david that was, uh, read out by david sherborne, his lawyer. the mission continues. sherborne, his lawyer. the

, calling the david sherborne, calling on the metropolitan police to investigate potential criminal chargesarket to what we have seen and to reflect what we have seen and sort tank certain stocks, so sort of tank certain stocks, so to speak. >> but i think for him, he did view it as victory. you know, view it as a victory. you know, he i feel vindicated. i he said, i feel vindicated. i feel happy with result . he feel happy with this result. he actually, you know, said that he, know, slay dragons. he, you know, to slay dragons. he knew he was going get he knew he was going to get a bit was well bit burnt, but this was well worth um, think, you worth it. um, so i think, you know, his point of view to, know, from his point of view to, to found that 15 out of 33 to have found that 15 out of 33 articles were the product of unlawful information gathering by mirror group newspapers was was a big deal. okay. >> india grant, thank you very much. for now. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> joining me now is the daily express roundup host express royal roundup host pandora talk the pandora forsythe to ta

prince harry lawyer david sherborne today outside the high court in london where a judge ruled that for000 — about a third of what he had claimed — but the for him money — but for him, money was never the point — it was his long—running quest to prove in court the wrongdoing of newspapers and the senior executives that ran them. the judge said 11 private investigators were used "very substa ntially" by mirror group well before 2003. the chief executive sly bailey knew about it said the judge and "turned a blind eye to it" as did legal director paul vickers. and there can be "no doubt" he said that piers morgan who was editor for some of those years knew about it, too — a judgment morgan has vociferously denied. i'v e i've never hacked a phone and nobody has... as for him saying this is "a good day for truth," the truth that has been repeatedly exposed in recent years as someone who wouldn't know the truth if it slapped him around his californian—tanned face. he demands accountability for the press, but refuses to accept any for himself for smearing the royal family, his own family, as a

, harry's lawyer, david sherborne, read out this statement earlier this case is not just about hacking it is this case is not just about hacking, it is about a systemic practice of unlawful and appalling behaviour followed by cover ups and destruction of evidence , the shocking scale of evidence, the shocking scale of which can only be revealed through these proceedings. >> the court has found that mirror group's principal board directors , their legal directors, their legal department, senior executives and editors such as piers morgan clearly knew about or were involved in these illegal activities . as the home activities. as the home secretary says, the government must and will do more after one person died and another was left in a critical condition in the engush in a critical condition in the english channel, a boat carrying migrants sank about five miles off the coast of dunkirk overnight. >> more than 60 people were rescued . james cleverly rescued. james cleverly described the incident as a horrific reminder of the people smugglers brutality . uk police smugglers brutality. uk

he said that his privacy was breached and that, in the words of his barrister, david sherborne, who has a lot of these cases in court, that there was widespread, habitual and unlawful activities by journalists, authorised at the highest level. a side bar here, the newspaper group, mirror group newspapers, which owns the mirror mirror and sunday mirror admitted that private investigators hacked phones and got hold of private information. and has admitted that some journalists information. and has admitted that somejournalists paid information. and has admitted that some journalists paid for that information in pursuit of stories. what the company has not admitted is executives knew that was going on right up to board level, that lawyers in the company's legal team who would be involved in any practices like that, working out if they were legal, that they didn't know. and the company says editors were not aware of what was going on. that is one major part of what this judgment today is going to be about. the other part of it, the generic case, if you want some jargon, is whether four peop

india outside his lawyer outside of court via his lawyer david calling the david sherborne, calling onstigate potential criminal charges and on the stock market to reflect what we have seen and sort of tank stocks , so to speak. >> but i think for him he did view it as a victory. >> but i think for him he did view it as a victory . you know, view it as a victory. you know, he said, i feel vindicated. i feel happy with this result. he actually . you know, said that actually. you know, said that he, you know, to slay dragons. he knew he was going to get a bit burnt, but this was, well worth it. um, so i think, you know, from his point of view to, to have found that 15 out of 33 articles were the product of unlawful information gathering by newspapers unlawful information gathering by a newspapers unlawful information gathering by a big newspapers unlawful information gathering by a big okay.:)apers was a big deal. okay. >> india grant, thank you very much thank you. joining much for now. thank you. joining me is the daily express me now is the daily express royal roundup host pandora for

and barrister, david sherborne. he describes kind of taking on the tabloids as slaying a dragon. but he also says that this is just the start, doesn't he? talks talks to the metropolitan police . he to the metropolitan police. he appeals to them directly and says that they should investigate for criminal charges. so my question to you, jenny, is where do you think prince harry wants to take this? we know about the other cases with the other tabloids. he's obviously feel spurred obviously going to feel spurred on to do that. but do you think he wants to see people in jail over this ? over this? >> oh, i think he very much like to see people in jail to think back. you know, people were in jail. and one of the reporters i used to work of the used to work alongside of the news the world, um, clive news of the world, um, clive goodman, was jailed for, um, goodman, he was jailed for, um, using illegal methods to obtain information from the royal household . so it's happened. but household. so it's happened. but andy couls

prince harry's lawyer, david sherborne , harry's lawyer, david sherborne, said it was utterly implausiblegroup because a mirror group news editor at the time, described as the king of hacking in court , had prince hacking in court, had prince harry's mobile phone number now the trial lasted for around seven weeks and the judge, mr justice fancourt, will deliver his decision this morning. if he wins, prince harry will see this as a complete victory in his fight against the way the british media operates. if he loses it will be a bitter blow for him. and because he sees it as his life's mission to change the tabloids, it could also be incredibly messy. where some sides he wins some of it, but not all of it. but prince harry's court battles are far from over. he has another four civil cases going through the high courts at the moment, involving different publishers as as the british as well as the british government over his security. >> thanks cameron . cameron, >> thanks cameron. cameron, thanks very much. >> maybe he lose those legal cgses. >> cases. >> they must be taking such a stress o

, who i know and david sherborne, who i know very well, is one of the best harry could have got.on't think people realise the mirror group tried to settle with with harry before this for 250,000. so he's got 140,000, but let me remind you, didn't he . yeah. he wanted you, didn't he. yeah. he wanted it because he's. look he wanted his day in court because he blames the press for his mother's death. sadly, sadly , mother's death. sadly, sadly, um, it was a drunken driver and she wasn't wearing her seatbelt. there. the facts now, not many people know this, but actually, prince william , a very bold 23 prince william, a very bold 23 year old, took the press to court himself, um, over hacking claims . and he actually had 39 claims. and he actually had 39 cases. catherine had 155 hacking. um, so situations which were awful at and they actually won 1 million. they did it very quietly. he, they and they gave the money to charity, um, which i think was the right way to do it. i think these two are going to do that. totally changed the way journalists then worked after the milly dowler sit

and the other thing i wanted to talk to you about, jonathan, is david sherborne, who is harry's barristert various mirror group executives therefore lied under oath at the leveson inquiry. as you've alluded inquiry. as you've also alluded to so could there to yourself. so could there actually a criminal actually be a criminal investigation into mirror group executives, including , i executives, including, i believe, the editor at the time, piers morgan ? piers morgan? >> well, that goes back to my previous point. should there be? absolutely there should be. you know, in the same way andy coulson and rebekah brooks were both held to account in the sense of there being criminal trial. so sly bailey and paul vickers , who are named in the in vickers, who are named in the in the judgement, who were mirror board members at the time. yes they should be the subject of criminal charges. marcus partington, the in—house lawyer who i thought many, many times again repeatedly named as as knowing all about this . should knowing all about this. should he be the subject of police investigation. and pier