i don't want to say old justices, clarence thomas and anthony scalia and david sutter said cameras would only roll over his dead body. there seems to be a generational gap. it is important to point out that even the justices who are the most keen to having cameras have made it clear that they would never impose that on their colleagues. if their colleagues are not happy with cameras, they are not going to impose it on them. >> so as you point out, the idea of the legislation has gained momentum. there is support between democrats and republicans in both chambers. where does it go next and what time line could we look at in congress? >> i have heard that the senate might bring it in this spring. most likely after oral arguments. the sponsor of the house bill made an interesting point that it is not accurate in his mind to view it as this is the last hurray. he thinks to the contrary. however the supreme court rules on this issue, there will be such public outrage on one side or the other if it strikes down or it upholds it that we are going to see this push continuing in the coming years.