asÍ es, estÁ testificando ahora david tucker, editor del tabloide, quien supuestamente acordÓ un planconente. Él ademÁs tambiÉn supuestamente fue quien negociÓ el trato con la actriz porno stormy daniels. como lo dices, antes hubo una audiencia acalorada, donde la fiscalÍa acusÓ al expresidente de violar la orden mordaza unas 10 veces, por lo que ellos piden que pague una multa de 1000 $ por cada violaciÓn. lo que sÍ sabemos hasta ahora es que aparentemente la defensa no quedÓ muy bien parada ante esta defensa, sin embargo, el juez no ha tomado una decisiÓn, todavÍa dijo que tomara una decisiÓn mÁs adelante, mientras tanto, la defensa dijo que trump estaba tratando de cumplir con esta orden, y lo que busques que no ataquÉ precisamente a testigos o a personal de seguridad a travÉs de redes sociales. dicen que estÁn tratando de cumplir con esta orden, pero que simplemente estÁ respondiendo a otros ataques polÍticos. esa es la informaciÓn que nosotros tenemos por ahora, regresÓ con ustedes. aileen: muchas gracias por este reporte. en "ediciÓn digital" seguimos este caso que sin duda conmoci

the 1st witness allegedly had a hand in that conspiracy. tabloid publisher david tucker, has admitted to working with trump to barry damaging news and the run up to the 2016 election, which he eventually won. so as trump's former lawyer, michael cohen paid the actors known as stormy daniels, $130000.00 and was later reimbursed by trump for what was recorded as legal fees to the defense pointing. to cohen's history of lying on the stand argues there was no affair and no attempt by donald trump to hide the payment. spoiler alert said the defense. there's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. it's called democracy. and while the former president may be the one facing charges, he again attempted to put the us justice system on trial in the court of public opinion. these are all this is done as everybody knows it. being able to be in pennsylvania lots of other places, campaigning, and is very unfair. donald trump has said he wants to testify in this case, but on monday the judge warned if he does take the stay on, the prosecution has the right to ask him about his other legal

in this case, a man by the name of david tucker, who was a publisher of the tabloids and i discussed with donald trump and has admitted discussing with donald trump and donald trump's lawyer, michael cohen. a skein to essentially by any stories that are, were considered negative and not publish them in order to not get bad news out. like for contacts, we need to point out that this was all happening in 2016 just months before the presidential election after a very controversial access. hollywood tape was released, where donald trump could be heard talking about how he treated to get away with it. because he was rich and famous, that is the contact for this case, which the prosecution describes as a election interference election fraud, pure and simple. but the defense is already taking that on. they're attempting to discredit michael cohen, one of the key witnesses in this case, the man who actually made the harsh money payments to store mcdaniels. they say he's got a record of perjuring himself before the court. they've also said that was an election. this is democracy. there's noth

david tucker, who has admitted to purchasing stories, the rights to stories that could have been damaging to donald trump in the run up to about 2016 election and then not publishing them as a form of protection. the other 2 witnesses we expect to hear from stormy daniels, the actors herself who received a $130000.00 in order to not tell her story about an alleged affair with donald trump. trump denies that ever happened. we also expect to hear from michael cohen, his former attorney, who is the one who made the payment to stormy daniels. donald trump, will claim that he was making legal payments, who's defense expected to argue that he had no knowledge of the recording of those payments. and this is all expected to play out over the next 6 weeks or so. the question remains. will donald trump himself take the witness stand and in the opening this morning, before the jury got in before the jury began getting instructions, the judge did warn donald trump, that if he takes the stand, that he will be open to questions about other cases that would otherwise be off limits, so remains to be seen

richardson payment, the offer payment to the doorman, we are going to learn that donald trump and david tucker that during the 2000 or perhaps even beyond the election 2016, that they had an agreement, where david becker would do the catchup kills the stories of donald trump, stories that would never appear, the ones that we have heard a lot about, but also that he was somehow involved in stories that involved marco rubio, ted cruz, ben carson, hillary clinton. i don't know quite where that list ends, but i think we are going to hear a lot more about that relationship with these guys have known each other for years. they both have very large estates done in palm beach, and seemed to go back a long time, in terms of trading information that went right into the national enquirer, donald trump helping out on stories, you know, they had a very mutually beneficial relationship for years, and i think that the jury is going to hear a lot about that. >> why is that not a story of biased press, and instead is a story that prosecutors say was effectively an illegal conspiracy, criminal conspiracy to inf

something bad to say, the 1st witness allegedly had a hand in that conspiracy. tabloid publisher david tucker, has admitted to working with trump to barry damaging news and the run up to the 2016 election, which he eventually won. so as trump's former lawyer, michael cohen paid the actors known as stormy daniels, $130000.00 and was later reimbursed by trump for what was recorded as legal fees. the defense pointing to cohen's history of lying on the stand argues there was no affair. and no attempt by donald trump to hide the payment. spoiler alert said the defense. there's nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. it's called democracy. and while the former president may be the one facing charges, he again attempted to put the us justice system on trial in the court of public opinion. these are all this is done as everybody knows it. being able to be in pennsylvania lots of other places, campaigning, and is very unfair. donald trump has said he wants to testify in this case, but on monday the judge warned if he does take the stay on, the prosecution has the right to ask him about his

scheme they say was hatched by donald trump, his lawyer, michael cohen, and a man by the name of david tucker, who was the publisher of a tabloid here in the united states, who agreed to purchase any on flattering stories, the rights to be stories in an attempt to bury them in the run up to the election. and just for more context, this was all about the time of the infamous access. hollywood take a tape during which donald trump to be here talking about women and his ability to basically sexually assault them, to grab them without protest or without any consequences because he was rich and famous. that's true, but had come out. and clearly the campaign was worried about more negative pressing to run up to the election. and the prosecution is alleging that this is what was behind these payments that were made to an adult film star in order to buy her silence. but of course, it's not the payments that were legal, it was the way they were recorded. and the comments from the prosecution leading into this is that evidence will show that this was not spend, but a long running conspiracy to silence

they have to embrace david and michael cohen and hope hicks and stormy daniels because this is the case, tucker, dr. speaker says, if the article quote, got out to another publication or another media outlet it wouldn't be it would have been very embarrassing to the campaign. this isn't direct response to the prosecutor saying if it's not a true store, you're saying it's not a true story, thousand percent in tree, you said donald trump offering to take a dna test to prove that it's not true. why would you pay for it? he says because we don't want another publication or another media outlet to publish it. and he says specifically why? because quote, it would have i've been very embarrassing to the campaign, not to donald trump not to donald trump's family, but to the trump campaign for president kaitlan yeah jake, another update is david testifying about this agreement that even though the story was not true, it still has the but what the argument was that this guy was making, which is that donald trump as he was alleging and trying to shop around that he fathered an illegitimate child. >> i mea

david jolly. i think that the facts about who donald trump calls hostages are probably irrelevant to, i don't know, laura ingraham or i don't know who's on at 8:00 anymore. the new tuckerextremists are. i know bret baier and martha mccallum are serious journalists. you don't need everybody on prime time at fox to be horrified by the conduct of the hostages. you just need people who are still journalists to communicate even to that audience that these are not hostages, these are violent criminals. and i say that because i think there is a political point to what trump's doing. he wants to convince his base of something so distant to reality to discourage and tire and sort of decimate enthusiasm of the democratic coalition, saying we're not going to lose on this, we're going to win on this. but he's talking to a shrinking pool of people. and to answer charlie's question, i had the numbers in front of me. i think 81% of trump's hardcore base believe the lies. that number's up from actually on january -- 81% of trump's strong supporters believe biden won the 2020 election because of fraud. 51% of republicans. 58% of his most fervent supporters believe the lies. and those l