. >> yes, david winslo, staff architect and the deck is not a part of this application and it sounds like it was something that was previously built and has a notice of -- not necessarily a notice of violation but a complaint registered against it. the code allows decks to be built up to 30-inches above grade within the required rear yard and they do not require a variance and that is the surface of the deck, obviously, guardrails and handrails can exceed that. for having that -- just by having that explanation, i would like to not have the commission be impaired in the judgment that there's something that is potentially illegal that requires us to wage again and i would make a motion that it is approved as is. >> i don't need to comment. it's ok. >> excellent. commissiocommissioners, a secons been seconded. pai pair (role call). >> this passes unanimously 7-0 and places us on our final dr of the evening, item 2019 at 1856 29th avenue and i will remind members of the public that there was an item that fell off of consent that we will hear after this. mr. winslow, i believe you're on