good afternoon, president koppel, vice president moore, david winslow, staff architect. the item before you is a public-initiated request for discretionary review of building permit application 201805179469 to demolish an existing two-story existing house and construct a new three-story single-family house. there are six d.r. requesters, adjacent neighbors, two across the street and down the street to the east of the proposed project on 66 mountain spring who claim that the project does not conform to numerous residential design guidelines and is generally too large and out of scale with the neighborhood. to date the department received ten letters in opposition, i'm sorry, zero letter in opposition and zero letters in support. the advisory team confirmed this meetses residential design guidelines and the planning code. this is in a hr-1d zoning district. the d stands for detached dwelling. they are characterized by lots of greater width than other parts of the city, by single-family houses with side yards. the structures rarely exceed 35 feet in height. landscaping at t

>> seeing none, project sponsor. >> good afternoon, commissioners, david winslow and staff.i am jane cook. i am the owner of 2651-5 3:00 tavia. my husband and i are 30 year residentses san francisco we raised our family 8 blocks from that. we hope to create two units for multigenerational living for elderly parents and children and ourselves. my husband and i work from home. we worked with the planning staff. >> sorry. ssfgovtv can you go to the competitor please. >> historical preservation with countless e-mails the proposed plans before you are positive collaboration between us and the sf planning department. i would like to thank the staff for expertise. we are pleased with the design and believe they meet our needs and comply with the planning code and maintain the character of the neighborhood and the library. my architects will take it from here. >> good afternoon. i am sarah and i am the architect with my business partner. this is a three story residential building built in 1950 located near octavia and green street next to the golden gate library. the intent to accom

we collaborated with david winslow, chris townes and linda whole and to implement a number of revisions to the original proposed design. the planning department has determined this project follows the residential design guidelines. although design was compact to start, through the review process we have rte reduced the proposed tightly 4 feet and by reducing floor to fly floor -- what a floor height and reducing the slope of the shed roof. we reduce the overall length by 3 feet. we request a conditional use authorization for demolition because it will be most economical to demolish the existing building. the building is also determined to be a class seat nonrestored -- and on historic resource. proposed building is designed to continue the pattern established on the uphill side of diamond street with minimal varying front setbacks. the shed roof is sloped facing south to improve access to light to the uphill neighbor. the position of the massing of the building forward on the lot was encouraged by the design advisory team to improve the neighbor's access to the midblock open straight --

good afternoon, president koppel, vice president moore, david winslow, staff architect. the item before you is a public-initiated request for discretionary review of building permit application 201805179469 to demolish an existing two-story existing house and construct a new three-story single-family house. there are six d.r. requesters, adjacent neighbors, two across the street and down the street to the east of the proposed project on 66 mountain spring who claim that the project does not conform to numerous residential design guidelines and is generally too large and out of scale with the neighborhood. to date the department received ten letters in opposition, i'm sorry, zero letter in opposition and zero letters in support. the advisory team confirmed this meetses residential design guidelines and the planning code. this is in a hr-1d zoning district. the d stands for detached dwelling. they are characterized by lots of greater width than other parts of the city, by single-family houses with side yards. the structures rarely exceed 35 feet in height. landscaping at t

we collaborated with david winslow, chris townes and linda whole and to implement a number of revisions to the original proposed design. the planning department has determined this project follows the residential design guidelines. although design was compact to start, through the review process we have rte reduced the proposed tightly 4 feet and by reducing floor to fly floor -- what a floor height and reducing the slope of the shed roof. we reduce the overall length by 3 feet. we request a conditional use authorization for demolition because it will be most economical to demolish the existing building. the building is also determined to be a class seat nonrestored -- and on historic resource. proposed building is designed to continue the pattern established on the uphill side of diamond street with minimal varying front setbacks. the shed roof is sloped facing south to improve access to light to the uphill neighbor. the position of the massing of the building forward on the lot was encouraged by the design advisory team to improve the neighbor's access to the midblock open straight --

david winslow staff architect. the item before you is public initiated request for discretionary review for 2018 to construct a third story vertical addition and four foot rear addition with front faÇade and excavation of ground level to provide accessory dwelling unit to existing two story single family dwelling. the d.r. requester at 130hearst avenue is concerned the height and depth, the rear addition does not provide adequate set backs and that the scale is incominnot compatible. it is not to minimize impacts to light and air and extensive excavation could pose structural instability to add jay sent properties. proposed alternative to provide side set backs at the rear of the proposed building. public comment department received no letters in support or opposition. the advisory team found that the height and scale of the building is compat i believe with the neighboring buildings. rear did not comply with residential design guidelines related to articulating the building to minimize impacts to light, air, priva

. >> good evening, president koppel, vice president moore, commissioners, david winslow, staff architect. this is a request for a discretionary review of building permit applications 2019- 2019-01150390 and 201901150391 to demolish an existing two-story, 1,000 square foot single family house. it's located in the rear yard and a freestanding garage at the front and construct a new four-story dwelling at 617 sanchez street. there are two d.r. requesters. an adjacent neighbor who claims the project will block her view and a neighbor to the west that says the project doesn't conform to the residential guidelines. it is worth noting the guidelines were never adopted by the planning commission. to date, the department has received one letter in opposition, which i am going to hand to secretary to distribute and zero letters in support of the project. the residential design advisory team reviewed this and affirmed this meets the residential design guidelines and planning code. staff's recommendation is not to take the d.r. as the project meets the code and does not present any extraordinary or