is there anything from your prior experience here at nrc either 9/11 or davis bessie or the 2003 blackout that you think would be in your initial thoughts on how we communicate so that people in the american public understand what the results are of these near term and longer-term efforts? >> well, again, this is just my view, my public -- my assessment. i think that especially in the long term review that we do we need to build in a meaningful engagement with all the stakeholders. they have an enormous capability to understand the most technical issues. sometimes we think that capability doesn't exist, but it's, in fact, not true. and we get, have had enormously valuable input from a wide range of stakeholders. this is a little bit off of event response, but when we established the reactor oversight program, we did it 10 or 12 years ago, we used just that kind of approach. we brought in all kinds of different stakeholders from are all different perspectives, and it was a very impressive end result that had everyone's buy-in. people who came from pro-nuclear, anti-nuclear, and they all ag