out they determine your eligibility for the program after review is complete the permit is route to dbi and fire their, their final checks for those of i want to give you two pieces of information as you perfectly were adding 7 or more we have an assessment your no longer requiring that first step for my adu's in a project and also, if you have a perplex project that including an adu or several adu's we now updated the projects with the request forms that is available on the san francisco planning department and a special check box will be routed to the flex team and a specialized planner to provide input it is available for a fee but a specialized and technical type thing with the application so once your permit gets to planning i'll can you talk about that what we'll be reviewing your permit for the program highlights are as follows: one, we'll be looking at the adu and whether it is being proposed within the existing build out envelope unless under the new program a single-family homes and doesn't need a waiver and second we'll be reviewing for the adu that is not taking space from a

public health and one of the senior inspectors i send all the applicants to come to the district for dbi and others departments one of the questions that mostly come up with if an applicant submits the application for apartment to operate for a massage or tattoo manual and no construction is required or needed but facility was not a massage - never a massage or tattoo facility that existed more like this a slogan but add an additional kind of requirement for their business and the applicant needs to pull a permit or do they require an over-the-counter permit only if they don't need to do any construction because for record purposes they have to get an approval from dbi to get permit. >> yeah. generally a change of use will need to go through planning in order to - you'll need a building permit we can look to make sure that your complying with the existing and accessibility and the fire life and safety anything that is triggered by the change of use. >> one thing i deem as a problem every time i send the applicant to the dbi they look at over-the-counter and take it back and is no constru

and betty lee from dbi thank you. >> thank you can you hear me? >> no yes. okay great i'm marseille he manage the flex team that is known as sprout if you're familiar that the planning the accessary dwellings or adu and dwelling unit legalization permits at current planning i also in the preservation technical specialist and interviewing the application my name is jimmy chang with the bon appetit and work and the technical service department if you're sending e-mails or phone call they'll be directed to me. >> hi, i'm betty lee if the department of building inspection permit technician and staff at the first floor window number 8 at the current if you have questions about the legalization or the other programs great to thank for coming out and learning more about adu and is zoning legalization i'll kickoff with the planning overall i can we can see a show of hands of how many people wish to speak. how many people are property owner or property owner and other special of hands with the engineers of people on the technical side thank you that lets u

paul could approach dbi and ask for a written determination from that and get it from dbi, rather than me giving it here tonight. if those plans are with dbi, you're gonna know if the seismic is required on that. that could be done if there's a permit application z -- i don't think anybody in this room wants to see them put out of business. >>> i'm just reading out the section in the code. . >>> i'd like to speak with a representative from dph. >>> i'd be happy to. >>> she requested a map and information about the number of active permits that we have. and i basically told her that i would send her a link. it has a very well coordinated system. everything basically goes on a web base. it's very -- we love it because it really helps manage our record requests and provides a custodian that communicates with the requester and inform them of our progress or any challenges that we may have. especially since we don't have a clerk and i have a staff that's gone, so we have just me. so i told her i would send her the link and she sent me an e-mail the same night. i spoke to her in the daytime

, the ordinance requires that planning staff attend the existing pre-application meetings hosted by dbi. we are also supporting that. and this would help with the coordination and avoid iterative revisions that applicants have to do. lastly, the ordinance also changes -- makes changes to the legalization program in addition to the adu program. about a year ago, the department sent -- published a memo or sent a memo to the commission about the legalization program and highlighted two policies concerns about the legalization program. one of which was the cap of one unit per lot that can be legalized. and thawas a concern. this ordinance removes that cap and allows all unauthorized units to be eligible for the legalization program. so it addresses that concern. we are also proposing that the second concern bedreed as well. which is an eviction loophole that is in the legalization program. to explain that, the legalization program has an eviction prohibition built into it. so if there is no fault eviction on unauthorized unit, that unit is ineligible to use the legalization program. and the

they are requesting a rehearing of 10-010 paxton versus dbi. the board voted 5-0 to grant the appealishand issue the permit. there after, the permit would be issued. the permit holder is 330 presidio avenue llc and the project is the addition of two accessory dwelling units on the first floor of an existing 6 unit building per ordinance 30-15. seismic application is on 201509046211. application number 201601116829. so for the rehearing request, we'll hear from mr. paxton, and you have three minutes, sir. >> is this working? here we go. i would like you to consider that there are two pieces of information which i could not present at the continued hearing, but if you had had them, either could have swayed how you ruled on appeal. after the original hearing and before the continued hearing, i object entertained a memo from the red board relying on the information i had provided to them, the red board's memo to the project applicant states the following: the report of alleged wrongful severance filed by your tenants indicates that the notice to se

that a property -- property owner would be able to schedule with dbi and planning staff. who is to say if the plans presented are an accurate representation? the original intent of a.d.u. legislation was to create more rent-controlled units out of unused spaces in order to increase the city's affordable housing staff. tenants are concerned, and rightly so, when their landlord seek to take away their lap -- laundry facilities, parking and storage spaces in the process. this violates their contracts and is unfair. maybe a.d.u. needs to be reconfigured to avoid this from happening. why not include the tenants in the process? however, in response to tenant concerns, the removal of housing services, as you have heard is going to be a modification of the a.d.u. screening for them to include notice to the tenants what services will be removed. moving onto the proposed tenant provision outlined in the legalization of illegal units, they don't address the tenant's plate when they are evicted from an unauthorized units. there is no telling how long it will take to get the rental un

it's something that dbi takes care of. >> vice president melgar: second. >> president hillis: great. and you'll come back to us with improvements that are not planning code oriented to get at kind of the pop out and other pretty standard residential expansions? >> oh, absolutely, again, this is one piece along the long path of process improvements, including -- you know, let's change things internally, amen, and this is one of the pieces before us, so we'll absolutely be -- the regular reporting on all that will continue. i just want to ask for again, we have the draft resolution, i just heard, and i think i saw secretary ionin writing down one, two, three, four, five, six, additional resolution drk-items in your resolution. i would also ask whether or not it would be cleanest for us to be sure that the commission recommends -- you know, we had these other modifications about the pop out that are irrelevant. i guess there's no harm in leaving it in here, and also, the three-year rule about the pop outs -- >> president hillis: i think you can cleanup the ordinance. if the no notificat

but we worked with dbi originally when we were looking at this project and they told us to bring it up code and we would completely demolish it. that was the only way to fix the deficiencies in order to make this a habitable unit for a future renter and i believe we detailed that in our prior application about all the things that would have to be replaced in order for that to work. essentially, we have one legal unit and one illegal unit and what we will do the project is created to watch what you legal units. >> so you had run with -- one request, if we had a successor project. what was it again and query you are the next-door neighbour? what was your request if we approved this project? >> that the rear roof would be lowered to a flat roof and allow more light into the back of the property, along my property line and secondly, that the walkway be extended to the southernmost portion of my kitchen window. in other words, the breezeway to the back to allow more light to go in. >> the breezeway is on the west side of my building, access. >> have you talk to the project sponsor about thi

occupancy load don't permit dangerous flammable storage we do have this phenomena called hoarding at dbie have a professional to deal a house to gradually over a period of time work with a person to not included that impacts people in other units in case of a fire maintain the roofs don't add fire loads and roof deck without a proper permit we had one yesterday tina is she still here remove wirings you saw the pictures electrical wiring don't do that see that picture properly maintain electrical wiring change it install with that a permit check it out and make sure you're doing everything right and prepare disadvantage to a wirings the chief electrical inspector has warning signs essentially sparc you see aspects or credibility breakers tripping or elements warm to the touch or hot that would be a warning sign okay proper maintenance in apartment building do not change occupancies without a permit and install gas. >> penicillin without a permit and place combustiblecombustibl >> the property owner will be appreciative that helps a small problem from growing and costing more in the long t

we're just -- dbi wanted to add that to the big earthquake safety fair, so again, it's just another way to reach out to property owners. also, we do -- we are planning a workshop in chinatown at the request of the chinatown property owners. that is scheduled for june 27 from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m., but again, to get the information out to the property owners, we are going to do a press conference on monday, the 25th, at 11:00 a.m., and if you're interested in attending, let me know and i'll provide you that information so -- so -- and i think all the outreach and education that we have been doing from all of the city agencies involved, it's really getting out there. we -- so we have definitely noticed a reduction in calls coming into the office in terms of explaining how does this work, who needs to comply, is it the business, is it the property owner, and what are the steps in the process that need to be gone through to do it. so that's good. the lacktation in the workplace, oewd had a hearing on that last friday, and that's close, so they'll be finalizing and issuing their guidelines for b

reduction of one time $3.1 million in the current year due to the elimination of revenues sent over from dbi in the current year. the 18-19 budget also has some good news for the general fund in that there's a reduction of $5.3 million in los subsidy required. we've been able to move those units over to project based vouchers funded by the federal government instead of the city. the biggest change is this last item, one time appropriation of the downtown neighborhood's preservation fund. this was adopted by the board in 2016. this was a project commonly known as the ocean life center being built at 51st street. $40 million of dedicated revenue to affordable housing that has specific uses defined. and we're appropriating those funds in this budget because the fee revenue has started to come in. in the community development side of things, the board in the current year put forward a supplemental appropriation for additional services for immigrant population in our city. the proposed 18-19 budget annualizes that to $2.5 million. we also will be doing cost of doing business increases for our non

we completely are trying to confuse the dbi to achieve approval. first and foremost false statement on the plans that state these windows are needed for natural light. these are extremely large windows on our profit line. there are other windows for the apartment. second not addressing the notification of violations of all windows. only four were mentioned in the plans. there are a total of six. third the other missing items. no sprinklers mentioned, no neighborhood notification, not addressing the size limitation of the window and structural impact of the building. last week he applied for two more permits missing windows. the current permits are suspended until the decision of this hearing. quickly, the impact of the windows on us. i would like to respectfully ask the members of the board to imagine how it would feel to understand your neighbor violated city code and is on your property line not with one window but six windows accrues the length of your home. from our point of view they are unsightly, they are large, over bearing and it is defini

that's what happens at dbi. there's kind of the same thing. it gets you the process improvements but still maintains that simple noticing that -- that -- to nrs. i think if you're bumping out your building, whether it's code i got this thing called an annual report, and i don't -- for some reason, i didn't get it -- how do we measure whether we're doing a good job, and

it was approved by dbi and the design phase has been concluded. next project is the northern police station richmond police station and taraval police station renovation. contrctor is moving along,nd and they have completed the site and drainage work at richmond police station. they've also -- are close to 80% done at northern police station. and the next project is the firearms simulation training facility at the lake merced range? the modular building was fabricated at an off-site facility and it was delivered and shipped to the site and placed on a foundation that was built by a different contractor. that work was completed and the mission police station renovation which is a structural strengthening project at this station is -- has completed 65% design? it's actually further along now, with upcoming mile stones on the various projects, the firearms simulators training facility was supposed to achieve completed construction in april 2018, but due to some late discoveries during construction, it's noing t be completed this monthnd it's actually

that planning requires prior to enrollment of the program, so the screening form requires review by dbi staff. it has to be stamped in before filing the adu permits. we have worked with ddi staff to amend that screening form to include an owner affidavit stating they recognize removal of how the removal of services require just cause. it also provides the property owner to now post notice to tenants and letter posted of proposal related to the adu so that they are made aware of the proposal, and they have to provide us copies of that notice now. so that is not something that is currently required. it modifies the process now in that the tenants are noticed well in advance of the permit issuance which can happen as we know months later. >> president hillis: okay. thank you. >> one other types of activity that may happen related to seismic, this does not address that, so that's another topi >> commissioner richards: so just another clarifying question -- all questions should be clarifying. does housing services mean parking, storage, laundry, all those things? >> yes. >> commissioner rich

that's what happens at dbi. there's kind of the same thing. it gets you the process improvements but still maintains that simple noticing that -- that -- to neighbors. i think if you're bumping out your building, whether it's code

where you'll go have not payment of fees and that's where you're planning fees will be paid and the dbi fees, your field inspections and the transit impact with the san francisco unified school district if the contractor is picking you up the drawings make sure that that is a licensed contractor in good standing with the workers' compensation certificate with the business tax certificate and requires the cal osha safety permit once that is done job card issued once that is issued let's go to the next page here once the job card is issued for occ you can start our work okay now submitted projects it in take for submit projects is absent different because submitted projects they're more complicated go through planning to get the entitlement and may usually requires the neighborhoods notification or through the site permit and addendum process okay so you'll start at the central permitting on the first story i don't understand the information deck and the planning department all the way to the first story along the back wall go up the slope they'll do essentially the dismantling but a scre

owner fails to comply this placard maybe posted on our building and abatement action maybe taken by dbi once the notice of violation is issued and the case will be referred to the code compliant for further medic actions but keep in mind this retrofit is protection of your asset maybe may only cover a percentage or a cap on the damage in an earthquake anyway so wanted to talk about the financial group not due until next september this is tier the commercial spaces that tier requires two separate permits one for the commercial and one for the residential and the project cost is looked at by floor area in addition to 20 percent of commercial costs would be used for accessibility and improvements at the ground floor so for example, if the retrofit was $90,000 and you had a 3 story building the two floors of residential the $60,000 permit and one floor of commercial $30,000 plus 20 percent the 6 thousand will be used towards the disabled assess so we recommend you get started now on this to schedule the work hours impacting the operations of our commercial tenant the next slide is the dashg