through dbi. i just wanted to note. do you think it's a team obviously inspection and checks and balances are key. dbi is involved, the design team is involved. people who see something inappropriate, there's always responsibility for heads up and we can work together on that but i wanted to note the process in general of when structural engineers go into the site is often we're looking atthe structure when it's completed and very rarely are we seeing finished buildings . so it would be potentially in this case if there are additional units installed the structure may look the same. so that may or may not be noticeable again. no idea if there was any matters onthis process but i want to make that comment . that struck me. and then my question which for mister duffy in this presentation was helpful. and i'm not sure that this is you know, sort of the place to discuss this so you can tell me what you think buti was curious . this is obviously a complex issue. ithappened over a period of time . now we're trying to reconcil

i will note, again, as we get into enforcement, ultimately, where dbi is focused its attention is the property owner. that's where we take enforcement actions against. currently, this is really a big reason why we're making the changes to the legislation. we currently have 11,398 addresses that are non compliant, which equates to about 5,589 individual property owners. the current deadline for the program to be able to come into compliance is september 1st. as i mentioned, there's interdepartment team working together on the deadline extension and looking at the program in general. so those actions will be forth coming. so the legislation, what it does, it is pretty simple. it extends the deadline for property owners to come into compliance by two years. as you are well aware, we have been through and continue to be through a global pandemic. one of the areas we felt was important was to extend the program for two years to make sure with the high number of people we have, our businesses out of compliance, to give them the opportunity to come into compliance. the first step as i mentio

you would file the complaint with dbi and i can look into it. if mr. sanchez is going to speak to answer his planning part, let me look up and see if we already received any plumbing or electrical in the last few months. >> president honda: okay. deputy zoning administrator. you've been waiting patiently. >> thank you. i usually don't wait patiently. i appreciate the appellant's comments and information about the stair removal. we were not aware of that. that's something we were looking into. it is an issue for usable open space. there hasn't been egress, that would be something for d.b.i. and it sounds like that would be okay. but for accessing the open space. had there been stairs accessing the back yard. removal of those stairs would require a variant because you'd be using that code required open space: i had looked into this and looked at some past aerial photos going back a few years. i did not see a stair there, so if the appellant has any information along those lines, they can e-mail it to me. scott.sanchez@planning.org. >> director: thank you

up so he's making a very, very big bet, what 33 plus million bucks on his own company this year so dbiertainly a name to watch. there you go your top five. martin transport, trinseo, oscar health, designer brands, keep in mind these stocks have largely out performed the broader market they're up an average of 22% this year and 17 have doubled in the past year. doesn't mean they've doubled since we brought you the names but it does mean insiders have had pretty good timing for majority of these stocks >>> as we head to break, we're going to get back with our special panel in just a minute talking more about their stock picks. let's also remember it is hispanic heritage month and all month long we'll highlight some of our friends, colleagues, contributors, anchors, reporters. here is former goldman sacks' cfo. >> my mom told me spanish was important. i'm a computer scientist right one day i'm doing my trading on the desk at goldman sachs, the boss came by said marty someone told me you speak spanish. i need you to go talk to our clients in spanish risk management that moment got me out i

i will note, again, as we get into enforcement, ultimately, where dbi is focused its attention is therty owner. that's where we take enforcement actions against. currently, this is really a big reason why we're making the changes to the legislation. we currently have 11,398 addresses that are non compliant, which equates to about 5,589 individual property owners. the current deadline for the program to be able to come into compliance is september 1st. as i mentioned, there's interdepartment team working together on the deadline extension and looking at the program in general. so those actions will be forth coming. so the legislation, what it does, it is pretty simple. it extends the deadline for property owners to come into compliance by two years. as you are well aware, we have been through and continue to be through a global pandemic. one of the areas we felt was important was to extend the program for two years to make sure with the high number of people we have, our businesses out of compliance, to give them the opportunity to come into compliance. the first step as i mentioned be

we're on the landlord's dbi screen -- okay?. >> and my other question too, as of now the local adu program, we're all aware that it's rent controlled. but how do people know -- or especially the tenants, that their unit is actually rent controlled? do we have that process as well of notifying those future tenants that will be in the local adu program? >> when the local program adu is subject to rent control, it's the regulatory agreement that is a contract between the city and the property owner. that is then recorded against the deed of the property. and it's essentially a notice of special restrictions. and this is linked on our property information map, and so it is easily accessible. other than that, i believe that perhaps the rent board can chime in, but i believe that tenants can reach out to the rent board and confirm whether they are subject to rent control. >> so it is a [indiscernible] that the units are rent controlled? >> yes, and it's recorded against the deed of the property. >> okay. thank you. so those are my in

they said they got the planning permit quickly it's more around dbi permitting. because of the location of their new site, it's not a prop h parcel. they were frustrated that they didn't benefit from prop h. that's just an example. i was just wondering if you could talk more about what we can do to expand the fantastic improvements that can take advantage of prop h. >> right before the recess, the board passed a portion of the small business recovery act which should ensure that they get into that 30 day portal next time they move. what still need it happen is removal of some notifications for the small pink section of that map to be able to get into that thirty day pipeline. one of the great things about the portal is who wasn't fitting into it an where we could do more work. that really was the goal of the business recovery act. how to ensure more people can get into that time line. how else could be considered to be principlely permitted. where could we remove conditional use. that would be a different answer for a different corridor. something that communitie

they said they got the planning permit quickly it's more around dbi permitting. because of the location of their new site, it's not a prop h parcel. they were frustrated that they didn't benefit from prop h. that's just an example. i was just wondering if you could talk more about what we can do to expand the fantastic improvements that can take advantage of prop h. >> right before the recess, the board passed a portion of the small business recovery act which should ensure that they get into that 30 day portal next time they move. what still need it happen is removal of some notifications for the small pink section of that map to be able to get into that thirty day pipeline. one of the great things about the portal is who wasn't fitting into it an where we could do more work. that really was the goal of the business recovery act. how to ensure more people can get into that time line. how else could be considered to be principlely permitted. where could we remove conditional use. that would be a different answer for a different corridor. something that communitie

the first is a hearing as well as a request to the city attorney both involving dbi and co-sponsored by supervisor peskin. in the 18 months since the suspension and then resignation of former department building inspection head tom huey, following charges of legal violation, further allegations have arisen pointing to a deeper web of corruption at d.b.i. that is both undermining public trust and endangering residents across the city. last friday, mission local reporter published a story alleging missing -- and false inspections on property owned by building inspection commission president angus mccarthy, as well as insider conflicts with d.b.i. clients. last night, the commissioner sent a detailed response refuting every allegation and welcoming investigation. sadly, this supervisor's space in d.b.i. and anyone associated with it has been so eroded by the weekly scandals that are alleged, that with each additional allegation i'll continue to call for a thorough investigation no matter who is accused. and so along with supervisor peskin, i am introducing today a formal request to the