and funds that are cut from dbi's budget by the board can only be used for or dbi purposes because dbiis funded boy building inspection fund limited use special revenue fund. in this can is there is an tounlt for the burden to reallocate yes or no fund cuts elsewhere and other departments to dbi had is choose to do so. that's not likely, though. >> it is in the a typical thing we have seen and we will see. i know well are lobby efforts going on now. i like to say one thing before commissioner alexander-tut. that00 autothings we have been talking about or that i personal low focussed on stroll lining the permit process because this day was coming and -- we all predicted some point dbi was going to consume the reserves and start balance a negative budget the last 2-3 years. staff dbi hired. so far the idea that we could the rest of the city is enengages in racial equity conversations by the raise of the task force and going it go in a phase looking how our services being received by inference france how are we promoting race equity in our service delivery system. and we are not sure if l

they rely on and so we would defer to dbi for any waiver of their fees. in terms of planning fees for this permit we looked into it and would not have impact on our budget. >> legislative affairs manager for dbi. i want to note that the building inspection commission is in support of the proposed ordinance. they have not yet considered the recommendations by the planning department. thank you president supervisor peskin for bringing those up at a staff level am d bi had concerns about amendments made by planning namely the fee waiver for signs because of the impact it would have on the department. as well as not requiring professional drawings for signs under the building code. but if those recommendations are adopt in the duplicate file tell be rereferred to dbi where staff can raise concern and bring recommendations back to land use. supervisor preston >> thank you. thank you for the presentation. i wanted reminds folks it is a lot of context for the reason that this legislation was brought forward. i will say in my district we had unfortunate leech fol

and dbi will need to be optimized. i want to thank planning staff for work. lilly and andre power who i enjoyed working with and my staff sunny on this. and then we have a number of amendments were suggested by the planning staff to the planning commission the planning commission recommended this body and have been discussed. they are not -- way substantive they are enough that they will require a week continuance one rrmedation i did not take i would like to peek to which was a suggestion by one planning commissioner that it is planning commission voted to recommend to us. and that was regarding the nature of the legislation. the legislation as proposed, by the mayor and myself. has a 2028-5 year from now expiration date. reason is that this is an incentive to take advantage of these provisions. now. rather than later. which is not to say that this legislation will not be extended to that time but i think we want to create a come down and get it now while you can first customer of the day atmosphere time is of the essence relates to our challenges and opport

program and again want to acknowledge dbi and planning staff. we developed a template and easier way for people to comply without having to go and get professional drawings done as part of the permit application. again, these are existing awnings. fourth, it allows the planning department to sign off on the building permits for existing awnings or signs even if they are on compliant structure or non conforming use. and lastly, wave dbi and planning department enforcement fines and penalties which were the cause of a lot of concern for these small business owners. so, that is in a nut shell a summary of the proposal before you. sponsors mayor breed and president peskin have reviewed the recommendations and are in agreement with these recommendations of staff, however i will let dbi representative speak to some of those. the small business commission also heard this proposal and voted to support this ordinance and also i just want to lastly give the opportunity to share in 2022 our office added two small business permit specialist to the team to a

and dbi will need to be optimized. i want to thank planning staff for work. lilly and andre power who i enjoyed working with and my staff sunny on this. and then we have a number of amendments were suggested by the planning staff to the planning commission the planning commission recommended this body and have been discussed. they are not -- way substantive they are enough that they will require a week continuance one rrmedation i did not take i would like to peek to which was a suggestion by one planning commissioner that it is planning commission voted to recommend to us. and that was regarding the nature of the legislation. the legislation as proposed, by the mayor and myself. has a 2028-5 year from now expiration date. reason is that this is an incentive to take advantage of these provisions. now. rather than later. which is not to say that this legislation will not be extended to that time but i think we want to create a come down and get it now while you can first customer of the day atmosphere time is of the essence relates to our challenges and opport

the office should work harder to coordinate with planning and dbi. we must address the issues around saturation in our neighborhoods. today many cannabis businesses like many one type of any businesses particularly alcohol or other are not good for one neighborhood and shouldn't be saturated in one neighborhood. i'm committed to my constituent we consider the 4835 appeal to do something about saturation and this legislation would follow up on that conversation. today we'll hear from the office of cannabis who has presentation and there will be two sets of amendments. at least one is ready and the others are in the drafting form. i'll ask the committee to update the findings and i think we e-mailed to you but i'll hand that out since there is a lot has changed since 2020, and supervisor chan is in conversation with our office about a sunset date beginning january 2028 on this ordinance while requiring the controller to do economic analysis of the industry in general to determine whether it makes sense to continue past that time and or design safeguard

if we had a dbi representative, they could maybe speak to when and under what circumstances. like a 3r report which is a report of a residential record. if and when those are automatically produced and updated after a cfc and a change in unit count. obviously, those are always produced upon the sale of a property. and same thing for tax collector. i'm not sure, i just don't know what the standard turnaround time is for those records to be updated. i'm sorry. >> okay. thanks. >> okay. thank you. no further questions so commissioners, this matter is submit and a reminder the standard of review is error or abuse of discretion. >> we'll start with commissioner lopez and for no particular reason other than you're at the other end and i'm not. >> sure. thank you. i'm inclined to deny the appeal. i know that that we've had, i think some reasonable questions about the wording of the memo. but it is, you know, one piece of evidence among others, in my mind, are countervail and that contribute to the conclusion that the nov in the complaint, you know, are what should rule the day here.

they rely on and so we would defer to dbi for any waiver of their fees. in terms of planning fees for this permit we looked into it and would not have impact on our budget. >> legislative affairs manager for dbi. i want to note that the building inspection commission is in support of the proposed ordinance. they have not yet considered the recommendations by the planning department. thank you president supervisor peskin for bringing those up at a staff level am d bi had concerns about amendments made by planning namely the fee waiver for signs because of the impact it would have on the department. as well as not requiring professional drawings for signs under the building code. but if those recommendations are adopt in the duplicate file tell be rereferred to dbi where staff can raise concern and bring recommendations back to land use. supervisor preston >> thank you. thank you for the presentation. i wanted reminds folks it is a lot of context for the reason that this legislation was brought forward. i will say in my district we had unfortunate leech fol

dbi is not equiped search the community. we other infrastructure. please issue funds us. ooifrment diego a resident of d 11 and program, cystant at delores street community services in district 9. we provide immigration services to low income andim guarantee willing defense collaborative. it it is per mership of 16 agency and provide legal provided immigration court for over 1600 resident in know front. we ask the board today to ask the board to provide funding through add back to expand services to mote the needs of community. im guarantees are voilths to the recovery of the city and access to serves meches an fran safer for everyone. thank you. thank you for sharing your comments. next speaker, please. i'm ape communities'd vocate for asian law caucus serving low income immigrant communities. klines work mull pull jobs to make endy meat and access to heck and house and not making it. the workers are not okay. the mayor's budget cuts to housing resources and wage enforcement out of tune with people's reality of the city. throughout the opinion sdemic the wealthy got away

that fee study should come out sometime in the fall, at which time dbi, along with the mayor's office and other stakeholders, will review the results of that study. the potential, the potential impact to tbis budget, and then likely propose a more nuanced, comprehensive fee proposal. so we're familiar and understand the purpose of the additional fee raise that the commission has recommended, and it's something to consider. again in these next few hours as we're debating what can be funded in the ultimate budget. but there's a number of things worth considering as we think about the future of dbi and how they're funded. and thank you and colleagues like it is my intention, though, when we do return, that i would like to be in agreement with the mayor specifically on this building code fee increase. i look to the mayor to consider, but i am most definitely inclined to make the motion to move this item forward with a recommendation to full board as it currently is before us. i understand. and even through the process, it was it was quite a rush. but the most importantly for me is the fac

dbi is not equiped search the community. we other infrastructure. please issue funds us. ooifrment diego a resident of d 11 and program, cystant at delores street community services in district 9. we provide immigration services to low income andim guarantee willing defense collaborative. it it is per mership of 16 agency and provide legal provided immigration court for over 1600 resident in know front. we ask the board today to ask the board to provide funding through add back to expand services to mote the needs of community. im guarantees are voilths to the recovery of the city and access to serves meches an fran safer for everyone. thank you. thank you for sharing your comments. next speaker, please. i'm ape communities'd vocate for asian law caucus serving low income immigrant communities. klines work mull pull jobs to make endy meat and access to heck and house and not making it. the workers are not okay. the mayor's budget cuts to housing resources and wage enforcement out of tune with people's reality of the city. throughout the opinion sdemic the wealthy got away

is when we do through the dbi. i had case of renters who's roofs are falling and stoves don't work and they must lead themselves the landlords will not make repairs they have to finds other housing i urge you to support all the causes to support just cause and the allocations for these vital services we offer to support our communities. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. good afternoon i'm lighthousea and i work as a councillor at just cause i urge you to fund the code enforcement out reach program and sro program and tenant service to make it possible for tenants to limp in habitable phones. >> thank you for listening. thank you terror lending mow your ear its is sad that we are here talking in a 4 manslaughter i hope however that all of you are present here will open your ears and souls to us and open your hearts to us. if your hearts still beat. i think it is completely irresponsible to make a budget cut to programs like the ones that i support. i hope that you who are the elected officials will supp

is when we do through the dbi. i had case of renters who's roofs are falling and stoves don't work and they must lead themselves the landlords will not make repairs they have to finds other housing i urge you to support all the causes to support just cause and the allocations for these vital services we offer to support our communities. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. good afternoon i'm lighthousea and i work as a councillor at just cause i urge you to fund the code enforcement out reach program and sro program and tenant service to make it possible for tenants to limp in habitable phones. >> thank you for listening. thank you terror lending mow your ear its is sad that we are here talking in a 4 manslaughter i hope however that all of you are present here will open your ears and souls to us and open your hearts to us. if your hearts still beat. i think it is completely irresponsible to make a budget cut to programs like the ones that i support. i hope that you who are the elected officials will supp

>> ad hoc base ask dbi to include enforcement planners in the final inspection. can i ask the code enforce am manager if can do t. >> appreciate the request given the nature. so want to until through to the end. where commissioner diamond. >> nov are recorded? >> no. i don't think we issued an nov the notice of enforce am stage we have been working with them through that process. assuming they don't follow through we would o'riordan nov on the property at this stage they are working with us we don't see a need for it at this stage. >> short of reporting something on the property how do we have comfort that it is not sold with the buyer selling without notice of enforcement. it would be on the title. yao will record the nsr against the property. why excellent. that makes confident. there it is a motion that has been seconds to approve this with conscience with the amendments. on that motion commissioner braun. >> aye yoochl commissioner upon diamond. >> aye >> commissioner imperial. >> aye >> commissioner koppel. >> aye. >> commissioner moore. >> president tanner.

line item recommendations that they are determining the cost to provide each individual service that dbi provides and will determine the amount necessary to recover to provide those services and therefore and estimating what the volume next year is likely to be. and therefore what the fee amount needs to be to recover. yeah, and i appreciate that. and i think that given just where we're are today, colleagues, i would like to make the motion to move the building fee forward. also, as recommended by, you know, the building inspection commission, second by vice chair mendoza and supervisor sorry, i'm sorry to interrupt. deputy city attorney ann pearson. so this ordinance is subject to charter section 2.109, which provides that fee ordinances introduced by the mayor may only be approved or rejected by the board. we've advised in the past that when the mayor introduces that type of ordinance, she may request that the board amend it. so if the mayor agrees with the recommendations of the commission, she may come to you and ask that you amend the rate to go up to 20. but this committee doesn't

line item recommendations that they are determining the cost to provide each individual service that dbi provides and will determine the amount necessary to recover to provide those services and therefore and estimating what the volume next year is likely to be. and therefore what the fee amount needs to be to recover. yeah, and i appreciate that. and i think that given just where we're are today, colleagues, i would like to make the motion to move the building fee forward. also, as recommended by, you know, the building inspection commission, second by vice chair mendoza and supervisor sorry, i'm sorry to interrupt. deputy city attorney ann pearson. so this ordinance is subject to charter section 2.109, which provides that fee ordinances introduced by the mayor may only be approved or rejected by the board. we've advised in the past that when the mayor introduces that type of ordinance, she may request that the board amend it. so if the mayor agrees with the recommendations of the commission, she may come to you and ask that you amend the rate to go up to 20. but this committee doesn't

i'm wondering from what i heard from previous discussions here 12 employees at the dbi department of building inspection and about 600 non-profits working along the 7,000 homeless on the streets, so it sounds like if their budget is $53 million and they have placed 2650 people that comes to $20,000 per placement just to direct somebody enter housing not the cost of the shelter, shelter bed, what have you. that's just to direct them there which seems pretty excessive. i have called needed a to struck one -- to w truck and charged $75 and when the truck arrived charge $75 to call the truck to send it to me and got me there. as far as the -- you know we really va-- i have called hot teams over to a couple of homeless people better. i notice they show you in a car and four, five people in the car. come out and talk to the person and the person after five minutes or so they wave them on. sometimes an ambulance comes as well and i don't know how much this costs and the homeless person just waving them off and i would like to know what something like that actually cost? >> thank you. there

move back in buildings now that has been certified safe and all the life safety system signed off by dbi that is the date when we issue july. that july date and after genetics. and even to august that is not just time dph mead to prep the new building and -- move furniture in and the building set up there is an among of dph will spend their forces to essential low operationalize the clinics they move back and see patience around august of 24. so that's helpful. up to this point used up the contingency 2.2 or 2 million dollars. right? correct. >> this was. >> yes. >> during -- as we within. right. >> what -- was the officer and leakages part of the original contract that was roofing outside the project scope this was a now issue this was identified between the when dph moved back in august of 22. to more about i think january or december or yen when it came to light the water infiltration issue the water during the past winter. why that was not what is construction company awards this project, too. >> the contractor is bilt prove. >> doing all the change orders. >> no. so we as far as the

specific space where they say all these acronyms are out to get you and they are all place holders, and dbiout of this that some big anonymous entity at the top is trying to get you, trying to reel you in, and instead of talking about football and stuff that actually exist and real issues, like cheerios cost $9 or something, that's going to be a problem because you can't bring them back from that, and you can't bring them back from talking about cheerios are $9 if they believe there's one big entity trying to rule the world. >> go ahead. >> it's hard to fix the misbeliefs, and what is a psychological need? it's the need for relief of stress. i am looking for something to blame, and what do i find to blame? here is this particular entity, particular acronym to blame. if you look at the mechanisms, they do both, and they create the stress, and they increase the chance that somebody would look for another nonstandard explanation. a lot of mistakes happen and lots of things, but the moment you create stress you drive people into something that is that a causal, an evil entity that would do it a

that fee study should come out sometime in the fall, at which time dbi, along with the mayor's office and other stakeholders, will review the results of that study. the potential, the potential impact to tbis budget, and then likely propose a more nuanced, comprehensive fee proposal. so we're familiar and understand the purpose of the additional fee raise that the commission has recommended, and it's something to consider. again in these next few hours as we're debating what can be funded in the ultimate budget. but there's a number of things worth considering as we think about the future of dbi and how they're funded. and thank you and colleagues like it is my intention, though, when we do return, that i would like to be in agreement with the mayor specifically on this building code fee increase. i look to the mayor to consider, but i am most definitely inclined to make the motion to move this item forward with a recommendation to full board as it currently is before us. i understand. and even through the process, it was it was quite a rush. but the most importantly for me is the fac