of the costs that are going to flow through you now, and do flow through you, are audited by dcaa. and it's critical onto things. do they get an adequate submission, and do they do the audits timely? and are you aware that in the case of dyncorp, and i picked three because i picked three, the last to the dcaa completed and not it was 2004. are you aware that at kbr, logcap, the last to be completed an audit was 2003. are you aware triple canopy, that they have yet to use their words to complete a year of anchored cost rx now, -- incurred cost? now, yes or no? >> i'm certainly aware that dcaa has not executed every request on a timely basis. >> okay, i know you're working with them. you said that, but then i would say are you aware that taking those saintly contractors, i picked dyncorp first, that dyncorp has submitted, you know, they've done their part according to dcaa, adequate submission that had been accepted by dcaa for those years better open. .. -- those years that are open. .. >> now, those are a lot of words, but to auditor, they mean they are concerned, they have unallow

are you aware in the case of the last year that dcaa completed an audit was 2004. are you aware that at kbr log cap, the last year they completed an audit was 2003. are you aware triple canopy they have yet to complete a year of up curred costs? now, yes or no? >> i am certainly aware that dcaa has not executed every request on a timely basis. >> okay, okay. i know you working with them. you said that, but then i would say are you aware that picking those same three contractors, that dine corp. submitted, you know, done their part according to dcaa for those years that are open. you know, we're talking five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, a lot of open years with billions and billions of dollars with historically there have been audit results, but i would say then are you aware that kbr recently, they had their certifications on hand, and they were on paper or on the view adequate submissions, but they've withdrawn 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 because in their words, they want to relook at built expenses and cost accounting practices, but in the company's quote to dcaa, t

you now said to flow through you are audited by dcaa. get adequate submission and is a timely? are you aware, in the case of the nine core, the last year that dcaa conducted an audit was in 2004. are you aware that triple canopy has yet to use their words to complete a year of incurred costs? yes or no? >> i am certainly aware that dcaa has not executed a request on a timely basis. >> of tape. i know you're working with them. you said that. are you aware that picking those same three contractors -- i picked dinecorp first. we are talking about a lot of open years of billions and billions of dollars. are you aware that kbr recently had their certifications on hand and had adequate submissions on paper. but they withdrawn 2006, 2007, 2008, and to the other night because they want to look at cost accounting practices -- and 2009 because they want to look at cost accounting practices. previous expense assumptions. to an auditor, that means that they are concerned that they have a novel cost within their claims. they pull them back because th

d dcaa backlog is going to be over $800 billion. it will take me longer than i have to state what the return to the taxpayer is like. contractors have pulled it back. i give an example where a contractor has struggled to get a good submission action. my whole point is to propose we become more visible champion for dod, ensuring that you do on a reimbursable basis is fully staffed. we want them to make a dent by 2014. if i am in charge of the function of that company, i would be worried about what is the impact. i believe you can be a champion for that. you are going to make a transition and to use dot support initially. -- dod support initially. >> for life support. not for maintenance. >> it is supposed to be awarded july 31. >> you have got to compete consistent with the manner we support. we fully support rock island army action. >> yes. >> that is really important. as you evaluate that, had a company that puts all of its claims out -- why did you pull all of those out? that is a fair question. it says i certify they believe that