while the dda require that all the subsubsidy doesn't explicitly state when it be delivered.n the cases of phases 1 and 2 won't be needed until construction is complete lenare requested they provide the funds provided closer to the time they are needed and as a substitute for that cash a letter of credit from a bank. so at this time staff is recommending the commission approve to allow the cost over run portion of lenare's contribution as long as we're in receipt of an an irrevocable letter of credit and we are recommending that so long as phases 1 and 2 maintain their current schedule to meet the funding deadlines and there's no additional cost to phases 1 and 2 for acquiring the letter of credit and it minimizes risk toal to alice grifth griffith and ocii and maintain consistent see with the development agreement and you approved that in october of this year so with that i'm going to turn it back over to annabell e. thank you. >> thank you. >> so we have an additional slide that i skipped over. so as as far as history of what the commission approved the commission approved

okay you go on and talk about the dda and all these different situations and also talk about every year, every time deadlines that you guys have to appear and the developers have to appear but what about the deadlines for us, the residents, the tenants? now, i've been in contact with hud d. it's hud and they ain't budged and the regions down here don't understand. city hall don't understand. there's a few. so you have all these lawyers and new developers and everything is changing but what about the residents and the tenants? ladies and gentlemen, back in the days they didn't have no -- what they call it? a relocation. sued and don't get up there and talk about something -- it burns me up i got to sit through all this bs and there's no safeguards, no safeguards until you talk about litigation. >> thank you. >> hi my in hi my name is yolanda lewis and i'm with the black leadership council of san francisco and i'm here to talk about the human rights issue related to the demolition and it says alternatively lenare may use conventional demolition techniques i'd like to know who approved thi

decrcyasprd my pas twor sot' g rttobld potil stutnsha c tuly acmteho mas r rtipio >>oue eanglsabt e dda wldik t tbo t dd cssndtsol moacynd t hethr saeaan ia obm r moac >>riot s reth 20 yrs ag decacy rkstnociy tt ha aro mdlcls. thk dd-csseope, eyre ecadth a unarofhathgornnt ngant heom prer ioheovemenca ket ayuaior nfcaonth a n gng bhay outha ansothefe,thnk erhe t mdlcls s alyseeth ppt r moac th'shythknhna r ame,heeg igointo pua obm cae ghno the tho 0 lln ine atane asfi a mdlcls. eyo thohat e tein ehen t ine uile otwte th a t os thk nt mo freed, df doccy er in toome ace keana e eshoil pu ft. tres ascodin whh moachadelod thpa a treern acrscoec milela, rkgas laowrs a e psas. tt'rit. c y ge ver vi ofhatchthse gup i test i sofo emphe dd-cssan torott thr proer. ehesinreedn licartipaoor codiibti? >>hiinay en ple keatin ari. neelhas eenbjtto isictohiof ho cve fothla ser yes, an yoee thahapo op spo h bau his for disiti ern- wain te ctry mo omilela wt optyiht bau th n'wa ovre t biary kehis ay th tre aolla in cls at'seein tatar ofheor t bwa o cseatm. doccys meinth bo wtso vend t ni ithk doccyen to