this court would review the court in that record, de novo, anyway. in that regard, it's no different than any other case that makes it's way to the court, where the court is asked to review the record and make a determination on how the ordinary person could report the conduct. it's unreasonable and unlawful for the purposes of the 4th amendment for the officers to convey the impression that it has the authority of a warrant when he doesn't have one. and when that prompts as it obviously would an occupant of a home to move and then that movement is used as evidence that exigent circumstances exist and warrantless search is justified. if this court to, you know, adopt the framework that the commonwealth is arguing for, the exception to the warrant requirement would be the rule. so we would ask the court to affirm the decision of the kentucky supreme court. >> thank you, counsel. mr. farley, you are four minutes remaining. >> my time is short. i'd like to make a few quick points. i believe mr. chief justice and justice kennedy were absolutely correct.

other times an issue sort of de novo, you know, an issue that really nobody's thought about very much, and you're kind of bringing it to the fore front. you know, the field is wide open there. you might have some ability to frame the issue better, you know? you don't have to, you don't go in to talk to somebody and they say, oh, yeah, i know this. this is that thing about so and so, you know? and then you spend ten minutes in the meeting trying to explain why it really isn't like so and so, right? whereas if you go in and it's a new one, you know, you have the ability to sort of frame it and, you know, put parameters on it at the, you know, at the time. .. >> it's going to be hard to say oh no, it's not that. it probably is. good question. now, now, stephen, or john today when we were in our little discussion before suggested, well, gee, wouldn't it be better to be a posed. wouldn't it be better to be on the side of stopping? than on the side of passing? absolutely. almost always. in lobbying the congress. just because the congress is so fragmented and decentralized, there are so many