later i'll see you have to state that you know the debate and the debates are meant to happen in a proper t.v. studio and it wasn't clear from the very end whether the were going to happen but they did happen although they were having discussions in arguments about the rules that's how the two stages of and that's where you saw the different singers and bands performing those who are supporting or shango on one stage those who are supporting selenski on a different stage and for me it was unclear how it's going to happen because one man needs to go to another stage or vice versa and surprise surprise the current president walked all the way over to the different end of the stadium and he stood up to talk to mr zilinskas yeah i mean obvious. if you look positively it's encouraging the youth to get involved with politics there was a lot of young people in that stadium yeah and obviously that constant probably helped that situation i mean if we look at the characters involved we obviously. let's talk about him a little bit he. plays a president and t.v. here's this still going out on netflix

>> it is important, this vote is to change the amount of time that can be demanded for debate, once a filibuster has been surmounted on eight presidential nominees confirmation. you might remember several years ago the overall threshold for overcoming a filibuster on nominees was lowered from 62, just a majority vote the democrats in 2013 what we call the nuclear option, rules change procedure to lower that threshold from the 60 down to just a majority vote but even after that you still had to go through up to 30 hours of debate on each nominee, once a filibuster had been ended. republicans say democrats are unfairly using that repeatedly on president trumps nominees not just for debate purposes and so those rules change, it would lower that time for most nominees it would be two hours. supreme court nominees, circuit court nominees would still remain at up to 30 hours of debate but other nominees say it would be two hours of debate once a filibuster is ended. >> are all hooligans on board with this effort by the majority leader?>> on the tuesday vote all republicans were on board, we

debate in a football stadium. rising in northern iowa least one point jack twenty one years after the signing of the good friday peace deal police say it was terrorism and launched a murder investigation. i'm phil gale welcome to the program the u.s. house of representatives judiciary committee has issued a subpoena demanding to see a complete unproductive version of the will report committee chairman jerry not less said he could not accept the current version which he said leaves most of the congress in the dark here he's talking about the version released by president trump's attorney general william. attorney general barr it appears to have shown in unsettling willingness to undermine his own department in order to protect president trump the report outlines disturbing evidence. good president corrupt engage in obstruction of justice and other misconduct and the responsibility now fools to congress to hold the president accountable for his actions straight to washington that is why we joined the w correspondent

debate they call them on the phone line of a live on air sorry. he was in france at that time and he refused and so on and so forth so when the two states were there it was unclear for us how are they going to talk to each other if there are the different sides of the stadium was going to scream obviously there were microphone but then all of a sudden the current president petro poroshenko walked all the way to a limousine and age and that was a rather awkward moment too so indeed very extraordinary with a lot of instances. and moments that seemed really awkward to us i mean you know the way you described it in the run up to the debates it feels like a very old fashioned deal doesn't it you know one challenging the other and the other not being able to refuse how did the candidates try to win over the orgy and well first of all we have to remember how petro poroshenko he came to power and i have already mentioned that that was the result of the my dad revolution when the president who was considered pro russian victor unicode ridge was thrown out

so he was not here when i set out the three debates that we are debating today.50, the previous petition was in relation to a second referendum on the eu debate. and i take great exception to the honourable gentleman suggesting in some way that i am being dishonest in what i am saying. he did! order! i don't think the honourable gentleman was suggesting anything dishonest in any shape or form, therefore i think we not need ask him... he did! i think he did not. i'm sure he was not. however, the order will... i am sure he was not being that. he did suggest i should be honest. and i have been honest and i am being honest. and this petition is calling on the option of a revocation of article 50 to avoid us crashing out of the eu without the deal. shortly after that intervention, craig mackinlay left the debate, as did two other conservative backbenchers. 0ne mp found that contemptuous. i appreciate everybody‘s diary‘s busy in westminster but i find it extraordinarily at the end of the debate this afternoon, there is literally now nobody on the side of the house that

to boost his favor with voters the fiery debate certainly lived up to its stadium setting. and therefore lead to i am not a politician younger but i am not a politician at all i am just a human being an ordinary human being who has come to break this instance law through markets system. your reason i am the results petro alexeyevitch i am the result of your mistakes and promises. that's the truth and you know it. here is written how is he going to fulfill the functions of commander in chief. for your team already said that you're going to start a course for young fighters that's a good thing to do but you should have done it five years ago in two thousand and fourteen when ukraine needed the efforts of every volunteer it could get up and build out of here was hiding from his conscription notice these have i was. in economy is outside the olympic stadium in kiev nic first of all just give us some background on this debate itself i mean this has got to be the strangest format for a presidential debate that i've ever heard of how did this whole thing come about. well definitel

while debate is underway, there's also activity on the house side.ajority party is making a desperate effort to pass the bill through the senate. congressman martin favors legislation to aid farmers but is opposed to the methods proposed in the administration's bill. he is determined to block the bill in the house, or force a compromise. he has his secretary summoned the republican whip for the house. the party with directs the maneuvers on the floor. they decided they need the advice of a former house leader for the republican party. he is invited to join the conference. they must think this out carefully. they must bring to bear all of the strategies they have learned through many years of legislative experience to stop the majority bill in the house. this constant struggle between the majority and minority, the two parties in congress, the republicans and democrats, is the very essence of democratic lawmaking. it assures that every bill made into a law shall be subjected to the most vigorous examination and debate. meanwhile, lobbyists went in the

camera so that's why these debates will be so interesting to really see if we get more information on where all of the ski who on the base of the polls will be ukraine's next president where he wants to take this country interesting creative capital kiev thank you. now for some sports and the biggest game of the season so far it's just a day when the blue industry going to tell us all of this is chris how did ten of the sports and of course talk about the match between by and dortmund welcome chris to the jealous cornett of the classic a classic the juiciest encounter and the bundesliga do a fabulous clubs but very very different and this is this time more than a match it could be the title decider that's what everyone is saying right now and i'll explain why that is the case because past seasons in the but as they say here's one example five years ago bart munich clinched the title in the but as they get after twenty seven match days fast forward to this season now we have by actually looking up a dog when we haven't seen that in a very long time so that's why all of the buzz has bee

indeed, the legacy of the senate is a story of debate, ample debate, followed by compromise. and it's thanks in large part to the rules that govern how this chamber works. it's crucial those rules not be twisted or abused for partisan advantage. the majority, by taking yet another step to erode that legacy, risks turning this body into a coliseum of zero-sum infighting, a place where the brute power of the majority rules with little or no regard to the concerns of the minority party and where long-standing rules have little or no meaning. i am sorry, so sorry, my republican colleagues have gone along with senator mcconnell's debasement of the senate. to do this for such blatantly political ends is simply unworthy of this institution. i yield the floor. mr. mcconnell: mr. president? the presiding officer: the majority leader. mr. mcconnell: one of the advantages of having been around the advise and consent process for as long as i have is i know a little history. i was actually here as a young staffer on the judiciary committee when richard nixon appointed two supreme court ju

connelly i asked him what to expect from tonight's debate. so tonight will be the real test we've been waiting to submit for two weeks now and there's been lots of to ing inferring about the detail less about the actual content and from what we understand now if they do appear at this debate they won't even be sharing a single stage they will be on separate stages at opposite ends of the football pitch so let's see how much detail we actually get and how much this actually turns into being more of a concert for the respect candidates respective supporters the relationship with moscow we know it has been a very big topic in this election who is moscow's preferred candidate on the ukrainian side. you see in the first round we had a candidate who actually travel to moscow basically to show that he was supported by the russian leadership he met with the prime minister and with the head of russia's gas monopoly gas from and he came in fourth place so i think after the war of this conflict with russia being seen as moscow's friend doesn't pay off a

open in late summer in a replica oppression palace and it's long been one of germany's most hotly debated and ambitious cultural projects. that's what a place that will welcome the world citizens on it. that's the fifteenth in terms of investigation into the provenance of the artifacts humbled form his last ten years of funny people time to make what set this way of. the home with war for the good suggests he suffered in the history. the genesis of the humboldt forum and the challenge is our focus this week on twenty one but let's go back to the beginning. on september seventh one thousand nine hundred fifty the government of the german democratic republic blew up the berlin city palace. it didn't fit with the ideology of the new socialist state. dominating the district of berlin it had been the residence of prussian kings in the german counties or for over two centuries now it was history. the palast there republic was built in its place the seat of the east german parliament the folks coming and the venue for key events. german reunification heralded the end of the people's palace in on

we debate and we vote. the debate is important. and we should have started the debate a while ago. i do not think the time is now for a vote because we still do not have all of the evidence. we do not have the full mueller report, for example. but we should have started this debate a while ago and that is called for afor -- last year. >> seth moulton spoke this morning and watch the entire speech this evening at 7:00 eastern on c-span. then california senator kamala harris, she held a town hall at dartmouth college in new hampshire. we will have at 8:00 eastern here on c-span. you can find all of our coverage online at c-span.org, or listen on the free c-span radio app. ♪ >> c-span's newest book "the presidents." provides insight into the lives of the american presidents through stories gathered by interviews with noted historians. it is the life events that shaped our leaders, challenges they faced, and the legacy they left. order your copy today. it is now available as a hardcover or

i can finally agree on the terms of the debate. so nic tell us if selenski does indeed win this election what does it mean for the country. well we thought we were going to hear more from him in the past weeks he has been very vocal about fighting corruption taking away members of parliament immunity from prosecution modernizing the the ukraine's government bring in more digital governance also he says on the really big issues like joining nato or the you he'll put that question to the people through referendums but it has been preciously thin on the detail but it doesn't seem to be doing him any harm if anything the polls show him increasing his lead of petro poroshenko since the first round so tonight will be the real test we've been waiting to see but for two weeks now and there's been lots of two inferring about the detail less about the actual content and from what we understand now if they do appear at this debate they won't even be sharing a single stage they will be on separate stages at opposite ends of the football pitch

bank in the public space of the debate the second india was a positive. to the technological change and the symbol of this. has been. to the technological. exactly what and where i want to take this conversation forward because many critics of the e.u. have absolutely no issue with europe's past they recognize the enormous success of the european union. conciliation and peace are its greatest achievements most of the people agree with that they take issue with the ability of the e.u. as a system as a mechanism to move forward to be as efficient as it has to be in present times can you really do the reunion without changing the way the decisions on made yes be done. and the exactly what happens. in these middle age with the amount of innovation. to element of innovation because the good the good in them and creation of. plastic knology should have been closed only that in a close region the region of. the society that i've heard of this time was a medicine and the second. for the new world order mystery or you know that it happened many times in history th

congress does two things, we debate and we vote on things. the debate is important. and we should have started the debate in a while ago. i do not think the time is now for info, because we do not have all the evidence, we still don't have the full mueller report, for example. but we should have started the debate a while ago and that is why i called for it last year. announcer: the dema -- democratic candidate seth moulton talk in bedford, new hampshire. watch the speech here on c-span at 7 p.m. eastern. then kamala harris, she held a town hall at dartmouth college in new hampshire. we will have that for you at 8:00 p.m. eastern here on c-span. you can find all of our political coverage online at c-span.org, or listen on the free c-span radio app. on saturday at 2:30 p.m., but tv has coverage from the news am -- taling about c-span's new book "the presidents."ranking the best and worst chief executives . that is saturday at 2:30 p.m. host: the rising cost of insulin across the country is getting the attention of congress and others. we are joined this morning from t

on, and he sorted out and they were debating on, and he sorted outand i'm they were debating on, anded out and i'm told reliably that we are currently voting on a monday 21, which was put forward by —— and then at 21, it says it takes out the requirements to put the chosen extended date. so what you see here is really the brexit elderly through, those within the bench is trying to limit the scope of the bill and restrict what it does, and those like yvette cooper trying to ensure that they have as much face account the length of the delay. there were a whole loads that went down from the erg all of which was trying to limit the capacity of the comments of getting in the way of no deal, which puts limitations on it, stop us and participating in european elections and parliament and making sure the extension does not go beyond 22nd of may, so there isa not go beyond 22nd of may, so there is a big attempts to limit the scope because one of the things that's quite interesting, when the government lays that motion, which is required for that to pass, that means it's on the government to s

we'll be hearing some of the lord's debate ina be hearing some of the lord's debate in a moment. house of commons approve the legislation by one vote last wednesday but the arguments about it raged on. with the lead of the house confirm that the bill that is currently going to the house of lords at the moment is the biggest dog ‘s dinner of any bill that we have seen in recent times his is the government opposed to this bill and will it do everything to defeat it? well, i entirely agree with my honourable friend that this is a huge dog 's dinner. as i mentioned to colleagues when we were looking out the business of the house motion, the european union notification of withdrawal act 2017, that was the act to revoke article 50, had two causes, containing only 58 words. it was debated for five full days in this chamber and it seems inconceivable that parliament has looked at this bill for the first time last tuesday and has had just a few hours of debate across both houses. mr speaker, it is not so both houses. mr speaker, it is not so much a dog 's dinner, it is a dog's brexit, and

usually you expect these kind of debates to happen in some sort of proper t.v. studio they're usually well planned and well regulated by the law actually behind your back you can see that it's not a full stadium there are some empty seats behind the stage but just because the actual football field can be filled with people it is expected that some sixty thousand people are attending it is the main stadium of ukraine that's actually the place where the final of the euro twenty twelve happened in our opinion football championships but with these debates according to ukrainian law the candidates are not obliged to take part in it so before the first round there were no debates at all between the main competitors the favorites but after the first round when mr selenski the comedian came out as a winner the current president petro poroshenko realized that definitely he needs to do something there needs to be some sort of move to energize his supporters and surprisingly though it was. you who invited petro poroshenko to have these debates but this was where the trick

we'll be hearing some of the lord's debate ina be hearing some of the lord's debate in a moment. the house of commons approve the legislation by one vote last wednesday but the arguments about it raged on. with the lead of the house confirm that the bill that is currently going to the house of lords at the moment is the biggest dog ‘s dinner of any bill that we have seen in recent times his is the government opposed to this bill and

again us i'll be waiting for you here at the olympic stadium the debate will take place here in front of the people of ukraine all the channels can broadcast alive and all journalist will be able to attend both candidates must undergo medical tests so that ukrainians can be sure neither of us is an alcoholic or drug user this country needs a healthy president you know my brain about the withdrawal of islam and there it was. his long awaited reply to all those who say he's weak on policy as a lady on a comedian running scared of tough questions like this were an ordinary political debate an ordinary television studio instead selenski wants it hell i live in front of a crowd of up to seventy thousand interior olympic stadium. the same epic soundtrack the same attempt in formality the incumbent petro poroshenko is response wasn't long in coming the president never missing a chance to insist that his show business rival isn't serious about politics. if the bucket for a debate is not a show an election campaign decides the future of the country for years and decades to come but this is no

here is a look at the floor debate starting with house foreign affairs committee chair eliot engel. mr. engel: thank you, madam chair. i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. engel: madam chair, it's a little surprising that we find ourselves back on the floor debating this resolution. after all it's already passed both chambers, with bipartisan support, in fact, it's passed the senate twice. they have used every book in the trick to slow it down. we reached the last page in the book and i'm confident after we vote today this resolution will head to the president's desk, and the president will have to face the reality that congress is no longer going to ignore its constitutional obligations when it comes to foreign policy. when it comes to determining when and where our military is engaged in hostilities. we're taking up this resolution because we see a policy from this administration that's strayed from our values and a crisis that demands moral leadership which is the war in yemen. i fully understand america's security c

>> the debate sparked "curiouser and curiouser," said alice. "the rabbit-hole went straight on like a tunnel for some way." "i've seen a cat without a gri, but a grin without a cat." hey, mercedes, end audio. change lighting to soft blue. the completely reimagined 2020 gle. with intelligent voice control and available third row. your adventure awaits at the mercedes-benz spring event but hurry the event ends april 30th. >>> police in oakland with a crackdown. >> i'm kate larson, where a whale carcass has washed acareer >>> dogs in the workplace. is it a perk or a problem? we explore all sides of this dog debate. >> live where you live, this is "abc7 news." >>> out ocorol in the east bay. wing to crack down this olice weekend. >> oakland city leaders are following supporting stiffer penalties for participants. but we are asking, are there better solutions to the problem? >> our reporter has the story. >> reporter: this happened sunday night on international and 42nd avenue. no arrests were made, even though a bus and big rig set on fire and a dr

armemen: this grand debate consisted of 10,000 sessionons. emmanunuel macron himself locked logged 92 hours.s. therere were 16,000 books of complainints, a throwback k to e last d days of the old regime in french before e the french revovolution 1616,000 books of cocomplaints.. those e produced o one and a haf million individidual contributis and 1.1.8 million onle comments. all of thihis habeen processed with the help of various officials that werere thanked t the primehilippe, ministster, and with thehe helpf artificialal intelligence, becae it cannonot be d done purely b y humamans. all of thihis is being made sese of at the moment, and we are expectining trench presentnt emmanuel macron, in mid april,, histyty soon, to gigive conclusions and whatat he intens to actually do with alall this , or i if he does d moreying to create progreressive taxes, what does that mean for the budg deficit? ere are all these bigg questitions to answer. there are elections coming up in may as well. genie: w with european elelectis cocomingp and the two bigge

i've ever heard of can you describe for me what was that debate like inside that stadium. good evening karl well it looks even more unusual as it started there were two stages at the two ends of the football pitch at the bottom of the olympic stadium so had things run as expected we would have had both candidates standing off against each other with several hundred meters between them in the end poroshenko sprinted across the pitch to join selenski on his day so we did have some kind of face to face interaction they shook hands selenski seemingly not very happy about that but he had no choice but to accept and then basically not much journalism going on first we had them providing monologues and then they started asking each other questions it got very heated it got very personal and the crowd of about a third i'd say of the sixty thousand capacity in the stadium tonight started getting very vocal and booing and shouting trying to drown out the particular there was a majority of those supporters in the stadium but it in the end you did get brief glimpses of their personali

the how and the when of a potential debate instead of discussing the issues of which there are more than enough in a country locked in standoff with russia with more than a million refugees and millions more leaving the country in search of work. critics argue that's no coincidence they say as a newcomer to politics he has little to win and much to lose debating the details of being president today ukrainians have one last chance to hear their next president whoever that will be set out his vision before they go to the polls that is if selenski can finally agree on the terms of the debate. to sports now and in men's tennis an update from the third round of the monte carlo masters world number three germany's onyx and a set of was knocked out and the surprise straight sets defeat to fabio fognini meanwhile novak djokovic cruise past his opponent now face a tricky task in the quarter finals. despite showing plenty grit and determination tayla fritz didn't stand a chance against novak djokovic playing in red jackets gave the twenty one year old american a sound beating winning the firs

gives lympics stadium capacity seventy thousand and the place was immense he says he wants to debate with petro poroshenko as new dusty t.v. studio facility who prefers to talk to his supporters direct through social media. feelings once again selenski throwing down the gauntlet and once again pushing the left with no other option but to agree. astonished observers with a late night reply by video message if it's the stadium you want then so be it i'll be waiting for you. traveled to paris to meet a man on a visit intended to underscore his diplomatic standing selenski again peeped in to the post meeting mccall and his advisors hours before pushing. the tension in ukraine was focused on the mood music between the presidential candidates and their french toast down to the number of minutes spent at the iliza palace. less than forty eight hours after his return from paris petro poroshenko was walking the turf of the limbic stadium alone with his supporters his challenge to selenski to bring the stadium debate forward had simply been ignored with his poll ratings fly high selenski is ap

can we have a debate about that?mind something offensive said last night by the member of parliament when at this time as we are in lent and approaching easter when he used the phrase forgive them, father, for they do not know what they do. i'm a former parliamentary churchwarden and it was deeply offensive to use that phrase in the context of a debate on brexit. it was offensive andi debate on brexit. it was offensive and i do hope that we can have a discussion about what is and what is not appropriate to say in this house. as i have always said, it is vital that everybody in this place and palace of westminster, treat each other with courtesy and respect. i completely uphold that. as the honourable gentleman will be aware, behaviour in the chamber is a matter for the chair and on the other hand iam sure for the chair and on the other hand i am sure mr speaker will also agree that it i am sure mr speaker will also agree thatitis i am sure mr speaker will also agree that it is vital everybody is treated with courtesy

a discriminatory all guests debating the issue. i think it's i think it's ridiculous i think asking women to comment when they come into a country do you dress this way.

here is one, debating question.nion? 1973, 1971, 1980 find, or 1984. no, we joined in 73. or did we join in 71? the first referendum, we were already in. yes. was it? i wasn't there. were you? no. no. iwas at school! we've been in 46 years. talk of the early years prompts another debate. my mum and dad say they voted tojoin the common debate. my mum and dad say they voted to join the common market, debate. my mum and dad say they voted tojoin the common market, for the british people it has always been about trade. that is definitely, the eu has definitely changed since then. it has become a united states of europe. no, no, it doesn't happen. it doesn't have an army, doesn't want to have an army. by army, doesn't want to have an army. by adding their cue card to the barrel, the mps are one step closer to freedom. ten. and soon after, they unearth the next clue. to freedom. ten. and soon after, they unearth the next cluelj to freedom. ten. and soon after, they unearth the next clue. i found something. yeah, ifound it

the debate is important, and we should have started the debate a while ago. i don't think the time is now for a vote, because we still don't even have all the evidence, we still don't have ll mueller report, but we should have started this debate a while ago. that is why i called for ed last year. >> other questions for the congressman? thank you for your service and thank you for being here this morning. all the art colleges, visual or performing arts, are very concerned about the current administration's continuing attempt to defund the nea end of the arts and humanities councils and all of those. fixingld you go about that for us and make sure those stay intact? the arts are a pathway to success for many people in life, people with challenges and without challenges, so how would you ensure you have those for the future of our children? great question and i will discuss education reform more broadly because of what you brought out. i should point out to everyone, jo oversees the congressional art contest every year that turns out amazing art in washington d

the how and the when of a potential debate instead of discussing the issues of which there are more than enough in a country locked in standoff with russia with more than a million refugees and millions more leaving the country in search of work out critics argue that's no coincidence they say as a newcomer to politics he has little to win and much to lose debating the details of being president today ukrainians have one last chance to hear their next president whoever that will be set out his vision before they go to the polls that is if selenski can finally agree on the terms of the debate. you know you said yourself a little bit earlier that vladimir selenski has given very little in the way of detail or policy proposals so what could you crane actually look like if you were to become president. well sumi has spoken a lot about fighting corruption stripping members of parliament of their immunity as a way of doing that also modernizing ukraine's government systems digitalisation but i think it's really worth seeing this as more a promise of generational change in a static change

and a public debate but in any case in the agreement the. deal framework with. relation with china is very open these betty is very clear so is an ongoing debate i think that we have to find a way to cooperate with china well let me stop you right here we have to take a break now but back in just a few moments. let's learn. i'm greece of the fight. thank you for. the story that's right. slavery. in a world of big partisan. and conspiracies it's time. to dig deeper to hit the stories that mainstream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming the door. and shouting past each other it's time for critical thinking it's time to fight for the middle for the troops the time is now we're watching closely watching the hawks. welcome back to worlds apart with the president of the european economy and social committee mr i heard you say those who opposed the european project often do without offering anything concrete and yet if we look at the euro skeptics in your own country they seem to be very raza loued abo

of the debate. too often, i've seen this discussion, or u.s. concerns about huawei diluted with the charge that there is no smoking gun. >> this is something that representative rogers addressed and others talked about briefly. it is worth drilling down, for just a minute, into this question. we have these doubts, there's no actionable intelligence. if the united states had reasonable cause they would've shared the intelligence with the world. maybe this is a witchhunt to keep china down and stifle competition. first, you don't need a smoking gun to have very credible concerns about what huawei might do in a 5g network. that is because of the nature of china, what was discussed earlier, what klein mentioned. they have a national intelligence law that compels their companies to share intelligence with the chinese state. elsa said that huawei could be exploited for intelligence purposes by the chinese government, with or without the company's complicity. these risks are not just about them, but the in

and debate but in any case in the agreement the. deal framework. of the relation with china is very open these betty is very clear so is an ongoing debate i think that we have to find a way to cooperate with china. we have to take a. break for a single purpose. of. training very young. eight months of intensive school. they're rats. and they save lives. but ok so what's this if you're lucky you're just the first one to be the purest we're just going over to the other hundreds. i just knew this would do him good to. see if it was my in the car can you. approach the put it you talk a little. it's a local supreme. court school board of these critics going up to the school with the pledge because he's been. pushing him to lie for the smear. job that you. oppose someone. because he doesn't look like you the late eighty's. welcome back to worlds apart as with the president of the european economy and social committee mr i heard you say those who oppose the european project often do that without offering anything yet if we look at the euro

as you brought it up, you have a debate in late june, cnn's debate in late july. rules cap the number of people who can be on the stage at 20. over the two nights. right now, there are 18 candidates, but it seems like there could very well be more than 20 democratic candidates by then. i mean, are you prepared to cut out, let's say three or four candidates, even one candidate, from these first debates? >> well, we'll cross those bridges if and when we get to them. it's unclear how many people will be in the race. what is clear is that in these debates, we're not going to be talking about hand size. we're going to talk about health care, we're going to talk about how we reduce the cost of prescription drugs. we'll talk about how we make sure america works for everybody, not just a few at the top. and again, on these debates, the first night and the second night, we're going to do a random assignment so there's not a varsity and a jv, because i firmly believe, i know that there are some who have come to me, kate, and have said i'm worried about a large field. i welc

the debate signature off the program so what what are you going to be debating what kind of topics are going to be getting into. everything christine i tell you nothing is off bounds and it's not so much what it is we're talking about but how the engagement is happening i'll give you an example we've just come from uganda we were talking about gender inequality a topic that's already hot in and of itself but i had really lenny walls from africa telling me things that left my jaw on the floor and this is the kind of engagement that we wanted from the people on the ground and it's exactly what we're finding shocking things things that are making us question what views and realities about africa and all of it is coming from these young people the seventy seven percent as i like to call them ok to have all excited now windows the show debut well it's starting on the sixth of april the first time a seven u.t.c. they're going to be for the times after that so people don't have to but if they miss it ok that's the seventy seven percent coming up on d v thank you to my colleagues it of humanit

its promises and policies ahead of next week's election plus the findings of the brakes national debate in france in response to the best protests will be live in paris. hello there we've got some wet weather that is gathering forth across parts of china for look at the satellite picture we can see the clouds as they gradually edge their way eastwards and they're going to really develop as we head through into choose dates a choose day for some of us here is looking like a pretty wet day ahead of a day it will still be very warm force in shanghai with a top temperature of twenty seven degrees that benefit them sweeps its way past and the temperatures drop force has a maximum just of fourteen that rain will then be making its way across parts of japan so here it does look pretty wet at times. during the day a very is so b. day in store i mean further towards the south end of may is the warm weather we're expecting in shanghai for choose day before the rain sweeps its way across us and things begin to turn a lot cooler for the south though it still stays warm force in hong kong and dry wi

and a public debate but in any case in the agreement. to deal framework with. the relation with china he's very open these that he's very clear so he's an ongoing debate i think that we have to find a way to cooperate with china let me stop you right here we have to take a break now but back in just a few moments. join me every thursday on the alex salmond show and i'll be speaking to. it's small business i'm show business i'll see that. what politicians do something to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president. or somehow want to. have to go right to be close as it was before three in the morning can't be good good i'm interested always in the waters in the house. first sydney. when you smell like it's a malt this is yours you just put the first one to open the worst we're just going over to the other hundreds. i just mean this would do him good except. if it was mashed the car can you pull off. a thought if the but if you poke a little. it's a little push for from the typical seems. to me

five floors the structure was built to reflect an industrial workshop the exhibit is meant to spark debate not eulogize the past since how much semen of the weimar classic foundation thus gets us to day but we can only understand it now that one can see the bow and also museum puts the sound close we remain today to the incredible developments of one thousand nine hundred and the following years and for them in addition to tons i think this will really change our city that socially each business got food and that was. the building as a symbolic rebuke to the nazis stamped on the bounce house movement in germany. forcing a fraud. you know that's exactly what i think we need to pay attention to today that our needs this openness and the ability to provoke about house with an institution that cross borders that survived and thrived on the diaspora without open borders that wouldn't have happened and without them it can't happen today i think you talk to me often occurrence in the midst almost needs to get as a whole to. getting its modern digital technology the light something concrete the su

open in late summer in a replica oppression palace and it's long been one of germany's most hotly debated and ambitious cultural projects. that's the place that will welcome the world. in terms of investigation into the provenance of the artifacts the humbled form has lost ten years if time in my quest said this way of. the whole but what is good justice. in the future. the genesis of the humboldt forum and the challenge is our focus this week on twenty one but let's go back to the beginning. on september seventh one thousand nine hundred fifty the government of the german democratic republic blew up the berlin city palace. it didn't fit with the ideology of the new socialist state. dominating the district of berlin mitta it had been the residence of prussian kings in the german kaiser for over two centuries now it was history. the palace to their very public was built in its place the seat of the east german parliament the fox comma and the venue for key events. german reunification heralded the end of the peoples dallas in one nine hundred ninety the building was closed due to as best u

her words are worthy of debate. >> they are worthy of debate.te about that, it would be one thing. what we're talking about the use of 9/11 footage to make a point that was not her point. >> i hate to shut down debate, but thank you so much and welcome to the family. >>> could president trump help george washington better promote the washington brand. stay with us. s to reducing the sugar in your family's diet, coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org i felt i couldn't be at my best wifor my family. c, in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured.