. >> i am a debbie downer, i am sorry. >> debbie downer, straight talker, return us to the planet. let me ask you, lisa, because there is a lot of history in here, it talks about nixon quite a bit and the precedent, how that is not a precedent and what the framers intended. he points out the framers, no support of the type of immunity trump is cleaning. how is that an argument? you think as a sane person that argument would be effective with the conservative justices but i know sherilyn is going to tell me not to be naove. so how do you think that argument will play with the conservative justices that this is not what the framers intended. how likely is that going to be something we here? clean look, i agree with sherilyn completely that this is a court that fetishize his history and that the absence of history was one way in which they justified what text really was an unjustifiable result in the section 3 case. the provision of the constitution that was at issue there interpretively should have led to a different result and yet the court knew what results they wanted to reach and

. >> on this beautiful friday, i don't want to be the debbie downer, but since i play that role typicallymean, obviously, look, a lot to love. 3.8% in terms of the unemployment rate. here is one of the reasons i think yields might have gone higher. if you look at the trajectory between full-time jobs and part-time employment, they are crossing over the wrong way. part time employment going through the roof. full-time jobs are going down. this is just my interpretation, people need more jobs, two jobs, because we are trying to combat inflation any way they can. that wreaks the fact that inflation is still a huge problem. >> you want to find -- >> of course i do. but i started by saying it that way. >> right. that was the thing. >> yeah. >> well, yeah. >> so, let debbie have his way. i think you have got a case here though, if rates are higher and there is a backdrop we know there are sensitivities to the equity market in higher rates, whether it's 4.5, 5 again, this week was also interesting. microsoft got all-time highs. upgrades of meta and google. whether it's fab four, super five, you

. >> i am a debbie downer. >> straight talker. -- we need to be aware of things , all super important. let me ask you, lisa. there is a lot of history in here. we talked about nixon a bit. and the president that is not a precedent. he also talked about what the -- the framers supply no support -- how is that argument? you think as a saint part -- person the argument would be -- how do you think the argument will plate with the conservative justices? that this is not what the framers intended? how likely is that to be something we here? >> i agree with sherrilyn, this is a court that fantasizes history. and the absence of history was one way in which they justified what textually was unjustifiable. the provision of the constitution at issue there interpretively should have led to a different result. and yet, the court new what result they wanted to reach. he reached out and grabbed the asset -- absence of history to get that. to be said there is a counterpunch, it is this framers argument. this is the court also fantasizes originalism. -- what is the history of this document. and at it

i don't want be debbie downer. >> the moon >> will completely block the face of the sun for just minutes across portions of 13 states, as well as parts of canada and mexico. other locations across north america. will get a partial view of the club's for up to 80 minutes. a resident eclipse expert joins us now with more first things. first how can we watch the eclipse safely? >> yeah, how can we watch the eclipse safely? well, first off, i have my i can do it like this. yes that will work very well or you can do that here. you have to go all the way through like that, right? my glasses on there you go. i have a gift for you >> here you go. are these these are i heard there were like phony ones have gone to ease or logit. my friend, i'm going to put them on for you and i can literally see nothing that's going on. i'm literally blind, so i'm going to take them off. but the way that you know that the these are legit is if you zoom in, you will see the iso approval. oh, you're looking fantastic and you really, you really can't see you can't see anything, but you can see the eclipse. you can s