any comments >> staff: through the chair, supervisors, yes, debra newman from the legislative i wouldust note that the mta did issue a request for causal in november 2015, and then in december 2015. the board approved a ordinance require the sfmta eight to include prevailing wages and worker retention provisions in the new agreement. so if you look on table 1, on page 4, of our report, it doesn't show the various funding sources that will be used to fund the 142 million dollar agreement over the next five years. we would also note the proposed agreement for the first year for fiscal year 16-17 will cost approximately 25 $20 million, which is about 2 million, or eight 8.6% higher than the fiscal. about 22.7 million, and we just note the primary reason for the cost increase is related to the higher salaries associated with the prevailing wage provision that we do recommend approval. >> supervisor peskin: thank you ms. newman can supervisor breed >> president breed: thank you. ms. williams, i just had a question you during the process, can you provide me with information of who did it on

review that opponents budget to mention quickly john lee theresa cao, christine-melissa white house debra newman evidently joel-. as public employees in the clerk's office of public boswell for a moment to watch this quick presentation and i want to just say your the individuals truly responsible for the success of an apartment and i express my sincere gratitude to all of you and two other key members in the leadership team of the clerk's office. now to the business. in february, the committee approved the proposed budget as a result of provide a very brief high-level summary and focus mostly on the few changes from that review today. i will state at the outset were in agreement with a budget analyst recommendations. this budget was developed as part of core mandates and omission of our office. a lot has happened behind the scenes to provide operational support to connect our data to the public and to provide administrative support to the board. our ethics requires us to take a magic seriously to be successful at bringing the public into the process by providing open and equitable access to our

any comments >> staff: through the chair, supervisors, yes, debra newman from the legislative i would just note that the mta did issue a request for causal in november 2015, and then in december 2015. the board approved a ordinance require the sfmta eight to include prevailing wages and worker retention provisions in the new agreement. so if you look on table 1, on page 4, of our report, it doesn't show the various funding sources that will be used to fund the 142 million dollar agreement over the next five years. we would also note the proposed agreement for the first year for fiscal year 16-17 will cost approximately 25 $20 million, which is about 2 million, or eight 8.6% higher than the fiscal. about 22.7 million, and we just note the primary reason for the cost increase is related to the higher salaries associated with the prevailing wage provision that we do recommend approval. >> supervisor peskin: thank you ms. newman can supervisor breed >> president breed: thank you. ms. williams, i just had a question you during the process, can you provide me with information of who did it

any comments >> staff: through the chair, supervisors, yes, debra newman from the legislative i would just note that the mta did issue a request for causal in november 2015, and then in december 2015. the board approved a ordinance require the sfmta eight to include prevailing wages and worker retention provisions in the new agreement. so if you look on table 1, on page 4, of our report, it doesn't show the various funding sources that will be used to fund the 142 million dollar agreement over the next five years. we would also note the proposed agreement for the first year for fiscal year 16-17 will cost approximately 25 $20 million, which is about 2 million, or eight 8.6% higher than the fiscal. about 22.7 million, and we just note the primary reason for the cost increase is related to the higher salaries associated with the prevailing wage provision that we do recommend approval. >> supervisor peskin: thank you ms. newman can supervisor breed >> president breed: thank you. ms. williams, i just had a question you during the process, can you provide me with information of who did it

review that opponents budget to mention quickly john lee theresa cao, christine-melissa white house debra newman evidently joel-. as public employees in the clerk's office of public boswell for a moment to watch this quick presentation and i want to just say your the individuals truly responsible for the success of an apartment and i express my sincere gratitude to all of you and two other key members in the leadership team of the clerk's office. now to the business. in february, the committee approved the proposed budget as a result of provide a very brief high-level summary and focus mostly on the few changes from that review today. i will state at the outset were in agreement with a budget analyst recommendations. this budget was developed as part of core mandates and omission of our office. a lot has happened behind the scenes to provide operational support to connect our data to the public and to provide administrative support to the board. our ethics requires us to take a magic seriously to be successful at bringing the public into the process by providing open and equitable access to our

any comments >> staff: through the chair, supervisors, yes, debra newman from the legislative i would just note that the mta did issue a request for causal in november 2015, and then in december 2015. the board approved a ordinance require the sfmta eight to include prevailing wages and worker retention provisions in the new agreement. so if you look on table 1, on page 4, of our report, it doesn't show the various funding sources that will be used to fund the 142 million dollar agreement over the next five years. we would also note the proposed agreement for the first year for fiscal year 16-17 will cost approximately 25 $20 million, which is about 2 million, or eight 8.6% higher than the fiscal. about 22.7 million, and we just note the primary reason for the cost increase is related to the higher salaries associated with the prevailing wage provision that we do recommend approval. >> supervisor peskin: thank you ms. newman can supervisor breed >> president breed: thank you. ms. williams, i just had a question you during the process, can you provide me with information of who did it

review that opponents budget to mention quickly john lee theresa cao, christine-melissa white house debra newman evidently joel-. as public employees in the clerk's office of public boswell for a moment to watch this quick presentation and i want to just say your the individuals truly responsible for the success of an apartment and i express my sincere gratitude to all of you and two other key members in the leadership team of the clerk's office. now to the business. in february, the committee approved the proposed budget as a result of provide a very brief high-level summary and focus mostly on the few changes from that review today. i will state at the outset were in agreement with a budget analyst recommendations. this budget was developed as part of core mandates and omission of our office. a lot has happened behind the scenes to provide operational support to connect our data to the public and to provide administrative support to the board. our ethics requires us to take a magic seriously to be successful at bringing the public into the process by providing open and equitable access to our

review that opponents budget to mention quickly john lee theresa cao, christine-melissa white house debra newman evidently joel-. as public employees in the clerk's office of public boswell for a moment to watch this quick presentation and i want to just say your the individuals truly responsible for the success of an apartment and i express my sincere gratitude to all of you and two other key members in the leadership team of the clerk's office. now to the business. in february, the committee approved the proposed budget as a result of provide a very brief high-level summary and focus mostly on the few changes from that review today. i will state at the outset were in agreement with a budget analyst recommendations. this budget was developed as part of core mandates and omission of our office. a lot has happened behind the scenes to provide operational support to connect our data to the public and to provide administrative support to the board. our ethics requires us to take a magic seriously to be successful at bringing the public into the process by providing open and equitable access to our

review that opponents budget to mention quickly john lee theresa cao, christine-melissa white house debra newman evidently joel-. as public employees in the clerk's office of public boswell for a moment to watch this quick presentation and i want to just say your the individuals truly responsible for the success of an apartment and i express my sincere gratitude to all of you and two other key members in the leadership team of the clerk's office. now to the business. in february, the committee approved the proposed budget as a result of provide a very brief high-level summary and focus mostly on the few changes from that review today. i will state at the outset were in agreement with a budget analyst recommendations. this budget was developed as part of core mandates and omission of our office. a lot has happened behind the scenes to provide operational support to connect our data to the public and to provide administrative support to the board. our ethics requires us to take a magic seriously to be successful at bringing the public into the process by providing open and equitable access to our