eh, now i won’t talk about what deckard meant when he said this phrase and he said it to her exactly’s more difficult, as far as i remember, of the philosophical concept, but that’s not the point. and you say, uh that they say god has already thought of everything, and we are all. we simply accept it. it's one of the most complex theological hmm theological contradictions. between on the one hand all that we are god is almighty and moreover, he is all leading not only in relation to the past in the present. well, the future.

eh, now i will not talk about what deckard had in mind when he said this phrase and said where he didtly so there it is more difficult, as far as i remember the philosophical concept, but that's not the point. and you say, uh, what do they say god already thought of everything, and we are everything. we simply accept it. it 's one of the most complex theological hmm theological contradictions. between on one side. we are all god almighty and moreover, he is the leader of everything, not only in relation to the past in the present. well, the future is on the one hand, as it were, and we want to say, well, since he knows everything what is happening in the future. it means that everything is predetermined in the future, but on the other hand, god gives people absolute freedom. the lord knows even from our free elections, which are not mini free from this. becomes. we still do, a certain one is free. elections. we decide to think. and therefore, say that the lord predestined everything. uh, that's, well, not quite not quite right. as for the name of my channel, it refers not to some teac

eh, now i will not talk about what deckard meant when he said this phrase and whether he said it exactly like that there more complex, as far as i remember the philosophical concept, but the essence is this, and you say, and what do you say god i've already thought of everything, and we're done. it's simple accept. it's one of the most difficult such theological hmm theological contradictions between on the one hand. we are all god almighty and moreover, he is the leader of everything, not only in relation to the past in the present. well, the future is on the one hand, as it were, and we want to say, well, since he knows everything what is happening in the future. it means that everything is predetermined in the future, but on the other hand, god gives people absolute freedom. the lord knows even from our free elections, which do not become free from this mini. we don't care do certain free choices. we decide to think. and therefore to say that the lord predetermined everything. uh, that's, well, not quite not quite right. as for the name of my channel, it does not refer to some teachin

even after the deckard of having mail polling company i would say to the team that's the data.hen you are up every two paragraphs and ask yourself so what? what does it mean? how do we communicate to people? what are they telling us? okay be a great example i saw early on 97 i believe it was this ridiculous polling question that asked which of the fine would you vote for president, al gore or george w. bush? no, the summer of 1997 is closer to the 1996 election than the 2000 election, where you askinge people this can howdy out the candidates are going toe be? the answer to number 48% and 47%. and of course everybody goes on to been to so my got it's tighter than a tick gore and bush are both under 50% at the one point race you to have that company do know 48 minus 47 is 1% per look at totally different said come on, here till may 1987 or 1998 only fibrous and the country's undecided question at 40 plus 47 equals 95.al t i have 5% to gore both shows were undecided level of the rest of us. i learned to respect and people say i do not know, i am not sure, i need to know more info

[applause] it is my honor to introduce our next speaker the secretary of the deckard -- the democratictee, and a proud wisconsinite, given up for james -- >> good afternoon, milwaukee. november's elections are so important. it is about a choice. do we keep doing a better america, or do we allow extremists to take our nation backwards? i am fort building eight -- i am for building a better nation for everyone and that is why we need to elect mandela barnes as u.s. senator. we need to give tammy baldwin a real partner in washington. we absolutely must reelect governor tony e verse -- tony e vers. he is the last line of defense to protect our democracy, and keep our democracy alive. we must elect democrats up and down the ballot. the contrast between our candidates and the far right ultra-maga agenda couldn't be more clear. from their plans to cut social security to theirs and on reproductive rights. but voters are on our side. they want to see us work for them. that's exactly what people like tony devers, president biden, and mandela barnes are doing to build a better wisconsin and a bet

front, by the way, it fits into the universe that alexander kazakov painted for us, uh, based on our deckardgain the discussion that is going on. uh, now about the need for some kind of ideological unity, which, as they represent, and some categorically, a reject. any criticism of the actions of the state and the army. there are, of course, nuances. sorry again, we will now remember about it, and here, but we must express ourselves in such a way as not to fall under the action. there are articles of criminal distribution of fakes, for example, and our armed forces and so on and so on, but uh nobody cancels our criticism. nobody censors us. martial law has not been introduced, which means that people have. the right to express their thoughts ah, good or bad on the one hand. well, on the other hand, not everyone likes to quote sergei bodrov again that during the war nothing bad can be said about their own, then , when everything is over, then we will criticize, then we will figure it out. not yet. for now, that's all at this stage, that is, either we allow everything or how others do it, but t