decosta. >> supervisors, if you review this agenda item, you will see that that this property at 1 time was looked upon by federal government to be used. and this has been mentioned and then it was -- for a long time nobody knew really to whom this property belonged. so now we have uc, the regents, who are not very favorable in california, especially in san francisco. but they are very powerful. the regents are very powerful, and they are very corrupt. and most people will not say this because they don't have the ability to run a rap sheet on this corrupt regents, but i do. so now we have somebody saying that they want to build so many units for the lgbt community, and by throwing that curveball, they want us to be very compassionate and say let's go ahead with this about 400-unit building. well, if the regents want to show some good faith, they can build many of these units at mission bay. but having said that, you see the carpenters union and later on there will be some others telling you that you know such things are fast-tracked and in fast-tracking it, we don't have a real environm

next speaker, there decosta. >> supervisors, this morning i sent you all an email and in that email is a link about hud. how the housing and urban development a long time ago, before this silly ordinance that you are all proposing, offered anyone who lives in public housing the right to own their own units. so monies were set aside for the tenants to buy their units. those units were not built by the city. they were not built by the state. they were built by the department of defense. and hud made a great mistake by transferring it to the san francisco housing authority, the most despicable agency in the whole nation. we have crimes being committed like this. a lady and her family bolted and then the unit set on fire. and i can give you a hundred more incidents where people leave, where sewage runs all over the place, where the elderly are put in transit from rehab units. the rehab units are demolished, so that john stewart company can build whatever and our elderly are put in other homes where asbestos fly all over the place and in months they die and you think it's a joke and come up

espinola jackson, francisco decosta, leah otis martin from huntersview. [ reading speakers' names ]. >> i will let the tenants speak. so i will speak after them. >> people can come forward. thank you. >> hello there. my name is leo martin, i'm a tenant at huntersview. let me see, first of all, if you don't mind we would like to have the commission's meeting held in city hall for the people that can't make it. it could be televised and they would watch it some day later or whatever, because a lot of people can't get out and a lot of people need to know what is going on over here when they had the commission meetings. second of all, i don't think the kids that are on their parents lease should have as much power as these people give them because once they become 18 you can't just take them off your lease, but you are still liable for your kid if your kid does something wrong and gets evicted, the whole house gets evicted because of the bad beaver behavior of the kid and that needs to be changed. any time that the parents let the kids talk to them anyway they want and that is a problem.

else who would like to speak, please line up because we're going to close public comment pled guilty decosta. >> chair, i put in my card. there are two phases to this project. there is phase 1 and phase 2. phase 1 is the 3rd street light rail, which begins at 4th and king. and ends in the middle of nowhere visitation valley. now if you do the estimate of phase 1, it costs >> we have have to go back and get secondly approvals or follow-ups. several months ago, savemuni.com was made and myself as a professional architect and i think citizens of the city would air on the side of the and at one time there was language in both the general plan and charter that was somewhat less stringent. as a result there was a succession of harsher and stricter language in the plan over the decades until 1996 when it was much more stronger language was placed into the charter which said that construction on union square required two-thirds of the vote of the board of supervisors, which the mta is proceeding with here today in this resolution. but also, 4.1 13 subsection of the charter says any construction on a