terminal defense systems. need a much more robust capability in terms of air and missile defense. now procuring.re how you go about doing that -- that is a complex decision-making process. look at a lotke a of technical aspects before you make decisions there. forces to acing our 60-40 split, pacific versus atlantic. that will not solve the china problem. i recognize right now that the chinese economy is probably in a lot weaker position than we give them credit for a few years ago. even so, it does not seem to impacted very much chinese military improvements and expansion. until it does, we have a very serious threat out there that we are not adequately dealing with. add that we are touching on cooperating with our allies and expanding missile defense with south korea and japan. we are already doing a lot of great work with both of those countries, particularly japan. china has pushed back. at the united states has tried to play radar, deployed the battery that the united states wants and needs in south korea

also, i am not a defense expert. i am an economist and i hope to be able to bring that perspective to help us understand military difs in -- defense in the u.s. economy. you cited before a whole bunch of numbers, total spending. obviously those numbers are important for the amount of resources that are being used in the national defense, but i guess i want to start by saying those figures are not measured the capabilities and potentialities. well, the united states spends more than the rest of our potential competitors combined, therefore we are military secured. there's a mistake. we have different goals and needs. in particular, there's exchange rates. if i'm comparing the living standards of the united states and china, i don't want to look simply at exchange rate adjusted gdp for person. i want to take into account that labor is much cheaper in china, therefore her cuts -- haircuts are much cheaper. it needs to be taken into account, the differences in costs. the things that applies to military and the comparison

as you probably know, some of you, defense is now representing the defense sector, is representing a little less than 3.5% of our gdp. just under 3.5%, that's a downward slope from about 4.5% at the very end of the bush years, early obama years when the washer at the peak peak and are headed downwards now to perhaps 3% of gross domestic product at the very end of the obama presidency. projections would have it to slide further after although who knows what the world will bring, but the next president and congress will bring. by historical standards this is a modest burden on the u.s. economy. certainly compared to anything in the world war ii our post-world war ii era. in the clinton years we're also around 3% in the reagan years we been up close to 6% of gdp, defense as a function of overall national economic activity. in much of the '50s and '60s the figure was often 8%-10%. defense spending is to very big. it's still almost $600 billion per year. so about 15% of the federal budget, much reduced from earlier periods us to a large fraction of the overall budget to be clear and to be

defense public hearing -- defense, policy. we concerted these broader strategic consequences of the agreement. what is already a bad deal only looks that much worse. to this committee perhaps the most concern about the agreement itself pertains to the verification and monitoring mechanisms, as has been verbally recorded,-- there will be no americans allowed on the ground. the details of how these monitoring activities will occur in certain important instances are contained in a separate agreement between the ieaa and iran which the u.s. and congress have not seen. furthermore, the mechanism to resolve these long-standing concerns about the possible military dimensions of iran's nuclear program is contained in another side agreement between iran. which the u.s. government and the congress have also not seen. to be sure, much is known about iran's past weaponization activities but we can never know what we do not know, which is why the director of the ieaaea depends on resolution of the pod issue. how that will occur we do not k

what role does the secretary of defense play? what this book shows better than anything else i have read is that secretary of defense in laird's case played a major role not simply as a policy adviser to the president, but as a policy leader for congress. the role that laird played in educating the congress, in informing the congress, in making the congress part of the policy process. this is something the senator referred to. i think it was much more than fairfax, obviously. this book brings that out quite forthrightly. laird spent time not simply with congress, but also time managing the military bureaucracy, which by this point had become the largest bureaucracy in the united states and the world with his partner, deputy secretary of defense david packard. together, they set a model for a public informant -- public information and policy making in line with other members of congress. if i might say so, it appears to me reading this volume that often they were replacing the reporting role that the national security council or t

their missions are defensive. if you look carefully at the provisions of the plan, already, march, 1942, you have a limited offensive operations inserted into it. without getting into detail, the document talks about strict defense in the east, vladivostok. defense on the west, mongolia and outer mongolia. in the north,ions primarily to guarantee the viability of the trans-siberian railroad. to which they require their 15th army based north of the river to attack southward in sees the gionsese fortified re 60-80 kilometers deep to security lines. lines.re the they require the same thing in northwestern manchuria. the aim, to secure the tenuous railroad line. order, i haveis read 1000 soviet orders, you get the distinct impression they are thinking ahead, even in march, 1942. someone in the general staff if not stolen is saying, look, maybe we can put together the shell of an overall plan. later, we can put the forces into the proper place. 1943-1945. we used to talk about the shift from defense to offense occurrin

you understand the difference between perimeter or crossed the -- crust defense and defense in depth? the americans are engaged. the british have second thoughts about the americans bombing in daylight, and try to convince roosevelt and churchill to make the americans shift from daytime bombing to nighttime bombing, join the british campaign. a major conference in casablanca, two major decisions made. one decision has a direct impact on the history of the united states air force. ira, a texan insurer drove the -- in charge of the eighth bomber command, convinces churchill it is important to bomb the germans around the clock. give them no respite. and he agrees. anybody know what the second thing to come out of the casablanca conference was that is important? >> the decision to execute operation overlord? col. wells: overlord but also the demand of unconditional surrender on the part of the germans. unconditional surrender on the part of the germans. so the americans are ready to go deep into germany with long-range strategic daylight bombardment against targets in the industrial west.

, ballistic missile defenses military defenses and economic warfare defenses regardless of our assessment who's right with respect to the regional dispute. this is the canary in this coal mine. as terrorism came to our shores economic problems will come to our shores and we have to think of changes to create economic defensive shields. >> that's great. the only thing i would take issue with is economic warfare has reached our shores. i think they would agree they really do delve down if we're going to be serious about that let's be serious. what does that mean in terms of organizational changes that may be necessary in the u.s. government. but our next two speakers focus on where really the rubber meets the road in terms of the technologyies that are going to be needed, how we think about that. ultimate ultimately, you know, you will have to be able to back up our words of deterrence with our technology technologies. the first speaker is dr. michael shed a program manager in the information office at darpa for those who may not know is the defense advanced research project agency. his foc

defense secretary says he has a lot to learn from silicon valley. he's trying to build a stronger relationship with the tech community. emily chang sat down with him. emily joins us from mountain view, california. emily, tell us all about the event. mily: the u.s. defense secretary is meeting with a number of different cyber security c.e.o.s. and the real thing that he is trying to accomplish here is to rebuild the relationship between the pentagon and silicon valley to recruit engineers who want to work for the government to change this perception that silicon valley leaders have, that they have to protect their users from the u.s. government given this is the post-snowden revelation era. he's scouting new technology. he talked about google and drones and things that facebook is working on. this is a secretary that only has 16 months left in this administration. why should these leaders commit to him now? what will be tangible proof that his efforts are working? take a listen. >> we'll be making partnerships and direct investments as we have for de

as is the place where cyber defense is defined. we need to do that in partnership with silicon valley. emily: mark zuckerberg called u.s. surveillance a threat to the internet. what do you want from a mark zuckerberg, what do you want from tim cook? sec. carter: i am with them a 100%. we are trying to find a solution that will allow people to make use of this technology in a way that is good for humankind and at the same time we do need to protect ourselves against terrorists, child pornographers, criminal networks, drug runners. on and on. there has to be a certain amount of public order as well as private freedom. i don't think we can strike that balance in washington, we can only do so by talking to the greatest leaders and minds in this field. emily: you're working on the 2017 budget, the last budget you will have a big impact on. what needs more money? what needs less money? should there be a site -- should there be a cyber security arm of the military? sec. carter: it needs more money. even in an era where there is a lot of b

he had probably 8 or 9 defensive men to worry about. now he's got 53 to worry about, offense to worry good, the defense to worry about, the owner to worry about, the media to meet with. before he was with his guys in the trenches, doing his thing. now he's got a lot bigger role. >> i can't wait to see what he does with that spotlight. ahead with all the departures on defense could a local guy steal a roster spot? former cal star did desmond bishop returns to his roots. ,,, ,,, the buttery jack was a huge success. people went crazy for a burger with melted garlic herb butter. now, here's the sequel... ...with portobello mushrooms. boom. hang on, i don't want anyone to trip... ok. oh yeah. that's jack's new portobello mushroom buttery jack, the sequel to the classic and bacon & swiss, topped with the same melted garlic herb butter, plus portobello mushrooms and grilled onions. spoiler alert: it's awesome. ♪ ♪ hush my darling... ♪ don't fear my darling... ♪ the lion sleeps tonight. [snoring.] ♪ hush my darling... [snoring.] ♪ don't fear my

just get started. >> how important is run defense in terms of setting tone for rest of defense. >> it'smportant you want to make offense one dimensional. that's what we do as a defense we try to get them to throw the ball and i think with us now that we have back end the way we want with us doing getting our run defense better this year, i mean, the sky is limit on where we go as defense you. >> get them to know a certain situation and you make things happen. let's get you highlight of the game today. for that we send you to jeff skversky in our sports center, jeff. >> hey, guys, of course today no sam brad for or demarco murray. no problems for philadelphia eagles. plenty to work on before the monday night opener in atlanta. eagles look sharp in preseason opener against indianapolis colts. let's go to highlights. of course, murray. bradford rjs both on sidelines today and they are expected to play next saturday against the ravens. presidential mark sanchez he makes start for the eagles. plays two series. not very accurate. two of seven for 5 yards here in the first over throes, would h

no right of self-defense. and in the same way there is a duty to retreat, there is no right of self-defense. and i would like to begin with juan because you advise banks on this. and when you listen to the lawyers and the lawyers seek to work with you on this, do they feel the bank has a right to defend itself when it comes under attack by either criminals or nation states. >> i think part of this is how you define defense. because if you define defense passively and say of course we have the right to defend and we have the right to great layers and redundancy and a lot of the criticism is they haven't done those and the cyberine -- hygiene. and there is a lot of reticence of getting involved too actively. there are a lot of companies that don't want the idea of hack-back or to be active defenders of systems. they want the government to do it. they want more information to do it themselves. so in that sense if you define defense broadly, yes, they do. do they have an active defense role to play at this point a

ballistic missile defenses military defenses and economic warfare defenses regardless of our assessment of who is right with respect to a regional dispute. this is the canary in the coal mine. as terrorism once came to our shores, economic warfare will one day come to our shores. we have to start thinking through the kinds of methodologies, doctrines and institutional changes to create that economic defensive shield. >> that's great. the only thing i would take issue with is economic warfare has reached our shores and i think mark and andy would agree. and in their chapter, they really do kind of delve down into, look, all right, if we're going to be serious about this then let's be serious. what does that mean in terms of organizational changes that may be necessary in the u.s. government. but our next two speakers focus on where really the rubber meets the road in terms of the technologies that are going to be needed. how we think about that. because ultimately, you know, we're going to have to be able to back up our words of deterrence with our technologies. and the first speaker is

defense contractors, u.s. intellectual property, our electric grid, our health care system, the most sensitive parts of her government where we seeing something new? there's always been economic warfare where one side in the conflict is after the economy of another to affect and weaken its overall strength. the rise of the global electronically networked economy and a growing cross-border integration and interdependence of its constituent parts have produced sizable opportunities for various factors did develop new methods and factors of economic warfare both state and nonstate actors increasingly can contemplate new possibilities for using pernicious cyberpenetration of critical economic assets and systems or to cause harm to wake target state security capabilities. so we labeled this new class of security threat cyber-enabled economic warfare. the attempt at achieving legal and security goals through cyber enabled economic aggression. and in this type of warfare the united states, is particularly for the pok

all of this relates clearly to some big themes in defense, budgeting, defense strategy, to what extent is technology changing so fast that we need to emphasize pursuit of a revolution of military affairs perhaps even more than we have been. to what extent do we need to get on top of a new wave of innovation and make sure our adversaries don't do it first. or what extent is this an ongoing evolutionary process and a lot of exciting important things are happening but we don't need to get overly excited or disruptive about our approach to defense resource allocation. and the broadest of all senses it relates to the sequestration of the defense budget and what's going to happen to some of the innovations we're trying to facilitate or promote if indeed, when congress returns in a few weeks it can't figure out some way to stave off the looming budgetary showdown with the president and the possibility of sequester or even shutdown, which these things are perhaps, in a cosmic sense, they don't look all that horrible to the average observer because it typically involves 5%, 7%, 8% of the defens

defense than it is the offense. with such a transition for this defense, they're all different across the board. it's going to be a filling out period. you like to see them have more pass rush, get to the quarterback some more. hopefully over the next couple of weeks they can develop that continuity across the board. >> you say pass rush minus alton and justin smith, that might be asking an awful lot. one guy will be great to see. he might be on the field tonight is bowman. bowman did not play in houston. he will tonight against dallas. wednesday he practiced without the brace on that surgically repaired knee. before the injury, bowman was one of the best middle line backers in the league with 120 tackles, two interceptions, and four forced fumbles. he told me his career might have been in jeopardy. >> just thinking about in i was going to be able to play this game again, knowing i felt my whole knee go out the right side of my leg. me not having an injury like that really kind of puts second thoughts in your head a

as president, i will make defense a priority. it is not about spending more, it is about spending it on the right things. developing research and technology that we will need to defeat china's anti-access capability. they have developed a $4 million rocket that can destroy an aircraft carrier. we have to have countermeasures to defeat that. we have to defend our space assets from attack. we have to defeat our critical infrastructure from cyberattack. the way i described to people, whoever the commander-in-chief is 10 years from now, when they face a threat and military officials come to them with options, what those options will be our decided right now by what we are developing. if we do not develop cutting-edge technology that allows us to keep our promise to our men and women in uniform that they will always be the best trained, best equipped, and best informed fighting force in the ground and air, -- if we don't invest, we will not be able to keep that promise. >> we can train roughly three or four national guardsmen for ever

he is their guy on defense, he's the heart and soul of that defense. he's the leader of that defense. when he's on the field, everybody around him plays a step faster or just in tune that much more. and i think you can't emphasize the impact he's going to have on this defense. missing him last year, missing, you know, some key guys was huge for the defense, not being the same caliber. i know they have a bunch of guys that are retired or suspended or, you know, sent packing. but at the end of the day, he is the best defensive player, having him back is a huge impact for this team. >> when the observation was made, a little bit, a couple times when he had to get up last week. so the question is, his knee may look great in the first quarter, how is his knee going to hold up in the fourth quarter? >> having a little bit of, i guess, knee surgeries, you know, having a little experience with how many knee surgeries i've had. i've had nine of them in my career and continue to play after the fact. he's had 19 months to get back from his knee surgery. is he goi

the department of defense is not alone that so what is that conversion process?s it worth and who owns that? the department or someone else and how does that fit together? then with the cybersecurity aspect. if you have that data out there it is critical parts to keep pieces of machinery machinery, how do you secure that? in a very quick nutshell of what we're doing and what we're looking at how to think through the application of the technology whether or not it is disruptive or effective. >> a quick follow-up question. thank you for that background to original equipment manufacturer so we will try to connect some of the very innovative technology areas to a the conversation. how much of the dod budget could be lined up? and just to be clearer the budget is $100 billion per year and to those that have purchases of hardware is another 30 billion so out of that is is so revolutionary to see tens of billions of dollars of acquisition produced over the next few years? >> i will not venture to guess a number i am not comfortable to do that yet but it would be in a mo

talking about defense technology. and i'm pleased to have a number of members of our national security industrial based working group, from a number of america's greatest companies thinking about technology innovation across defense and nondefense sectors, and i'll introduce the panelists in just a moment. they represent companies that have been part of our group in an important way for a number of years, in some cases more recent recently in others, but a lot of expertise on several topics. i'm going to say a brief word of introduction about the panelists and the topic. let me do that first. what we're trying to do is look at a few specific areas of technology and innovation. a lot of you have heard with so-called 3d printing or additive manufacturing. we're also going to talk about propungz technologies which in some ways are you know, a long standing interest of the u.s. military, and sort of a traditional and in some ways old fashioned area of technology, yet one of very rapid and ongoing innovation. very central

defense has to get much more sophisticated. we as an industry are still in the process of catching up to that. emily: marc andreessen, cofounder of andreessen horowitz. bloomberg lp is the parent tv and is bloomberg an investor in andreessen horowitz. there is a bubble in the private sector. and we have a special focus on virtual reality innovators. you're looking at one company transporting you -- we are looking at one company transporting you to a virtual world. ♪ emily: and now to the cloud. another strong quarter as it pushes further into europe. aneeldown with ceo bushri -- bhusri. aneel: the marketplace for financials is about twice the size of the hr market. you are excited about the prospects. emily: your ceo said you could be profitable. why focus on growth in this current climate? aneel: our business is a once in a decade transition. we went from the shift in the 1990's, the growth in personal software -- we are in that shift again. it's basically a land grab for market share. emily: let's talk about a few competitors

where does nature and natural defenses fit into the design here? >> certainly the coastal environments can provide a buffer against storm surge and it's very critical for the long term sustainability for this constructed system. >> about 4 hours north in vicksburg mississippi, the army corp of engineers scientists are studying the exact impact coastal vegetation has on storm surge. jane mckee smith is a civil engineer. she's been studying the louisiana coastline since katrina. >> there's a lot of effort ongoing now to restore wetlands because that will help to dissipate not only the waves but it will also attenuate the surge but if we're going to include that into our designs we have to know how much. >> now as the waves are coming in explain to me what's happening? >> what we're seeing in this case is the waves coming in we see it traveling through...and it travels through the vegetation it's mobile ...so what we want to show is not only how the waves change as they go through but we want to have the dissipation as a function of distance, the heig

so his defense team reached out to a new potential advocate.t deborah saunders. >> as a supporter of the death penalty, i wouldn't want to see an innocent man executed, would i? so if there's a hint that somebody might not be guilty, i want to write about it. my editorial board at the san francisco chronicle wrote an editorial saying, gee, maybe kevin cooper is an innocent man. the defense attorneys laid out this case about how this innocent man had been unjustly convicted. >> for years they'd been unsuccessful in dna testing which could exonerate cooper. >> he kept saying, i'm not guilty, do the testing. if it shows i'm guilty, you can execute me. i walked out of there thinking, whoa, they've really made a case i've got to think about. >> san bernardino's current district attorney michael ramos was handling cooper's appeals. >> we felt that the ongoing request by defense counsel in this case was just another delay tactic. there was no evidence at all that anybody but kevin cooper committed these horrendous murders, none. >> but in the early 20

defense contractors, u.s. intellectual property, our electric grid, our health care system, the most sensitive parts of our government. were we seeing something new? again, there's always been economic warfare. where one side in a conflict goes after the economy of another to affect and weaken its overall strength. but the rise of the global electronically networked economy, and the growing cross-border integration and interdependence of its constituent parts has produced sizeable opportunities for various actors to develop new methods, and strategies of economic warfare. both state and nonstate actors increasingly can contemplate new possibilities for using pernicious cyber penetration of critical economic assets, and systems, in order to cause harm to a target state security capabilities. so we have this new class of security threats. cyber enabled economic warfare. the attempt at achieving political and security goals through cyber enabled economic aggression. and in this type of warfare, the united states

the defense is basically saying, look at these messages. are you really going to convict beyond a reasonable doubt a guy who was exchanging messages like this with her? after the fact? >> reporter: labrie's attorney claims the girl made up the rape charge to protect herself when the high school rumors started. >> she had to make the decision whether it would be her reputation that was going to go into the toilet or owen's. and she took the easier choice. >> reporter: labrie faces nine criminal counts, three of them felony sexual assault charges, each carrying up to 20 years in prison. >> there are a lot of charges here. this is not a simple case. and you could end up with a real divide on that jury. >> reporter: in closing arguments today labrie's defense attorney placed blame on the faculty of the elite new hampshire school for turning a blind eye to the senior salute. >> the idea that you would wink at a tradition that senior salute represents is shocking. it damages children. and in this case, it damaged both [ muted ] and owen. >> this

this is the place were the cutting edge of cyber defenses defined. need to do that in partnership with silicon valley. zuckerberg called internet surveillance a threat. what do you want from them? we're trying to allow people to make use of this technology in a way that is good for humankind and at the same time we do need to protect ourselves childt terrorists, pornographers, criminal networks, drug runners. there has to be a certain amount of public order as well as private freedom. we can only strike the balance i talking to the greatest leaders and minds. emily: what needs more money, should there be a cyber security arm of the military? even in an era where there is a lot of budget turmoil. we need to invest more and cyber. is cybery thing much thets is not so money, it's the people. it is finding good people that is challenging for us as we try to do cyber demands. hiring those people, deciding what makes of uniform people, government people, industry people we should have, that is more challenging than the dollars. emily: they will focus on ho

we'll do some digging on the defense's latest claims just ahead.you're a small business expert from at&t? yeah, give me a problem and i've got the solution. well, we have 30 years of customer records. our cloud can keep them safe and accessible anywhere. my drivers don't have time to fill out forms. tablets. keep them all digital. we're looking to double our deliveries. our fleet apps will find the fastest route. oh, and your boysenberyy apple scones smell about done. ahh, you're good. i like to bake. with at&t get up to $400 dollars in total savings on tools to manage your business. have a sunset mode. and an early morning mode. and a partly sunny mode. and an outside... to clear inside mode. transitions® signature adaptive lenses ...are more responsive than ever. so why settle for a lens with just one mode? experience life well lit®. upgrade your lenses to transitions® signature. get up to ninety dollars back when you combine crizal, varilux and transitions... and buy a second pair with xperio uv polarized sun lenses. visit transitions.com to lea

the photo was taken in self-defense. it was her cry for help. >> i wasn't posing. was doing what he wanted me to do. i wasn't assaulted that night because i did that. >> reporter: did you ever have consensual sex with him? >> never. >> reporter: the proof, she offered? one text. the smoking gun, she claimed. one out of, well, actually thousands of apparently loving and frankly explicit texes. this one, though, is so explicit we can't show you the whole text but it includes a line that suggests sex. reading in part, never put you through that again, baby girl. and that, said abby, is why she asked the detective what her definition of sex was. to abby it wasn't sex, it was sexual assault. >> he didn't look like a 15-year-old boy. he didn't act like a 15-year-old boy. he was a monster. >> reporter: in our interview, abby simon had just offered a stunning defense to a charge of having sex with a boy. turned herself from perpetrator to victim. the question was would it hold up in court? >>> coming up -- abby simon's telling text messages to her friends. >> i don't care

the secretary of defense awarded department of defense medal to mrs. linda m. -- odierno.h august of gift fifth. over the course of nearly four decades, mrs. odierno relently served as caring advocate for the military community at large, our servicemembers around their families. as an ambassador for department of the defense and department of the army she hosted senior military and civilian leaders and selfless worked toward improving military communities and quality of life programs for our men and women in uniform. mrs. odierno served volunteer within numerous support organizations and veteran support groups to insure they were aware how to best support our military families. she enthusiastically volunteered her time and support to military and community organizations which benefited countless military families along the way. whether helping servicemembers and their families cope through deployments to iraq and afghanistan or meeting with and comforting wounded warriors and their families, mrs. odierno was always there to aid and assist with understanding and caring supp

you know, defense? sure, defense is going to have to be on the table. despite the current climate there's no doubt there's a great deal of waste in the defense budget. we pick up the defense spending for a lot of other countries that spend a lot less on defense because we'll do it for them. there's a reason why we spend about 4% of gdp on defense. europe is one, 1.5 maybe 2% and maybe some of the big countries like britain nowhere near what we spend and that's because we're essentially being their army for them. so we have to cut there as well. but the big money is in entitlement programs. the fact is that we spend be about 47% on just three programs alone, medicare medicaid and social security. you can't really do much of anything unless you're willing to take on those three programs. >> host: we're going to talk about those programs in detail. first, would you raise any taxes? would you look at fixing this program entirely on the spending side, or are there taxes you'd be willing to raise? >> guest: well, i think i'd want to bring through spending fir

defense secretary ash carter is taking a conservative approach. years after president barack obama signed an executive order to close guantanamo within a year, a number of detainees has been cut from 240 to 116, and half have been cleared for release. most not facing charges. >> the pentagon says because they sent teams to looks at fort levon worth, and the naval brig. doesn't mean that's where the prisoners would go. one of things they are doing is figure out how much it costs to retrofit a prison. they need places for military commissions to take place for the support staff, and also looking at federal prisons that are not in the military. any time they identify a location is immediately a position to bring prisoners to the united states >>> that's jamie mcintyre. to look at guantanamo we are joined by jonathan hanson, author of "guantanamo, an american history", and senior lecturer at harvard university. the united states operates military facilities across the globe, including in many places of ambiguous standing. as many places in the western

. >> reporter: the defense attorneys tried to swat it all down. harris himself was adamant, he had nothing to do with his wife's disappearance. >> it's one thing to say, look, i'm innocent. i didn't do this. it's another thing to have so many people accusing you, pointing the finger at you. look, i'm not guilty. i didn't do this. i didn't commit this crime. >> reporter: there was no body, no murder weapon, and the defense said the forensics were unconvincing at best. but the jurors weren't having it. it was june 2007. they came back guilty. cal harris broke down and sobbed. >> because i knew i was going to not see my kids. i knew i wasn't going home that night, you know. i knew how they were going to be. it just was overwhelming. >> reporter: but in the eyes of michele's family, it was finally justice. and then? then an extraordinary thing happened. >> my first reaction was, come on. the judge is not going to accept this guy's claim. >> a new witness with an amazing story. and it turned the harris case on its head. >>> coming up -- >> as i was goi

officer randall kerik says he fired that gun in self-defense.nearly two years ago is another entry in a pattern of violent run ins between white cops and black victims across the country. jonathan pharrell was 24 years old. his attorney said he was the victim of unnecessary force. cnn's alina machado is covering the trial and we'll get the perspective of former judge alexer if rare as well. alina, wrap up for me. since we here in the closing arguments, where does this case stand? >> ashleigh, the jury spent the morning listening to closing arguments. it started with the prosecutors telling the jury that officer randall kerik made bad choices that night. choices that led to the use of excessive force and that ended jonathan farrell's life. they remind it had jury that kerik shut down his camera before his encounter with farrell and the only video they have came from one of the other responding officers. listen to this. >> thankfully, officer neal had his d.m.v.r. on. because if he hadn'ted that d.m.r.r. on, ladies and gentlemen, we wouldn't know

so with the department of defense at the policy level what are the implications? it is not just making sure to print the actual parts or to have material that is available. . . 2020. we all know the procurement budget ends today and it is about a hundred billion dollars a year then parts of the operation that are involved purchases of hardware. we are talking about roughly a 30 billion-dollar enterprise. we are going to start to see tens of billions of dollars of acquisition produced throughout the impact in the next few years or is it a more modest number? >> i am not comfortable with mentioning a number quite yet. the most specific technology would be in a modest way. they apply all of the parts to all of the services. some of those are high in span and some of them are low in span. you made to may need to replace them every 15 years. there is a need for use for added manufacturing but were trying to figure out where it would be most effectively applied. it can be produced with more manufacturing and will have the same functionality they had. is that appropriate

>> no. >> reporter: the defense also raises the mystery of sammy the dog. remember the notoriously noisy dog not heard barking when renee called the police? >> she had just went silent, and i was afraid that the person had shot her, too, that i was going to go in there and she was going to be dead, too. >> reporter: but sammy was far from dead when police arrived at the scene. >> going up the stairs, we encountered a dog. >> and what was the dog doing? >> it was barking and growling at us. >> and what did you guys do with the dog? >> i believe we had somebody mace the dog so that we could actually get to the top of the stairs. >> reporter: so, why was sammy quiet during the murders? >> the only reasonable explanation is renee did something with the dog, put the dog in her room. >> reporter: but prosecutors say that's nonsense and charge the defense is simply trying to divert the jury's focus from the defendant, ron santiago, and that damning shell casing. you must think that someone planted it. that's the only other way. either you had that shell casing...