on the defensive side we have to.eral barrett, how do you think about leveraging both offensive and defensive teams to take a more proactive approach to cybersecurity? how do they communicate, how do you bring them together, when do you keep them separate? >> they need to specialize and really build proficiency in what they're doing. so we have to be deliberate about -- i'd love to be able to circulate, especially the military members between offensively and defensive assignments. that's not possible. we do have some deliberate talent management where we will purposely move people from one side of the other to enhance that. the second thing we'll do is, we'll actually run exercises where the offensive teams perform up for opposing force functions against the defensive teams. that really sharpens both of their skills and brings them to an understanding of where they overlap in terms of, i want to be stealthy when i'm on an incident response and i want to be stealthy when i'm also attacking a network. guess what, we hav

defense engagement with asean. it's focused on practical cooperation and mutual respect, and that includes training the next generation of leaders and tackling emerging challenges and deepening maritime cooperation. i'm also pleased to announce the second asean u.s. maritime exercise for next year, which asean member states approved earlier today and i look forward to meeting with key allies and partners. now, i regret that the prc chose not to meet here. the prc's decision is a setback for the whole region. as i've said consistently, the right time to meet is any time. now, before i get to your questions, i have one more announcement. later today the white house will be announcing additional security assistance for ukraine worth up to $275 million to meet critical battlefield needs, and that will include munitions for rocket systems and artillery and anti-tank weapons. and with that, i'm glad to take your questions. iraq -- reporter thank you so : much for doing this. i hope you're ok with this question. aaro chie

wine to protect a defensive position. and potentially can slow an enemy's advance, they won't stop it. they are wonder, they will. uh, if, if, if used correctly it's covered by fire, which means every artillery or direct fire weapons that can engage targets that become entangled in the mind, builds that can be very effective in slowing an adversary and then helping inflict loss on them. they won't stop reports save it. ukraine is also used a british storm, a shadow cruise missile against targets in russia. and after the use of these us made attack comes, do we know how many of these weapons ukraine has and how many would be needed to make a significant difference to? well, we know that however many they have is not enough to make a significant difference. press reports, i've seen suggest that they have required on the order of 50 a tac them's, i don't have a number for a storm shadow, but i'm guessing is probably not a much larger. these are weapons that were designed to be used by the doesn't in an engagement. for exampl

the first is increased defense spending is now a necessity for the united states. we have a three region strategy and a one region military. we have been taking peace dividends since the mid 1990s, and we now have to reconstruct the strength that we need to be safe and prosperous. much better than president biden did. a second priority is rebuilding america's deterrence. military strength is part of that, but it's not all of that. we need to stop worrying so much what our adversaries might do and start acting in a way that our adversaries have to worry what we might do. and seeing some of the things that president trump did in his first term, the aggressiveness with which soleimani was assassinated, the targeting of russian mercenaries that were operating in syria had good effect in that regard. and the third thing, which you rightly pointed to, is the abraham accords, which did, you know, getting arab states in the middle east to acknowledge the degree to which they and israel had common interests in constraining iranian malevolence was i think one of the most imp

who regarding the defense of administer of defense, a, get them to be a during the for instance, and disputes are increased um that we sold that the a different demonstrations. i went ahead and the is there a, i guess the, the, the decision. and that again, we heard again, many of you was adults about the, the, the, the, the needs to has the, nothing new accountable. that's a, he is the one who is presenting it again and so on. so basically we got notice that in the a few past weeks and there was a kind of unity and as far as the, even the demonstrations, i guess nothing, me a whole degrees. and the, because the, the is what you'd be a engender of these are easiest, you need that it's time for the bottom of i live on, on. and that, that they are a jungle is succeeded in gaining a some legitimacy, the guard thing at the wood on the button on specifically, so after a, his decision regarding his minister. we so again, disputes we saw against the differences. so this sort of statement today is the reflection of the decision of the process within the government and as a way from the whole

the defense industrial base.at's over 1200 partnerships through our cybersecurity collaboration. the department is also asking u.s. cyber command to be able to grow partnerships in this area so that we can every day work with our industry teammates because this is a very unique domain. industry creates our domain. they're, of course, the partner that will have an absolutely great effect in the ability to defend u.s. interests and those of our allies. >> it's been two years since nsa awarded the hybrid compute capability. with the rapid advancement we're seeing in commercial technologies like gen a.i., quantum, how do you expect to harness these rapidly changing capabilities to stay ahead of our adversaries and how do you see those same technologies affecting our adversaries' trade craft? >> i think hybrid compute initiative is a really good example of what it will look like for our future, which is there are going to be some very unique technology things that will be bespoke within the intelligence community. but

we are in a unique position where how do we use defense to inform offense?e say based on my time at the national security agency, it takes a thief to catch a thief. how do we inculcate the offensive mindset in our defenders? what we have been doing is a little bit of a prisoner exchange between our offensive operators and are defensive operators where we actually have on mission with offensive folks working with defenders have actually caught nation malicious cyber actors because we have been doing this cross-pollination. our basic operators, it is important that they know their trade. as you move up to the senior and master level, it is a dit trade. let's look at my firewalls and boundary devices. you have to think about honey pot, tripwires. then you have to think about active pursuit. you have to have all the things available. then you create additional opportunities. eric: ok, so follow-up. what have we learned from cyber hunt forward activities to further develop our defensive strategies? maj. gen. mahlock: i think the operations are ones we have been d

p on defense. but there's still a lot to do. i mean, collective defense is still basically outsourced tomato, where dependencies on the united states are very acute and not sustainable in the long term. and we still don't have a common for an, a calling european foreign policy. we still have, you know, 27 independent national foreign policies. and that's a problem. i think how high is the risk of trump pulling out of nato. and depending on who you talk to, some people think he won't actually do it. and also in terms of trump, a band and in ukraine, i mean what, what sure is that prenatal and for ukraine, the re election of donald trump would be a much more difficult scenario as compared to the harris scenario. i personally find it also very unlikely. that's trump what to pull the united states out of nato, because in the end, he's not, he's not an isolationist, but the problem is with trump, that's his security policies are highly contradictory. i mean, he lanes the suppose the weakness of the by and administration of, for russi

but his time as secretary of defense in the memoir is coming after iran-contra and ears of the defense buildup and all that going into the department of defense to carry out his vision of peace through strength but he tried to reform the place and it came out in a way that i fully appreciate it his tenure as secretaryry of defense was 14 months. right, i think he was concerned about wasteful >> and the other thing when he reflected about his tenure as secretary of defense in one of this top accomplishments. , he was concerned with not cutting personnel and not affecting the morale of people in the military that he was aware thee infrastructure of the military could be breaking. i remember a story that he proposed this idea to the president and the president being an elected official said -- but it was successful and he came up with the idea of a commission to reduce basis in base infrastructure and he was given an up-or-down vote in congress and to be able to reduce >> overall without cutting costs. you write weinberger became the uptight person in foreign affairs probably sparring wit

our collective defense. our shared vision of a free insecure world adhering to shared and respected values. that is why we have gathered at the halifax international security for a bit i understand we may not all agree on everything, but as democracies, we share common values, and a united desire for safety and security and our prosperity. and we should make no mistake about this. -- individual national prosperity and global prosperity for the entire free world depends on our shared security. it's that collective commitment to defense that has led to a stronger nato and working in partnerships on common goals and challenges. and for partnerships for common goals and challenges. in the face of china's and russia's push into the arctic we have formed a northern defense dialogue with like-minded nations. we know as that area becomes more accessible to potential adversaries as the arctic melts and it could become the main point of transient -- transit, we know we need to work together for a peaceful and prospero

and defense production.ied nations have a fast wealth of experience there, pun intended, which could really be brought today. >> a follow up on that but mike first over deeply. >> first of all good morning and thank you for having me. i think michael and rob are onto something but it also think we're all suffering from a field of creativity. let me be very simple. i think we have to demolish and explode what it means to be part of the use defense industrial base. it doesn't need to be in conus in the continental united states. when we would think about we need to expand that did the westward where the threat is. we will not be able to shrink or vaporize the pacific ocean but we can diminish its influence on our ability to wage war to protect national security far to the west. what i mean is we talked about the rsf and that's great, an important part of all this. we need a people to work with partners to maintain, repair, overhaul forward. we didn't army pre-position stock. >> we done things like that, reposi

busy worthy of cooling, a defensive position, where natural defensive position brushing forces of also in the surprise offensive come very close to the settlement of any kind of a show of advancing almost 5 kilo mrs. within 24 hours, which in the context of this complex is a very serious advance. it again demonstrates the problem facing the ukrainian military and that is lack of my power. and lot of, i'm you vision to stop these a myriad of rushman offences along the front slides from the course. could agent uh decide if you look on that yet, and soon there is no tool, long ukrainians of russian defense to be ends up are always you aware that lines are especially vulnerable because when you create in supply lines, go from the west towards the east. if the russians managed to advance from the south and cut off costs of the thrills that will sell disaster for you credit and so supply large enough come back to efficiency and called back potential on the front line. meanwhile, the russian minister decides visits that causes of the northern bass with the se, the headquarters, the does it at

this trust cracked between me and the defense minister. and even so significant differences of emerge between the lot and myself and the management of the war. and these differences were accompanied by statements and actions that contradicted the decisions of the government and the decisions of the cabinet. so i made many attempts to bridge these gaps, but they kept getting wider. well, i'll tell you since the 2 had been defeated for some time, the warning gauze ultimately led to the demise with gallant choosing a p. m. of reading politics cloud. his decision making is also in question the continued presence of idea of treatments in gaza, saying quote, there's nothing more for them to do that. however, his replacement, the form of fall under miss israel tubbs as a different view. there's nothing left in jobs have to do. the major achievements have been achieved. i fear we are staying there just because there is a desire to stay there. we also have the quote i know together, we will complete the mission with god's help and bring victory to

this week, the business of defense. the united states is getting its money's worth for military spending. plus, turning the tables on cyber crime. we look at how law enforcement and private firms using technology to track down criminals and even get some money back. and what it takes to put a show on broadway. behind-the-scenes with a star producer and director as they launch their new show, "left on 10th." we start with a story about choice. the choice that most americans are making between two parties, two presidential candidates, two economic choices, and what that choice could mean for global wall street. beginning with the u.s. economy and the battle of inflation from bloomberg international economics and policy correspondent michael mckee. michael: voters face a pretty stark choice. one candidate wants to preserve the status quo, the other wants to completely remake the global economy. the u.s. came out of the pandemic in better shape than any other country. during joe biden's term in the white house, almost 7 mil

has been our longest standing defense partner. this agreement is a perfect new step toward a strengthened partnership. fiji has benefited greatly from the u.s.-fiji defense relationship through many programs and joint collaboration that has enabled us to protect our borders, and has assisted us in tackling transnational crimes. today indeed marks another milestone in the fiji-united states relationship, and we look forward to continued efforts to strengthen collaboration. i thank you very much. sec. austin: mr. prime minister, thanks for the warm welcome and the outstanding hospitality. i am very proud to be the first u.s. secretary of defense visit fiji. it is an honor to be here. our relationship is rooted in common values and our shared vision of freedom and openness. the indo pacific is our priority theater and strengthening our partnerships with fiji and other pacific island countries is vital to a free and open indo pacific. in our meeting today, we have discussed the security environment and fiji's role as a regional leader

defense was not cool and not the hottest thing. emily before launching anduril : he worked on virtual reality head sets in his parents' garage. by 18 he caught the worlds's -- by 18 he had a prototype that kick started the dr move vince and caught the worlds's attention including mark zuckerberg. zuckerberg bought the company for $2 billion. luckey was later ousted. palmer i think people think you : got kicked out of silicon valley. palmer that is because i made a : $9,000 political donation. it is for the person to be -- for a person and put tech to support the person who supported the president does this year. emily he means this guy. : disputes he was fired for -- meta-disputes that he was fired for his political values but it was a rift so he turned attention to defense and set up shop in california. how did you get interested in defense technology? palmer i was able to work as a : lab technician on an army project called brave mind teaching -- it was treating veterans of ptsd with virtual reality exposure therapy. that was bef

craig melvin (voiceover): was it self-defense? the lead detective kept telling us, everyone's life is in danger. craig melvin (voiceover): or was it something else? it's a lousy excuse to kill somebody. craig melvin (voiceover): what secrets were stored on this tape? craig melvin (voiceover): villain? i just couldn't believe what i heard. craig melvin (voiceover): or victim? hug your family. kiss your children. you don't know when you're going to lose them. hello, and welcome to "dateline." as day turned to night, a dark mystery unfolded on a stretch of sidewalk in miami when a car pulled up and opened fire on a father and his infant son. a widow was wracked with grief, desperate for justice. the shooting was caught on a security camera, but detectives soon learned that the pictures only revealed a small glimpse into this twisted tale. here's keith morrison with "miami heat." keith morrison (voiceover): it was dusk in miami. the day's heat retreated. parks filled up. soccer games were called to order. orlando mesa loved the evenin

>> heads. >> heads is the call. >> defense. >> you want defense. which way do you want to go? >> okay. georgia will go this way. georgia tech will play defense. >> joe: you know, there was some concern with carson beck after that last play of k katie. >> katie: we have seen him stretching his right arm. he's been holding his elbow, shaking it out. we have seen him grimace over here on the sideline, so there is definitely some discomfort there in his throwing arm as we head to over time. >> jesse: yeah, katie. and he's played so well here in the second half. kpa and so here we go. just the fourth overtime in series history, in a series that dates back to 1893. and georgia tech winning the coin toss, opting to play defense first. you always want to know what you need when it is your turn to go on offense. >> joe: or each team get it is ball at the 25 yard line with the attempt to score. and this is phillips. he is upended at about the 22, like clayton powell-lee. >> jesse: yeah. generally the best overtime tees are the best red zone teams and usually are the best running teams.

i would love to be the defense attorney on that case.se not only does the evidence show that, but the defense would be like kevin did it. >> who is this guy? >> kevin is a name on paper. that man is not a kind, and he is not my family. >> where is justice for diane in all of this? >> kevin did serve some time in prison, and i don't believe diane would even want him to serve life in prison for her murder. in my i mind, he should still be behind bars. >> but now kevin's got a second chance at life. he says he's dedicating it to his mother. >> she's looking down and sees i'm maturing, and i'm going to be the man she wanted me to be. >> and so in the end, what do we make of this who done it? where no one could say for sure who murdered her? leaving a husband and son still pointing the finger at each other, professing love for diane. but one of them, still defiantly lying about having killed her. >> it's a had

is one of our longest standing defense partners. that agreement is a positive step towards a strengthened partnership. the indo pacific is our priority theater and strengthening our partnerships with fiji and other pacific island countries is vital to a free and open indo pacific. in our meeting today, we have discussed the security environment and fiji's role as a regional leader. we discussed how we are deepening our bilateral cooperation. this includes a new acquisition and cross servicing agreement, and i will sign that agreement with the ministry for home affairs and immigration later today. this agreement will mean closer logistics cooperation between our forces, including for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. we are also announcing the start of negotiations on a status of forces agreement, or sofa. once complete, the sofa will expand our defense collaboration through exercises in military engagements. we also covered the new security assistance that the united states is providing to fiji, including $4.9 million in

the defense industrial base. we see that as foundational to defend the departments interest in cyberspace. today that is over 1200 partnerships through our cyberspace collaboration center. increasingly, the department is asking u.s. cyber command to grow partnerships in this area so we can work with our industry teammates because it is a very unique domain. industry creates our domain. there of course the partner that will have the great effect in the ability to defend u.s. interests and those of our allies. >> it has been two years since nsa alerted the initiative capability to commercial platforms. with the rapid advancement we are seeing in commercial technologies, how do you expect to harness these capabilities to stay ahead of our adversaries, and how do you see the same technologies affecting our adversaries tradecraft? >> hybrid computing initiative is a good example of what it will look like for our future. there are going to be some very unique technology things that will be bespoke within the intelligen

is always for self-defense.ortionate and agile and the response to russia's own actions, and it is in accordance with international law. under article 51 of the u.n. charter, ukraine has a clear right of self-defense against russia's illegal attack. christian: well, joining us from new york tonight is france's ambassador to the u.n., and very soon he will be leaving that post to become france's ambassador to moscow. you are very welcome to the program. amb. de riviere: thank you for having me. christian: can i get your reaction to vladimir putin tonight, he said a conflict of a global nature. how far do you think he is willing to go? amb. de riviere: i don't know. i think it is important to get back to the basics. in february 2022, russia took actions against ukraine. there is on this issue an aggressor and a victim. ukraine is defending itself from the very beginning, and as far as i know, the ukrainian army never took actions against russia. they did not engineer this war. so ukraine is defending itself, accor

if you get somebody from the defense industry that knows how to help fix the department of defense and a lot of reforms could be made in the cure meant area if nothing else, that would help save money that could be plowed back into better defense programs. whether or not that is what is going to happen, we do not know and it highlights one point for all of the cabinets and nominations, they are the heads of their departments but it will be important who the deputies and undersecretary czar. we are a long way from knowing that i think. >> that is a good point. on the dod itself, this announcement is coming after we heard reporting earlier today from the wall street journal about this draft executive order that had been presented to the trump team, it will create a board that will purge three and four star generals. if it happens and circumvents the normal promotion process in place at the pentagon, do you worry that will create a chilling effect on top brass? >> i think it is a real risk to politicize the military. it has been a fundamental precept from the beginning of the republic tha

the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such as science . some of my colleagues will research. i spoke with foam, a pencil on 616 and security policy on this michael, i believe he said the use of the arrest nick, myself and a message to the west. you got to distinguish between what the latest one and what the people want. and what i'm concerned about is that these people are out of control. the elite us are out of control. and mr. hutton has been very steady and staged in his responses. and this was a response to the west escalation. i don't care what the white house says, right? i, i saw it with my own eyes when they, us, and the in the u. k. a set their, their, their missiles, which they had the program in which they had it and they had to actually manipulate who was and they told us it was a nato sense. yeah. and consequently, and mr. putting in warranty, against doing that even beforehand. yeah. and they didn't believe him. so now, by the, by sig

hegseth potentially running the defense department?think he clearly is a loyalty choice. i think that's the -- that's what trump is after. as i've said before, i don't think loyalty is really the right word. it's altyfealty. he ubservients, coming to see the emperor had to castrate himself knock his head on the ground four times before the emperor would recognize him. that's what trump thinks is loyalty. are they prepared to be the yes man or yes woman? i don't know what hegseth's performance will be. he performed honorably in his military service and if he lives up to that ideal he won't be afraid to tell the president what he thinks. >> sir, what are the potential scenarios where a defense secretary under donald trump may have to decide between following the norms and expectations, laws, around the use of our military and the orders of the commander-in-chief? >> well, i think they're going to be quite a lot of them. i think the defense and justice department are the two flashpoints where, for example, trump has said on many prior occ

the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such as science . this is impossible. i emphasize once again, that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who generally, they are pushing the entire world towards global conflict. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response to the pentagon express concerns about russia launching that new hypersonic missile and emphasized that while washington is supposedly not seeking a direct conflict with moscow, it will continue to provide supplies to key of also the white house accused rush of escalating the conflict, but dodge questions about the, about whether it was in fact, the us that instigated it, the escalation at a return at every step is comi

they even have a new defense commissioner role that they've created and brussel. so now is really not the time for peace please. he's from the battle test. the nation of lithuania, defense is one of the top priorities for the next commission. so let me select the tasks me to help you prepare itself for the most extreme military contingency. which means to prepare for the possibility of production regression against. do you remember states what can predict the doing false coming to the case? 0 nights of states is likely to increase its focus on just a district chart. and suppose by trying this longer term shift necessities, most self reliance would appear on different subjects. and so the you is really just going to have to, why don't keep writing russia all by itself, while truck moves on to other things like, or on the u. s. economy through trade, which he's more interested in doing as a business man, i guess the, their new playground. how it really doesn't sound like he wants to play the same game as the old out by that. they said he will start a war. i'm not go

the world's current air defense systems. and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such miss science. this is impossible. i emphasize once again, that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their who gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards the global conflict. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response. i thought it was one of the pentagon kind of firms that russia did warn . the us about the hypersonic missile launched. also, the white house accused rush of escalating the conflict. but dodge questions about whether it was, in fact, the u. s. fed instigated it escalation at every turn at every step is coming from russia. they're the ones who escalated this. they're the ones who started this war is because of their a

he's just to penetrate the air defenses. it is also a message, it's meant to take a symbolic thinks it tells the west the look you have, you will miss all shields which you've been building for, for 10 years because it, because of which you completely ruined relations with, with russia. and yes, here we are almost 2 decades down the line. and we have a weapon system, the competitive trade, any of your defenses, nothing you have. and none of you are safe in the event that you decide to attack russia was a push russia, a b on, you know, measures as a pace is beyond reasonable boundaries and aesthetic ease brushes on. so it takes 10 minutes. but i, i'm not interested me. so far look at a boosted. yeah. uh me. so uh, so i lose it would take you 10 minutes to reach for example. nice who bases in pool of 15 minutes ravished on a base, america's base in germany 20 minutes long. that it leaves new time to evacuate, for example, to mount any sort of response points, a buddy action it is to be a weapon. the cannot be the septic has to

today, let's start by defining proactive defense.ete: peter: thank you to everyone in the room for sticking it out. i think it depends on where you sit. i will speak from the perspective of government and how government agencies would look at proactive defense. for me that means getting out of the defender space, getting out of victim networks, looking at the adversaries who are threatening us and trying to understand where they are coming from, what is motivating them, what type of internet infrastructure they have to navigate on a path toward trying to victimize our networks. that perspective comes from a couple of places at the cia, one is we are a foreign intelligence agency so that's necessarily where we are focused, we don't have the authority to remit to look at the defender space, we don't have the explicit mandate others have. but there's also a lot of opportunity there. there's a sense that when you get outside of well-defined networks or large banks, and you look at like the water sector that was spoken of earlier, there i

attorney in san diego was involved in brought our office at the defense. part of the resumes able to evade detection so long is he bribes in naval investigative service investigator who would feed them information. feed him information about the investigation and quash the investigation. so, the fraud went on for a long time part for over a decade. we brought some significant evidence and ratcheted up the investigation. that's a sense o of value of whistleblowers and also the value of outside investigators who eventually bring the case to fruition.e, >> what is the best estimate of the cost of that fraud to the united states? >> the estimated cost was $30 million that's a very conservative and low estimate it's much higher than that. yes, sir? >> given the outcome of the election, we now have a president who is seething with a desire for vengeance and he plans to arm his attorneyal general to be his personal attack dog. given the supreme court has been given the precedent power to act with impunity and given it congress seems to have turned red et cetera,

now that self defense as well. so, so the person that killed william in a civil case, hawkins family versus john though that tells report that either i'm not disclosing the name of the defendant or we don't know the name of the defendant. i guess we're just trying to so how is this man so protective? yeah, that's the question. that's the question. and the only thing i could come up with in august 2023, nearly 2 years after william was killed, a source shared the shooters identity with fault lines. he's it 45 year old white man who was previously arrested for assault in a separate case. we reached out to him to ask why he felt threatened enough by william to shoot and kill him in a message he told us to read the police report and to not contact him again. this shooter is living his life and has the choice to live his life every single day. it's a living hell. it's a sentiment. nicole also shares about the man who killed her husband. not too long ago i ran into another restaurant and my heart just stopped. like just

the same in the department of defense. but the president can remove an inspector general under a recent amendment to the act. he's supposed to give articulatable and case specifically reasons why, but that's just a process issue, so he can do it. it would be unfortunate in my view because ig's are nonpartisan, but he was the ability to do that. >> he fired you when you were acting inspector general at the pentagon at a time when you were highly regarded publicly by the defense secretary. did he ever tell you why? >> no, i never learned the reason why. i was the acting inspector general for four years and then the pandemic hit and we all remember that where we were. that congress and the executive branch appropriated trillions of dollars in the covid relief fund and also to oversee the use of the funds to make sure there was reduced fraud and abuse in the fund. as part of the of it, one ig, one inspector general had be to be selected as the chair. i drew the short straw and i was selected by the fellow ig's being the chair

m, and form a defense minister of glance, her wrist and his statement. the group said that the arrest warrant is unimportant historical precedents and a correction to a long pulse of historical injustice against palestinians. thomas called on the i c . c, to expand the scope of its warrants to include all of these roles, meters and ministers. he's been involved in kidding palestinians. the statement goes on to say that is rated. he does have subjects of palestinians to the most heinous acts of killing terrorism on salvation known to modern history. israel's closest allies, the united states says it's fundamentally reject thing the i c c arrest warrants, and that's in the all her as well as galani. white house says it remains deeply concerned by the chief prosecutor has rushed to seek a response and says, the quote doesn't have jurisdiction of the boxes. well, we have with us michael mansfield, who is an international human rights law, and he joins us live from bombing him in the k. thank you very much for joining us tonight. so when you look up prime min

who is this you unplugged or put the defense? who would probably agree with this, i most things are like, well, if you don't stop them and you pray and then he's gonna go over and apologize. i don't, i don't think she's mean maybe in a perfect world where he had unlimited capabilities and he couldn't from himself, king of europe. he would. i think he's probably knows enough to know that is probably not going much for the new. great. and the case of ukraine who want for what he's talking about, if he wants to ward. and now as a business man, he's not going to tell you about his negotiating tactic to bring it to a close. but i don't understand why we would not want to war like that to end you. we do not stop them. no, we must do it. the i was so furious but not surprised when i saw the bloomberg news report that the bite and administration is now considering draining $200000000.00 out of army reserves to send more money to crane. i. i can't even believe this is a controversial view to take on this for, but i believe that the us arm

the world's current air defense systems and the missile defense system of the americans in europe do not intercept such. ms. silas, this is impossible. i emphasize once again that it is not for russia, but the united states that have destroyed the international security system. and by continuing to fight and cling to their gemini, they are pushing the entire world towards the global conflict. we have always preferred and are now ready to resolve all contentious issues by peaceful means. but we are also ready for any development. if anyone still doubts this, it is in vain. there will always be a response to well, according to the russian president, the rusnick is the state of the art intermediate range, ballistic missile. it can travel, as we just heard, put in the se at mach 10 that's up to 3 kilometers per 2nd. mr. put and emphasized the advanced divers, tonic projectile can penetrate any defense coming spokesperson. dimitri pest of also noted russia did not give prior warning to western powers that it would use the arrest next because it was not obligated to do so. our 2 senior cor