SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
60
60
Mar 20, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 60
favorite 0
quote 0
harris we've lived the house since 2004 at - the house is more or less in delipidated condition when we moved in as well that is deteriorated i know that ms. harris it is not getting better by leaps and bound worse the rodent problem is they literally chewed through her wall into our house there is a hole it is patched now but the rats come raccoons are - where all the raccoons deprecate in the same place with worms and whatnot that was in the the area between the two properties we spent thousands of dollars and countless hours clean power the rats and the health hazard and the disadvantage i have too young children boys that one whom was alergies i can't imagine the conditions i know since 2002 at least the city and multiple agrees have been convening task force and offering help and coming to meetings every time i've heard the same thing she wants to change but refuses help but when offered she turns it down she's turned it down from a nonprofit back in 200 or 4 i personally offered even a couple of months ago to help she said the only way if i were to roach the rats and release th
harris we've lived the house since 2004 at - the house is more or less in delipidated condition when we moved in as well that is deteriorated i know that ms. harris it is not getting better by leaps and bound worse the rodent problem is they literally chewed through her wall into our house there is a hole it is patched now but the rats come raccoons are - where all the raccoons deprecate in the same place with worms and whatnot that was in the the area between the two properties we spent...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
51
51
Mar 12, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
the foundation fix the foundation and supporting the upper portion of the building it is so badly delipidated no way to hold the building are safe any portion of the building so that is what seems to be the demolition beyond the scope of work as you can see from the first picture nothing to be saved and there is nothing, in fact, left in front of the building if you see the roof the amount of grass is greg on top of the roof and basically the weight of the grass and the rain and wood and stipulate all is very unsafe by no choice to save the building and during the crosswalks things happened when you know you open it and and a we tried tie save it but that is impossible you know let me show you this is a portion of the roof which we tried to a safe you see the portion of the roof is basically eaten by termites and dry rot we tried to hold it what can we do how much can you save we tried our best unfortunately, it happened to be a little bit beyond the scope of work if you have me questions i'll be glad to answer them. >> okay. thank you. >> anything else from the project sponsor? okay. if not
the foundation fix the foundation and supporting the upper portion of the building it is so badly delipidated no way to hold the building are safe any portion of the building so that is what seems to be the demolition beyond the scope of work as you can see from the first picture nothing to be saved and there is nothing, in fact, left in front of the building if you see the roof the amount of grass is greg on top of the roof and basically the weight of the grass and the rain and wood and...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
58
58
Mar 26, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 1
since the property owner didn't document the old shed and down the road the one that created an delipidated shed with a variance with one that was required if they followed the proper persuades and said there are other structures the area and the leg illicit of melrose is proven and i've filed containment about a couple of other rear yard structures the neighborhood that i've - the building department has remedy the them at the variance when they first started to build this i filed a complaint with the building department and it is my first exhibit there and the inspector came out and told them to reduce the size to 10 by 10 on 3.6 work in the long run it changed a couple of times when the windstorm was whether january or february and they have permits for this new this drawn up in february and so they didn't get a permit actually until july so the combrishg came out and said reduce it by 10 by 10 and get to reinspected that didn't happen at the variance hearing which i have a little recording this is a recording of variance hearing the contractor and the homeowner saying they've not done a
since the property owner didn't document the old shed and down the road the one that created an delipidated shed with a variance with one that was required if they followed the proper persuades and said there are other structures the area and the leg illicit of melrose is proven and i've filed containment about a couple of other rear yard structures the neighborhood that i've - the building department has remedy the them at the variance when they first started to build this i filed a complaint...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
25
25
Mar 17, 2016
03/16
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 0
since the property owner didn't document the old shed and down the road the one that created an delipidated shed with a variance with one that was required if they followed the proper persuades and said there are other structures the area and the leg illicit of melrose is proven and i've filed containment about a couple of other rear yard structures the neighborhood that i've - the building department has remedy the them at the variance when they first started to build this i filed a complaint with the building department and it is my first exhibit there and the inspector came out and told them to reduce the size to 10 by 10 on 3.6 work in the long run it changed a couple of times when the windstorm was whether january or february and they have permits for this new this drawn up in february and so they didn't get a permit actually until july so the combrishg came out and said reduce it by 10 by 10 and get to reinspected that didn't happen at the variance hearing which i have a little recording this is a recording of variance hearing the contractor and the homeowner saying they've not done a
since the property owner didn't document the old shed and down the road the one that created an delipidated shed with a variance with one that was required if they followed the proper persuades and said there are other structures the area and the leg illicit of melrose is proven and i've filed containment about a couple of other rear yard structures the neighborhood that i've - the building department has remedy the them at the variance when they first started to build this i filed a complaint...