. >> thank you, chairman delman. good morning. i am an project manager in the controller's office here to introduce the findings of the city survey as well as background which you have heard. the senior performance analyst will go into more specific service readings. one objective this year was to increase visibility and accessibility of the survey data. we want to thank chairma thank g this hearing. it was administered from late november 2018 to february 2019. the main portions of the survey ask respondents to rate a, p, c, d or f for city services. one of the key benefits is to allow us to see how well the city is performing, which is valuable for offering evidence of the work that they do. it can drive additional -- thank you. focused engagement and follow up efforts by departments. this was the 17th city survey conducted. it was originally done via mailer. now it is through the phone with web based option to allow a greater sample we had over 2200 surveys completed. when we look at the entire sample the ratings are weighted to

. >>> the chair recognizes the delman from rhode island for five minutes. >> i think of alexander hamilton, one of the great founders. my friend mentioned were allowed to be appalled by the conduct of this committee. i'm thinking the chairman for convening this hearing on this very important question. the hearing is entitled "tran01, : constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct " >> sorry, was that addressed to me? >> article 1 lays out congress's authority, and they are multiple. certainly, the legislative power includes oversight as an essential part of it, but also in article 1 is the power to impeach. those -- they are not all alternative. >> are you saying impeachment is the principal process? >> i -- >> to address presidential misconduct. toxic i think it's one of the processes. i think is more of a continuum. as i mentioned my testimony during nixon, during the watergate hearings there was actually -- almost a year went by before there was a referral to the full house on a vote on the article. >> so i think it's hard to separate, i would say. >> i agree. i think

. >>> the chair recognizes the delman from rhode island for five minutes. >> i think of alexander hamilton, one of the great founders. my friend mentioned were allowed to be appalled by the conduct of this committee. i'm thinking the chairman for convening this hearing on this very important question. the hearing is entitled "tran01, : constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct " >> sorry, was that addressed to me? >> article 1 lays out congress's authority, and they are multiple. certainly, the legislative power includes oversight as an essential part of it, but also in article 1 is the power to impeach. those -- they are not all alternative. >> are you saying impeachment is the principal process? >> i -- >> to address presidential misconduct. toxic i think it's one of the processes. i think is more of a continuum. as i mentioned my testimony during nixon, during the watergate hearings there was actually -- almost a year went by before there was a referral to the full house on a vote on the article. >> so i think it's hard to separate, i would say. >> i agree. i think