so it can all make political etc it's definitely normal in ingold also in other demain so it can all make political etc it's definitely normal in english to think that you're at the agent in your life and that the way that anything is going to think that you are the agent in your life and that the way that anything is going to happen is that you have to make it happen and and that's your role is to try to make things to happen is that you have to make it happen and and that's your. role is to try to make things happen and to make change and to make progress and that's often how we define is happening to make change and to make progress and that's often how we define what is good how much change and progress has been made as opposed to for example how much what is good how much change and progress has been made as opposed to for example how much things have stayed the same or how relatively calm things if things had stayed the same or how relatively calm things have been or how much you preserved. so that is a set of cultural norms in or how much you preserve. so that is a set of cult

expansion is both linguistically you talked about english being so widespread but also in the other demain sic nomic political etc it's definitely normal in english to think that you are the agent in your life and that the way that anything is going to happen is that you have to make it happen and and that's your role is to try to make things happen and to make change and to make progress and that's often how we define what is good how much change and progress has been made as opposed to for example how much things have stayed the same or how relatively calm things have been or how much you've preserved. so that is a set of cultural norms and it's reflected in some structure and in the language it's definitely the way that we have been defining good. in cultural. time for for quite a while in the west i also heard you say that. you were in your new acquaintances of your russian heritage fairly early in your conversation otherwise they would be suspicious has it always been the case or is it a relatively new phenomenon for your following 2016 elections and russia gave gumbo you know it's a

something that's in the general demain.elf the fact of smearing an ambassador or acting in this unprofessional and maybe hateful way, that would not be impeachable. >> today we know mark sandy of the office of management and budget is testifying behind closed doors today on a rare saturday of testimony. his testimony might be in the category of the whole follow the money, right? if an explanation and perhaps even a directive as to whose idea was it to withhold this military aid to ukraine and why? how do democrats need to be directing their questioning to him today in order to get to the answers that are with clarity? >> i would hope both democrats and republicans would be focusing on the question whether the president used taxpayer money to try to get ukrainian government to criminally investigate an american politician or his family. if that's what happened, we're in a very grave area, one that we really haven't seen before. or whether instead this was not really a presidential campaign or effort, it was a casual hope but