>> 2008 was a battle for the soul of the democratic party. 1992 was a battle for the soul of the democratic party. 1980, kennedy versus carter, was a battle for the soul of the democratic party. the presidential process is always -- whoever becomes the standard-bearer -- it's always a contest about what is gonna be the sort of dominant ideology in this grand coalition. like, both parties are coalitions of sorts, right? but within that coalition, what's gonna be the dominant ideology? >> has bernie done his service to the democratic cause or to the progressive cause by running in '16, by realigning the issues, by realigning the party. and that names like elizabeth warren and kamala harris and senator cory booker and senator kirsten gillibrand and many who have adopted the mantle of progressivism, following bernie's lead, does it make him not the best progressive candidate anymore? >> i think, in terms of where bernie would start in a presidential election, he obviously starts in a very different place than we did last time where he was at 3% in the polls, nobody thought he was serious, what

but i think people overstated just how left the democratic party is shifting. it is a pressure point. the base is pushing, but not all of it. suburban women, a lot of hem are moderate. a lot of the talk in the republican party nd about the house was incited by the election of alexandria are causing a cortez in new york and unseating joe crowley. before her there was a special election that elected conor lamb in pennsylvania. a moderate. the fact that democrats got as many seats as they did tells you that in order to win you had to be a more moderate centrist person in order to win these republican seats. so the class coming in is far more moderate than people realize. >>i agree with that. it is about who will become the standard bearer in 2020 and what type of character that person has. i do not think the fever is going to break for a while. this next generation might be able to break the fever. i see it in them. they are more pragmatic and inclusive. conservatives and liberals alike are more inclusive and accepting as a generation then older parts of ur leaders

the democratic party is likely to retake the house. democrats ought to be cheerful and confident.nstead they look like this. >> you're supporting nazis. do you understand that? yeah, i [bleep] am. >> don't pour your coffee on me. >> [bleep] you, i will. [bleep] you. do you understand that fascism is here? do y'all understand that nazis are here? i hope y'all realize that you're normalizing and enabling nazis. do you really care? do you? >> yeah. [bleep] [bleep] [bleep] [bleep] >> tucker: the video you just saw was shot at florida state university, but it could have been at any college campus. f'ing nazis. if the left had a slogan right now, that would be it. it's a scream of rage. it's not aimed at actual nazis either. the group progressives are yelling at, the real enemy, is america's middle class, which they consider disgusting and immoral. >> you have racism and sexism driving this president's base. >> i think there's a bigger racist part of this country. we're seeing it. we're living it. >> he does have to take some responsibility for the type of racist bioclimate that we find

[upbeat music] ♪ - i officially announce my candidacy to seek the nomination of the democratic party esident of the united states of america. [cheers and p.plause] bold leaders - there was nobody really that was out there on the democratic side who wathe obvious frontrunner. mike dukakis was a governor. gephardt was a congressman. al gore was a senator, but there was nobody that was the odds-on favorite, so you know, you've got one black guy and four or five white guys, do the math, you know, and that's what we did. instead of targeting states, we tar congressional districts. - they had a joke, we would always say that the most dangerous ace in the world is between jesse jackson and a tv camera. a lot of people thought it was grandstanding, but they also knew that he could force the issues by the sheer force of his personality. - hope. [applause] jackson fights for comparable work for women--hope. jackson fights to save our farms--hope. he fights to end the flow of drugs--hope! he fights to end the nuclear race--hope! he fights to revive the people--hope. we the people will win. thank

gregory: the professor's points are valid in the ongoing debate in the democratic party. you have to recognize that the democratic civil war, which has been undercover, because the republican civil war has been in the news, but the democratic reckoning about their own future, their own fight, their own values is really happening now and it is still being fought. in 2018, it was dominated by the congressional democrats. you think about the agenda she outlined in health care, trade, democrats thought if they could focus on health care in a place like wisconsin, they could knock off scott walker. ran almost entirely against him on pre-existing conditions and they defeat him. across the industrial midwest, they run on health care and trade. democrats said we have passion on immigration. you talk to the top strategists and they say we have the same passion you have on immigration but if you really want to take back the trump voter, you had to steal back the issue of trade. you listen to bob casey in pennsylvania, michigan, senate candidates all ran on health care and trade. rea

so, the democratic party was new social programs, but without an economic program to generate the revenuesy for them. i sensed that my party was running out of intellectual steam. [upbeat music] - he talks about having a lunch very early on with guys named steve jobs and steve wozniak in some little restaurant somewhere in silicon valley. he leads this group of democrats that come to be known by the media as the atari democrats, because they are the ones who are talking about the transformation to this computerized information economy. - instead of talking about protection from foreign competition, i talked about how we defeat foreign competition with better products and new products. - hart was a break from orthodoxy. he was a really different candidate, stylistically and with a series issue positions. - i was excited to work for gary, who to me at that time-- i was a young lawyer-- was the kennedy the '80s, in brains, in looks, in prospect. - walter mondale was driving l down the establishmee, believing that he had all of the politicians he had all the money, all of the basic democratic

and the democratic party is much by a party that is defined he energy and the activism of its grassroots. that grassroots activism really on the ssive effect election in terms of the amount of money that the democrats were the amount of doors they were able to knock on and it's a big difference going as we head into the 2020 these two very different parties than we had at last ginning of the presidential election cycle. go ahead. >> first of all, good evening, ladies and gentlemen, it's a you.sure to be with needless to say, i disagree with a lot that geoff had to say. forlieve it was a good year democrats. i don't think it was a fantastic year. there are a number of democrats that was disappointed results. of the the strong point to be sure was the very strong showing in the house of representatives, but if as many as ans get four additional senate seats, i don't know very many people that predicted that. that's dependent on what happens in arizona. everybody ida when thought that was a loss is pretty good, too. the ther thing about esults is, yes, it's true, democrats will pick up in t

just days from now the democratic party is likely to retake the house of representatives, and with itmeaningful political power. nearly every poll predicts that will happen. we will see. but democrats ought to be cheerful and confident. instead they look like this. >> you are supporting nazis. >> don't pour your coffee on me. >> i will. do you understand that fascism is here? i hope you all realize that you are normalizing and enabling nazis. you can fill me, i don't give a [bleep]. do you really care? do you? [bleep] [bleep] >> tucker: the video you just saw was florida, but it could've been been anywhere else democrats occupy. fing nazis, that is the democratic slogan. the real enemy is america's middle class, which they consider disgusting and immoral. watch the next point. >> you have racism and sexism driving this voting base and we have to call that out and address that. >> america great again, make america white again. >> i think this is a big racist part of this country. >> he does have to take some responsibility for the type of racist climate we find ourselves him, which is

if you are frustrated with the democratic party because they were the congressional democratic agenda in 2018, that will change in 2019, because now it is not schumer and pelosi taking the reins, it will be a battle royale for the democratic nomination and there will be a real fight to make 2020 a referendum on issues like immigration. john: we have lots of people and a little time. let's take three questions at once. >> my name is i'm an undergraduate student at the school of foreign service year. aboutve spoken at length the cross-section between democratic voters and catholic voters on the issue of abortion. i would like to ask you a question on the cross-section between democratic politicians who are also pro-choice. it has been almost 40 years since father rob was a congressman from massachusetts who said he was morally opposed to abortion illegally pro-choice. i am wondering why 40 years on, that seems to be a radical stance for democratic politicians to take. john: next. >> i am also an undergraduate here. working on my honors thesis about evangelical political participation. o

the other thing i want to tell the democrat party.. te democrat, not because i'm so excited to be a part of the of the party. they don't have a foreign policy platform that works for us and works for people like me. what's happening is and what happened in so many of these races. voter suppression is slule part of why some folks are going to lose races but also because they dn't have a foreign policy platform. who i love ortez, dearly doesn't have a foreign policy. you cannot win from the center. you cannot win without a foreign policy platform and without talking like uncle ralph said about talking about puerto rico and issues nobody wanted to talk bout in this election. those folks, the pro israel groups are mad at us. if you're not going to vote all the way progressive. you cannot beat him from the center. you have to beat him with an alternative visionary plan. if you're going to run for office in 2020, you have to look at what people thought was going to be the blue wave. this was a blue dribble. let's be real about what happened.

a record number of minorities to run mostly for the democratic party well joining us now from kansas city in missouri is state representative barbara in washington she got into politics last year and is on the ballot again on tuesday barbara welcome to the program so a record number of women and also minorities are running in the midterms but let me ask you briefly why did you decide to run what motivated you. i wanted to run because i felt like as an african-american woman who's college educated activist speak for the total community african-american women have always been the backbone of the democratic party way back to fan fannie lou hamer who just went around organizing making sure people knew what to vote knew what the issues will were to someone as great as shirley chisholm who was the first african-american woman to run for president in america so working with that bag i wanted to be a part of that force that made a difference in our community because those who are representing us now are not doing that and observers say it's not just the number of women running for office

>> the professor's point were valid and reflective of the ongoing debate in the democratic party. you have to recognize, perhaps, that the democratic debate, the democratic civil war, which is really undercovered because of the republican civil war has been the dominant story for the past decade. so the democratic reckoning about their own future, their own fight, their own values is really happening now, and it's still being fought. in 2018 it was nom dominated by the congressional democrats. you think about the agenda outline, health care and trade. democrats thought if they could focus on health care in a place like wisconsin they could knock off scott walker. ran almost entirely against him on pre-existing conditions, they defeat him. across the industrial midwest they run on health care and trades, democrats said, we have passion on immigration, you talk to the top strategists for the house and the senate, they say we have the same passion you have on immigration, but if you really want to take back the trump state, take back the trump voter you have to steal back the issue th

none she gets her votes and so as the speaker of the house she is very effective but for the democrat party i don't know that she's the face that you want of the party but one thing obvious trump is the republican party. if it wasn't before if it wasn't the case before it is now because the people who won are the people who trump helped and the people who lost of the people he said in the press however there was one of the most childish things i've ever seen the president said he said he read off the list of people who didn't want him campaigning with him and said sorry you lost sorry you lost badly he read the names of people who didn't want his help that lost and then he read the list of people who got his help and want but what people are missing they're so distracted by the the circus of the truck press conference of what they're missing is the substance the substance of that is the republican party is going to be molded more in the image of trump than it ever has before because the people who won their races they did it with trump's help so don't think he won't hold that over their hea

so the progressive movement of the democratic party will be disappointed, but will be moderates. ky who the democrats had a lot of hope in. she was former us service personnel and would have been an interesting candidate is moving forward. she unfortunately lost as well, so a real mixed bag for the leading candidates that the democratic party had put great faith in last night. clodagh, what do you think this means ford domestic politics in the us over the next couple of years? are we going to see more government shutdowns, more deadlocks and frustration?” more government shutdowns, more deadlocks and frustration? i think government shutdowns could be the practical manifestation of a lot of this. you are literally going to have a clashing horns over so many issues. now that nancy pelosi is going to be back in her former position, she said last night that democrats now owns the ground. so there will be possible continuous strife. this may be the moment for donald trump to look internationally, asjames donald trump to look internationally, as james said, because he can't get much els

close to the election. >> cnn learned the accusation started when the voter reached out to the democratic party to say he discovered potential vulnerabilities in the registration system. the democrats, including the rival stacey abrams deny the claim. >> there were imperfections in the system. weaknesses. they were told about this on friday. instead of owning up to the failure, he decided to blame democrats. we are not responsible. we have nothing to do with this. i'm sad that instead of owning up to his responsibility and honoring his commitment as secretary of state, he is misleading georgia. >> groups say kemp is in a conflict of interest. >>> president trump claims he will reinstate protections for pre-existing conditions if the lawsuit successfully guts the affordable care act. right now, the justice department says it should cut down the pre-existing conditions. that could lead to lose of cover. republicans have never come up with the same plan. the president blaming the mess on his embattled attorney general. >> did jeff sessions give you a head's up before the justice department? >> no.

>> i think that the risk in the democratic party is not only the gender rift and the black women in the else, it's generational, she's 72 year's old, so there's a generational rift and the fact that they all ran, all the new members to have house ran on this idea of change, they represent sort of the establishment, just like the republicans had the same issue last week with the election of kevin mccarthy and jim jordan's challenge to kevin mccarthy, you the same thing going on in the democratic party. it would be short-sided for the democratic party to ignore the fact that nancy pelosi has been in power for she's long, she's part of the reason that they're in power now. for president trump to support her tells me that he wants another poster child for the next election to say this is what you're getting, he would rather have maxine waters speaker of the house but nancy pelosi is a nice second choice. jillian: we have to run, i want to give rochelle a couple seconds, if democrats can't come together on this, do you think it'll cause more problems? >> i think it could cause more problems,

these are exactly the type of changes the democratic party needs to make. w jeff weaver on video recently. he said when he and bernie sanders were on a campaign tour, they spoke with someone from the democratic alliance, which is a group of democratic donors, and this gentleman told him that what the donors had thought was true for a long time was that we can only handle and only needed incremental change, and that one thing that the 2016 campaign showed a lot of the donors is that that is not true, because both sanders and trump, very successful candidates, were talking about old visions and big changes. bold visions and big changes. you can look around the country and see climate change and see that we do not have time for incremental change. inching toas been the right ever since bill clinton, and we need to move definitively to the left. that does not mean we will become communists. it means we want to invest in our kids, in an education, we want to change to a green economy. we saw in the last election last week, we saw progressive measures pass, even w

, by the democratic party i mean what people are voting for and what people are polling on. i think ultimately had the party moved to the left it's much easier to discipline joe manchin when he's in office. joe manchin will definitely be somewhat problematic if the democrats take over, but the idea is that you've got to have enough ballast so that joe manchin becomes irrelevant. >> i think when you think long-term my whole point can be summed down to this. in the long-term we can get a richard ojetta in joe manchin's seat, we get a living wage, we get health care for all, and end the wars. >> and what you don't need-- those two things are not at odds. >> i disagree. >> so, we've got to end it here, folks. i don't know, can we-- do we have like 60 seconds for each person if they want it. 60 seconds and if you want to start. >> i'm going to give up my 60 seconds, i really want to get to a debate. so-- >> so okay. >> don't let the right confuse you about socialism versus social democracy. this is something that they're doing now to confuse and divide and conflate. understand the

the democratic party says they didn't create or attempt to hack the system. so how is stacey abrams responding, first of all, to this investigation? >> reporter: yeah, that's right, wolf. the democratic party saying that these are scurrilous claims. they're 100% false. the democratic party did not create, discover, or attempt to take advantage of this deeply vulnerable system used by the secretary of state's office, as they say. this morning, stacey abrams was on "state of the union" with jake tapper and reacted to the news of this investigation. >> i've heard nothing about it. my reaction would be that this is a desperate attempt on the part of my opponent to distract people from the fact that two different federal judges found him derelict in his duties and forced him to allow absentee ballots to be counted. those who are being held captive by the system to be allowed to vote. he's desperate to turn the conversation away from his failures, from his refusal to honor his commitments, and from the fact he's part of a nationwide system of voter suppression that

now the democratic party is the party of merciless corporate power of google, facebook and the rest, punish you if you get in the way. two of the bluest parts of the country showered promises and billions and billions of taxpayer breaks on jeff bezos. he runs amazon. in return, both those states are getting a new amazon headquarters which is a great deal for jeff bezos, not that he needs it. but what about taxpayers? eric scheffer joins us tonight. thanks for coming out. >> my pleasure. >> tucker: it's not clear to me. why would new york, and virginia pays more but why would they need to pay that much in taxpayer dollars to the richest man in the world for the privilege of having the company moved to new york? >> i came on because the state representative there, cortez, made a statement and made comments basically saying that she didn't want to take amazon's jobs in new york because perhaps it wasn't going to be unionized double, et cetera. and you agreed with cortez in this situation. >> tucker: no, i wasn't -- i'm sitting right here and i can tell you what i agreed with. i'm never

times" reports that some wins and near losses have raised questions about whose vision of the democratic party will emerge victorious in 2020. and it raises questions about whether democrats can deliver a consistent message to voters. among the crew of possibly familiar contenders, a politico morning consult poll taken in the days following the midterm found joe biden as the early leader. 2016's runner.up, vermont senator bernie sanders came in second. but to underscore the desire for new faces, beto o'rourke, fresh off his loss in the texas senate race came in third. senators elizabeth warren of massachusetts, kamala harris in california, corey brook in new jersey followed closely behind. none of the other 14 possible candidates mentioned earned as much as 3%. none of these big name candidates declared the stump, but many seem to be previewing their own 2020 pitches. >> democrats choose hope over fear. democrats choose unity over division. >>ed whys were perceived to be radical and streamist ideas are now ideas supported by the vast majority of the american people. thank you, iowa. >> we are

because barack obama is a former president and he still really is the leader of the democratic party. he is one that can really turn out voters and if democrats turn out a lot, basically the more people to vote, the better news for democrats in the election. host: one note as you well know, tim kaine who is running for reelection, hillary clinton's running mate, was among the first senators to endorse barack obama when he was running back in 2007, 2008 before he got the nomination. >> that's right, that's right. obama mentioned that. they all remember who backed them early on, especially when it was brave to back politically speaking obama over hillary clinton, certainly as obama noted that tim kaine was probably advised you probably don't want to be one of the first to endorse obama. they go back a while and kaine is a heavy favorite to win his reelection campaign, as is jennifer what extent, who is looking to unseat barbara comstock. most independent handicappers have her winning that race. host: i was talking to sean sullivan of the washington post, but i want to go back to some nu

brian kemp accusing the state's democratic party of hacking the head of the georgia democratic party will be here to respond. well you remember what happened last year. you can't bring a backup thanksgiving to my sister's house. it's not like we're going to walk in with it. we'll bring it in as we need it. ...phase it in. phase it in? yeah, phase it in. phase it in? at t-mobile, forty bucks gets you an unlimited plan and a new samsung galaxy s9 included for every line. this is what you get with your $40 plan at verizon. recap! with t-mobile, you get this: four lines four phones for forty bucks. with verizon, you get this... the choice just got a whole lot more obvious. get more because you deserve it. only at t-mobile. whoa! presenting the iwhat's he doing? come on, let's check it out! nice. he's pretty good at this. hm! it's like a game! (gasps) woo-hoo! got it! which car should we get? all of 'em! ooh, yeah! that one! this one looks nice. yes, and yes. i like this game. i think we're winning! delivery? where? (doorbell rings) (man) it's here! what? (announcer) buy your next car fro

that's one of the biggest problems of the democratic party. we continuously, unilaterally, on the procedural front. when the republicans took over congress, when the democrats took it in 2006, they brought them back. here, republicans, here's a tool for you. >> bringing back the filibuster. >> that's insane. >> the only person who played the game very well was harry reid. harry reid was as cutthroat as they were. we're talking about procedurally. there is nobody who put the senate in knots and able to push through things like harry read at the time. -- harry reid at the time. >> my question is, you call for a socialist policies within our democratic republic, and denounce centralized power of multinational corporations. how is an increased in clunky governments and socialist policies going to protect the average american when the commonality between big government and big corporations is big equals bad. >> i'll answer that question. you or at least /3 of this room if you are general op pew lation would be living in poverty in our retirement wit

do you foresee a split within the democratic party? do you see a new party emerging? let's talk specifics. cenk: i don't want a new party. so that is a great question and , bifurcated answers. should there be a split within the party? yes. they say unity. ok, great. let's unify before the most this behind the most popular politician in the country, bernie sanders. no no no! you said primaries were about 2016 when you wanted hillary to win and now primaries are the best idea. i love primaries. i have been consistent on that. should bernie get a free ride in the primary? no. let's fight, let's figure out who is right, let's have people vote. should you splinter the democratic party overall? no. it is a fool's errand, a disastrous idea and will help , the right-wing win. >> are you saying you don't pick -- think it should happen, but you are talking about civil war. cenk: no, i think there will be healthy and sometimes not healthy fight over ideas. we're not going to bow our heads. when they say let's take donor money and keep spending for defense contractors our answer

times" reports that some wins and near losses have raised questions about whose vision of the democratic party will emerge victorious in 2020. and it raises questions about whether democrats can deliver a consistent message to voters and unite behind one nominee from a slate of candidates who could range from socialists to pragmatic scentrists. a few names loom large. a politico consult poll taken in the days following the midterm found joe biden as the early leader. bernie sanders came in second. beto o'rourke, fresh off his loss in the texas senate race came in third. senators elizabeth warren of massachusetts, kamala harris and cory booker followed close behind. none of these big name candidates have officially declared their intention for 2020 2020 but on the stump for 2018 candidates, many seem to be previewing their own 2020 pitches. >> democrats choose hope over fear! democrats choose unity over division! and most importantly, we choose truth over lies! >> ideas that just three years ago were perceived to be radical and extremist ideas are now ideas that are supported by the vast majori

should gain that momentum and should be smart about that but the question is will the democratic party be smart about it ok are they matthew what do you think will they regroup looking at what happened what do you see the democrats doing moving forward well i think we're going to see more of the same they're going to continue to pour money i think into these areas where they think they have a chance our home state of arizona for example these states that appear to be shifting a little bit from the conservative camp towards the democrats some people call them purple states and you're seeing a very interesting phenomenon in these places where the urban areas are clearly moving towards the democrats and in many cases are already pretty solidly blue whereas the rural areas remain red remain republican and i think this is going to be the challenge in two years because it doesn't matter how many votes you get at the end of the day in a lot of places it matters you know what you get in the electoral college and so this means that the rural areas is their electoral college is very important fo

this is a common view in the democratic party, one of the things they are running on. ts of americans won't like that obviously but democrats are concerned about that. they no longer care about what those of you can stink. that's why they fight harder to provide birthright citizenship for farmers than they ever thought to protect american citizens from plunging middle-class wages or privacy destroying tech monopoly monop. you already know about the democrats of demand that america ignore its own immigration laws, but it's gone far beyond that. elizabeth warren who is the center for massachusetts has condemned our entire criminal justice system as a racist. meanwhile, beto o'rourke agrees with that and because our justice system the new jim crow. he accuses cops of shooting people based on their skin color. he offered no evidence that cops do that, because he just knows it's true. meanwhile, laws against crime like shoplifting and public and others can no longer be enforced because that would be racist. the result of all of this is inevitable. more crime, and you are see

democrats will tell you they are the party against racism, and they love al sharpton. to this day. just yesterday, top democrats lined up to prostrate themselves in front of al sharpton. watch those. >> that's why you have leaders like the reverend alou sharpton who will not give up and will not give in and will never let it go. >> it seems that whenever there is a crisis, al sharpton and many of you are there. >> reverend sharpton, thank you for saving america. >> tucker: whenever there's a crisis, al sharpton is there. that's for sure, that's the understatement of the year. thank you for saving america. did he save america before or after he decided to insight a shooting at freddy's fashion mart? save that tape for the next time some liberal calls you a racist. hilarious. east coast opening columnist may routinely denigrate them but americans remain a caring and generous people. the most caring and generous people in the world by far and unfortunately some people take advantage of that. one year ago, mark d'amico and kate mcclure raised $100,000 on the go fund me site. they did i

not democratic party. along the lines of my point democratic control of the means about socialism changing, if you look at the socialist party platform from 1912, which a listener sent me, many of the proposals we now see already implemented in the country. a five-day work week. an eight-hour work day. no child labor. something along the lines of social security. minimum wage. freedom of the press was already there. a progressive income tax. what i would like this panel to look at is to what extent should we embrace socialistic policies? and those of us on the left, within the context of electoral politics, we are a month away from the midterms. to what extent should we embrace the labels of socialism and the policies from an electoral standpoint? what i would also like to do now, starting with ana, is give us a sense, without justifying it, where you are on that spectrum from the left to the idea of total democratic control of the means of production. which would mean the major industries controlled by wor

he institutionalized the idea of small-dollar email fund-raising in the democratic party. ied through and benefited obama's run in 2008 and then ultimately obama's run 2012. - howard dean had a holistic approach to curing what ailed the party as opposed to just fixing one bone at a time. i believe he will go down as one of the best chairs that we've ever had. - the way to get elected iotthis country is no be like the republicans, it's to stand up against them and fight. if you don't have guts, you're not an attractive candidate, and you basically lose, 'cause the american people are looking for somebody's guts. i waamerica that looks like america, where we're all included... - billmylinton once said--it's avorite saying in politics-- "people will always vote for someone who's strong and wrong before theote for somebody who's weak and right." we have a dream, we can only reach the dream if we're all together. i wasn't afraid to stand up for what i believed in, and i though whatever the consequences were short-term, it was important to tell the truth. stand up for america. st

democrats. vote for the green party. that means the democratic party is losing votes. m sure they are doing this everywhere. i can't imagine anybody wants to vote for the green party. they know they are not going to win. virtually all the so-called v values is what the democratic party is thousands. why would you vote -- the democratic party espouses. host: youth engagement is what we are talking about. what you think about the youth vote? caller: i think a lot are energized. a lot of people are going to do the right thing. everybody has a right to vote for whatever party that shares their values. what i have seen is, based on everything in the last two years in this country, definitely more youth are engaging as far as gun regulations or whatever their concerns. a lot of them are definitely voting democrat this year. people are energized. that i see for sure. host: the american psychological association did a survey of people who plan to vote in this election cycle. when it comes to that survey, when it comes to those who describe themselves as older , andcans, 87% wer

that momentum and should be smart about that but the question is will the democratic party be smart about it. okay are they matthew what do you think will they regroup looking at what happened what do you see the democrats doing moving forward. well i think we're gonna see more of the same again continue to pour money i i think into these areas where they think they have a chance -- our home state of arizona for example these states that appear to be shifting a little bit from the conservative camp towards the democrats some people call them purple states. and you're seeing a very interesting phenomenon in these places where the urban areas are clearly moving towards the democrats and in many cases are already pretty solidly blue were as the rural areas -- we remain red remain republican and i think this is going to be the challenge in two years -- because it doesn't matter how many votes you get at the end of the day and a lot of places it matters you know what you get in the electoral college and so this means that the rural areas in the electoral college is very important support.

democrat for 65 years. --ave never been so seemed so ashamed of my party. straight republican except for one judge, a lady, she is a democrat and she had no one running against her. i am so mad at our public broadcasting system, channel eight, that i donated money to and was putting in my trust, i am not now. every night knocking our government and president, we had a boston tea party and we had a war and got rid of the brits and now they are back trying to run our government, they say the russians interfered with our last election, the brits are really interfering with this one. me, watch't believe channel eight. absolutely ridiculous. they have made me mad. host: thank you. caller: the last word from indianapolis. you are calling on the line for independence, how will you vote tomorrow? caller: i have voted republican and the reason is because of what president obama said electiveears ago about surgery. he said sometimes someone or whoever does not need to have a kneegery and i had that i was -- could not even walk on, i was going to have to have a walker

cortez also said there are three chambers of congress. >> she is extremely left wing, and the democratic party and the press who supports that is constantly apologizing for her announcing she is a new up and coming leader. nancy pelosi is fairly hard left. but if you vote for a democrat you are putting into the leadership of congress, this woman from new york. and nancy pelosi. there is no longer a moderate wing of the democratic party. but they cheerfully will be voting for and with a very dark, deep hard left leadership. >> cortez does make herself irrelevant when she says any complaints against her are sexism. cortez gets basic economic definitions wrong. she says the jobless rate is low because they are working two jobs. there are 7 million multiple job holders. grover, people are saying the defense department got a $700 billion budget increase when that was the total defense spend for 2018. these aren't just rookie mistakes. there is something wrong with our university system in how they pump out these individuals and get basic stuff wrong and they become our leaders. >> the democratic pa

of the democratic party actually sent out altered forms to several thousand voters in broward county. statewide. they did so-called chasing effort but they only sent them to democratic registered voters. their only interesting and corrected the signatures for democrats, not republicans. and unfortunately, this judge, who seems to have a conflict went ahead and extended that deadline. that's organized. it wasn't one-off. isn't a mistake. thousands of ballots, thousands of forms going out with false information deceiving voters about their right to correct their ballots. >> laura: pete, what i'm concerned about in the hand recount, this effort to discern the intent of the voter. if the ballot is rejected by the machine because it was either i guess it could be an under vote. no, there was something on the ballot that was wrong? you spill your coffee on it? i don't know what it is. if it is not read easily by the machine, the attempt to say well, if you voted for desantis, you would have voted for nelson or if you voted for the democrat agriculture commission, how odd that you didn't vo

in the republican party, 43% favorable, 54% unfavorable. plus four for the democrats. inus 11 for the republicans. >> and that is -- sometimes it's good to be the opposition party, isn't it? you can function as multiple things to multiple people. you can be sometimes just the protest vehicle. you can be not the governing party, not the ruling party. sometimes if you're the opposition party and control nothing, that could be good enough. >> all right. we will go through states and job ratings. georgia, trump job, 51 approve, 47 disapprove. boy, that's -- talk about right down the middle. that tells us this georgia governor's race is going to be close. >> and the wild card in georgia, of course, 50% runoff threshold there too. >> in this case what's interesting here according to the exit poll, stacey abrams is winning a larger share of the disapprove than brian kemp is winning of the trump approve. just a little tea leave there as we move on. let's move to missouri. the trump job rating, ready for this one -- >> what is it? >> 50 approve, 49 -- okay. why do i have a feeli

last ditch effort to bolster their friends in the democratic party, they were literally an extension all things liberal, socialist democrats, and they are like state run democratic media. take a look. >> if trump wins, he will cast it as a complete endorsement of his most undemocratic behavior. if you are 18 and that happens, you stand a very real chance of not living at a western-style democracy for part or all of your life. >> he is a racist pig! he is talking about whites a premise does ideology. >> what donald trump did was normalize racism. >> donald trump is not only disgusting and violently stupid beard >> racist, heartless, soulless man. >> he is obviously racist, obviously demagogue. >> he has red radicalize more people than isis. >> sean: blah, blah, blah. look at the states they are winning, florida, tennessee, indiana, missouri, massive victories in the states. by the way, elsewhere, commentators, anchors, nbc, abc, cbs, cnn, once again, they started to crack up and melt down. it was like 2016 all over again for them. take a look. >> tonight, there was some hope that the

you have certainly made a dent in the democratic party. now it seems like you're trying to make a real difference with a slate of candidates across the country for everything from the senate down to local elections. who are you most excited about in that crowd? >> well, we have great candidates. >> reporter: democratic randy bryce is running in wisconsin's first congressional district, the seat currently held by house speaker paul ryan. when you entered this race, i gather you were a bit of a sacrificial lamb, you were the long shot and suddenly you're the front runner. >> we've been able to put together something that hasn't been put together in the 20 years that paul ryan has been here. >> reporter: bryce is an iron worker by trade and a former volunteer on bernie's 2016 campaign. >> i've heard they call you iron stache. >> i've been called that. >> reporter: and i also read that your campaign not only supports unions but is unionized. >> we're the first in american politics to unionize, absolutely. >> with your help and with help from p