they're taking over the democratic party. 's very scary and frightening and certainly will not win on a national state. >> and how do you see the democrats plan? because i see them going further to the the left. >> they do have a platform. boycott in-n-out burger. demonize the police. so they have a platform. it's clear. i wish they would listen, because i want a really good opposition party that is loyal and cares about the country. but you're not seeing that manifest right now and that's because there's no leadership of the democratic party. they can continue this. it is something americans will reject. we've always rejected it. we also happen to be in a time where americans in a very short period of time have seen what even the democrats give you via barack obama compared to what donald trump has done. world of difference. it is a shocking reformation that americans would not have expected because we were told it was the new normal. and yet now everything has changed. and for the first time we see, what is it, 85% of workin

is that the democratic party of today?> i sure hope not, it's one strand in the democratic party, it hasn't taken over and my advice to the fellow democrats is to stay in the center, stay positive, and stay constructive. we have an eight-point lead in the generic vote, the president is at a record low, disapproval inin "the washington post" poll, we will win a big victory in november. >> jason: how do you see democrats pointing out, i see them pushing for the abolishment of ice and this scorched-earth resistance movement. >> that's exactly right, they have become radical, they are embracing socialism. look at what happened last here in florida, andrew gillam won. he's calling for abolishing ice, he started a debate stage next to bernie sanders and called for a revolution. we don't want a revolution in florida but nevertheless that's what he's calling for. and in arizona, the guy who won the gubernatorial primary he doesn't just want to abolish ice, he said let's get rid of the southern border. these are crazy fringe ideas,

be competitive is a really important part of the future of politics, about the future of the democratic party and how people people about the republican party right now. >> i think texas is for democrats what new jersey was for a long time for republicans, which is to say you had -- over several decades you had over and over these competitive senate races in new jersey where republicans would spend tens of millions of dollars on ads i market to lose by two or three or four. and eventually they realized they were throwing good money after bad and they gave up. similarly in texas you see all these polls. i haven't seen a poll that has beto ahead. it's like down by one -- so i think the proposition for democrats is it feels like an opportunity to spend a ton of money in a very large state to lose by a little bit. think that's the hesitation. >> let me argue against that, though, as someone having followed texas politics fairly closely. part of the issue in texas, it's the second biggest state in the union, right? there's lots of -- like the democratic party there is so poorly hollowed out that a

they're taking over the democratic party. very scary and frightening and certainly will not win on a national state. >> and how do you see the democrats plan? because i see them going further to the the left. >> they do have a platform. boycott in-n-out burger. demonize the police. so they have a platform. it's clear. i wish they would listen, because i want a really good opposition party that is loyal and cares about the country. but you're not seeing that manifest right now and that's because there's no leadership of the democratic party. they can continue this. it is something americans will reject. we've always rejected it. we also happen to be in a time where americans in a very short period of time have seen what even the democrats give you via barack obama compared to what donald trump has done. world of difference. it is a shocking reformation that americans would not have expected because we were told it was the new normal. and yet now everything has changed. and for the first time we see, what is it, 85% of working

they are being pushed to the radical, they, being the democratic party, are beingd pushed toward the cal left. the farthest end of the spectrum that anyone in america has ever witnessed. this is a party right now thatat its establishment is threatened by that leftward push from the grassroots and, by the way, also from the leaders of the democratic national committee. perez, ellison, these are radical left wing democrats and that is where the party wants to be. nancy pelosi would be at once irrelevant and probably trampled by the herd if she even suggested such a thing. >> tucker: so you are saying that the establishment is afraid of its own constituents. it's afraid of the crazies on his leftward flank. >> absolutely. and it's constituents are -- the democratic party has become tribal in itself. people talk about tribalism within our society in modern america, but the democratic party is built up of a set of constituencies that is warring with one another.bu they don't trust each other and they don't quite know each other and the result is, it is a party without discipline. a party w

the democrat party is radical socialism, venezuela, and open borders. u never heard this before. the party of crime. it's a party of crime. judge jeanine: president trump taking shots at the left in a rousing rally in west virginia. joining me, my favorite political panel dan bongino and chris hahn. the party of crime. dan bongino, why would the president call the democrats the party of crime? >> because they are. in the last few years what have we witnessed from the democrat party up on the hill. a spying scandal with the weaponization of the intelligence community to take their their political opponent. you see democrats advocating for open borders and uncontrolled immigration despite crime consequences. now they have become not only the party of crime but the party of character assassination as they try to take down judge kavanaugh in what was an abomination of a week for the democrats. i'm disbusted disgusted for them. >> in january you will be calling them the majority party. and they will be calling comey, gates, flynn. now they have a justice who

the democratic party, but the real name is "the democrat party". the democrat party.n you see "democratic party"" that is wrong, there is no name, democrat party. that is a great name, they should probably change the name, if you think about it. then i would say, the democratic party. the democratic party is radical socialism, venezuela, and open borders. it is now called to me, you have never heard this before, the party of crime. the party of crime. that is what it is. and to pay for their socialism, which is going to destroy our country, democrats want to erase medicare and destroy social security. that is what is going to happen. democrats want to completely destroy medicare with so-called "medicare for all." it will be about two months before the country goes out of business. robbing the seniors for the benefits they paid into their entire lives and giving it to people who don't deserve it. giving it, by the way, to illegal aliens who come into our country. ok? [booing] republicans want to attacked medicare for our great seniors who of us who have earned it and p

their important, the policies of the democrat party, and everybody always says the democratic party. like saying it better, it is sweeter, the democratic party is better than bank the democrat party, but it is really the democrat party, and why should i make it sound sweet. it is not called the democratic party, that is a nice name. they should probably change their name. i do not want to give them any ideas. to me, it is the democrat party. they are extreme, they are frankly dangerous and crazy. [applause] want to abolish ice, and in other words they want to abolish immigration enforcement entirely. let violent sadistic gangs like ms 13, the worst gang in the world run wild in our communities. i have seen our guys from ice, i have watched it. ms 13 are tough, but not like our guys. they are not tough like our ice people. our guys and gals go in there, it is unbelievable. that is what we need. you cannot have, he is a wonderful person. we need tough people. these are sadistic, mean, criminals. ice is incredible and we will protect them and cherish them, and thank them very much for k

the policies of the democrat party and everybody always says the democratic party.han the democrat party but it's really the democrat party and why should i make it sound sweet? it's true. it's not called the democratic party. they should probably change their name. i don't want to give them ideas. to me, it's the democrat party they are just extreme, they are frankly dangerous and crazy. they're crazy, democrats want to abolish ice. they want to abolish immigration enforcement entirely. violent gangs like ms 13 run wild in our community. i have seen her guys, i've watched it. ms 13 are tough but not tough like our guys. our guys and gals go in there, it's unbelievable. that's what we need. you can have like isn't he a wonderful person, we need tough people. these are sadistic, mean, sick criminals. ice is incredible. were going to protect them and thank them for keeping our communities safe. [applause] democrats want open borders which equal massive crime. republicans want strong. democrats support sanctuary cities, cities of crime. they flutter streets with crimin

[chanting] president trump: the democrat party, their best ally is those

the democratic party is better than the democrat party but it's really the democrat party and why should sound sweet? right? it is. it is the dem -- not call the democratic party. that's a nice name. probably should change their name. i don't want to give enemy any ideas. but to me it's the democrat party, and they are just extreme, they are, frankly, dangerous and they are crazy. they're crazy. democrats want to abolish i.c.e. in other words, they want to abolish immigration enforce. entirely, let violent, sadistic gangs like ms-13, run wild in our community. i've seen ore guys from i.c.e. i've watched it. ms-13, they're tough but they're not tough like our guys. like our i.c.e. people. our guys and gals, they go in there -- i tell you, unbelievable. and that's what we need. you can't have, like -- isn't he a wonderful person. we need tough people. these are tougher people. these are sadistic, mean, sick criminals. i.c.e. is incredible. we're going to protect them and we're going to cherish them and thank them very much for keeping our communities safe. [cheering] [cheering] democrats w

the democrat party is radical socialism, venezuela, and open borders. ou never heard this before. the party of crime. it's a party of crime. judge jeanine: president trump taking shots at the left in a rousing rally in west virginia. joining me, my favorite political panel dan bongino and chris hahn. the party of crime. dan bongino, why would the president call the democrats the party of crime? >> because they are. in the last few years what have we witnessed from the democrat party up on the hill. a spying scandal with the weaponization of the intelligence community to take their their political opponent. you see democrats advocating for open borders and uncontrolled immigration despite crime consequences. now they have become not only the party of crime but the party of character assassination as they try to take down judge kavanaugh in what was an abomination of a week for the democrats. i'm disbusted disgusted for them. >> in january you will be calling them the majority party. and they will be calling comey, gates, flynn. now they have a justice who

the democrat party is radical socialism, venezuela, and open borders. it's now called to me -- you necessity heard this before. the party of crime. it's the party of crime is what it is. [cheers and applause] and to pay for their socialism which is going too destroy our -- to destroy our country. democrats want to raid medicare and destroy social security. they want to completely destroy medicare with so-called medicare for all. two months before the country goes out of business. robbing our seniors of the benefits they paid into for their entire lives. giving it to people who don't deserve it. giving it to illegal i will yens who come into our country. okay? republicans want to protect medicare for our great seniors who have earned it and paid for it. and i will always fight for and always protect patients with preexisting conditions. you have to do it. you have to do it. [cheers and applause] some people think that's not a republican thing to do. i don't care. and i will tell you why. all of the republicans are coming into that position now. all of the

well it's becoming a more democratic party and i think the leadership will accept. the voice of the members. about democracy and actually the call for a new referendum on brics it is also about democracy labor membership has boomed under a philosophy that says the wider the wealth gap in britain the harder you have to fight back until now this unrepentant socialism has maintained

i don't think she would. >> i don't think nancy pelosi is the leader of the democratic party and mostf the democratic base would like to see nancy pelosi not be the speaker of the house and in 2019 -- she doesn't speak to progressive, she doesn't speak to the younger generation. she's not lead choice of the group of democrats to be speaker. >> tucker: the point remains why wouldn't -- i do think she's going to be speaker if democrats retake the house, who knows, but why wouldn't a universally acknowledged leader of the democratic party -- how about andrew cuomo? the governor of new york, why wouldn't he say political violence is never under any circumstances justified? you can't punch someone just because you think he's "nazi." it's not allowed. >> two points on that, one, you are asking us to believe that the same snowflake, blue haired limiting liberals that you've been decrying for all these years are now a violent political group was going to throw kale at you. you are saying antigun activists -- >> tucker: i don't think that. i live among liberals. they are my neighbors. they are

the democrat party is radical socialism, venezuela and open borders. 's now called to me you've never heard this before, the party of crime, it's the party of crime. that's what it is. jeanine: president trump taking shots at the left at a rally in west virginia tonight. joining me tonight my favorite political panel dan bongino and chris, radio talk show host, thanks for being here. so the party of crime. now, dan bongino why would the president call the democrats the party of crime? >> well, because they are. in the last few years what have we witnessed from the democrat party up on the hill? we have witnessed the spying -- you had congressman nunes on, a spying scandal with the weaponization of the intelligence community to take down political opponents. you've seen democrats openly advocating for open borders and uncontrolled immigration despite any crime consequences and now we've seen it become the party of crime, judge, but the party ofar character assassination as they try to take down brett kavanaugh, i'm disgusted for them. jeanine: a lot of u

and i see the future of the democratic party in this room tonight. the future of the democratic party is jobs. it is diverse. it is progressive. and yes, the future is female. so do not despair. to all the young people, to all the young women, to all the queer people who reject the gender binary. . soon, you will be standing here and when it's your turn, you will win. [applause] you are on the right side of history and every day your country is moving in your direction but we cannotafford to wait . this is not a time to title for the way things are or sit back and hope that things change. this is a time to fight and as long as corporations and wealthy donors continue to run this state, we will keep fighting. as long as new york remains the single most unequal states in the country, we will keep writing. as long as we have an education system that sends wealthy children to college and another that sends the poor and children of color to prison, we will keep fighting. we will keep fighting for a new york where every child and every zip code can go to a

today's democratic party wants to raise your taxes. today's democratic party once open borders and to abolish ice. today's democratic party thinks obamacare didn't go far enough. and they are now running actual socialist for higher office. today's democratic party wants abortion on demand and they want you to pay for it. many of today's democrats and their hollywood friends find it fashionable to mock the values of the american people. in fact, hollywood elites routinely mock faith and family and patriotism and many leading democrats have joined the chorus. we all remember hillary's basket of deplorable a few years ago. well, now the governor of new york recently said that america was never that great. and my predecessor joe biden said just last week that those of us who stand for traditional moral values are forces of intolerance, including the dregs of society. the truth is, faith, family, hard work and patriotism are the glue that has bound the fabric of our nation for generations. [ cheers and applause ] we're not a people bound to

but it isn't working for everyone sunday's election is likely to see a far right party the sweden democrats catapulted into second place with support from around one in five voters it's a prospect appalling to many because of the party's neo nazi origins and its anti immigration policies are multitude of what they. everything points to us having a good licks and that just how good one can never know it's a question for the voters the party's rapid rise is a psychological setback in a country that long held its own a beach in high regard it regarded itself as a sort of moral superpower in all sorts of ways that attitude was particularly shaped like a cold war actually it was issued itself between nato and between the soviet bloc and allied itself very much with the third world in more recent years this identity has been more associated with openness to asylum seekers and refugees and it's clear that since the great crisis of two thousand and fifty that. that has changed policy has become much tighter in line with other european countries and that obviously has affected three perceptions of t

democrats. only one third called themselves republicans, and 1/6 independents. republicans, however, were much more competitive, because much of the south remained a one-party democraticarea where there was no organized republican party at all, and in most states outside the south, neither democrats or republicans dominated by very much. ideology, however, in 1960 had a nothing to do with party affiliation. democrats were split roughly three ways among liberals, moderates, and conservatives. conservative democrats were concentrated in the south. republicans had a thin liberal wing, perhaps 10%, with the rest of the party split about 45%-45% between conservatives and moderates. a republican can win the presidency bait using the formula that had worked for richard nixon in previous elections. nixon had won his first election in 1946 and a democratic house race, and the senate contest in alifornia. nixon's formula was that 90% of the republicans, 20% of the democrats, and 50% of the independents. in most places outside the south, that formula would yield a republican victory. nixon had achieved that success both in 1946 and in 1950, and stressed anti-communism both at ho

the democratic party is not interested in joining any party that would take the country in the wrongection. >> so the constitution needs to be amended again in your view. >> there are some undemocratic elements, some provisions that could be obstacles, to the things that we want to do for the good of the country. but we would seek a broad consensus because we don't want the constitution to be yet another conflict point. >> you helped orchestrate the fall of the last government. given what has occurred over the last four years having the military in power do you now view it was possibly a mistake that you did? >> no. my stance was that i did not accept a corrupt government. i don't think that the country has to choose between a corrupt regime and a dictatorial one. the thai people deserve better and the democrat party will do its best to represent that. >> post elections what policies are needed for thailand to go forward? >> a quick revival of the economy is needed. not the broad g.d.p. figure. but the income of ordinary people particularly in rural areas. there have been -- they hav

democrats' party makes big gains in a general election dominated by concerns over immigration. at this hour a second wave of migrant demonstrations eastern germany. of a twenty two year old in the city of curtain. are a few of the week's top stories british authorities released photos of two men they claim carried out the poisoning of former russian spies. say there are major inconsistency. with the top stories from the past seven days on right up to the moment developments well this is the weekly or national hello and welcome union o'neill our top story a nationalist party has made dramatic gains in sweden's general election with no almost eighty five percent. counted the immigration democrats party holds almost eighteen percent of the vote it's been a disappointing night though for the ruling social democrats who hold twenty eight percent which may not be enough for them to form a new governing coalition the first time in over one hundred years they haven't got a thirty percent mark the swedish moderate part of the conservative. second place at the moment with twenty percent

i realize joe mccarthy said always call it the democrat party. it's the democratic party. of the party. >> democratic socialist party, which bernie sanders and ms. ocasio-cortez -- >> it's the democratic party. >> they want to be democratic socialists, do they not. >> it's the democratic party. leland: chris, you're making a substantial point here. how do republicans shift the argument from president trump's personality, which even mick mulvaney agrees and understands is a problem, and at the same time focus on the issues you just brought out about democratic socialism? >> i don't know if feeling accounts for much. look, tom and i share this in common. we're fortunate enough to talk to real folks who are working every day. this job as a talk show host, i have the ability to talk to everybody from billionaires to guys working the line and here's what i know. people feel this economy is roaring. they feel great about it. it's positive. there's great -- leland: i neither of you guys were going to agree on this one. you knew that. i know you understand when i say i'm up against

you have a professional in the democratic party advising her. and the way the democrats have played this. what say you? >> obviously one of the questions of credibility goes to the way this has been handled, not just because there's no other evidence. there are no other accounts of this event happening, no contemporaneous accounts of her telling anyone at the time, there's in time, no place. we're missing a bunch of information. but what thawl that would sugges the only information they is this woman's testimony. the democrats have been doing their damnest to make sure she doesn't testify. they've been putting cons on the hearing that cannot stand. like tva kavanaugh is supposed to testify before she does. you can't respond to an allegation unless the allegation has been made. beyond that dianne feinstein kept this stuch e stuf stuff hir weeks. she didn't ask brett kavanaugh about it one time during all of the written testimony, during all of the oral testimony. at no time did she raise this issue. and what this makes you think is putting aside t

although, so many democrats acknowledge there is no crime with which to charge him. they simply want him out of office. this is an entire partyft and announcing publicly that they intend to overthrow a presidency. >> this is becoming extremely difficult for democratic leaders. you have seen in the past, they have tried to be cool about impeachment. or at least let's not talk about impeachment. august 21 was a big day. a was the day of the michael cohen plea. it's also the paul manafort guilty verdict. with the michael cohen plea, the democrats got so excited about the presidenting implicated in a felony of campaign finance violations. i think the democratic desire to see, the base desire to see impeachment went up more. there has been a poll by axios recently that showed 79% of the democratic voters favor impeachment. the leaders cannot really put a lid on that. >> lou: especially leaders who have, by the way, been out leading that very strategum talking about the impeachment of the president. they have said so much falsehood and ignorance and so much vitriol in to their party that i don't know if they can escape what they ha

democrats jimmy. as the result has a breakthrough for his party. you'll be at this well the only thing i know who's won this election is the sweden democrats that's how it's. we are strengthening our pivotal position and increasing our seats in the swedish politicians we see that we are going to get incredible influence in the future and no one can take that away from. sweden moderates have agreed to start talks with the christian democrats on the forming a conservative coalition meanwhile the swedish prime minister stefan live then says has said that he will not be resigning he has called for the cross party cooperation to keep the sweden democrats out of power accusing the nationalists of trying to increase division and hate. political analysts to trolls or toe believes the result is a blow for the leadership it doesn't seem like this is going to be a clear break with the past i think it's a rejection of the current leadership i think it's a combination of. concern and care about the state the bad state of the immigration influx in the violence an

we'll uncover a double standard at the highest levels of democratic party appear they'll be called out tonight. their message to the american people? only allegations against republicans should be taken seriously. not against the fellow democrats. also tonight, we have big breaking news from john solomon and sara carter. this is huge tonight. according to newly unearthed documents, there were fears within the fbi that the obama administration, right up to the top, where weaponizing top-secret intelligence against donald trump. other words, the house of cards are falling. sara carter, john solomon will join us tonight from vegas. also any undercover report. project veritas catching employees within government accountability office bragging about breaking the rules, resistance, sabotage within the trump campaign. in all aspects of government. we also end on a good note. we have a report about a booming economy just 47 days away from election day. anyway, it's time for our big breaking news. las vegas in addition opening monologue all right. i have emphasized this over and over again. 36

it has never been addressed by the democratic party. we are heading for all kinds of standstill's and big problems. >> sadly it doesn't really matter which party wins. i'm a progressive leaning more toward the democratic side. just want to fight and argue about getting rid of president trump, that doesn't solve anything. he's doing stuff and getting stuff done. not saying i support the president or anything like that , it's what you are going to do for us as far as anybody goes. i do think the democrats should have the house and senate back to have us -- have an equal and stable floor. them a we are going to -- >> right now the act is still pending in agra's -- in congress. when we think about the future of education and workforce, this ties together very carefully. don't provide the right support for our students, they can't be successful in the workforce in the long run. >> part of c-span's 50 capitals tour. texas republican senator ted cruz faces democratic challenger beto o'rourke in dallas. from friday, this is about an hour. ♪

his breakthrough victory made history, but he happens to be the democratic party third african-american nominee for governor in 2018. the other two being stacy abrams in georgia and ben jealous in maryland. and democrats aren't just making history in primary races in the south. in texas, beto o'rourke is polling so close to ted cruz that ted cruz is counting on the man who accused his father of being in on the jfk assassination and who insulted his wife's looks, one donald j. trump, to save him with a rally. will november be a blue wave and will it bring that wave to the reddest region of the country? joining me is andrew gillum, the democratic nominee for governor of florida and i should add someone who's been on this show as a guest many times. i'm going to brag. we knew first. we already knew you were a star. thank you for being here. good morning. >> joy, i can't thank you enough and you're right. i just want to honestly appreciate you, because you were ahead of the curve. you allowed me on, asked me good questions and allowed me to talk about our vision for the future of the state

it's not the democratic party may be voted for in 2016." >> harris: it keeps the democrats from touchingn those issues, by the way republicans have so many accomplishments that they like to talk about. but our gas last hour, steve hilton, says it's going to take more than talking about the ecog republicans. me to take down the list of what they have accomplished. he agreed income always good to have your own program. thank you. >> thank you. >> harris: we continue tracking florence, the massive storm moving toward the carolinas, and dumping feet of rain all over the region. forecasters are warning of possible record storm surge mixing in with that rainfall. we will get a live report from the north carolina coast, coming up. ♪ you're headed down the highway when the guy in front slams on his brakes out of nowhere. you do, too, but not in time. hey, no big deal. you've got a good record and liberty mutual won't hold a grudge by raising your rates over one mistake. you hear that, karen? liberty mutual doesn't hold grudges... how mature of them. for drivers with accident forgiveness liberty

this is a disgraceful performance by the democratic party. and let me say this to mazie hirono, the hawaiian senator, democrat, who told all the men of america to shut up. tonight i say to her, shut up senator, shot up. i'm sick of you, i'm sick of dianne feinstein, i'm sick of senator blumenthal and all the democrats who have one thing in mind. they want power. they thirst for power and they don't care who they ruin in the process. this is a moment of disgrace. for the united states senate and if they don't confirm him to the united states senate, the republicans will lose the senate. this is a national disgrace. >> sean: i have known you for many, many years and you've never told anybody to shut up in your life. could you imagine anybody saying to any woman ever, shut up, and what the reaction would have been? >> yes. it's amazing and i'm so sick of the democrats on this committee, what they are doing. it's not just to judge kavanaugh but the country. >> you are absolutely right and it's also about women. tammy bruce brought up a good point.

so i think you're seeing a lot of disagreements within the democratic caucus or within the democratic party more broadly on how to hand this will right now. look, it's politics, right? the democrats want to delal this nomination. they want the documents to be out there to find something on judge kavanaugh that might, you know, cause a couple of republicans to announce they might oppose him. and from the white house's perspective, they want to block the release of this document -- these documents because they don't want to risk anything coming out that might derail the nomination. it's just politics in the end. i think as you mentioned, a lot of folks have resigned themselves, particularly on the kraic si democratic side that kavanaugh will be confirmed. >> one issue that the senator raised and a lot of people have been talking about is kavanaugh's position on executive power. >> you have the lawyer pleading guilty and a nominee who has -- had one of the expansive views of presidential power that we've seen in history. this is a guy that says, one, a president should be able to declare a sta

the growing ideological underpinnings of the democratic party really do make me wonder if people in the media are overestimating the democratic wave. the ideology scares a whole lot of people. rep. davidson: if you look at the pro-life issue, for example, we had a bill called the born alive act. attended abortion, the baby isn't aborted successfully, so the baby is actually alive -- really, really rare scenario, and there was a vote on that. only six democrats voted for that. the position for life within the democratic party is pretty monolithic, and it that way on a lot of issues. republicans have a much more inclusive ideology. if you look at grandma and grandpa's party when john f. kennedy was the icon, and he was celebrated, but asked, ask not what the country can do for you but what you can do for your country -- find a democrat that will run on that instead of the exact opposite. your country isn't doing this for you. when i'm there, it's going to do more for you. they will be offering lawnmowing any day now. host: congressman davidson, it's been my pleasure to sit down and have a

but the deeper question is whether the democratic party will commit resources these candidates will needul in november. joining me now is democratic national committee chair tom perez. thank you for being with us, mr. chairman. >> it's always a pleasure to be with you, rev. >> now, about a month ago in atlanta black leadership summit of the dnc and people were concerned what a record number of black women run rearing record number of women running, where the democratic party would be in terms of its resources and dealt with it with you forthrightly and you came back very strongly saying we'll there, we're going to put the resour resources there. how, in this increased number of black women running and others running that have, in many case, not been political before, how will the democratic party function where it is not a beltway down kind of engagement but really engaging and working with organic and grassroots candidacies? >> i think that's the key. we've been working together with an array of partners out there in the progressive ecosystem, not just starting this year but last year.

we're seeing a sea change inside the democratic party. certainly to the left side logicalllodg -- ideologically. >> i want to know what this means in november of 2018 and also, david, as we look to 2020 in the primaries there. >> there is no doubt about that. it becomes much more likely as you look at these results, back in june, pressley, stacey abrams and andrew gillum, this is a party that seems more poised and perfect to nominating someone more from the left and a more diverse nonwhite male in the party. if you're a nonwhite centrist in the 2020 race, you may need not apply in the current party in the way the electorate is responding. it is huge for us to think about, we don't know, of course, is the answer, but are they moving too far left, that is not the case in massachusetts, there is no republican opponent, but in general for the party are they moving too far left for a general election? we have to be open to the idea that may be a older way of thinking. i remember a lot of people in 2015 that thought if jou a candidate for mt. t

democrats don't do trade deals, they never have. bill clinton managed to pull his party along but in recent decades, democrats are very wary, republicans and republican leadership from the top always pushed these over the finish line, democrats do not want to give any victory to donald trump in any way, shape or form, if democrats are running the house to see how this happened, republicans on policy standpoints don't feel this is a good trade deal and it is not free trade or not, he has to convince members of his own party. >> the us trade rep working with democrats and labor to craft this so they will come along, will he have done enough, his talking about protectionist elements. >> sandy live in, he doesn't think the deal does enough, what will end up happening, they go back to trump and say we need more, stuck in a cycle where he has to demand more from the mexicans. >> question is whether democrats would be willing to take responsibility for killing the deal. >> they may have an of republicans to join with them, two factions, one to say this is not free trade, the af

the actual press secretary of the democratic party c.e.o. of the now and strategies consulting firm he's in las vegas in a new york is amy holmes coersion the p.b.s. show in principle a former staffer to senate majority leader bill frist. well here's good dissolve on the topics of amy this week president drone border crisis of occasional all documents connected to the russian probe. well he ordered that the texts between lisa page and peter struck be put in the public domain those are not classified documents and you know they were texts on government you know handheld devices and computers so hopefully they didn't have any classified documents on them because if they did then those two people involved they would be in a lot of trouble and then he ordered twenty one pages of the files application one particular press afaik application in june twenty seventh he'd to be redacted the president has the ultimate authority as a constitutional authority to declassify anything he wants presidents do it all the time president obama spoke very openly