so in pursuit of that own political interest, the democratic progressive party, the peo, thirty's, have shown complete submission to external forces using taiwan semi conduct to industry and other leading enterprises as stepping stones in their attempts to pursue separation. by relying on accidental forces. they have even treated these companies as gifts to be given away repeatedly selling out the interest and wellbeing as people and businesses in taiwan. be this, this shameless sight of selling taiwan away while taking pride in pandering to the us space, increase single position from a growing number of people and companies in taiwan. they came to stories across the well, the usa i, the agency is here as well. china is accused of being the instigator of various groups that are promoting the idea of tie one's independence and quote, are inciting conflicts across the street. in a recent poll of tie when they use it was found the majority of residents. i'm not inclined to build strong stronger ties of washington and are opposed to transferring advanced technology to the united states. wel

the democratic progressive party, the peo ortiz, have shown complete submission to external forces using taiwan semi conduct to industry and other leading enterprises as stepping stones in their attempts to pursue separation by relying on accidental forces. they have even treated these companies as gifts to be given away repeatedly selling out the interest and wellbeing of people and businesses in taiwan. either this shameless act of selling taiwan away while taking pride in pandering to the us has faced increased single position from a growing number of people. and companies in taiwan in florida is across the world of usa. i. d is here as well. sign up for the kids that are being instigated, various schools are promoting taiwan independence. i know quote and slicing conflicts across the states and the reason paul or the tie when a residence. the majority of them are not inclined to bill from the ties with washington and i posed as transferring advanced technology to the united states. all state wanted me to call john swain's, what's behind washington's desire highway semiconductors, r t

so in pursuit of that own political interest, the democratic progressive party, the peo ortiz, have shown complete submission to external forces using taiwan semi conduct to industry and other leading enterprises as stepping stones in their attempts to pursue separation. by relying on external forces. they have even treated these companies as gifts to be given away repeatedly selling out the interest and wellbeing as people and businesses in taiwan b. that's this shameless act of selling taiwan away while taking pride in pandering to the us has faced increasing opposition from a growing number of people and companies in taiwan. and thinking the story is a, across the world. for example, the usa i, the agency is right there as well. china is accused of being the instigator of various groups promoting taiwan independence and uh, quote, inciting conflicts across the straight. and every, some fold of i tie when he's residents, the majority of them are not inclined to build stronger ties with washington. they're also opposed to transferring advanced technology to america. overall, to want to c

get leaders who actually will fight for them not for washington and the old guard, the progressive democrat party that's so out of touch with the american people. today president trump will sign an executive order to do something we already passed through the house and that is to say men can't play in women sports. this is a bill we passed through the house twice now. almost on a bipartisan line vote, which seems bizarre. it should be something everybody agrees to. talked about a lot during the election. most americans are with with us in saying that women sports should be reserved for women. biological women. president trump will be signing that executive order today. as the bill we passed hopefully goes through the senate. see it can become law in a permanent way. we are going to continue to work with this president to deliver on those promises. a lot of those promises that we are working to deliver on are going to go through the budget reconciliation process. i know are you following that closely. we have been working very closely with our membership. we got into very specific detail at our re

there's also the, the work side of the democratic party, the progressive side, are they gonna become lambs and be quiet and let the with the, the, the conservative wing of the democrats from the show again, where the democrats have a better chance winning. and for years, all these things are this debate is still has to happen to the democratic party. they haven't really got there yet. but what kind of a responsibility to the democrats have to shoulder for the situation that the country is in right now? and this is, robert cleared law stan or i think they have a responsibility not just to that own base, but also to every single, an american who belongs to a modularized group whose life and existence is now under direct attacks from this government. so i think that's why that's been a lot of discontent from their own base with the way that democrats hackman, reacting with this sort of a set closeness, almost that they displayed in the last it's gotten a bit better within the last couple of days, but still considering what the face with this is a very still very tepid reaction to someth

democrat voters have said enough to alter progressive policies. this is according to a new gallup poll. 45% say they want the democratic party to be more moderate. the progressive cause. so why aren't democratic lawmakers actually listening to their voters? president trump is the first republican to win the popular vote in 20 years. the american people have spoken and definitively so, but instead, democrats are warning of a constitutional crisis. >> what we are witnessing is a constitutional crisis. >> constitutional crisis. >> constitutional crisis. >> i think this is the most serious constitutional crisis the country has faced. >> kayleigh: they got the talking point and also the marching order, pushing back on everything donald trump does. >> and let's [bleep] shut down the city! we are at war with unprecedented organizing, mobilizing, entertaining, we will see you in the courts, and congress, in the streets. >> we are prepared to fight! we are prepared to fight! >> kayleigh: yikes, mentioning her ears bleeding last block, i think i am with her now. democrats saying things like this. >> you had mentioned trying to engage more women in manufact

party. kevin ko has more on the message from bay area democrats. >> reporter: it's not often voters protest against their own party, but bay area progressives say they'veugh. as hakeem jeffries was getting ready to speak inside the kaiser convention center, hundreds of demonstrators stood out here demanding that jeffries and his party step up. >> the democrats need to fight as hard as the republicans fight. they need to be disruptive. they need to delay things. >> reporter: milly cleveland organized the rally outside the henry j. kaiser convention center friday night. she and hundreds of other democrats say their party isn't doing enough to counter the trump administration's sweeping actions across federal agencies. >> we need our representatives to fight harder. just because you're in the minority doesn't mean that you can't fight. >> the whole neighborhood is on fire and the democrats are talking about what color the fire truck should be, right? we need democrats with hoses in their hand, buckets in their hand with the people fighting for them. >> reporter: pastor servant b.k. woodson says democrats need to take action. >> do your job! do your job! >

party. kevin ko has more on the message from bay area democrats. >> reporter: it's not often voters protest against their own party, but bay area progressives say they've had enough. as hakeem jeffries was getting ready to speak inside the kaiser convention center, hundreds of demonstrators stood out here demanding that jeffries and his party step up. >> the democrats need to fight as hard as the republicans fight. they need to be disruptive. they need to delay things. >> reporter: milly cleveland organized the rally outside the henry j. kaiser convention center friday night. she and hundreds of other democrats say their party isn't doing enough to counter the trump administration's sweeping actions across federal agencies. >> we need our representatives to fight harder. just because you're in the minority doesn't mean that you can't fight. >> the whole neighborhood is on fire and the democrats are talking about what color the fire truck should be, right? we need democrats with hoses in their hand, buckets in their hand with the people fighting for them. >> reporter: pastor servant b.k. woodson says democrats need to take action. >> do your job! do you

held by a lot of democrats certainly here in this chamber and the progressive movement in the country. it hearkens back to two other democrats who pretty much got pushed out of their partye in the united states senate for holding views that ran contrary to the majority view of the progressive wing of the democrat party. those two democrats were joe manchin and kirsten sinema. in the case of kirsten sinema, she was viewed, i think, by democrats as perhaps too free market. she was viewed as pro-business, pro-investment, and as pro-jobs, lighter regulatory touch, lighter tax policy, pro-energy policy. in the case of joe manchin, he had pro -- i should say he had what i would say are accurate views with respect to energy development in this country, in other words, making america energy dominant, a view shared by many in our party, including our president, and for that he was viewed as too conservative to be a true democrat. and so joe manchin and kirsten sinema end ed up getting pushed out of the democrat party here in the united states senate. now, their ultimate cardinal sin, however, in the case of manchin, he was pro-energy in a party that is dominated by climate, gree

democrats have been a little slow to embrace the cra and their elements that don't want to embrace this congressional review act and would like to see it abolished on the progressive wing of the democratic party but there's more and more appetite in other wings of the democratic party to be involved in at least the symbolic free vote aspect that arises at certain points in the electoral calendar so i would expect to see once the current look back window closes to see, quote, record-breaking democratic introductions but i do think in the end the distinction between republicans and democrats historically i do think this conversation is right that it's a substantially similar provision that has been particularly frightening from the democratic point of view. >> thanks, everyone, for being here, thanks, everyone on the panel for this, we found it useful and you can hit the ground running over the next couple months to make some hay out of the congressional review act. thank you. [applause] >> wednesday, a look at ways to increase government efficiency and reduce unnecessary spending with iowa governor kim reynolds and citizens against government waste president thomas shatt before the house overs

will deliver the progressive prebuttal to his address, her office telling ktvu she was asked to deliver the address by the working families party. that is the progressive flank of democratswill represent the larger democratic party. new at 630, the u.s. supreme court heard arguments about so-called reverse discrimination in the workplace. at issue is whether majority groups face more hurdles than minorities when it comes to filing discrimination lawsuits. the case involves a woman from ohio who is looking to sue her employer after she says she lost jobs to gay colleagues, who she says are less qualified. her employer says she was passed over not because of her sexual orientation, but because she lacked the necessary vision and leadership skills. jeff bezos, the owner of the washington post, says going forward, the paper's opinion pages will be dedicated to supporting, quote, personal liberties and free markets. in response, editorial page editor david shipley, who had held the job for more than two years, decided to resign. the trump administration, praising the shift, which comes four months after bezos axed the post presidential endorsement for kamala harris, prompting

there are certainly elements in the democratic party that don't want to embrace a congressional review act and want to see it abolished. certainly on the progressive wing. there is more of an appetite in other wings of the democratic party i think to, to be involved in at least the symbolic free vote aspect that arises in certain points of the electoral calendar. i would certainly expect to see, once the current look-back window closes, to see record-breaking democratic introductions. i do think that, in the end, that distinction between republicans and democrats historically, i think that this conversation is right, it is a substantially similar provision that has been particularly frightening from the democratic point of view. mr. fragoso: thanks, everyone, for being here. we are coming up on one hour. thank you to everyone in the panel. hopefully you found it useful and can hit the ground running over the next couple of months to make some hay out of the congressional review act. thank you. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright

democrats to organize against. they're going to cut your medicare. >> they're going. >> to cut your, you know, social security. so i hope that across the democratic party, across the progressiveovement, they use that as an opportunity to get people to make their voices heard. and at the same time, if they can negotiate to, you know, make it less awful, that would be that would they would be wise to, to do so as well. but again, with democrats, both sides have to be in the house and the senate. they've got to come together and fight this fight. >> are you confident that democrats have that leadership though, and that messaging? because one lesson of the first couple of weeks of the trump administration is they're struggling and there's a fair amount of infighting. there's a lot of self-flagellation. yeah. self-questioning. >> well, a couple of things. number one, i do want to give props to the u.s. the attorneys general, democratic attorneys general, they were ready to go. they were organized in december, ready for the the things that we saw happening very quickly. and look, we just elected our dnc chair, ken martin. we'll see what happens when he occupies the dnc and if he ca

during the campaign i said i thought kamala harris w would lose, democrat party has been hijacked by progressivertment of education 280 billion as our test scores plummet, and 50 million from epa for environmental justice groups aligned with hamas. i mean, you go down the list, and the democrats just won't win that debate, there is a word they should heed back to clinton era, mend is, don't end it, work with trump administration to fix the problems rather than fight them, most thing that could come out are this would be to put some sunshine on to these grants that have been going out for aid and epa, none would pass muster if press were able to get a hole of them -- hold of them, i think that democrats have chosen the wrong fight, they will lose. david: mike, quickly, the doj drops case against mayor adams in new york, some people say is was political, a lot of republicans say it was political to indict him on the changes, it happened after he went against thebining biden administration on the migration policies -- your thoughts? it is a fair thing in dropping the case. >> absolutely. the biden

to start but i always argued the democrat party has a much bigger dna problem because generally there's a gap between what the upcoming generation sees as the progressive values and socialism and all that that they want to see out of the democratic party versus the old school democrat party which is a little more traditional. republicans have the same thing but we are not defined, trump is trump, hughes the president, we are not defined by, there's no trump light coming up. i'm not saying it goes back to the way it was but who is going to be running for president in four years? might be jd vance or desantis or some governor. i need to make some money. if you're hiring, let me know. in all seriousness, both parties have problems in different ways. i think social media and how we consume information is at the heart of a lot of it. i think people talk about empathy but don't practice it. the reason i get instilled with optimism is because i don't live in this, excuse me, godforsaken city. this place is a bubble unto itself as you know. i was a governor of a state where you are held accountable into believing local control. a reason i like what trump is do

waste and abuse, and i mean what does this party stand for other than they're trying to stop american progress? >> well look i think they're actually three democraticties. there is a woke hard left party which is actually a religion. they can't negotiate they can't compromise, they can't deal with reality because they basically are religious fanatics with transgerundism as being a key part of their church. the second part of the democratic party is just plain corrupt, it is chicago it's the jill state government it is large parts of california. these are people that teachers union these are people who are desperate for your money and if they don't have the taxpayer funding them they're going to go broke and be out of business. then there's a third part a tiny sliver of actual competent practical people who like to serve the country and those three parts, i think, find it impossible to come together and trying to deal with president trump and with maga and so you have a party that's mired down the noisiest part is the religious group of who believe fanatically in values that about 80 to 85%th of the american people repudiate that's a key part of wha

progressive movement itself. as he puts it, quote, over the past half century progressivism, cultural aversion to power has turned the democratic partyut government down. progressives are so fearful of establishment abuse that reformers tend to prefer to tighten rather than loosen their grip on authority. the movement discounts whatever good the government might do in service of ensuring that it won't do bad. and that's driven well intentioned reformers to insert so many checks into the system that government has been rendered incompetent. joining us now, fellow at brown university's watson watson institute for international and public affairs and author of the new book, why nothing works who killed progress and how to bring it back, mark dunkelman. i loved this piece, mark. i loved it, i thought it very incisively put the problem within the democratic party. and there was a message on how to fix it. and when you're talking about the democrats and their desire to make sure the government doesn't do harm in order for it to do good, i think there are so many great examples, one of them being the million dollar toilet in san francisco,

there are certainly elements in the democratic party that don't want to embrace a congressional review act and want to see it abolished. certainly on the progressive wing. there is more of an appetite in other wings of the democratic party i think to, to be involved in at least the symbolic free vote aspect that arises in certain points of the electoral calendar. i would certainly expect to see, once the current look-back window closes, to see record-breaking democratic introductions. i do think that, in the end, that distinction between republicans and democrats historically, i think that this conversation is right, it is a substantially similar provision that has been particularly frightening from the democratic point of view. mr. fragoso: thanks, everyone, for being here. we are coming up on one hour. thank you to everyone in the panel. hopefully you found it useful and can hit the ground running over the next couple of months to make some hay out of the congressional review act. thank you. [captioning performed by the national captioning instit

there are certainly elements in the democratic party that don't want to embrace a congressional review act and want to see it abolished. certainly on the progressive wing. there is more of an appetite in other wings of the democratic party i think to, to be involved in at least the symbolic free vote aspect that arises in certain points of the electoral calendar. i would certainly expect to see, once the current look-back window closes, to see record-breaking democratic introductions. i do think that, in the end, that distinction between republicans and democrats historically, i think that this conversation is right, it is a substantially similar provision that has b

bay area residents with two different progressive democratic groups on one side of 10th street, the democratic party has been paying lip service to the working class for far too long. they say democratic leaders have been ineffective in opposing the trump presidency and agenda. we don't want elon musk running our government. and the anti-war group code pink across the street, criticizing jeffries for his support of israel defense spending and for taking money from israeli lobbyists. with all of the backing he gets from the pro-israel lobby, that he would change his position. but inside, oakland's former mayor called out the protesters. unfortunately, they're in the wrong place at the wrong time. lieu harris said the demonstrators need to redirect their energy against the white house, which has an agenda to divide and conquer. jeffries also encouraged democrats to unite. donald trump is not a king, and we will n never bend e knee. he said the administration is trying to disorient, discourage and disillusion the american people. while republicans pushed through an agenda that benefits only the wealthi

however, the progressive leadership and even the democratic party leadership is so coastal he based.ffries, schumer from new york, jeffries from new york and especially pull oc and gavin newsom from california do not represent my social values as a midwesterner. and another one that is new on the scene i cannot stand is that jasmine crockett. so i would like to know where is the midwestern sensibility in progressive leadership? host: alex in detroit, thank you. guest: really appreciate the work you put into it. when i think about the progressive leadership across the country i look to people like senator malory mick morrow in michigan. state senator zach walls, she is an independent now but nebraska state senator hunt. zooey zephyr and there are so many others. i think it's worth thinking about why some of the -- the democratic leadership comes from these blue places. in part because they can stake out positions that maybe wouldn't necessarily be what a swing candidate would be willing to take. they are not as afraid of their own reelection. there are pros and cons of that pride but

however, the progressive leadership and even the democratic party leadership is so coastal he based.jeffries, schumer from new york, jeffries from new york and especially pull oc and gavin newsom from california do not represent my social values as a midwesterner. and another one that is new on the scene i cannot stand is that jasmine crockett. so i would like to know where is the midwestern sensibility in progressive leadership? host: alex in detroit, thank you. guest: really appreciate the work you put into it. when i think about the progressive leadership across the country i look to people like senator malory mick morrow in michigan. state senator zach walls, she is an independent now but nebraska state senator hunt. zooey zephyr and there are so many others. i think it's worth thinking about why some of the -- the democratic leadership comes from these blue places. in part because they can stake out positions that maybe wouldn't necessarily be what a swing candidate would be willing to take. they are not as afraid of their own reelection. there are pros and cons of that pride bu

progressive things for our country. what's the message that the democratic party needs to have so they can reconnect?oint to democratic senator futterman who said we don't need to have our hair on fire for everything the president does especially when it comes to something like u.s. aid which is something the american people overwhelmingly support cutting. when you look at trump's agenda so far, it's not far right or not -- necessarily super conservative. as he calls it, it's common sense and the american people are with him but democrats are so anxiety ridden over what they've accomplished by pushing biden out of the race. >> thank you so much. did you hear we have tom brady coming up? we're excited. >> i'm sorry i'm not as handsome as tom brady but i will warm up the seat for him. [laughter] >> thank you so much katie. we appreciate it. it's far from his first super bowl but it be as first time calling the big game. seven-time champion and fox sports analyst tom brady is live on fox & friends from new orleans. we can't wait to talk to you. that's next. hillsdale was founded in 1844. we're passing o

democratic party's interest in minnesota politics. he started his career as an intern for the late progressive firebrand senator paul wellstone. d of the democratic party in minnesota, the democratic farm labor party. in the two decades before martin became the state party leader, the minnesota governor's office had been occupied by two republicans and one libertarian leaning former professional wrestler. but in the 14 years since martin took over as state party chair, not only have minnesota dems won every governor's race, they've also won every statewide race period. after winning the race this weekend for dnc chair ken martin declared a new day for the democratic party nationwide. he said, quote, trump the republican party. this is a new dnc. we are not going to sit back and not take you on when you fail the american people. joining us now is ken martin. he is the newly elected chairman of the democratic national committee. mr. martin, congratulations. thanks very much for joining us tonight. >> thank you for having me, rachel. >> i'm glad to be on. >> what should americans know about you who don't know about your record or

candidates want to see is they want to see these institutions that are part of the democratic party and part of the progressiveent kind of have enough money to last until, you know, 2026 or 2028. clearly, like, i mean, i think that the words that come up a lot are people are checked out. these wealthy people, in fact, some of them are not watching the news or, or be engaging in civic life in the way they were in 2017. so that's another way. they're just like regular people. and i think the challenge for the democratic party right now is like, if you can't get george soros excited about, you know, ken martin or about, you know, fighting trump, then, you know, what do you say to a middle class voter in milwaukee who is checked out as well? >> all right then, gentlemen, thank you both so much. when we return, in honor of presidents day, donald trump quoted napoleon. you know, the french emperor. i'm going to need historian jon meacham to explain that one to us. he joins us next. >> imagine a switch that could wipe your personal data off the internet with one click. incogni. stops identity thieves and protects you

democratic party. it's not. this is about making progress and they're well on their way. >> dana: the left are suggesting with that headline who is running the government? i remember that from bush days, right? it's just is karl rove or dick cheney running the government? trump is running the government. to me musk has been quite differential to the president. i don't think that tactic is going to work. >> yeah. no, it's not. you can't actually get the guy. you try to get the guy underneath him, right? they are basically just trying anything they can do to hamstring the trump administration. you've seen it as you said during the bush administration. i experienced a little of this when i was the chief of staff, too. if you can't take the guy out you have to go after their number two and try to make them politically unpalatable. the interview shows about status of the relationship and president trump's willingness to pursue doge until they get results. >> bill: they are saying a trillion dollars they can save. see how close they get to it. nic

i have always argued the democrat party has a much bigger dna problem because i think generationally, there is a gap between what this upcoming generation sees as the progressive values and socialism and all that sort of thing they want to see out of the democrat party versus what we will call the old-school democrat party which is just a little more of the traditional. republicans have the same thing but we are not defined -- trump is trump. he is the president. we are not defined by it. i'm not saying it goes back to the way it was, but look, who is going to be running for president in four years? it might be jd vance. it might be to santos. it will probably be some governors. host: might it -- >> might it be you? >> no, i need to make some money. if you are hiring, let me know. both parties have problems in different ways. i think social media and how we consume information is at the heart of a lot of this. i think people talk about empathy but they don't practice it, and i think the reason i get reinstalled with optimism is because i don't live in this -- excuse me -- godforsaken city. this place is a bubble unto itself, as you know. i was a governor of a

party. kevin ko has more on the message from bay area democrats. >> reporter: it's not often voters protest against their own party, but bay area progressives say they'vekeem jefferies was getting ready to speak inside the kaiser convention center, hundreds of demonstrators stood out here demanding that jefferies and his party step up. >> i didn't know what it was. i thought it was like a ring or something. the democrats need to fight as hard as the republicans fight. they need to be disruptive. they need to delay things. >> reporter: milli cleveland organized the rally outside the convention center friday night. >> free the people. >> reporter: she and hundreds of other democrats say their party isn't doing enough to counter the trump administration's sweeping actions across federal agencies. >> we need our representatives to fight harder. just because you're in the minority doesn't mean that you can't fight. >> the whole neighborhood is on fire, and the democrats are talking about what color the fire truck should be, right? we need democrats with hoses in their hands, buckets in their hands with the people fighting for them. >> reporter: pastor serva

bay area residents with two different progressive democratic groups on one side of 10th street, the democratic party has been paying lip service to the working class for far too long. they say democratic leaders have been ineffective in opposing the trump presidency and agenda. we don't want elon musk running our government and the anti-war group code pink across the street, criticizing jeffries for his support of israel defense spending and for taking money from israeli lobbyists. with all of the backing he gets from the pro-israel lobby, that he would change his position. but inside, oakland's former mayor called out the protesters. unfortunately, they're in the wrong place at the wrong time. lieu harris said the demonstrators need to redirect their energy against the white house, which has an agenda to divide and conquer. jeffries also encouraged democrats to unite. donald trump is not a king, and we will never bend the knee. he said the administration is trying to disorient, discourage and disillusion the american people. while republicans pushed through an agenda that benefits only the wealthie

party, he's sounding more like me. >> the first one is some democrats. >> and progressives in new york are advocating for bereavementpet leave. okay, so in other words, if your cat dies, you get three days of paid leave. and it's like there's a plant somewhere in, quote, progressive unquote america that just sees how many jackass stupid things that they can embrace. it's stunningly stupid, both of them. >> but not everyone's down to reboot the party's platform. hawaii democrat brian schatz is his name, says establishment strategists or hasbeens, quote, those guys have not been in the trenches legislatively or electorally in a full generation. and there's a cottage industry out there. a democratic strategist, in order to be a democrat strategist, you actually have to do politics currently and not just podcast about it. victor davis hanson is a senior fellow at the hoover institution, and he's back from pet bereavement leave. how many days did you take for old yeller? 4 or 5. >> i don't know. >> it's been a while. >> but carmela's in a bad position. i mean, she has no official office. she's not a vice president. she's

democratic party. they don't have a message and focused on progressive issues that america is not worried about the guy who wants to have a sex change operation but america's worried about putting food on the table and donald trump got it. they were worried about the border. they were worried about paying bills in the grocery store. that was it periods be when we are seeing a sense of team withe trump guys and marco rubio go south with the message and pam all kicked finality in guatemalh venezuela and el salvador you have to take your people back. not only does el salvador guatemala to take people back that they will take other people back. really? here are your hostages and we will take our people back in panama as of now, we will go to sunset that deals with china and push them out and eliminate fees on your ships. pam bondi comes out and says stop funding sanctuary cities. so trump sets the tone and says go do it. that was not happening the first time periods before they all like each other and nsync. i was on the ground with pete hegseth and talking to marco rubio and mike waltz as well. they are o

democrat party has a much bigger dna problem. i think generationally there's a gap between what the upcoming generation sees as the progressive values and socialism versus what we call the old school democrat party, which is a little more of the traditional. republicans have the same thing but we are not defined -- trump is trump, we are not defined by him. i am not saying it goes back to the way it was. but who is going to be running for president in four years? it might be j.d. vance, desantis. it might be some governors. prof. sesno: might it be you? mr. sununu: no, i need to make some money. in all seriousness, i think both parties have problems in different ways. social media and how we consume information is at the heart of a lot of this. i think people talk about empathy but they don't practice it. the reason i get re-instilled with optimism because i don't live in this, excuse me, godforsaken city. this place is a bubble unto itself. i was governor of a state where you are constantly held accountable, where you believe in local control. one of the reasons i actually like what is happening with what trump is doing, it is a de