said that he is discussing the idea of ​​reducing the number of ministers. with prime minister denys shmygal note here, as the political scientists we interviewed told us, shared their opinions, denys shmygal himself is unlikely to be affected by any personnel rotation, resignation, he will affect everyone. suits, at least as of now, it looks like that, but who and where are going to be cut, as volodymyr zelenskyi said, will be clear in the spring, in a month or two. listen. when we speak about the reboot depends on some things to be honest with you. we have this conversation with the prime minister, and it is based solely on the lack of money. if there is a corresponding deficit, will continue, we will do everything to infrastructure. and it is not only about the cabinet of ministers, so that the management infrastructure of our state is reduced, and this is such a format, we are prepared for it, reducing the number of ministries, reducing the number of ministers, it is easier, or cheaper, let's say. yulia zabilina, the political columnist of the nv edition joined our broadcast, yulia, hell

prime minister of ukraine denis shmygal sounded the alarm at the end of last year, saying that the country economy was in survival mode. in the office of the president of ukraine. they say that an additional 10-15 billion dollars are needed, the ukrainian economy is generally unviable in the absence of assistance from western countries, but again we must understand that it will not be viable even with continued assistance from western countries, because this assistance mainly falls on time and debts on the ukrainian economy, which they will not be able to to pay several generations of ukrainians. at the end of last year , ukraine’s total government debt reached a historical high; it increased by a third and exceeded $145 billion. and now, how borrowed and other funds are spent is already raising questions. kiev is counting on aid being allocated without additional conditions, in fact , the ukrainian authorities can spend it as they wish, corruption is rampant in the country, and naturally, most of the funds go offshore. kiev expects that money from the eu’s long-term assistance program wil

warsaw ignored the delegation from kiev when the head of the cabinet of ministers denis shmygal arrived at the polish border, where. blocking ukrainian grain, to save the situation, but vladimir zelensky himself rushed to lviv to curry favor with american congressmen. as you know, my ancestors lived here seven generations ago, but you are not alone, because what you do, what ukrainians sacrifice their lives and destinies, with all this you not only defend your country, which wants to be free, you protect europe, you defend the west, and you defend the honor and strength of the united states, so we have faith in you. however, these are just words. in fact, on the second anniversary of the conflict, zelensky is preparing for the defeat of ukraine, as democratic majority leader in the us senate chuck schumer wrote after the meeting, if there is no money from washington. but $61 billion in aid promised by us president joe biden is being blocked by congressional republicans, casting a major shadow over kiev's hopes of repelling a larger russian army that is much better supplied. as the publi

ukrainian prime minister denis shmygal sounded the alarm at the end of last year. survival mode. the office of the president of ukraine says that it is necessary additionally 10. the ukrainian economy, in general, is not viable in the absence of help from western countries, but again, one must understand that it will not be viable even with continued assistance from western countries, because basically this help takes a toll of time and debt on the ukrainian economy , which several generations of ukrainians will not be able to pay. at the end of last year , the total public debt... of ukraine reached a historical maximum, it increased by a third and exceeded $145 billion, here's how borrowed and other funds are spent raises questions. assistance is allocated without additional conditions, in fact , the ukrainian authorities can spend it as they want, corruption is rampant in the country, and naturally, most of the funds go to the offshore accounts of functionaries of the ukrainian government, and do not reach the recipients. kiev expects that money under the long-t

ukraine, the budget deficit this year will be about 40 billion dollars, prime minister of ukraine denis shmygalded the alarm: the country's economy is in survival mode. the office of the president of ukraine says that an additional 10-15 billion dollars are needed. the ukrainian economy is generally unviable in the absence of assistance from western countries, but again, it is necessary understand that it will not be viable even with continued assistance from western countries, because basically this assistance will be imposed by time and debts... at the end of last year, ukraine’s total public debt reached a historical maximum, it increased by a third and exceeded $145 billion, here’s how borrowed funds and other funds are being spent , raising questions. aid is allocated without additional conditions, in fact, the ukrainian authorities can spend it as they want, corruption is rampant in the country and... naturally, most of the funds go to offshore accounts of functionaries of the ukrainian government, and does not reach the recipients. kiev expects that money under the long-term assistance p

if not, then a technocratic government, and can the government of denys shmygal be considered exactly that technocratic government? er, in general, as a political scientist, i must say that the very option of a government of national unity, it is taken from a situation when there is a great split in the country, when there is a great confrontation on ideological grounds, er... up to the point of civil conflict, that is in such situations, the idea of ​​a government of national unity arises, which should stop this confrontation, include the main ones, so to speak talk about these groups in power and thus reconcile the conflicting parties. today in ukraine we have the exact opposite situation, there is a big one, it is probably not the same now. it is clearly visible, but there is a great consolidation on a patriotic basis, on a civic basis, and here the very idea of ​​the government of national unity is rather a euphemism used by the opposition in order, so to speak, to advance its own agenda, political and ideas and wishes. as for the technocratic government, yes, according to the ide

national unity possible now, if not, then a technocratic government, and can the government of denys shmygal be considered exactly that technocratic government? in general, as a political scientist, i must say that the very option of the government of national unity, it is taken from a situation when there is a big split in the country, when there is a big confrontation. on an ideological basis, up to the point of civil conflict, in such situations the idea of ​​a government of national unity arises, which should stop this confrontation, include the main, so to speak, these groups into power and thus reconcile the conflicting parties, today in ukraine we have the exact opposite situation, there is a big... it is probably not so clearly visible now, but there is a big consolidation on a patriotic basis, on a civic basis, and here the very idea the government of national unity is rather a euphemism used by the opposition in order, so to speak, to advance its agenda, its political agenda and its ideas and its wishes, as far as the technocrats are concerned. of the government, yes, according to

today, the ukrainian delegation headed by denys shmygal went to the polish border, as volodymyr zelenskyi announced yesterday, and wanted to meet with polish government officials, but polish government officials were not there, because donald tusk clearly said that the two of us would meet. we have a meeting planned for march 28, we will meet and talk about everything. shmygal , on the other hand, said that ukraine has developed and is offering poland a plan of mutual understanding regarding the unblocking of the border, it consists of five steps, but the issue of the border, unblocking must be resolved before march 28, otherwise ukraine reserves the right to apply mirror measures at checkpoints. let's talk about what it looks like first. from the side of the ukrainian border, first marina gives what shmygal's trip looks like, and why it turned out like that, why they went there, why, i can't understand, if no one was waiting for them there, and then they took a group photo at the border, said, well, no one came, we don't know what the poles want, i think that we are the best on this topi

serhiu, considering that donald tusk met with denys shmygal and there were attempts to draw some kindof road map for settling the situation in general, at the same time... donald tusk emphasizes that it is difficult to find a greater sympathizer of ukraine than himself, but there is still food security. ukraine poses a logical question: what can we do, what can we do in response and how long can we tolerate this? on february 20, if all border crossings between poland and ukraine will be blocked from the polish side, then in response ukrainian carriers plan to block the crossing point on the border with poland, yagodyn dorogusk, for example. many ideas on the topic of what we should do with polish goods on our shelves, whether it is worth investing in it, if they allow themselves to treat our grain at the border, and so on and so forth. my question is the following: not only are we interested in the fact that the transport connection between our countries is preserved, and the matter here is not only in grain, how much is poland interested in us now? ukraine is among the top ten for th

representatives of the international currency fund and met with the prime minister of ukraine denys shmygal, about this and other things ihor burakovskyi, doctor of economic sciences, professor of the department of economic theory of sciences ma, chairman of the board of the institute of economic ... research and political consultations. glory to ukraine, mr. professor, we welcome you. to the heroes, glory, thank you. well, the delegation of the international monetary fund has arrived, and we understand that they are preparing to create an additional financial security cushion for us. well, because, as the classics used to say, in the united states it's clear that it's dark. and accordingly, we have to insure money just in case. your visions. so to speak, the prospects of new additional tranches from the international monetary fund, and in general, on what conditions can they give us money? well, i want to say that right away the current mission of the international monetary fund came under the extended financing program, the decision about this program was made last year, its cost is about