documents received recently by another group on occupy wall street being monitored by the department of homeland security this is entirely outside of what the department of homeland security is supposed to be participating and they are monitoring for legitimate first amendment assembly and speech activity they're monitoring for criticism of the government they're monitoring entirely nonviolent groups who are participating in legitimate first amendment activities back in the sixty's. s.d.s. which we discovered after the fact was not only infiltrated the sixty's and seventy's but not only observed but was infiltrated and there were provide. it's worse in some cases is there any evidence that v.h.s. is doing them like that and we've seen stories in the past about law enforcement groups infiltrating useful asked by war protester groups and then classifying people within terrorist screening center databases or fusion center databases. david what are your thoughts on google's new internet privacy policy well i think the new privacy changes are going to make it harder for google users to control the disclosure

when newly released documents show the department of homeland security closely monitored the occupy wall street movement it also shows that they were concerned about crossing the line and unconstitutional surveillance truthout was the first organization to file a freedom of information act request with th us on the matter so the first to get hundreds of pages of internal documents and we've been given bits of information here and there in the six months since occupy began the d.h.s.s. report that was released by wiki leaks after training strappers e-mails so we look at these they had an interest but you these documents show as if they ever actually broke the law by lated civil liberties what about the question of a quarter native occupy crackdown joining me from our studio in los angeles is jason leopold lead investigative reporter for truthout or jason thanks so much for joining us tonight and i guess for starters mean there's nearly four hundred pages of documents that you've got here what the county the most. yeah that's right there are about four hundred pages and what stood out the

your introduction you mentioned the document turned over to wiki leaks received on the department of homeland security and its role in monitoring street that document is actually referenced in the cash that that i received yesterday and that actually it was a cause of concern for the department of homeland security because some officials actually said that the preparation of this particular five page report was on authorized and as a result it was unauthorized and posted on the internal database information that's also shared with the f.b.i. and they scrubbed it they ended up scrubbing that because it again. fears that it rose to the level of authorized surveillance i would say that feels a little fishy to me because if you go back to that document that stratfor had the way they compiled it all the sources it was open source they basically just cut and paste the little tidbits from new york times articles from bloomberg articles it was something that anybody out there could have found and so does it seem to you like they were being overly careful right i mean these days i guess it would be nice to ass

of our national security. this is a tight and, and high standard. after, identifying the systems that meet those standards, the secretary of the department of homeland security under the legislatiowo the private sector operators of the systems to develop cybersecurity performance rs o privately operated cybersystems flexibility to meet the ever hardware or software they choose, so long as it achieves the required level of security. the department of homeland security will not be picking and in my opinion there is nothing in the bill that would stifle innovation. in fact, a letter from cisco systems, oracle, two of prominent it companies concludes that this legislation, and i quote, includes a number of tools that will enhance the nation's cybersecurity without interfering with innovation and development processes of the american it industry end quote. if a company can show legislation that the -- show to the depart o it alreadys cybers met -- then it will be exempt from further requirements under this law. failure to meet the snapped ard that will be pro posed by the department during a standard rule making and comment it create is a streamlined cyb

so then what's the logic in providing the overall authority to the department of homeland security? anyone who has been through an airport, as i do regularly, as most of us do, have no confidence in the technological capabilities of the department of homeland security. in fact, as an example, nothing has changed as far as airport security is concerned since probably september 12th, 2011. so the major threat comes from overseas. what would be the logic, then in making the lead organization the department of homeland security? >> senator, i think the issue, if i could, i want to break this out into three areas to make sure my responses -- >> make it brief. i have additional questions. >> yes, sir. i see three major things. we want dhs to take the lead on resilience and working with civilian agencies in critical infrastructure. we want d.o.d. to take the lead on defending the nation under cyberattack, fbi under law enforcement, and intelligence. and i think all three of us are need to work together as a joint team to move this forward. if we don't work as a team, then the nation suffers

so then what's the logic in providing the overall authority to the department of homeland security? anyone who has been through an airport, as i do regularly, as most of us do, have no confidence in the technological capabilities of the department of homeland security. in fact, as an example, nothing has changed as far as airport security is concerned since probably september 12th, 2011. so the major threat comes from overseas. what would be the logic, then in making the lead organization the department of homeland security? >> senator, i think the issue, if i could, i want to break this out into three areas to make sure my responses -- >> make it brief. i have additional questions. >> yes, sir. i see three major things. we want dhs to take the lead on resilience and working with civilian agencies in critical infrastructure. we want d.o.d. to take the lead on defending the nation under cyberattack, fbi under law enforcement, and intelligence. and i think all three of us are need to work together as a joint team to move this forward. if we don't work as a team, then the nation suffers

if the department of homeland security determines they want be any further regulator but there is a lot else in the bill but ultimately that is the moment and the point of truth and the other real put in by some of our colleagues doesn't do that and therefore it doesn't get. >> senator collins? >> that is a key provision of the bill. you cannot ignore the fact that 85% of critical infrastructure is in the private sector and say that we are going to be securing the country. but we very carefully crafted the bill so there's industry participation and drafting the performance base standards that would have to be met as senator lieberman said there were some sectors, some industries that are already doing it. they would be exempt from the regulations come and the department would work collaboratively. there is also very important information sharing provisions in this bill, and we owe a debt of gratitude to our colleague senator dianne feinstein for those provisions. we need to make sure that the industry does a better job of sharing its knowledge about intrusions' and the threat with the g

if the department of homeland security determines it already on their own they met it, they won't be any further regulated. there is a lot more in the bill, but that's a point of truth. the other bill put in by some of our colleagues doesn't do that and, therefore, it doesn't get the job done. >> senator collins. >> that is a key provision of the bill. you cannot ignore the fact that 85% of critical infrastructure is in the private sector and say that we're going to be securing our country, but we very carefully crafted the bill so there is industry participation in drafting the performance-based standards that would have to be met. as senator lieberman said, there are some sectors or some industries that are already doing it. they would be exempt from the regulation and the department would work collaboratively. there is also very important information sharing provisions in this bill and we owe a debt of gratitude to our colleague, senator dianne feinstein for those provisions. we have to make sure that industry does a better job of sharing its knowledge about intrusions and the thre

the bill that senator colins and i have introduced as this provision for the department of homeland security to work with the private sector to require the most critical covered infrastructure, not every business, to take certain actions, to defend their network to defend our country. general alexander, i believe i heard you say, i just want to have you confirm it that you believe we need both of those authorities in government, that is, information sharing and a system for protecting and better defending privately owned critical infrastructure, that is right? >> senator, that's correct. as you stated, that's the hard part, determining. how do you do that in a way not to burden industry? we have to set up some standards. we use the gold standard. >> right. >> the gold standard is one that we thought provided our networks the best defensive posture. we give that out free. we put it on the nsa.gov, here's set of standards. i think, as we work with industry, the issue is how do you make sure they are as defensible as possible without being overburdened? >> correct. >> i think we have to set tha

department of homeland security is going to be a policy equation, and they're doing the best they can with the tools and the resources that they have. but they've been challenged because they don't have the right and their most robust authorities to compel other departments and agencies to engage in cybersecurity. you know, it may not be the mission, for example, of the department of treasury or commerce or state to protect their government networks. they have other missions that are their primary focus. we need to have an agency that has cybersecurity as a primary focus but also an entity that has both policy and budgetary authority to compel adoption of robust cybersecurity standards. i have believed and i've advocated and the csi has commissioned which i co-chaired as one of the four national co-chairs of this commission called for a position to be established within the white house with this robust policy and budgetary authority. that being said, the lieberman-collins legislation does give dhs more authority than what they have now, and it does begin the process of closer collabor

so then what's the logic in providing the overall authority to the department of homeland security? anyone who has been through an airport, as i do regularly, as most of us do, have no confidence in the technological capabilities of the department of homeland security. in fact, as an example, nothing has changed as far as airport security is concerned since probably september 12th, 2011. so the major threat comes from overseas. what would be the logic, then in making the lead organization the department of homeland security? >> senator, i think the issue, if i could, i want to break this out into three areas to make sure my responses -- >> make it brief. i have additional questions. >> yes, sir. i see three major things. we want dhs to take the lead on resilience and working with civilian agencies in critical infrastructure. we want d.o.d. to take the lead on defending the nation under cyberattack, fbi under law enforcement, and intelligence. and i think all three of us are need to work together as a joint team to move this forward. if we don't work as a team, then the nation suffers

ordinance authorizing the department of emergency management to retroactively accept and expend a fy2011 homeland security grant program grant in the amount of $1,434,644 from the united states department of homeland security, through the california emergency management agency, for building and sustaining preparedness capabilities, and amending ordinances to provide for the creation of one grant- funded position in the department of emergency management. supervisor chu: thank you. >> i am joined by our emergency services manager and our service specialist. the grant in front of you today is a $1.4 million grant from the department of homeland security that we have received and we have brought to you every year. this is one of the bread and butter plants that funds the operations in the department, including equipment training and exercises for the city and county of san francisco. it also funds medical planning for mass casualty incidents in san francisco. this is 100% grant funding from the department of security. there are two items that might be of interest. it does shift to the position from gsa to gd

department of homeland security officials have not said how many people have been put deportations proceedings as a result of those reviews and again a new report from homeland security on this expected later in the year. well, back to today's news conference at the white house. the president accusing his republican critics of, quote, beating the drums of war. but he says that's easy for his republican critics to do so, when they are not the commander in chief. a news conference got under way at about 1:10 this afternoon from the brady briefing room, and the first issue that came up, israel and iran's nuclear capabilities. >> when i came into office, iran was unified, on the move, had made substantial progress on its nuclear program, and the world was divided in terms of how it feels. what we've been able to do over the last three years is mobilize unprecedented crippling sanctions on iran. iran is feeling the bite of these sanctions in a substantial way. the world is unified. iran is politically isolated. and what i have said is that we will not countenance iran getting a nuclear weapon. my p

. >> so then what's the logic in providing the overall authority to the department of homeland security? anyone who has been through an airport as i do regularly as most of us do have no confidence in the technological capabilities of the department of homeland security. in fact, as an example, nothing has changed as far as airport security is concerned since probably september 12th, 2011. >> joining me is janet napolitano. madame secretary, first, can you respond to john mccain's criticism at this armed services hearing just this week? >> well, i think it's unfortunate because it's wrong. the plain fact of the matter is that the tsa has managed to keep aviation safe in the decade following the attacks of 9/11 and technological improvements are being made all the time. moreover, i think that the senator didn't understand that the department of homeland security is already performing major functions in the cybersecurity arena. what we're talking about now, however, is having the congress help d.o.d., dhs, the department of homeland security, all of us better protect the cybersecurity net

amendment to the defense bill codifying a memorandum of agreement between the department of defense and the department of homeland security. the purpose of that amendment was to ensure that this relationship endures and highlights that the best governmentwide cyber security approach is one where dhs leverages not and expertise. this bill, unfortunately, this principles of that moa by expanding the size, scope, and reach of dhs and neglects to afford those necessary to protect the homeland to the only institutions currently capable of doing so. u.s. cyber command and the national security agency. at a recent fbi sponsored symposium at fordham university, the commander of the u.s. cyber command and the director of the nsa stated that if a significant cyber attack against this country were to take place there may not be of much he and his leaders could do to stop it in advance. in order to stop a cyber attack you have to see it in real time. you have to have those authorities. these are the conditions we put on the table. now how and what the congress chooses that will be a policy decision. this legislation does nothing to a

department of defense or the intelligence community. in other words they should take the lead in protecting federal civilian networks. i wonder if you would respond as to why you think the department of homeland security, as obviously we do, is better prepared this critical responsibility. >> well, several points. first, the department of homeland security, as i stated, already is exercising authority in the civilian area, working with the private sector, working with federal agencies so that's a space we are already filling and continue to grow our second, military and

>> senator, what we do on the border as the department of defense is to provide support to the lead agencies, department of homeland security primarily, justice department's organizations as well. we're eager to provide that support. it's mutually beneficial to both the agencies and the soldiers and sailors and marines training. we look for every opportunity to meet their requirements. >> maybe for you and general frazier, we have identified a lot of the cartels and their leaders, guzman's name and others are very familiar to us. according to your -- to the assessment released by the justice department, the car tell us now have presence in over 1,000 u.s. cities. why don't we know those names? maybe that's kind of an elementary question, or maybe ask general frazier and know the names of the cartel leaders and don't know the names of the people running the drug rings in over 1,000 cities, or do we know them? >> senator, my estimation would be that we know to some leveled the members of the cartels that are operating within the united states, i have spoken to several agencies within the united states about this issue, and i

we have also in the president's etrequt asked for a budget that would be held by the department of homeland security but would be used to help improve or raise the level of i.t. protection within the civilian agencies. >> all right. thank you. very quickly if i could just follow it up and justyou st talt more about how your department will be able to achieve what the president has requested, a $200 million for federal network security and how this legislation will impact those activities? will you just drill down that .or us? what it allows us to do and what we will be able to do is have a fund out of which we can make sure that the civilian agenciest practices, hiring qualified personnel and in other wayseng security within the federal government. >> all right, thanks. mr. chairman, if i could just say iofn the things that i hear a lot from businesses across the country e they want us toictality and one of the the regulations may flow from it are just that, predictability and certainty. with that in mind, i say to our witness that is are following, again, figure out ways in your testimony not just

would you agree that the department of homeland security has the lead role in interacting with the owners and operators of critical infrastructure to get them to strengthen their protections, harden their defenses up front as opposed to when an attack occurs? >> i do agree with that, senator. >> and the distinction that i'm trying to make is once there is an attack, that has significant consequences, d.o.d. would become the lead agency just as you would if we were attacked by missiles. is that an accurate assessment? >> that's correct. and there is the confusion lies. it is the role of the department of homeland security under the current practice of this administration and under the legislation that senator lieberman and i have authored to try to strengthen the defenses of our critical infrastructure, and in our legislation, and in a collaborative effort with industry which is absolutely critical that it be collaborative, the department with industry would develop risk-based performance standards. is that your understanding? >> that's my understanding, senator. >> and the reason for that

he's the former undersecretary for intelligence and analysis for the department of homeland security.is is first of all, you know, what kind of information does the government have on me and how are they gathering it in the first place? >> they don't have information on you unless there's reasonable belief or suspicion that you're engaged in extremist activity or terrorism. this is a slight revision of existing guidelines that were put in effect by the previous administration in 2009. it does not increase custody of new information on the federal government. it simply extends a period that you can retain this data and it does give the national counterterrorism center under the director of national intelligence better ways to query data sense that may be held, say, for example, in department of homeland security, law enforcement agencies. >> i thought we were talking about ordinary american citizens whether you are suspected of something derelict, nefarious or not, the government is holding information on you. >> if you've engaged in criminal activity there may be data sets that we hav

seven major web sites and the fact that they can get into you know the nasa website the department of homeland security these are places where you think they'd have some of the best of the best working and i mean what do you think it says that they're not able to deal with combat and on. it's worse than you think in fact that's all that was used to get into those sites was an automated tool that anyone in the security field can buy for cheap we're talking under two hundred dollars with lifetime updates that's all you pointed at a website and wait until it gets you in so you could have actually done this hack i just visiting this web site and downloading bestowal it's that easy and what it says is that they're not doing the amount of work they need to do on their security you know some very very simple security measures would have stopped most of those hacks what's the likelihood greg this real briefly of anonymous actually being kind of their network sort of being dismantled by the government eventually it's just not case is not a capability they have a network doesn't really exist all right so many ch

including it delineates rules of the various components of government to include the department of homeland security which i believe has an important role to play here. it defines what i feel is a good talents in a relationship with the private sector and how intrusive the government is going to be which is an issue and most importantly to protect civil liberties and privacy. i am sure there are other provisions in the bill that some may take issue with but the precepts i think are important in terms of the balance between protection and our freedom. >> i appreciate very much what you have just said. part of the problem e

. >>> the department of homeland security's 2013 budget request cuts two large cutters for the coast guard saving about $1.4 over the coming years. it only funds one of three large ice breakers the service says it needs. that would leave the coast guard with six large cutters to replace aging hamilton class ships that are being retired after four decades of service. heavy ice breakers are needed making the polar ice caps and a half gabl. the coast guard is going to have to pick up pace on the lower intensity maritime missions. here to tell us what all of this means is scott of greuber technologies, an analyst and consultant who regularly advises coast guard and navy leaders. welcome to the program. >> thank you, vago. good to be here. >> let's take this from the very top. how are these cuts going to affect the coast guard and how is the service going to work around them to perform its multiplicity of admissions? >> coast guard cuts are going to be broad, but not as bad as it was during the 1990 whz they were underfunded by about 6,000 people. they've got the 6,000 people back and look

it doesn't necessarily authorize anything new these are things that the police and the department of homeland security and various other agencies have been doing anyway this is just a way to sort of. secure the lid the legitimacy of what they're doing and i think it's incredibly dangerous and that people all over the country should be outraged about the signing of these are the facts as a lot of people don't even know about them which it which is pretty interesting out there have been some different numbers coming in in terms of this weekend's six month anniversary protest holder you said a thousand we heard a couple hundred but there's no disputing that the occupiers came out in force so did the police talk to me about the police presence and if you felt like anything's changed since you know some of those major events back in the fall with pepper spray and police batons and major arrests i mean is there going to be a new relationship between the protesters and police or will it be more of the same . i think i mean this is been a really interesting experience for me because this is my first time in a

freedom of and from asian requests and got some information they discovered that the department of homeland security has actually been tracking the occupy wall street movement even long before it ever started and that a big reason for that was the involvement of anonymous in helping to organize these protests i'm wondering first of all how much of a role do you think anonymous has played in occupy wall street and to what extent do you think movements like this will actually make them vulnerable to government involvement. they played a pretty big role you know when you look at adbusters first putting out the call for this protest in wall street there wasn't much pick up very few news organizations actually covered it and then someone arms found it and the second anonymous decided to talk about it everyone in the news out there decided oh this is news we have to cover it and then thousands of people showed up you know i think anonymous played an interesting role almost as the p.r. agent for it you know that they brought a lot of the eyeballs and in the end they also played a very technical role you kn

violent crime but honestly it's just not the way to do it is not the way that we did a department of homeland security when i hope working with them and i hope that the n.y.p.d. learns you know not only from this but their conduct of the occupy wall street protesters that they're sort of overstepping the sort of the lines of logic and what sort of policing will sit in a lot of areas that when it comes to environmental activists animal rights activists occupy wall street protesters that a lot of the time fortunately they do start just bought a touring people and they're really silly reasons and you know there's no we think there's a silly and they've mentioned shops a couple times that i'm going hungry for dinner yet but the point is that in karachi police have a surveillance over student me a restaurant because they know the bad guys hang out here just like we monitor the italian mafia perhaps there would be restaurants maybe have watched a few too many godfather movies but nonetheless restaurants are places of gathering and so while there are a lot of jealous jokes about he doing as agates you know t

cyber security director in the office of the white house, basically giving that position much more directive authority to coordinate and implement cyber security protections. department of homeland security is going to be part of the equation and they're doing the best they can with the tools and the resources that they have. they have been challenged because they don't have the right and the most robust authorities to compel other departments and agencies to engage in cyber security. it may not be the mission, for example, of the department of treasury or commerce or state to protect their government. they have other focuses. we need cyber security to be the primary focus and an entity that has budgetary authority to compel adoption of robust cyber security standards. i have at advocated and the commission in which i co-chair called for a position to be established within the white house with this robust policy and budgetary authority. that being said, the lieberman-collins legislation does give d.h.s. more authority than what they have now and it begins the process of close collaboration between the government and private sector. it will require a public-private sector to get

and the department of homeland security are warning u.s. law enforcement sunday's shooting rampage in afghanistan could contribute to the growth of homegrown violent extremists meaning american citizens who carry out islamic jihad right here on united states soil. >>shepard: thank you, james. the former intelligence officer from the secretary of the defense office is here, and former director of strategy for the white house security council and part of consulting firm. mike, now, we have a series of problems. now the afghan president says "get your troops out of the villages and back to the bases," and the afghan president is saying you have to speed this up and the end of 2014 will not fly. you have to speed it up. now what? >>guest: this is where you see we have dearth strategy, the military is executing administration best they can but we said we are leaving in 500 days or whatever it is, and when you say that, the question is, how much more can you do before you leave? obviously, if we are pulled back and in the cities and people are on

. >> the department of homeless security plans to use by a metric data to track one immigrants leave the united states. -- the department of homeland security plans to use bio metric data to track when immigrants leaving the united states. administration officials say they will have a plan for a tracking system ready for congress to look at within weeks. the idea is to keep tabs on foreign visitors in the united states who overstay their visas. >> gas prices are already on the rise. it may become even more expensive to own and operate a car in our area. >> a well known diner goes on the market online. >> a picture-perfect day across the region. [ male announcer ] for the saver and a big first step. for the spender who needs a little help saving. for adding "& sons." for the dreamer planning an early escape. for the mother of f the bride. for whoever you are, fofor whatever you're trying to achieve pnc has technology, guidance, and over 150 years of experience to help you get there. ♪ ♪ >> we are following breaking news from montgomery county where police are on the scene of a serious accident. this happened a short time ago at univ

. >> with assistance from the department of homeland security, they busted up a gun ring spanning from the city and the baltimore county. it began back in january when a suspect was arrested on a handgun charge and information spawned a three-month investigation leading to the massive blast. thursday, police served search warrants on five homes in a storage facility coming up with cash, herald in, guns, bulletproof vests, and drug- making material come overall a street value of more than $30,000. >> everything that goes hand in hand with the drug trade. >> arrested a, ronald price, jessica career, and keith james. >> he seemed like a really nice guy, you know? >> james lived above this dentist's office on harford road. staff at the office said he was last seen in january and had suspicious people working for him meaning that it is possible that he was the first person arrested in this case. >> he had some people working for him. he kind of looked sketchy. i thought maybe he was doing something, but i never would have thought that. >> police would not confirm who was the first of breast

they say that there department of homeland security started keeping track of the suspects in january through wiretaps. today, police executed warrants in the city, one in the county, and at a storage unit. all of the items seized were worth more than $30,000. >> the searches on for a convicted sex offender who did not register as a sex offender as required by law baltimore county police say that xavier has a tattoo on his left arm. on his right arm, there is a tattoo of a girl. anyone who has information on his whereabouts should contact police. >> neighbors say the addition of a new program adding hundreds of patients is unfair and unhealthy for their neighborhood. >> baltimore behavioral health has been treating patients here for decades. but a sale and purchase last week, according to some neighbors, there have been more problems. >> it is a group of us. it is everybody that lives here. >> this coalition of neighbors in southwest baltimore communities are showing their frustration the best way they know how. >> if you have over a thousand people coming to this corner a week to be

. >> why is the del potro of homeland security the right doctor the department of homeland security the agency to monday tar that? >> the cri cooperate do it. on the other hand, homeland security can cooperate, as they are, and even be a partner with n.s.a. i don't see janet napolitano when i don't see keith alexander at the same place. we had a meeting earlier this week, and they were both on the same page and cooperating with each other. somebody has to take the lead, and janet no poll -- napolitano, who i really trust, and you look at katrina and other things and say i don't know. but it is the right place and in fact the only place that you can do it. >> now some groups such as the aclu and others have raised privacy concerns for individuals with this legislation. >> and that would be automatic, wouldn't it? when i was chairman of the intelligence committee, we did fiza, allowing two telecommunications companies to be able to go ahead and collect intelligence with their servers all-around the world from whence we got about 80% of our worldwide intelligence. but they have been sued b

department of homeland security, you're supposed to protect us, not do goofy exercises that waste

again, under the leadership of the indiana department of homeland security, the indiana emergency operations center is increased staffing and will be activated 24 hours a day to monitor conditions and to provide resource support to the county emergency agency and it is areas affected by yesterday afternoon's severe storms and tornado activity. there are several state agencies, multiple state agencies that have converged on the site, along with over 250 indiana national guardsmen, along with local and state authorities and the red cross is also very active in our recovery efforts. >> rob, what are the weather conditions right now? are people out of danger from the weather? >> caller: well, currently, within indian athere are no severe weather indicators. it is anywhere between 40 to 50 degree, depending on where are you at in the state. we do have strong winds, but no tornadic activity or severe storms reported at this time. >> we are seeing a lot of damage here in the pictures we are looking at right now. are rescuers able to get out there and search in the darkness? >> caller: yes. you know

. >> given the magnitude of the threat, whether the homeland security department, also known as dhs, serves a place on the cyber team. >> anyone who has been through an airport, as i do regularly, have no confidence in the technological capabilities of the department of homeland security. >> i think the lead for working with critical infrastructure and helping them prepare their networks to lie with dhs. >> fbi director was pressed on whether the u.s. was facing a cyber 9/11. >> is it fair to say that of all the things that we should be concerned about cyber attacks from foreign governments and terrorist is a growing threat by the day? >> yes. >> general alexander says the government needs more real time availability and more latitude to combine attacks with the growing cyber capabilities. in washington, fox news. >>> coming up, a super bowl winning skins quarterback is leading the way in a showdown with the nfl. we'll explain. plus, a maryland man under arrest for his role in this viral video. and check out some of the other stories on the rundown. we'll be right back. >>> this is fo