and i also know that it's the position of the department of justice that the 180-day distinct is an artificial one. so speaking as an fbi agent, we take on legal guidance from the department of justice, so we would follow that. i think the issue from my perspective in particular is because the question so complicated, if you update and change the laws, more changes are going to be in place that are going to make the job of law enforcement investigators more different. is there also a way to change the law to make the process better, acknowledging the fact now that department of justice wants to have a warrant, what other things are in play in terms of the changes? there are disclosure issues, and there are also emergency exception issues as well that have to be addressed if this law moves forward and if any changes are contemplated. >> host: grover norquist has a question, agent motyka. >> guest: do you think that an e-mail should have any less protection than a letter under the fourth amendment? >> guest: well, now you're asking me, again, when i -- that is my personal opinion at this point a

i also know it is the position of the department of justin -- justice of the 180 days distinction is an artificial one. i think the issue from our perspective, from my perspective embark together, because the question is complicated, if you update and change the laws, more changes will be in place that will make the job for investigators more difficult. it hosted change a lot to make the process better. what other things are in play in terms of the changes? there are disclosure issues and emergency exception issues as well that have to be addressed as this goes forward. >> grover norquist has a question. >> do you think an e-mail should have any less protection than a letter under the fourth amendment? >> well, now you're asking me -- again, that is my personal opinion at this point. tivoli here to discuss the policies. i'm not able to get into my personal view as far as how i feel about that. the department of justice itself -- we have to follow the regulations -- is treating the content of e-mail communications as requiring a warrant issued by the court. >> that is common sense. wh

eric holder is my favorite department of justice official. tom perez is my second favorite department of justice official. we are very honored today that tom perez has come from washington, dc, to give welcoming remarks here at this summit. tom perez is the assistant attorney general of the civil rights division in washington, dc, he was nominated for that position by president obama and sworn in in october of 2009 and we are all the lucky -- we are all very lucky that that happened in october of 2009. tom has spent his entire career in public service and on protecting the civil rights of our most vulnerable people. tom actually joined the civil rights division as a young lawyer and while he was there he prosecuted some of the most significant cases in the country. lawyers in the civil rights division get fanned out to places in the country to handle cases in mississippi and alabama and california and all over and tom was one of those people. he was sent to texas to handle a very significant hate crime case when he was a young lawyer that invo

in my opinion the only bribes record with the department of justice is so significant because in itself this is a fellow i don't know the name of many federal prosecutors i couldn't just start running off district attorney's names to you however when i saw the neil mcbride was being considered as a potential replacement to robert mueller is the head of the f.b.i. it amusing immediately raised a red flag because i knew this name right off the bat i knew this is a guy who has been in charge of at least three very very significant cases during the obama administration so mcbride was appointed by president obama in late two thousand and nine cents and these three cases in particular i think his actions show just how serious this guy is about going after anyone said he went after john kiriakou a cia agent in charge him under the espionage act john kiriakou is the only cia member to ever be imprisoned for the cia's torture program because he blew the whistle on the torture program mcbride is also gone after kim dotcom a german national living in new zealand who operates a file sharing website

essentially, the grant is for $461,000 funded by the second chance act from the department of justice, and this is one year in duration, a continuation of the -- of a three-year grant in the amount of $66 0,000 from fiscal year '09-'10. the model really is dedicated to youth returning from long-term commitments and it involves a collaborative approach including the -- a judge from the court. there is an assigned judge to the reentry team, excuse me. probation officers, social workers, all both in the public defender's office and the public and the juvenile probation department representing attorney for the youth, case manager from the center on juvenile and criminal justice, and, so, all of these members are really working together to improve the outcome for the youth when they return to the community. the method is simply that a team member meets with the youth just after disposition, and disposition in the juvenile system means sentencing, for lack of a better term. and that member sort of walks through with the youth what the program is and what they have -- what we have to offer.

we know that eric holder's department of justice. in the case of m.f. global it appears as though perhaps there's been a cover up let's go back to lanny breuer the assistant attorney general sixty minutes documented that in the two thousand and eight mortgage crisis specifically with countrywide they did not ask the appropriate wist witnesses questions there were the financial fraud investigator had significant information and that person wasn't question according to this report if you look at what's happened in m.f. global it's gotten more and more brazen. you know the law firm that lanny breuer now works at is now employed at and was the same law firm he worked at before he was at the department of justice they represent john corazon and you can make the argument that throughout this process clear evidence was in view but it wasn't invented this this process of not not investigating what is considered clear criminal fraud is damaging to the financial markets one can make the argument that if you look at how the decisions were made in the acid transfer

we're talking about the civilian department of justice. e take a former republican member of congress who could say, what did you name? anemone drag the attorney general and here and demand he respond to questions he has no involvement with the scars he knows knows, right? >> rate. the >> and i think does a disservice in this matter. we should pursue what the people that made this decision. they may have made it for very good reason, to further the effective prosecution of the gentleman who did this and other matters might have to come in sequence to a final decision in the court may be the perp are we to proceed, even if emotions are high about the matter, we have a government of law to proceed under several of law. i appreciate everything that's been said, but there's no reason to believe what john mchugh made this interesting and, he within the department of justice -- >> would the gentleman yield? >> i will. >> i w t line of questioning. called me to directly,be i but when the inference is made and we were going to have the today, it is

of course, the overlap is obvious when you have 56 programs for victims assistance. the justice department claims they were all a little bit different. the gao issued a report in july of last year. updated at it just this week. they said the justice department has started to look at us. gerri: starting to look at it -- it's their department. normal organization would tolerate this duplication. tom, thank you for coming in tonight. an important story, i'm so glad we told people about it. gerri: now we want to know what you think. should the department of justice catch criminals or help hollywood? log onto gerriwillis.com and vote on the left-hand side of the screen and we will show you the results at the end of the show. and the department of justice may not be stressing about how they are handling their jobs, but that is not the case for most americans. according to a new survey, more americans are stressed out about work now than they were last year. with us now is dr. keith ablow. thank you for coming on the show tonight. >> thank you for having me speak on these numbers are worse than l

breuer now works at is now employed at the same law firm he worked at before he was at the department of justice they represent john corazon and you can make the argument that throughout this process clear evidence was in view but it wasn't investigated and that's damaging this this process of not not investigating what is considered clear criminal fraud is damaging to the financial markets one can make the argument that if you look at how the decisions were made in the asset transfer is that enough global it looks to me like it's defiance it looks like to me like it's disregard it's my opinion that knowing the facts in these asset transfers that they had no concern for criminal accountability what they did was so brazen that it defies logic the only the only logic that i can come up with is the fact. they didn't think that the law was going to be enforced in their particular circumstance oh we know brewer's quote from the sixty minutes piece he said basically that he couldn't prosecute bankers because it would be systemically to be too risky so that the idea of too big to fail has corrupted the

today as we move forward you will understand that we are in this together with you at the department of justice. this is an all hands on deck enterprise. there is so much to do. i hope at the end of this day we will indeed all follow the lead of that student, walk out and say what are one or two things i'm going to do differently and better? how are we going to improve this situation? i hope if you take one and only one thing from melinda and my and ruslyn's remarks today, if you have an idea, please bring them to us. we want to learn from you. we are in this together and i want to say thank you because the most important thing we have is a recognition that you understand that this is indeed a national issue for us to deal with. i'm looking forward to the rest of the day, i appreciate your presence and i appreciate your leadership, melinda, and let's get on with it. (applause). >> i have the honor of sbre duesing our moderator, tom perez has graciously agreed to stay and participate in our first panel, business creating a healthy safe and inclusive environment for all school students, the role

and what they're giving back whether this is quid pro quo corruption is the subject of the department of justice investigation that's by the way very difficult to prove i mean they the f.b.i. the department of justice actually has to come up with evidence that the mcdonnell family did these official favors for star scientific specifically in exchange for the gifts that they've received a very difficult standard to prove but that's what the department of justice is undertaking especially considering the fact that they're saying that their friends are at the well and you know that's something else that really needs to be taken a look at it turns out that they haven't been friends for that long they've been friends for roughly the time that mcdonnell has been become governor as so you've got a company that you know appears to be wanting to get some kind of favors from the state government providing lots of gifts to the governor this is not an friendship they were friends like back in high school or college before mcdonnell became governor they became friends when there was a business relationship g

breuer now works at is now employed at the same law firm he worked at before he was at the department of justice they represent john court on and you can make the argument that throughout this process clear evidence was in view but it wasn't investigated and that's damaging this this process of not not investigating what is considered clear criminal fraud is damaging to the financial markets one can make the argument that if you look at how the decisions were made in the asset transfer is that a global it looks to me like it's defiance it looks like to me like it's disregard it's my opinion that knowing the facts in these asset transfers that they had no concern for criminal accountability what they did was so brazen that it defies logic the only way the only logic that i can come up with is the fact that they didn't think that the law was going to be enforced in their particular circumstance oh we know lenny breau is quote from the sixty minutes piece he said based. that he couldn't prosecute bankers because it would be systemically too big to risky so that the idea of too big to fail has corru

fbi does at the moment because we work through the united states attorneys office which is a department of justice, the department justice has a policy for e-mail content held by providers a warrant is required at this point. >> host: agent konrad motyka brandon sasso is here and ask a question. >> guest: i'm wondering if you think the way it is written and there is a distinction between whether e-mails are 180 days over whether they been opened or not and if that distinction makes sense with the people use e-mails now and if that something that congress should change? >> caller: well, it was under review during the prior congress and is under review by this congress. i think there is no doubt going to be certain modifications made and i also know that it's the tradition of the department justice or a 180 day disc tension is an artificial one. we take our legal guidance from the department justice so we would follow that. i think the issue from our perspective in my perspective in particular is because the question is so complicated if you update and change the laws were more changes are going to

department of justice, securities exchange commission, and the commodities future tradings commission had launched investigation in the libor setting banks to investigate libor. >> supervisor avalos: that is the extent of what we believe was the duration of the manipulation that -- the city or do you think we can go further than 2007? >> i think the reports have been clear that it started in 2007. i think it's what the concern is, is whether it was beyond 2010 to '11 or '12. so they're still -- it hasn't been publicly determined but every speciality is deciding on different time periods. >> supervisor avalos: so prior to 2007 there was no reported manipulating people were aware of around the world? >> i don't know that for a fact. we can research that and get back to you. >> supervisor avalos: is there any possibility that we could be at much higher basis points in terms of the magnitude of the impact? >> well i think if you -- depending on where you are in this transaction, typically liobr rates are pretty low. as an example i believe one month was 20 basis points equivalent to 2.0 p

the fact is, you can come up and say whatever the pact is the department of justice investigated this case, your department investigated this case. the justice department investigated this case. it was not the secretary of the army that investigated it, you and your department investigated it. so what i'm asking you, out of respect for these men and women, 13 that gave their life, who paid the ultimate price, this young lady here, i found out today what is your name, ma'am? angela. she just moved from my congressional district -- moved to my congressional district, i will work with them, if no one was there, say, no one here was but i'm asking you on the record, on behalf of the people who serve this country, 13 who gave their life, will you send someone up from the justice department next week and mr. fatah should be there and i will come and mr. rooney wants me to come to say what the involvement was, whether you were, not you, whether justice was or was not involved. yes or no. >> we'll do the best we can but i'm saying to you, you're asking me to make a pledge. >> just to come up

now i will say that the, they contacted the department of justice and they made some arrangement. we trying to get all the details of what that arrangement was, so that the court would show up. but again, this wasn't the department of justice contacting the judiciary and saying we've got a guy to come down to arraign. it was the judiciary calling in saying we're going to do this. it was i argued highly unusual. there are exceptions, the exception under the new york persons quarrels case is that it's clear, broad and on a case-by-case basis when you're talking about weapons of mass destruction, this is as serious as it gets and we better err on the side of public safety. but to have the court affirmatively push their way in, is a, i think it's wrong and b, we should have given the fbi the time they needed, given the circumstances of someone in the hospital, who is in and out of consciousness and on and off medication, for the d.o.j. not to push back, the attorneys' office. they have a lot of explaining to do. and if it takes a legislative fix, they haven't told us that yet, then we'

the department of justice people would like to believe don't arrest somebody they don't have anythingu have different opinion of doj understandably. >> there is good people and bad people in everything. white hats and black hats. civic lesson is white hatsds but the constitution is beautiful but a lot of people are in there for career advancement f you come into their cross-hairs, it is not personal. they're trying to get to the that seven figure white-collar job or next political office they will utilize their advantages. liz: are they trying to improve their reputation by hurting a famous person in business reputation. >> of course. i think we're all reading about the gentleman you referenced earlier steve cohen every day in the papers as this plays out. they have been playing in my view after learning at sharpened how it is played they're playing the cooperate or dominoes game as they work towards him, get somebody and work on them to say what you want them to say or admit what you want them to admit so you go after the next person in the chain. liz: you have been out for more than

your bullets that licensed seller then electronically transmits the record of the sale to the department of justice. the department of justice can then look against the data base. >> assembly member skinner says there will be no waiting period to buy the ammunition unless the purchaser is on a prohibited list to buy weapons. meanwhile former congressman hutchinson unveiled a safety plan founded by the national rifle association. the 205 page report recommends a staff be on campus carrying a gun. the father of a sandy hook shooting victim spoke in support of the plan known as the national shield program. >>> investigators are working to determine exactly when caltrans realized the bolts used on the bay bridge were brittle and are asking when they cracked before they were installed, during tightening or after. ktvu's consumer editor tom vacar reports. >> reporter: it just had to know that further stressing them would neither help nor work. >> the steel rod into something called -- >> reporter: two engineered that work for exponent failure analysis say these massive defective bolts hundreds of them ev

and the department of justice investigated this case. your department investigated this case. the justice department investigated this case. it was not the secretary of the army. you and your department investigated it. so what i'm asking you, mr. attorney general, out of respect for these minimum, 13 lost her life, paid the ultimate price. this young lady here i found out today, what is your name? [inaudible] spent angel. and she just moved to my in gresham district and i will join hands and i will aggressively work. they deserve this. so if you were never involved and no one there, but next week and say, nobody was. but your department investigated the case. i'm asking you on the record, on behalf of these people who served his country, 13 who gave their life, will you send someone up from e justice department next become an mr. fattah should be there, and i will come and mr. rooney, wants me to come, to say what involvement was, whether you were, not you, whether justice was or was not involved. yes or no? >> we will do the best we can but i say to you, you're asking you to

the department of justice gave accurate information to the foreign affairs ministry in iceland that i was not the subject of criminal investigation they however a while ago demanded to have access to all my private data like my private messages on twitter and my ip numbers and various other very private information and also demanded data from the four other companies but me and my lawyers we've not been able to unseal widths. of the other companies there are speculations it might be facebook and google maybe skype it's impossible to know we do so recently took it yet again to what to to try. and the judge said he would not release it because of a request from the department of justice because of an ongoing investigation so i'm very confused right yeah that's that's the canned response that they can't give you more information because it's part of an ongoing investigation it's definitely a vague but i'm glad that you're here getting answers i read in your read it and may that you participate in the anonymous shut down of some pay pal account as we know pay pal refusing to grant funds t

hope it will take into account his cooperation, but we have no agreements with the sec or the department of justicez: that is definitely breaking news. no agreement whatsoever. we will wait to hear more developments on this. he is also former u.s. department of justice assistants determine two department general. we will continue to watch it. charlie gasparino is going to give us his reaction about what brian shaw's lawyer just said in the latest on the trading case you just receive a whole bunch of new information on this, charlie has the spin. stay tuned. at tyco integrated security, we consider ourselves business optimizers. how? by building custom security solutions that integrate video, access control, fire and intrusion protection. all backed up with world-class monitoring centers, thousands of qualified technicians, and a personal passion to help protect your business. when your business is optimized like that, there's no stopping you. we are tyco integrated security. and we are sharper. ♪ liz: concert tickets, meals, cash in envelopes and parking lots outside true value in the valley. this

should take place at that specific place and time during this questioning and whether the department of justice or the fbi expressed any concerns about the timing of this and concerns about the fact that the suspect would now be read his miranda rights. i should tell you the department of justice hasn't yet responded directly to that letter to attorney general holder but they did put out a statement saying that the fbi agents and prosecutors in boston weren't told that this initial appearance had been scheduled before it happened and that that was coordinated with the prosecutors, and so we're still learning more information about that, certainly the information that congressman rogers is seeking and we'll see if he gets that. poppy? >> and you know i think it's also important to point out our susan candiotti reported late last night that her sources are saying that the bedside interviews conducted by interrogators were "very thorough" and the source says investigators did not feel hindered by the timing of the miranda rights and charges being brought forward so i think that's an important poin

one of the ways that we have partnered, department of education and department of justice was right here at the university of california in san diego where you might have heard about the compton cookout and the alleged noose in the library and we have heard similar instances in california and elsewhere, things like (inaudible) the kinds of resolutions and remedies we seek are not just about ensuring that those that were responsible for these activities that caused a hostile environment that adults knew of, should have known of and knew of and done something about it, is about ensuring that the culture that gives rise to that is eradicated. so our resolutions are about mining the data in detail so that you know not just what's happening but who feels comfortable saying it and how they are going about trying to remediate it. it is about doing climate checks because unless adults consistently talk to their student body and understand you don't know whether it's getting better. in lots of instances in our resolutions it's also been about ensuring that there was a community school leader comm