we got these were very separate investigations on different matters, and the fbi, the department of justice and the united date looking at what attorney general loretta lynch called and democrats and within -- called endemic corruption, and this is very much at the center of the story and the investigation led by the department of justice and by the fbi, and the main reason for this is that some of those allegedly actions and some of the alleged corruption went through u.s. banks in the u.s. financial system. that is why the united states believes they have jurisdiction, and that is why the u.s. is investigating all of this. anchor: some believe they also have sepp blatter himself in their sites. philip: when he resigned, maybe he already knew that the noose was tightening, because what the fbi is doing now, according to u.s. media, is looking exclusively at sepp blatter. he is now the subject of a federal corruption investigation by the fbi and federal prosecutors per you he has still not been named as a suspect but that could happen relatively soon, because these are the tactic that the d

of justice will be investigating this as a hate crime. is that pretty normal for this type of thing? >> it is. the departmentstice has investigated whether or not in some of the other high profile cases with racial overtones, investigating whether there are racial motivations behind the police officers who shot and killed african american individuals. so this is something that the department of justice regularly looks at. i would say it generally takes more time for them to determine whether or not they will be launching a hate crime investigation. this is lightning speed, this incident happened in the 9:00 hour last night, and the department of justice working quickly to establish that. the fbi and federal law enforcement working in conjunction in what has been a massive manhunt, and investigation into this shooting. and to remind our viewers that president obama on his way out of town to california is going to be stopping in the briefing room to deliver his thoughts. obviously he is going to begin with the thoughts and prayers that go out to the victims and the families of the victims. >> okay. mike viquei

the department of justice gathers information and gets out. but even when these police departments are asking for backup from the federal government, a number of people are contending cr simple toothless. can a voluntary initiative really be expected to reform an entire culture of policing? to find out, paul beban, embedded with spokane police. >> we're sorry for what happened. >> reporter: a public apology from a police chief, not something the city of spokane had heard before. >> it is time to begin the healing process. >> reporter: chief frank straub was hired in 2010 oturn around a police department, for outright lying after an innocent man was killed by police. >> i think communities and individuals can appreciate somebody saying, i blew this. so to some degree we have to get over ourselves. >> reporter: this gas station convenience store is where a mentally disabled janitor named otto zemm was beaten by police officers and died two days later. >> it was an absolute low point. >> rick ichstad represented the family of otto zemm against the

the department of justice had no comment. if the d.o.j. fients the clearance practices violate abt trust laws theater chains will have to compete less on the movies but more on the quality of the theater. >> they have all been engaging in improving the quality of the screens in the theaters with mechanical rec kleining seats, expanding concession sales and bringing in beer and wine reserve seating. >> some of the big chains making the investments and handler said it is still hard foreindependents to compete if the d.o.j. takes action. i'm julia boorstin in los angeles. > we gib tonight's market focus with a big buyback from wendy's. the fast food chain will purchase up to $1.4 billion in shares by the end of 2016 and it will include shares from trian group as that firm is trying to cut its stake in the company. also wendy's has hiked the long-term earnings growth target. after all of that shares were up 3% to $11.47. >>> meanwhile disappointing results from vera bradley known for the quilted handbags swung to a loss in the first quarter and

the department of justice spend about 18 months gathering information, offers reforms and gets out. as the trouble police departments call for back up from the federal government. a number of critics charge chi is merely a toothless way to placate an outraged government. can a voluntary initiative be expected to reform a culture of policing? to find out, paul beban embedded with the spokane police, in the midst of their own collaborative reform following troubling incidents. >> we are sorry for what happened. >> reporter: a public apology from a police chief, not something the city of spokane heard before. >> it is time to begin the healing process. >> reporter: the chief was hired in 2012 to turn around a police department mired in misconduct, lack of transparency and clig after an innocent man was killed by police. >> i think communities and individuals can appreciate someone saying "i blew this." i think that to some degree we have to get over ourselves. >> reporter: this gas station, store is where a mentally disabled man was beaten, hogtied and sat on by police. he died of his i

practice, the department of justice has doubled down. it recently entered into an over $50 million settlement relating to robo signing. $7.5 million of that did not make it to victims. instead it went to a third party. incredibly, the settlement specifically provided that there would be no oversight of the money. the situation is even more egregious when one considers that the required donation will nearly double the net assets of the d.o.j.'s specified recipient. it is deeply troubling for that to happen at the unilateral discretion of the executive barrage. this amendment takes no money away from any organization, it is purely prospective. it sheen -- it ensures that money goes directly to victims or to the treasury for elected officials to decide how it is to be spent. it is critical that we act. the department of justice is ignoring congress' concerns, increasing the use of third party payments even as we object. the purpose of enforcement actions is punishment and redress to actual victims. carrying that concept to communities at lar

the department of justice is very different. they collect information, and it's known it's confidential. the public can't go to the department of justice and say i want to see everything there is about charter time warner. and so i personally am very troubled about the coordination that goes on. specifically about chairman wheeler, think chairman wheeler is a great guy wonderful public servant in a very difficult situation. a very difficult situation with at least the appearance of suggestions from other parts of the administration. i do not envy him his position. so whether he is the greatest regulator or the most regulatory or the most pro consumer, i think tom wheeler is in a very difficult position in aned a marges that tries to tell them what to do. >> there are stores that chairman wheeler started calling the ceo's cable companies to talk to them and kind of say look we're not necessarily antibusiness, just we got look at these things. >> there was that article -- i have to say i was -- he's completely inappropriate for a g

this is put out by the department of justice. you do this evaluation and there's a color coded scheme. it's effective system in place for responding, improved timeliness in backlog reduction. if you sat and listened to the sum testimony of today and compare it to yesterday, i mean, we had as wide away ofrray of people you could have. we had a cbs news reporter to vice, we got a wide as a swatch of people as we possibly could. there wasn't anybody that believed that in general things were going well. when you do your own score card. the department of justice, you're solid green. you gave yourself five out of five on presumption of openness. five out of five on an effective system in place for responding. proactive disclosure. are you kidding me? the department of justice gives themselves a five out of five on proactive disclosure. do you think anybody in the world believes the department of justice is the most -- they're at the top of their game? they got an a plus, five for five? do you really believe that? >> i do. >> you live in

the department of justice gives themselves a five out of five on proactive disclosure. you really think anybody in the world believes the department of justice is the most -- they're at the top of their game they got an a plus? do you really believe that? >> i do. >> you live in la la land. that's the problem. >> you're a very nice person and i'm sure most of the people are very nice people. 550,000 times americans put forward a request and got a rejection saying doesn't qualify. you think that's working? is that a presumption of openness? you think that's proactive disclosure? i beg to differ. we're at the heart of why i think there is a problem. because you all think you're doing a great job. >> we are constantly evaluating not just how we do at d.o.j. >> and your evaluation says you have no room for improvement. >> that's not true at all. you aren't looking at the whole category. >> i will go through each and er one of them. i just read. here it is. we have green. proactive disclosures are making available to the public. >> presumption of openness. >> exactly. we can

to purchase with the vendor and tasers and international we've purchased from them with the department of justice grant and then are we're going to separate the data storage or purchase the whole thing? and then has the department analyzing different all of the elements for storage >> it sound like we're going to just wants so i don't know if you want to answer that now or agendize it. >> i'm happy to present on it is a work in processed so i can answer the different sides but no decision made the cameras that came they went out to bid. >> the tasers. >> yeah. the tasers won that bid. >> i theorist that - i believe they came in low bid. >> mined we got an exception with one vendor that met our needs so i'd like to know that's my recollection. >> so the acquisition of the body cameras we're obviously on two tracks the department is getting the cameras so that's a good decision. >> commissioner mazzucco. >> i actually want to talk about two agenda one with reference to the patrol specialize and officer is back with an issue that has come forward regarding the practical specialize all to calendar on

she shares her own unique style with though wealth of experience to the justice department at a time us safe from terrorist attacks to safeguard our environment to uphold the civil-rights. all of you that the justice department can do incredible work day in and day out we could not ask for a more incredible leader. board in segregated north carolina raced by a fourth generation baptist minister and a school librarian. neither seemed to mind speaking their mind. [laughter] that was my quick impression [laughter] more importantly taught loretta lynch the value of speaking up what is right for ago she would go to the courthouse with her father and they would tell stories but had no recourse under jim crow. he did this with the only the third grade education no matter the circumstances have the power to make a difference in the lives of others it is clear both had a huge influence on the right as her biggest cheerleaders for going she applied and an fbi agent went to their house the parents pulled out some scrapbooks. [laughter] and made the agents look through them. [laughter] i am sure

you will see one of our slides coming forward that will show that and based on department of justice data. we also believe-it is true there may be a correlation between have agpolice department and the level of crime but there was no direct correlation between police spending and crime rates. you can make anecdotal connection but there are so many other factors that lead to what our crime rates are. basis police staffing solly on population isn't good public policy. let's go to the next slide, slide 3. population increase does not mean crime increase. if we look at san francisco our population in 1994, the population was 742 thousand. in 2013 it is 825, 111 people. if you look that crime rate in 1994 for both violent crime and property crime it was higher than it is now. it was higher even though the population was about 80 thousand people less than what we currently have right now. does it make sense it is base our growth of the police department on population growth? are we actually seeing a rise in violent crime and property crime? i don't believe we are. the evident suggests other

chaffetz: the department of justice, the person they put in charge of this investigation from the department of justice was a max out donor to president obama. there are some of us that question if we will get a fair hearing. we talked to the victims of this. people on the receiving end of not being able to get the information out of the irs who were clearly targeted by the irs. the fbi did not ask them a question. you're the president of the united states in an interview on the super bowl sunday say there is not even a smidgen of corruption here. how did he come to that conclusion? the department of justice had not come we did its report. the inspector general has not completed his report. i do not think there is anything signaling to his political allies this is the conclusion we're going to have. that is not what congress is going to do. we will let the facts dictate the response and the next step is hearing from the inspector general. matt: wondering what you think needs to happen with secret service. rep. chaffetz: we have had scandal after scandal. deep-seated cultural problem. a lack

two years later in may 2014 the department of justice and state department finally launched a joint investigation. >> what happened in ajuas is a wakeup call for many here in america. >> reporter: in january 2013, congressman hank johnson of georgia wrote a letter demanding answers from the dea a letter co-signed by 57 other representatives from both sides of the aisle. the investigation has now been ongoing for almost a year. your office has sent another letter asking for an update. are you satisfied with the pace be at which this is happening? >> it's been a slow slog through what seem to be indifference and which could be construed as some to be a coverup. >> reporter: are you concerned about the last of accountability at dea? >> our war on drugs has been a complete failure here at home and now we're starting to see the effect of that drug war south of our borders and how it has negatively impacting honest, law abiding citizens who have nothing to do with the drug trade. but yet they get caught up in america's war on diswrugz. drugs. >> in may we asked the state department for an update and go

of michael brown, a black teenager killed by a police officer, the police departments around the nations rushed to equip their officers with body-worn cameras to document interactions with civilians, and the department of justice announced a 20 million programme to help police departments purchase the cameras. it's boom time for the companies that sell the cameras too. taser international is known for nonlethal weapons, and the leading manufacturer of body-worn cameras used by police. sales went from 3.8 million to more than 57 million in 2014. >> how many cameras came out of the factory? >> quite a few. you are looking at 41,000 cameras on the street. adding to the first quarter of 2015. >> you do hundreds a day. >> we can get thousands. >> police body cameras are in more than 5,000 of the nations 18,000 police departments, including new orleans, and here. >> the police department was one of the first in the nation to experiment with body cameras in 2008. they are warned by every officer who walks the street who takes the call. do you have reservations about bringing body cameras into the police force. >> no, we didn't. since going full-on into deploying the cameras on everyone in the field, our complaints ar

the summer movie season heats up three movie theater chains have received inquiries from the department of justice. a practice calls clearances deals with movie studies with exclusive rights to play particular mories in a particular markpa. >> the d.o.j. is looking out for the mom and pop type of small business owners. so the independent theaters are often much smaller than the three largest exhibitor chains in the u.s. so this is a issue they'll look into. >> disclosing on tuesday the d.o.j. contacted it related to a anti-trust probe after the two largest chains received a civil investigative demand looking into whether they violated anti-trust law. the concern is the agreements

department of justice was there. we questioned the department of justice on second chance opportunities and getting some of those funds here in baltimore. so they were very actively engaged. the department of health was there, because one of the key things for a neighborhood to be able to be a place where you want to live you have to make sure you have access to healthcare. we also want to make sure that you are not a food desert. we will make sure you have opportunities for healthy food choices in your community. all that are important areas to have a healthy nun yiey community and neighborhood. you know what came out the most that i heard? this is the reason i wanted to be here. i thank reverend stephens for making the arrangements. what i heard more and more is that most of us in government and that can make a difference, are we really listening to the community when we make our policy decisions? whether it's the mayor of baltimore or the united states senator. are we really engaging the community? you know there's

first, michael horowitz is the inspector general for the department of justice, a position that he's held since 2012. i'm going to skip over some of your background. he's held many positions within the department of justice. starting i believe as a prosecutor in the southern district of new york. and went to harvard law school, but i'm still glad he's here. nobody got that except you. margot schlanger is a professor of law at the university of michigan and her teaches focuses on how to induce large and complex organizes to respect them, and she importantly served in 2010 and 2011 as the presidentially appointed officer at the department of homeland security. next we have shirin sinnar, an assistant professor of law at stanford and her scholarship focuses on protecting individual rights in the national security context and has worked as a public interest attorney in san francisco. and finally, we have alex joel who has been the civil liberties protection officer for national intelligence since 2005. ten years. in that capacity, he leads the civil liberties and reports directly to the d

what part of violating the foia law does the department of justice condone? >> i think it's important to look at areas that need improvement in foia. >> okay. so what part of the law does the justice department condone? >> we don't -- we -- >> so you don't condone violating the law. >> of course not. of course not. >> okay. so i would think that would be your answer. do you violate the law? >> of course not. >> so you never violated the foia law? >> we work very hard at my office. >> i believe that. so the question is in your sworn testimony today does not violate -- has never violated the foia law. is that your testimony? >> i think what you're asking me is if we respond to requests beyond 20 works days. >> is that the law? >> the law allows for extensions of time. >> okay. so with -- have you ever gone beyond the law? >> so i wouldn't characterize it as going beyond the law. because the law actually recognizes in many different aspects the foia recognizes the reality, congressman, of the need for agencies to take more time to respond to certain requests that

violating the law and it gives particularry responses, what point of violating that law does the department of justice condone? >> i think that it's important, it's important to look at areas that need improvement in i. >> what part of the law. >> improving -- >> does the justice department condone? >> we -- >> so you don't condone violating the law? >> of course not, of course not. >> so i would think that would be your answer. do you violate the law? >> of course not. >> so you never violated that law? >> we work hard very we work very hard at my office. >> i believe the that. >> to promote transparency and compliance with the law. >> i believe that. so the question under sworn testimony today is the justice department does the not violate, has never violated the foya law, is that your testimony? >> i think what you're asking me is do we ever respond to requests beyond 20 working days. >> is that the law? >> the law allows for extensions of time. >> have you ever gone beyond the law? >> so i wouldn't characterize it as going beyond the law because the law actually recognizes in many different aspect

president, i pledge to you to lead this department of justice with integrity, with honor and a total justice. to the people of this great nation i pledge to you that your protection your liberties and your rights will be my sacred charge. to the law enforcement community, i pledge that this department will be your partner as we work to carry out our highest mission, the protection of the people of this great nation. and to all my colleagues and this wonderful department of justice, i pledge to always remember that the place of justice is a hallowed place and continue to strive to be worthy of the trust that you have placed in me as we work together to uphold the constitution to protect the american people and to serve the cause of justice. and to my family my wonderful family. i pledge to strive to continue to live up to the examples that you have set. i make these pledges to and before you all upon the oath that i have taken and the honor that i hold dear. to everyone here in this room thank you again for the trust that you have reposed in me for your faith and confidence in me and

already made her mark here at home and abroad because of her laser focus on the core mission of the justice department; the protection of american people. she understand the importance of improving the relationship between police communities and citizens. she understands the importance of criminal justice reform and that we have to be smart on crime not just tough. that is why she is committed to working as a partner with leaders of both parties who want to pursue reform that continues the trend of a falling crime rate and falling incarceration rate. she understand the importance of protecting the national security while securing our civil liberties. that is why she will safe guard the programs that is critical to protecting american's lives and privacy. i see the fbi director is here and i know he is committed to doing the same thing. she lives out the words of one of our greatest attorney general's, robert f kennedy. the glory of justice and majesty of the law is not created just by the constitution, courts, officers of the law nor by the lawyers, but by the men and women who constitute our society,

you look at the department of justice report in cleveland and ferguson both of them point out, when you have more racial profiling, you have zero tolerance, you have more racism and bias. the ferguson department of justice report they're using racial epithets to describe the community. >> that's true. let me ask you this the president, the white house is coming out saying the president's been very supportive of the police as we point out, he has and he hasn't. he's been hit not just for seeming to couch his praise of them with but, they're biassed and discriminatory against black men. he's been accused of a rush to judgment against the police almost since he took office. dating back to what happened with professor henley louis gates and what he said about, well, listen. >> the cambridge police acted stupidly there's a long history in this country of african-americans and latinos. being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. that's just a fact. >> if i had a son, he would look like trayvon. >> i mean is he ignoring history, when josh ernest comes out today and says the president'

but "thet been charged new york times" said he has been the focus of the department of justice inquiryur justice officials have been arrested accusing of skimming money. confusion with each side drawing up rival plans. officials said they had agreed to a final offer. billion toying $1.8 the imf and the government says it does have the money. sales,ices and public recording better numbers than expected. chrysler saw sales rise 4% than last year for the best may in a decade. all posted better-than-expected sales. checking in on markets in asia this morning. unchanged, flat. dollar the new zealand slightly weaker. 71 u.s. cents. rba, we have a stronger aussie dollar. looking ahead to australia, japan, and korea opening in a less -- in less than a half hour from now. futures in chicago pointing to another lower open. we have dollar-yen right now rising but still at that 12 year low against the u.s. dollar. back to our top story. the surprise resignation of fifa president seth blatter. his time in office raises a lot of questions. we are joined by our sports columnist. er ignored calls for

justice is the foia litigator and the provider of agency wide guidance ought to be the model agency, but we know it is not. the department of justice denied 40% of its fiscal year 2014. 3% of foia requests were denied based on exemptions. 37% were denied for other reasons. 5% were denied on the basis that documents were not reasonably described. dhs is drowning in foia requests and needs to ensure the right resources are put toward properly clearing these backlogged cases. the department of homeland security receives about one third of all foia requests and is responsible for two thirds of the federal backlog. so it's particularly disappointing to see that dhs dhs foia program, and the gao's duplication report. even the gao has come in and said, this is a terribly mismanaged, ill executed system. so much so that there's highlights in the the gao's 2015 duplication report. my disappointment grew yesterday when the foia research center revealed to us that dhs hired contractors for the primary purposes of closing rather than completing cases. individuals requesting records from homeland security might hear from contractors

we gather it i think we have it available to be analyzed. >> that's something through the department of justice and everything that's going on something we should structure and put into a policy. >> yes. commissioner dejesus the occ is happy to work with commission on developing recommendations for tools that the police department would use to gather it's statistics and provided additional statistics. >> you're welcome. >> thank you commissioner dejesus commissioner hwang. >> thank you also for a comprehensive report first, i want to do a followup to commissioner dejesus question does the occ have access is to the data collected by the police department or only when it's complaint generated. >> commissioner hwang that depends upon which information you're referring to if you're talking about disciplinary position that information is only the occ disciplinary information that we have with regard to any other statistics if we requesting the information from the police department the police department provides the information. >> so the data we're starting having a presentation on the racial stop

of what this department is all about. attorney general lynch assumes her new responsibilities at a great moment in our department's history. over the past six years, the department of justice has flourished under the leadership of our friend, attorney general holder a man who thought tirelessly -- fought tirelessly for justice and who never shrunk to our department's ideals. [applause] sally: and while we're -- but while we are stronger than ever we're no doubt going to face challenges in the months to come. but i'm confident that whatever the task whether it's ensuring our national security, fighting cybercrime or preserving civil rights and public safety while deepening the relationship between law enforcement and the communities that we serve, i'm confident that we have the right woman for the job. [applause] sally: so let me be the first of many today to congratulate our new attorney general and to say how lucky we are to have her at the helm. and with that let's begin today's celebration with the presentation of the colors. [applause] sally: in the early 1960's, reverend lynch, a dynamic baptist minister from durham, north carolina traveled the south participating in

and you do your score card, at the department of justice, you are solid green. you give yourself five of five on perception of openness, effective system and place for responding. proactive disclosure -- are you kidding me? department of justice gives themselves a five out of five on progress disclosure? you really think anybody in the world believes that department of justice -- they are at the top of their game, they have been a+? >> i do. >> you are living in la-la land. you're a very nice person. is that a presumption of openness? that correct disclosure? i've they differ. where is the heart of what i think there is a problem because you think you are doing a great job. ms. pustay: we are constantly evaluating with the are doing. you're looking at the whole-- >> presumption of openness? >> respond to requests? we can argue about this. i baked it in. yet people yesterday who differed. there is nobody who would agree across the board, and most everyone of you got great scores i do not buy. want to ask me about the department of justice. arqule cute able to cond

the department of justice gives themselves a five out of five on proactive disclosure? you really think anybody in the world believes the department of justice is the most -- they're at the top of their game, they got an a-plus, five for five, do you really believe that? ms. pustay: i do. i absolutely do. mr. chaffetz: you live in la-la land, that's the problem. you live in fantasy land because it ain't working. you're a very nice person and i'm sure most of the people are very nice people. it ain't working. 550,000 times americans put forward a request and got a rejection saying doesn't qualify. you think that's working? is that a presumption of openness? do you think that's proactive disclosure? i beg to differ. i think it's absolutely fundamentally -- we're at the heart of why i think there is a problem. because y'all think you're doing a great job. ms. pustay: right. we are constantly evaluating, not just how we do at d.o.j. mr. chaffetz: and your evailuation says you have no room for improvement. ms. pustay: that's not true at all. mr. chaffetz: then why do you give

state department where does its obligation to you begin and end? another arm of the government the department of justicebe act of war against the very country that took you. wider strategies at play. your suffering real as it is doesn't figure into pentagon strategy. should it? how many americans' lives should we put at risk to get you out of a hidden cell somewhere, ten 20, 30? in the overall calculus of war is it right? is it fair? is it acceptable? if three people die saving you? i'm grateful that i don't have to make these calls. maybe you go back and forth in your own head about the right answer. but don't for a second under estimate the moral challenge the risk and the grief, when grief when it all ends badly. i'm suarez, thanks ray suarez. thanks for joining "inside story." >> i wanted to be seen. i wanted people to see me hear me. it motivated me to keep pushing and keep pushing. >> "america tonight's" sarah hoye with the man known as freeway, a hip hop artist dedicated to cavism and spreading a message. and also from the grass roots, correspond