get hold with deripaska.ts mentioned in mueller's report over 60 times. they had strong suspicions but were ultimately never able to confirm that manafort shared internal trump campaign polling data with deripaska via his former business partner who the u.s. has determined was a former russian intelligence agent. to underscore how close he was to the kremlin it says about him, quote, the russian government coordinates with and directs deripaska on many of his influence operations. it is against that backdrop that the fbi announced a stunning and just completely shocking arrest late last month of one of its own albeit it former most senior officials. charles is the former chief counter intelligence official at the fbi in new york. and the fbi unsealed two unbelievable indictments against him one of which alleges shortly after leaving the fbi mcgonigal began taking money. we're talking about someone who served as the chief counter intelligence official at the fbi in the new york field office who was tasked with

and the person he was supposed to give it to wise oleg deripaska. >> so people who were like deripaskaic, manafort, one of the things people are scrutinizing are the two people that came out in the october of 2016. james comey announced that there was going to be an investigation into clinton's email. they're picking that up. and in part makes this announcement a week before the election because he's worried that the fbi office in new york is going to leak word of it, it's gonna port leagues if comey doesn't do something about. it people are saying wait a second, fbi in new york office? was charles mcgonigle involved in this leak to the new york times that subsequently hurt hillary clinton and help donald trump? same with the new york times stunning front page story in the same timeframe, that said the fbi saw no clear links between trump and russia. those two new york times stories had, i think, and nate silver thinks, a measurable impact on the 2016 election. do you think that, i mean, is the fbi going to be looking at what mcgonigle was doing at that time? because he was at the fbi

sanctions by working with notorious russian oligarch oleg deripaska who has close ties with vladimir putin. mcgonigal took money from deripaska after me left the fbi in 2018, and the investigation does not appear to concern espionage. but new reporting today from insiders is posing a handful of concerning questions about when exactly that russian relationship began. here's the report. in 2018 mcgonigal traveled to london where he met with a russian contact who's under surveillance by british authorities two u.s. toelgs sources told insider. insider was able to determine the year but not the month of the meeting. the fourth source noted regardless whether the meeting occurred before or after mcgonigal retired from the fbi in september 2018 it suggested a serious and extended relationship. what does this all mean in terms of mcgonigal's russian contacts? did he foster the relationship when he was in the fbi or also when? and also remember two years before this meeting the fbi was at the center of some highly controversial work including an investigation into hillary clinton's e-mails a

in the one indictment that concerns deripaska they do not allege there are any investigations.t they do make a subtle allegation that there was in fact a criminal investigation that was opened up that may have been tied to it. and so what we do know from some of this reporting it's alleged since 2018 this individual has been under surveillance, under investigation. and what we don't see in these documents were allegations connected to russia impacted, and you really want to be cautious about jumping to conclusions even though as you said it's easy to do so. >> take me through what we know from the mueller report and other things we can talk about about deripaska's role and the association of constantine kilimnik and paul manafort. i don't have a dog in the fight. i think people should trust our institutions. the truth is people don't trust the fbi right now but they're in danger from the right. and the irony here is that the fbi, there's no chance they'll answer any of these questions. but what is in the public arena in the mueller report is an association. >> that's right. her

is that deripaska is basically joined to the hip with vladimir putin.y classified, but the treasury department has sanctioned oleg deripaska for having acted on behalf of the kremlin and the bipartisan report by the senate intelligence committee in five volumes said that oleg deripaska conducts influence operations on behalf of the russian government all over the world in order to further stay in interest, so -- but deripaska's spokespeople do engage with western media and they do challenge these assertions, but the u.s. government has really pounded the table that he is putin's man. >> let me -- >> i'm sorry, just one more -- >> go ahead, please, yeah. oh, no, most people remember deripaska, would remember him from an incident that was at the center of robert mueller's report, where paul manafort, who was trump's campaign manager at the time, met with a suspected russian spy and gave him internal campaign polling data, something that manafort admitted to me when i interviewed him, though he denied it to special counsel robert mueller. what the mueller

sanctions by warning for a notorious russian oligarch, oleg deripaska.g it's -- from deripaska, after mcconnell of the fbi in 2018. and it doesn't appear to concern espionage. the new reporting today from insiders, posing a handful of questions as to when exactly that russian relationship began. here is the report. in 2018, mcgonigle travel to london, where he met with a russian contact was under surveillance by british authorities, to u.s. intelligence sources told insider. insider was able to determine the year, but not the month of the meeting. the four source noted that regardless of whether the meeting occurred before or after mcgonigle retired from the fbi in september of 2018. it suggested a serious and extended relationship. what does this all mean in terms of mcconnell's russian contacts? did he foster these relationships while he was at the fbi, and if so, when? also, remember roughly two years before this meeting, the fbi was the center of some very highly controversial work. including an investigation into hillary clinton's emails, and a prob

well, in connection with this case deripaska, er, has been exposed.pleasant information regarding 2022. the glukhiv quarry of quartzite supplied 90% of its production to russia. and there it was used for the production of weapons, in particular , and in the rocket production of rockets in this industry, 90% to russia. well and in connection with this decision on deription, uh, this circumstance came to light, the court decision applies to the mykolaiv alumina plant, as well as to underground mining companies, that is, the glukhiv quarry of quartzite, the khust quarry, and the zhezheliv quarry, and what about them now well them nationalized so, that is, until 2022, they supplied materials for the production of russian missiles

been nationalized and what's next will bear responsibility, that is, in the same place, no, not deripaska himself, there were already a lot of people involved . yes, you are absolutely right that these issues of confiscation are now raising such, you know, whole plates of unpleasant problems for our people. vlast a-ah, well, the questions that need to be answered, yes, for example, how did it happen that , in principle, after the 14th year, we traded with russia for some kind of strategic resources, and that , in principle, nadra belonged to such oligarchs as derybaska, who is, well, direct agents of putin in let's be honest with the world, that is, i would still like to hear from the office of the prosecutor general of ukraine a list of all cases, i emphasize the list of all cases opened against russian oligarchs who have property in ukraine and their agents in ukraine, and that is, their top management, who worked with whom there traded, where was the money withdrawn and for what purpose, er, i am from the office of the general prosecutor, for some reason they do not hear this informati