alan dershowitz.rse of the trial cases, donald trump has been denied attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. any information he discussed as president with his staff is now available to prosecution and his lawyers as well, and we have a judge howell who is retired. she issued a secret search warrant because she says he is a pl flight risk, they go after his twitter accounts, if he is found guilty, he will serve over 600 years. putin doesn't even do that, the guy he goes after gets 30 years. you have been doing this a long time, you have done teaching the constitution and you litigated some of the biggest cases in history. did you ever imagine that a former president who is running for president of united states would be faced with this. >> absolutely not. i lived through mccarthyism that was very bad. this is worse. because this affects the future. you want our young people are told due process doesn't matter, free speech does not matter, just get trump, you talk about being denied various

elizabeth: coming up, we've got alan dershowitz.iolation of federal law, naming an insider in the doj to be the special counsel in the probe of hunter biden. federal law says it should come from the outside. the debate, coming up. ♪ ♪ et and want to make the right moves fast... get decision tech from fidelity. [ cellphone vibrates ] you'll get proactive alerts for market events before they happen... and insights on every buy and sell decision. with zero-commission online u.s. stock and etf trades. for smarter trading decisions, get decision tech from fidelity. [clicking] when occasional heartburn won't let you sleep. [clicking] get fast relief with new tums+ heartburn + sleep support. love food back and fall asleep faster. ♪tum, tum tum tum, tums♪ (bobby) my store and my design business? we're exploding. but my old internet, was not letting me run the show. so, we switched to verizon business internet. they have business grade internet, nationwide. (vo) make the switch. it's your business. it's your verizon. ah, these bills are craz

as professor dershowitz is pointed out, all losing candidates say that that's not a crime. you know, let's bring in. professor dershowitz, professor. let's go to two points and will get matched. take on this. the first point. is that the idea? i've read that transcript and i've read it again and again, and in that transcript donald trump on that call with georgia officials repeatedly talks about areas where where he felt that the vote was on fair at one point, even mentioning that he felt that he won by over 400,000 votes and gave specific examples of where he thought that mistakes were made. and then they seemed to only want to pull out the one line just like in the in the case of january, 6th one line they didn't want the public to see was many of you will peacefully and patriotic li march to the capital, so your voices will be heard in this case they focus in on but he talked about all of the votes that he thought were legitimately his his point of view. however i only need 11,700 whatever the number happened to be, and i would have won the state. that hardly seems to me

n anall right, professor dershowitz, we start with you tonight. >> oka wity. cument top secret classified documents was hillary clintos d jon and je biden. they have these issues. they be in the treated the same way as donald trump is being treated. no, none of them should have been prosecuted. these are administrative violations that should be treated the way they've been treated in the past. but to prevent the leading candidate from running against the incumbent president by raising the selective prosecution of documentstion is interference with the election. you know, none of the four cases justify stopping the election from going forward. but the get trump policy is the determined to stop this election from occurring. look, the new york times, tions the headline the other day to improve democracy, get rid of electionsand they. you read the article and they're afraid that democracy in electionsf will actually produce donald trump. >> so the whole goal of thisth i thing is to get him b convicted before there's any. then the convictions will be reversed on ap

joining me now is harvard law professor alan dershowitz.reaction to the charges against president trump and and also this issue of a mug shot. i mean, he put it out this on social media. he's obviously fighting back, or alan. >> well, he should. in my book "get trump," i predicted all four of these indictments. the strategy is to get a quick trial, get him convicted many jurisdictions that are overwhelmingly anti-trump and then not worry about it being versed on appeal because the reversals on appeal will occur after election. it's clearly a political ploy, especially since the district attorney now says she wants the the trial within two months. it's unthinkable. never in history has there been a trial within two months of a case as congresswoman plex and difficult as this with -- complex and difficult as this. what she wants is the mug scott, she's gotten that -- mug shot. shelfed like to get a quick conviction with a biased jury and then not worry about it reversed on appeal. that's tomorrow's news after the election. that that's just is

that's not a crime. >> sean: lesbian professor dershowitz. let's get to 2.3 the first point is the idea, i have read that transcript and i have read it again and again. in that transcript, donald trump, on that call with georgia officials, repeatedly talks about areas where he felt that the vote was unfair. at one point even mentioning that he felt that he won by over 400,000 votes and gave specific examples of where he thought mistakes were made. and then they seemed to only want to point out the one line, just like in the case of january didn't want the public to see was many of you will peacefully and patriotically march to the capital so your voices will be heard. in this case, they focusing on -- he talked about although votes he felt were legitimately his, his point of view. however, i only need 11,700 -- whatever the number happen to be. i would have won the state. that hardly seems to me like a strong enough case to bring before injury. your reaction to that. >> of course, it's pretty much the same thing. i did and another professor d

that was alan dershowitz . utterly brilliant, dershowitz.n say to that. utterly brilliant . well, i'm utterly brilliant. well, i'm joined by the equally brilliant , though somewhat younger patrick , who is, of patrick christys, who is, of course, standing for in jacob rees—mogg. what's the big shout tonight, patrick? >> yeah, look, why brexit? britain dealing with britain is dealing with the consequences of the migrant consequences of the eu's migrant madness. i suspect we're madness. and i suspect we're going paying world for going to be paying the world for this to come. i've got this in years to come. i've got ann widdecombe net zero ann widdecombe on that net zero referendum. it happen, referendum. should it happen, quentin top gear, quentin wilson, former top gear, fifth gear, sorts stuff. fifth gear, all sorts of stuff. he's on colonialism in ireland. >> he's very interesting. he's now a greenie, isn't he? he now a big greenie, isn't he? he is, yeah. >> he's also in the green room. is yes. well i'll is he? helps. yes. well i'll have ro

alan dershowitz is with us. good to see you both, greg. let'alhowitz i us let's get you of all of this. and thank you for pointing out to m.e the regulation that exists as it relates somebody within the government being an appointed special counsel, although the samo e in t governm about durhame . >> yeah, i mean, i agree with you. i think this is a farcink thise more cover up and corruption by merrick garland, merr is noty generaly allowed to appoint david weiss as special counseldavid we. >> under federal regulations, you can only appoint somebody outsidtions,e the government bec weiss is conflicted. >>auss i he for joe biden, as gd does, and weiss of course, is accused by irs whistleblowers of coursef political interference to protect the bidens, allowing the statute of limitationsf tict to expire, tipping off hunter's lawyers, scuttling plansatexpir search warrants for closing any questions about joe biden' any e involvement and, of course, negotiating the absurd pleina. you know, weiss is the absolutes cost on earth who should be spec

cheryl: joining me now harvard law prefer emeritus alan dershowitz you are author of get trump, civil liberties due process constitutional rule of law reaction to comments from senator cruz. >> ted was one of my student one of my very good students i think over states it a little bit when he you accuses merrick garland of lying there is no -- no doubt, that there was a dispute between how garland s describing the role previously of david weiss how david weiss described it to friends i interested -- more to misunderstood heing what i would like to find out what david weiss actually did not authorized to do what did he gailt did he look into breegsma or satisfy himself looking at gun charge a minor misdemeanor, and looking at two tax charges. i think it was a wrong person to pick for this, the regulation provides clearly special counsel has to come from outside government for good reason, what is so special about a special counsel, is that he doesn't have to answer, to the present administration he is independent but if you have somebody serves at the pleasure of the attorney general, a

but i agree with professor dershowitz. the prosecutor in this case doesn't care. she wants a guilty verdict to sideline donald trump and interfere in the upcoming presidential election , which is in my judgment the definition of a corrupt act. all right. let me get matt whitaker's take the same topic , matt. um because i think this is very, very crucial here. in other words, the fact that we're talking about things that i don't think most americans know a whole lot of and that's you know, why is this a rico case? why is this a racketeering case? why did they post this earlier on the website? um what was in your mind? and having been and a g? what do you think? what is the thinking behind this? yeah two primary thought. first of all. what greg just said is important, but this is also being done to catapult the prosecutors. political career. don't forget that. and then second, you know, for 5.5 years i was a u. s attorney. i signed indictments personally, whatever the grand jury returned true bills, you know, i made sure i signed those present mints. to the grand ju

that was alan dershowitz . utterly brilliant, dershowitz.can say to that. utterly brilliant . well, i'm utterly brilliant. well, i'm joined by the equally brilliant , though somewhat younger patrick christys , who is, of patrick christys, who is, of course, standing for in jacob rees—mogg. what's the big shout tonight, patrick? >> yeah, look, why brexit? britain is dealing with the consequences of the migrant consequences of the eu's migrant madness. suspect we're madness. and i suspect we're going paying the for going to be paying the world for this years to come. i've got this in years to come. i've got ann widdecombe net zero ann widdecombe on that net zero referendum. it happen, referendum. should it happen, quentin top gear, quentin wilson, former top gear, fifth all sorts stuff. fifth gear, all sorts of stuff. he's on colonialism in ireland. >> he's very interesting. he's now big isn't he? he now a big greenie, isn't he? he is, yeah. >> he's in the green room. >> he's also in the green room. is he? yes. well i'll is he? helps. yes. wel

alan dershowitz at prominent democrat, al gore a prominent democrat as well.ging on election illegal because donald trump wanted to do it? >> that is a great question, where is your first amendment rights, do we have the right to question the results of this election here in the state, yes president trump have that right and the 18 other people who have been indicted. they had the right to question it. i would submit to you. if this was as the secretary of state maintain the purest election the most safest election that we've ever had why did the georgia state legislature make a substantial and subsidence changes to the election laws after this happened. tell me that. cheryl: i want to ask you what happened yesterday. a lot of head scratching going on. the courts website, the charges came out in the noon hour yesterday. then they came out last night when they dropped on the indictment and said those charges were false. what was going on they were still having testimony from witnesses at that exact moment in the courthouse where the website put the charges out.

it is interesting to note that alan dershowitz, a harvard law professor defending the president of the senate floor, earlier this week, referred to the provisions involving bargaining for crimes and when the president could be indicted to strengthen his argument that only crimes could be included in the definition of crimes or misdemeanors, which is a key issue for the current impeachment process. because the goals of impeachment against president trump don't actually allege any particular criminal violation. at one of the big question is whether or not that meets the standard in the constitution. many scholars say it does, but dershowitz has taken the position that it doesn't, which is a fascinating debate. those of the provisions within the constitution, i know i said that quickly, and finally, just this little tidbit about impeachment. there have been 20 impeach officials in our history. 20. three presidents, johnson, clinton, and trump. one secretary, one senator. and 15 judges. the secretary of war, and the senator, 15 judges. eight have been found guilty and remote, seven acquitt

these cases, aldo dershowitz has no these cases down pretty well. it is all to try to defame the president. the main thing i want to remind everybody else is that the dossier that was used to create a false intelligence investigation against donald trump and was leaked to try to keep them from being the president in 20 16. then the hunter biden laptop, the fbi knew was legitimate and allowed the democratic party to impeach the president over phone calls to ukraine regarding be crime family. that was covered up by the fbi and they worked with twitter and facebook to keep it off of the internet so that biden could become the president. host: i think i got your point. guest: the point that tom is making, i'm not going to agree with all of your conclusions, but it is certainly true that the people in power in this country have done a lot to fritter away the trust they have been invested in. it's -- and the justice department under the biden administration is an example. the example i point to is the pro-life activist in philadelphia or outside of it had

former president trump lawyers were in court today, allen dershowitz, they are next.news addition of hannity straight ahead. wake up, achievers. you're making the most of every hour of your life. except the hours that you're sleeping. so why do we leave so much untapped potential on the table? this is a next level bed, for a next level you. my circadian rhythm is kicking your circadian rhythms butt! it's not a competition. i know, but i'm still winning! so, it is a competition. save 50% on the sleep number limited edition smart bed. plus, 36-month financing on select smart beds. shop now only at sleep number. ♪ . >> sean: all right, here with reaction to all of today's breaking news, david weiss appointed special down in the hunter biden probe, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett harvard law professor allen dershowitz is with us. good to see you both. thank you for pointing out to mow. the regulation as exists to someone in the government appointed special counsel although the same thing could be said about durham. >> yeah, i agree with you. i think this is a farce.

maria: i been saying for some time and i see alan dershowitz said this the other day that the timeframehat were talking about before the election does not really add up your going to have to have the so-called discovery process and the discovery process will include the trump lawyers to have access to all of the information and the data and dershowitz, and jonathan turley pulled coldwater on the idea that the trials will begin before the election. he cannot get down in the timeframe. what do you think. >> i think the experts are driving on the point that this is a form of election interference. it wasn't that long ago that the democrats were accusing the russians in the presidential election back in 2016. now we have the democrats being blatant about this and there interfering with the election of 2024. the other bad thing about this, this dilutes the meaning of justice for the average american, were seen more political justice and people are thinking to themselves, on one hand sometimes laws do apply but other times they don't apply. this is not good on. were on a dangerous course rega

that result here, a group professor dershowitz.i believe he can't given a fair trial in dc the trials in dc, it's complete it will b guilty verdict. what happens on the field, does he win? real quick, exit question. >> yes absolutely 100 percent he wins on appeal. either in the circuit court of appeals or supreme court. >> are right and matt, do you think he wins? >> i do. because ultima, the righteous about taking away individuals right and i'll see an individual where his right has been taken away. chris professor, the less sense. i cut you off, go ahead. >> i think he may lose in the unisys court of appeals for the dc circuit. but i think you will probably win the united states supreme court. with the grant review and they should grant review. when you have the president of united states people going after his opponent in a political election, it has to be beyond reproach. has to be without any prompt the strongest case in history this doesn't meet that standard. >> well said all of you, great analysis. tonight, editor-in-chief

it is interesting to note that alan dershowitz, a harvard law professor defending the president of the senate floor, earlier this week, referred to the provisions involving bargaining for crimes and when the president could be indicted to strengthen his argument that only crimes could be included in the definition of crimes or misdemeanors, which is a key issue for the current impeachment process. because the goals of impeachment against president trump don't actually allege any particular criminal violation. at one of the big question is whether or not that meets the standard in the constitution. many scholars say it does, but dershowitz has taken the position that it doesn't, which is a fascinating debate. those of the provisions within the constitution, i know i said that quickly, and finally, just this little tidbit about impeachment. there have been 20 impeach officials in our history. 20. three presidents, johnson, clinton, and trump. one secretary, one senator. and 15 judges. the secretary of war, and the senator, 15 judges. eight have been found guilty and remote, seven acquitt

that result here, a group professor dershowitz.ve he can't given a fair trial in dc the trials in dc it's complete it will b guilty verdict. what happens on the field, does he win? real quick, exit question. >> yes absolutely 100 percent he wins on appeal. either in the circuit court of appeals or supreme court. >> are right and matt, do you think he wins? >> i do. because ultima, the righteous about taking away individuals right and i'll see an individual where his right has been taken away. chris professor, the less sense. i cut you off, go ahead. >> i think he may lose in the unisys court of appeals for the dc circuit. but i think you will probably win the united states supreme court. with the grant review and they should grant review. when you have the president of united states people going after his opponent in a political election, it has to be beyond reproach. has to be without any prompt the strongest case in history this doesn't meet that standard. >> well said all of you, great analysis. tonight, editor-in-chief and foun

now, let's watch senator josh hawley, former trump attorney alan dershowitz, and you're going to see d.a. in action here. watch this. >> what's clear about this is, this is an effort by the ruling party, the democrat party, across states in the federal government to make sure anybody who criticizes them gets indicted. >> you cannot start making crimes out of things that the democrats, tilden, hayes, john kennedy election, 2000 election, 2016 election. jamie raskin gets up and does some of the same things. we're supposed to go to court. we're supposed to go to congress. you can't make those things crimes. and you can't expand the rico statute to now include political objections. >> and have you had any contact with the special counsel about the overlap between this indictment and the federal indictment? >> i'm not going to discuss our investigation at this time. elizabeth: how is she not allowed to discuss that? what if she did, what if she was coordinating with special counsel smith? you know, and how the -- how is this not political? local atlanta tv is reporting willis launched a r

. >> steve: alan dershowitz did say even though there are # # counts there are going to be convictionse whole idea for the trump team is to immediately appeal any conviction. will it matter? stay tuned we are in for a ride. >> ainsley: 91 counts. >> brian: there is a lot of people say there will be no convictions. >> steve: alan dershowitz. >> ainsley: 20 minutes after the top of the hour. nevada rangers now there plowing through protesters. latest on the climate crisis. >> steve: they should have moved. new report claims thousands of pilots are lying about medical issues that should keep them from flying. the concerns over pilots being unfit to fly coming up next on office. and look who else is on the big show today? ♪ i get a little bit closer. my name's dan and i live here in san antonio, texas. my wife magda and i have been married for 39 years. about three or four years ago, i wasn't feeling as if i was as sharp as i used to be. i wanted to try something that was over-the-counter. i saw the prevagen commercials. after a short amount of time taking prevagen, i started noticing a di

professor dershowitz is right for being with us. >> all right. here was one legal analysis. greg jarrett and former acting attorney general matt whitaker. >> greg, let's get your take. there's a lot should this investigation begin into bribery and money launderings? oh, absolutely. 100%. you know, devon archer readily admitted in his testimony that their moneymaking schemes raised alarmmoneyms of influence peddling, which is the center pointed out is usingic your public office for profit to confer a benefit in exchange for money in the criminal codes that is called bribery. and when it involves a foreign d entity, as here, it's a crime under the foreign corrupt practices act. >> you know, look, there's no evidence that hunter and his pals were selling any products or services. >> they were access to joe biden and promises of future influence. >> and by the way, he doesn't have to deliver on the promises of influence. >> the promise itself makes it i bribery. >> and he obviously knew he wabs the closer, if you will, get on the telephone, he attend dinners to prove the value.

i agree with professor dershowitz. i believe he can'ta get a fair trial in d.c. if the trials in d.c., it's -- it's a fait complete it be a guilty verdict. what happens on appeal? does he win? greg jarrett, real quick, exitds question. he wi yeah, yeah, absolutely. 100% wins on appeal, circuit court of appeals or supreme court. >> all right, matt, you think he wins? >> i d o, because ultimately this deprivation of rights is about taking away an individual's right. and under the way it's pled, i don't see any individual that his right has been away. >> all right, professor, we'll give you that last sentence. i cut you off. go ahead. i think he may lose in theri states court of appeals for the d.c. circuit, but i think appeals the unitedn states supreme court if they grant review and they should grant review when shoul you have the president of the united states is. people going after his opponent in a political election, it hags to be beyond reproach. it has to be without any has rec to be the strongest case in history. >> this doesn't meet that standard. thout an

and the fact that alan dershowitz said the judge had worked at a firm where hunter biden was on the board. i don't see how 95% of the electorate in washington, d.c. being democrat, i just don't see how president trump, former president trump could receive a fair trial. i think that a change of venue would be in order. host: kalani in honolulu, hawaii democrats line. caller: good morning, i wanted to mention, how do we get fact checking to be some kind of, i don't know, i don't know how to say it. there are so many lies out there that everybody is just misinformed. how do we get that corrected? that's one of the big problems with so many of us on one side and so many of us on the other side. it's a big problem, that's all i think. host: in this case in particular, where you think you are hearing the most misinformation? caller: when you look at the january 6 committee and with the doj has done, they have all these proven facts where you have the other side -- i appreciate everybody's input the you have the other side saying this and that but where are the facts? even with the republican po

at worst this kind of a rico case is simply guilty by association but i agree with professor dershowitz, the prosecutor in this case doesn't care. she wants a guilty verdict to sideline donald trump and interfere in the upcoming presidential election. which is, in my judgment, the definition of a corrupt act. >> all right. let me get matt whitaker's take, same topic because i think this is very crucial here. in other words, the fact that we are talking about things that i don't think most americans a whole lot of. that's why is this a rico case, why is this a racketeering case, why did they post this earlier on the web site. in your mind having been an a.g. what is the thinking behind this? >> yes. two primary thoughts. first of all what greg just said is important but this is also being done to catapult the prosecutor's political career don't forget that. and then second, for 5 and a half years i was a u.s. attorney. i signed indictments personally. whenever the grand jury true bills, you know, i made sure i signed those presentments to the grand jury and those indictments and that sai

congresswoman bass,ress w alan dershowitz, greg jarrett, i appreciate it. now, tonight, puomen. i apprt biden's approval numbers are, in fact, really bad. not only is the president struggling with allegations of corruption and incompetencs appv e, but he's also apparently deeply unlikable. it's not just you. you're not the problem. you guys, as i pointed out in my new article posted at a mac dot u.s.. biden lacks one key human value . he probably lacks a few, but in this case, empathy. for example, biden has yetis to visit east palestine, ohio, and apparently has no plans to go watch this. >> dbi o you still have planso. to go to his palace? mrthis. . president, this week, biden also failed to answeriledt most questions about the disaster in mauio t questi, whee recovery efforts have been severely delayedrely. >> no. >> can congresswoman darrell issa, congressman darrell issa say yo s, that biden is also stonewalling requests to meet with gold star families of all people. they lost the loved ones during the disastrous withdrawal from afghanistan. meanwhile, in what some are call

democratic party is no longer controlled by a liberalth left and when i thinkf liberal left, i think of dershowitz and jonathan turley. it's those that willfully disregard the atrocities and failures of the past. democrats no longer respect to the sovereign individual rule of law were the primary value of the constitution. instead, democrats regard to the constitution as a white supremacist document written by slaveowners designed to impress the genders and races is that of european fascism and soviet communism and its immediate goal as a a party state. the good news is we can take the country back if we are willing to fight. i came tonight ready to talk about some of the themes of the final battle. the public debate about02 the 20 election has been framed to demonizer the opponents and mae brazenly false accusations about their actions. according to democrats, the 2020 election was the fairest and most just never held. anyone who questions this conclusion moreover is said by them to be committing an unthinkable act of treason and constitutes a threat to our democracy. in the real world it's suppo

we have two great guests, we have alan dershowitz and miranda devine, we have ash lot toow talk aboutust 4.id russiaen

. >> brian: likalan alan dershowitz, the law is the law. >> if you bring a case against a former presidentas to be a compelling case. i am a democrat, how did it take nearly four years to bring this case? why have they not answered the question about fani willis conflict of interest? she held a fundraiser for one of the opponents in this prosecution. president trump has three or four trials. too much politics for me. >> brian: i watch people who just despise trump, legal experts say, why did she do this? she complicated, jack smith had challenged this. i don't see a reason to bring this case forward. others are saying, it is great. resources in fulton county to bring a president 2-1/2 years, who happens to be leading contender for republican nomination in for that shot and to post $200,000 bail, as if he was going to run or hideout. >> ainsley: he is accused of challenging the election. hillary clinton did, no mugshot of her. no mug shot of stacey abrams. you should be able to challenge an election, if ub feel things are wrong, there should be an investigation. >> steve: fani willis says h

. >> alan dershowitz said that you are one of the best students that he ever had in the history of harvardut your law hat on and tell us what you see here. >> legally i see the evidence is going and growing. we are also seeing jake tapper, elizabeth warren, neither the corporate media or any congressional democrat cares at all whether the president of the united states received millions of dollars of bribes from foreign nationals and you know, it was sort of influenced and is not bothersome and it's like no, those are not the allegations, you are a journalist, or you are supposed to be. the allegations are bribery. and it wasn't just him selling access, it was him selling official favors from his father, joe biden. let's go to what that specifically says, confidential human source that had been reliable to the fbi coming forward and saying hey, the oligarch paid $5 million to hunter biden and 5 million to joe biden in exchange for joe biden's help getting rid of the prosecutor that was investigating the oligarch. so what is it? it is a quid pro quo, we remember from the first impeachment,

this d.a., in atlanta, as well as jack smith, what are they doing or done, alan dershowitz wrote an importantfor daily mail. >> he says: >> this is normal. in 2000, florida state officials were lob t lobby to recount and select the counties. it goes on: >> trump was entitled as a candidate to ask a georgia state official, trump was told, that in and of these republican counties, that the votes were not in yet, they can't find the ballots and votes he said can't you find whatever it is 11 or 12 thousand votes? that is it! and continues: >> you understand the extent to which criminal activity is criminal activity, the biden administration. the department of justice. merrick garland. and jack smith. they are the criminals. let's look at what hillary clinton did. i know the media hate to do this, because media are frauds. unfreedom of the press, the book on what media have done to this nation, not a free press, this a practice practi pravda, a russian time press. the people who watch the programs, even though they have very small audiences, the big parts of their od audience. as for the judges, j

hello america i am mmark levin, had is "life, liberty and levin," we have two great guests, alan dershowitz

allen dershowitz say these were it is tactics used on democratic side to contest in florida finish one al gore. is challenging an election now illegal? trump did it and if so, i guess stacey abrams, governor of georgia in her mind, need to be indicted. what say you, mark? >> the constitution says we have right to petition the government if we have a grievance tlchl is no dispute donald trump and his legal team disputed who won the georgia electoral vote in 2020. that was legitimate fight they took to court, congress, state legislature and the government under the first amendment. when you read this indictment, you see, you say to yourself, looks like all they did was petition the government because they disagreed with what was going on and they lost in congress on january 6. all of a sudden, petitioning the government is a crime and criminal enterprise, what this indictment says. it is bewildering. >> carley: 19 defendants, 41 counts, all defendants being charged with racketeering. willis says it constitute criminal organization. can you explain what racketeering is and how the da is u

i believe alan dershowitz said given all the charges, there will be convictions. let's see how that pans out and like mark meridith just said, we have 400 days, more movie to see before people start -- >> brian: georgia prosecutor wants it the day before super tuesday, how do you pretend -- >> steve: that will not happen. >> ainsley: six months for his attorneys to prepare something and apparently you need more time. >> brian: 19 people. >> steve: and prepare four other trials. >> ainsley: one headline talking about bud light hired marketing students to have the transgender dylan mulvaney as their spokesperson, didn't go over well and they lost millions. now the family heir, who used to be involved in the company, his grandfather or dad started the company, hes he wants to buy it back. they sold anheuser-busch to imbev in 2008. he said it is owned by brazilian company and woke students are running this and marketing and they don't know who the buyer is, the parent company doesn't know who the customer is. >> steve: they don't understand the american consumer. here

he did, as professor dershowitz pointed out, it is not crime to say i need this amount of votes to win they did, was put tweets, he said we need to look at the election, that is overt crime. that is first amendment right and executive branch responsibility. we have a minute left, we have no idea who is first, who is first? >> i don't know, they are all chomping at the bit and it is ironic they waited 2-1/2 years to have it in six months. they wanted to mess him up in the middle of a campaign. they can't win against him otherwise, desperation. >> ainsley: new york case in march, florida case in may, january 6 case in january and georgia case to be determined. >> and leticia james in october. >> brian: all those dates are tenuous. insisting on october. >> 18 other people indicted, do you think the da will get them to flip. >> steve: real pleasure to have you on the couch. see you. >> ainsley: you have been busy, get some sleep. >> brian: run to the >> bill: gl morning, former president donald trump indicted for a fourth time last night out of atlanta yeah, georgia. prosecutor charging hi

. >> a federal matter diversity jurisdictions in civil procedure 101, alan dershowitz big dime democrat big dime lawyer worked for al o gore in 2000 the hanging chads he said tame process to contest election on be lav of although gore multiple attorneys spoke with was that criminal enterprise along lines of a rico violations? no, i wrote a best-selling book being about this how you are supposed to do these trump does something similar he and 19 individuals are indicted. cheryl: it is stunning, we will talk about that before the show is over, coming up, president biden touting "bidenomics" yet again this time in in in milwaukee, up of watching "mornings with maria" live on fox business. . ♪ ♪ the biggest ideas inspire new ones. 30 years ago, state street created an etf that inspired the world to invest differently. it still does. what can you do with spy? ♪ ♪ what if you could make analyzing a big bank's data... no big deal? go on... well, what if you partner with ibm and red hat, use a hybrid cloud solution to connect data across clouds, then analyze all that data with watson. okay, but

sandra day o'connor, alan dershowitz otherwise known as judge judy. from corporate leaders. poets such as billy collins. sailors from the uss abraham lincoln and musical visual artist. the gettysburg address written out in his own hands in a different format. he said, you know, i am 94. i will not be composing anything right now. the way that i have helped people overea the years learn to recite it. and so that is what he said to us. she said,no well, you know, i am not a writer. ideal photographs. taking a picture of the model. that's what we have in the book. many of our others have spoke of their own personal experiences in their family experiences. they wrote for us in essay that reminds us only a few generations separate us from slavery. i willly read some of it for yo. only my father's generation stands between julian and human bondage. i am the grandson of a slave. at 15, barely able to read and write my grandfather walked across contact the. his was black slavery was born in slavery. freed by abraham lincoln. determined to make their way in freedom. the college asked

their dershowitz and jonathan turley. so there's two of them. it's controlled by marxist, willfully disregard the marxist atrocities, failures of the past. democrats no longer the sovereign individual, the rule of law or the primary values of the constitution or equality of races, the spirit of compromise or the decentralization of power. instead democrats regard the constitution a white supremacist document written by rich white slave, designed to oppress all of the genders, races. its mentality is that of european fascism and soviet communism and its immediate goal is a one party state. this is actually a bad news. good news story. the bad news is that tremendous damage to our country was made possible because republicans and patria failed to address the threat when it could have been nipped in the bud. the good news is that we can take our country back if we are willing to fight for it. i came tonight ready to talk some of the themes of final battle. next election could be the last public debate about the 2020 election. i called public debate

getting started we're following the unprecedented story all morning long, harvard law professor alan dershowitz is here in the next hour with his thoughts on president trump's latest indictment but first zeroing in biden family corruption the house oversight committee identifying 16 times in joe biden lied about his connection to his family's business schemes, tennessee congressman and oversight committee member ways and coming up next, don't miss a moment of it you're watching morning said maria live on fox business. ♪ let innovation refunds help with your erc tax refund so you can improve your business however you see fit. rosie used part of her refund to build an outdoor patio. clink! dr. marshall used part of his refund to give his practice a facelift. emily used part of her refund to buy... i run a wax museum. let innovation refunds help you get started on your erc tax refund. stop waiting. go to innovationrefunds.com you really got the brows. (woman) what if my type 2 diabetes takes over? what if all i do isn't enough? or what if i can do diabetes differently? (vo) now you can with once-w

who knows how the jury will react to this, it is dc dershowitz said last night, where is this going to take place, it needs to be changed to north or southern virginia, can you make a motion for a change of venue, will they allow that? i heard most attorneys saying no, it will be tried in -- >> brian: they already picked out the judge. >> ainsley: if he appeals again it will go to the supreme court. >> brian: jeffrey clark, ken, i don't know who that is, different people, it could be the sixth. let's bring in bret bair on special report, that is a garbage truck, (718)798-7355 if you are looking for a good garbage truck. what stands out for you in this indictment because there is a sense that they really have something to challenge, the president's defense team has a lot to challenge on. >> yeah, you played the sound bite who we had on right after jack smith came out during special report hour. he made the case that their defense is one, this is criminalizing political speech. and two, they have to get to the fact that the former president now, the president then, truly didn't believe t

their dershowitz and jonathan turley. so there's two of them. it's controlled by marxist, willfully disregard the marxist atrocities, failures of the past. democrats no longer the sovereign individual, the rule of law or the primary values of the constitution or equality of races, the spirit of compromise or the decentralization of power. instead democrats regard the constitution a white supremacist document written by rich white slave, designed to oppress all of the genders, races. its mentality is that of european fascism and soviet communism and its immediate goal is a one party state. this is actually a bad news. good news story. the bad news is that tremendous damage to our country was made possible because republicans and patria failed to address the threat when it could have been nipped in the bud. the good news is that we can take our country back if we are willing to fight for it. i came tonight ready to talk some of the themes of final battle. next election could be the last public debate about the 2020 election. i called public debate

joining us now with reaction to what has been a very busy newsweek harvard law professor alan dershowitz of south carolina congress room, nancy mason as well as foxnews legal analyst craig jared. there is a lot of impact here. i know it can seem like so many different pieces. greg, we will start with you. becoming what's investigated and penciled uncial aids, aren't we looking here especially when we think about the pseudonyms. this was a dynamic invited was vice president. conducting official business under an assumed name with a government account. what does this say greg when it comes to what else may be happening and frankly, what is biden doing now? is that a behavior that you stop utilizing? >> no, it's not. if joe biden was using aliases to funnel privileged government information to a son who was then handing it off to his foreign business partners, his benefactors ravishing tens of millions of dollars on him. then it simply underscores the biden family corruption and joe biden's direct complicity and his sons influenced peddling schemes which are defined to the criminal codes as