item 12 a authorization for negotiation with desilva desilva gates construction company in the alternative with the newly formed joint venture with newco and exclusive negotiations agreement. >> good afternoon commissioners. i am joined by staff and i would like to ask given the hour would you like a presentation on this item. >> i'm sorry. i read the item and i have no questions. it was pretty clear. >> and you missed the presentation on this item last month last meeting. >> yeah, i was here. you would have been the one commissioner brandon because you weren't here and if you're happy we had the briefing. >> so moved. >> is there a second? >> second. >> public comment. >> now public comment and is there public -- is there public comment on this item? seeing none. public comment is now closed. i do want point out in terms of changes from the last presentation most of it was just clarifying some of the details and there's not as i see it no significant substantive from the prior presentation but some further clarification on the roles going forward. >> correct. >> all in favor? >> aye. >> o

item 12 a authorization for negotiation with desilva desilva gates construction company in the alternative with the newly formed joint venture with newco and exclusive negotiations agreement. >> good afternoon commissioners. i am joined by staff and i would like to ask given the hour would you like a presentation on this item. >> i'm sorry. i read the item and i have no questions. it was pretty clear. >> and you missed the presentation on this item last month last meeting. >> yeah, i was here. you would have been the one commissioner brandon because you weren't here and if you're happy we had the briefing. >> so moved. >> is there a second? >> second. >> public comment. >> now public comment and is there public -- is there public comment on this item? seeing none. public comment is now closed. i do want point out in terms of changes from the last presentation most of it was just clarifying some of the details and there's not as i see it no significant substantive from the prior presentation but some further clarification on the roles going forward. >> correct. >> all in favor? >> aye. >> o