i think professor destler. does that less than others although even already he's done a little bit of distortion and that realm rising co2 benefits tend to be trivialized or or denied climate mastery denial tends to not be discussed at all, and then fossil feel benefit denial is rampant, and i'll show that that professor destler is doing this despite seeming not to so through each of these factors explain my view and explain where professor destler and then the the net zero of you just go very wrong. so i'm going to start off with the harm. so i generally find professor destler reasonable. i think he's one of the more honest commentators what he and the ipcc say is nothing resembling what we hear in the media for example with sea level rises. you're talking like three feet by the year 2100 and extreme scenarios. not like 12 not like 20 feet in several decades like al gore talks about and on joe rogan. he said explicitly we have no idea in terms of what three degrees c will do and i cannot, you know cannot tell

we will lose if we follow a professor destler's policy. okay.to ask you each of you if we accept the assumptions about the impact of human on climate change. how much can the us and you're and you're mitigated when china soon to be the world's largest economy and india, which is soon to be the world's. most populous male already be the world's most populous produce so much of the world's carbon emissions, and i have a follow-up question of that, but let me throw that one out there for each of you starting with them with you andrew. oh, okay. yeah, so obviously it's a global problem. i mean the us can't solve the problem by ourselves, but you know, that's that's a political issue which i really probably you know, i'm not someone who is an expert on on international negotiations and you know the point is we can do this physically. you know, we just need to convince the country as well now, i will say that most of the other countries of the world with a few exceptions maybe australia in the us are kind of convinced are already convinced. they're re

because of adaptation we typically ignore adaptation and i'm going to show you some of these costs also destlertioned several times. it's a little unfair because tesla had to leave so he can't really defend himself, but i'm gonna do it anyway, so we have good. i talked to him out there and i told him about the the resources. i'm going to send them to him as well. we have good evidence and some of these costs about adaptation and they're not exceptional or incredible or something. they're about sarah point one percent of gdp. they're not zero, but they're certainly not huge. so let me just show you and alex already stole my thunder and this one, but i still think it's important to point out. yeah, if people what has happened with deaths from climate related disasters. so basically flood strout storms wildfire and extreme temperatures. we have good data for about a hundred years and it's not such most people would imagine that this just goes up that certainly what we get the impression from from the media. no actually in 1920s almost 500,000 people died every year from these climate-related disas