it was later determined to be the suspect's sister and ran hysterically across the hallway. at this time, officer heppler repeated san francisco police department, come out. hearing the commotion from the other side of the hallway, officer heisen and hernandez were standing. suddenly, from a door on the left side of the hallway, the suspect appeared holding a large knife in each hand. both arms were raised above his head as he pulled it down the hallway towards officers. officer eisen shot the beanbag. in an attempt to put distance between the suspect and himself, he started backing up all shouting, put it down. the suspect refused to obey the commands and quickly continue towards officer heppler with knives in each hand. the only option he had to stop the threat to him and fellow officers was to use the fire arm. officer heppler shot the suspect and save himself, the other officers, and undoubtably the suspect's sister from being stabbed. for these actions they are being awarded the silver medal of valor. congratulations. [applause] >>>> captain feeney, and lt. mak solomon,

item 19 determining the motion. item 20 reversing.tem 21 is a motion directing preparation of findings. >> president chiu: colleagues, this is also an item out of district 2. supervisor farrell. >> supervisor farrell: thank you, president chiu. seems we're going to be 2-2 today. at 1:00 today we had an agreement between the parties. similarly i would offer planning department, the project sponsor. if you have any questions -- i don't know if you want to come up, irving, district 2 residents is the appellate here. again come to an agreement, worked very hard. i want to thank irving and everyone else from reuben jewel yas as well as my staff who worked very hard on this one. >> members of the board, i'm pleased to announce that we have a settlement. all the parties are very pleased with it, and we are ready to go forward, and we wish the project sponsor much luck in the execution of the project. >> president chiu: thank you. as we did with the previous item, let's open it up for public comment. if there are any members of the public tha

yes, we have agreed and stipulated to the findings and determination that are presently before you. the matter should be decided by the planning commission to see if they will approve a conditional use. i think that is where the issue is better set, and that is why we agreed to the stipulation. president hwang: thank you. director goldstein: mr. sanchez? >> thank you. good afternoon, president hwang, commissioners. we have a of -- we have reviewed what was put forward to the -- to us. there is information that was not previously provided. this board agreed to the rehearing request because of some of this new information that has become available. it is required to go before the planning commission in order to continue the use as a tourist motel. so that due date would have been several years ago now, but they would not have been able to file the c.u. because it has been more than a decade now, so the result of this appeal will allow the appellant to move forward with the conditional- use to legally continue the tourist mattel use. that would be a hearing for the planning commission

you have to consider that what is deemed as a determination is true. and it's asking for you to provide the enforcement for that. that's a two-fold aspect. the first as commissioner remnn and studley pointed out, to get them to do what they were supposed to do. they had the opportunity to tell the task force why it's not a public document. and under 6730-c. it's not just public documents. it includes cpra and the brown act. state laws and not just sunshine. they have to show the cause there. they would have done that. so the hearing process already done. the evidence is there. the show-cause is this. it's already in the minutes and already in the orders of determination. no need to repeat it. i think what is important here is [buzzer] after all of that is said and done, your deliberations is what is the enforcement. first get them to do what they were supposed to do. and if they don't do it, that could be considered willful failure and you can move forward. okay, am i making sense? >> you are. except when we met, this was the compromise situation we ca

we want to go through the public planning process to determine how we want to use that site. how are we going to reprogram that site? we are going to be demolishing the existing digesters that are there now, just across the street from the residence, and have an opportunity to improve that location. that would be the $371 million that is shown there. there are a number of other large projects for the treatment plants. the first phase of our city wide green infrastructure projects and the combined discharge structure refurbishments. taking all this planning work and getting it through design and construction. when we look at southeast plants, we are looking at doing all of our planning up front in phase one so we will know everything that is going to occur, the timing. we are looking at phasing the construction and the construction dollars. if we were to lay that on the scorecard for phase two, that is approximately $3.2 billion. the breakdown is shown for treatment, collection, and program management. if you look further at this schedule, the implementation schedule, face to

this is a tree that has been on our radar but it is up to the department to determine whether or not we want to remove this tree because it is a tree that we have had the maintenance responsibility for. the other thing i would like to emphasize, i think there may have been a misunderstanding, when the appellant was filing the appeal, he thought his request was going to be forwarded to the department because i usually respond to a brief and that's my trigger to get you my brief on time and the appellant didn't file a brief so i also failed to file a brief so i'm not sure where that's where the confusion over the documentation came. i think the last thing i would add rez is our concerns is multilateral so it's not simply the sidewalk damage although the fact that the damage occurs opposite the lean is a concern, in order to be ada compliant, we can't leave a damaged sidewalk like that and there is some damage on this side, this is the worst o*f the damage, it is a privately maintained planter box, but even if we were to try to move that planter box, you know, we don't know what would h

i think if they receive this transcript, it will be difficult for them to determine what the basis was obviously, we are deliberating in public, which is highly unusual, if you are adjudicating the matter. i guess i worry that the new ones of the arguments that have been provided -- the nuance of the arguments that have been provided would be lost if we sent them a 500 page transcript, with 300 pages before-- pages today. commissioner liu: the salian findings would be the specific findings of fact, how we came together on that, and what we decided on the two options? chairperson hur: i am envisioning something very summary. these are the facts we found support the charges. this is how we interpret the law. this is the application of the that is one possibility. another option would be one that has more detail, and would provide perhaps even -- i guess more detail as to the bases of the>> had to the parties have vs on this? >> while we think about it for just a second, many people have talked about the passage of time and getting to the point where those supervisors can initiate their c

as noted in the report of your outside counsel, all final determinations including credibility determinationsre properly left to this committee since it is the responsibility of this committee and not your outside counsel to make the ultimate findings and conclusions regarding this matter. we state for the record, mr. chairman, should the committee decide to issue something short of a formal sanction, such as a letter of reproval to mr. moore for his actions in this matter, we would agree with that decision pending any new arguments, evidence, or facts presented by mr. moore at today's hearing. mr. chairman, we believe that such action would be consistent with the findings of the report and i thank you for allowing me the time to present this. >> thank you, mr. martin. mr. moore, at this time, i would ask that you please stand and raise your right hand so that i may swear you in. do you elmly swear that the -- and affirm that the testimony you are about to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you god? >> i do. >> thank you. and please be seated. for the r

if, however, task force determined not to make the change, it is not a relative question. let's first take the question up on whether to make the change, and then we can determine in making the change that we have to account for it or compensate for it in some other shift. the question before us now is whether or not to make this change. >> yes, and i had a proposal. >> great, thank you. >> yes. >> yes. >> yes. >> yes. >> yes. >> no. >> no. >> thank you. please make this change. >> just a second. we are going to make the changes. >> we put three decimal points on. -5.001%. >> please. >> i suggest that the task force errs on the side of caution and keeps it at or under 5% to as many decimal points as you can. >> there is a proposal? >> the thinking with sort of overall be this is in relation to the swap that was proposed. i am not in favor of it because it think it also breaks of the neighborhood boundaries that were suggested. my thinking was if we drew straight lines, in the district 5 two lines, i think it is worth reconsidering, since we were doing it four straight line

in this way, as we continue to develop this project, we can determine the right combination of tunnel size and green infrastructure to accomplish our project executive -- objectives. this would be accomplished through the ongoing watershed process, utilizing the triple bottom line analyses, and the planning and ceqa review that will be undertaken as part of the central bayside project. these analyses will be guided by the permit negotiations that will begin this fall, and of course, the performance from the green infrastructure or the invitation projects. this project has a total of one -- $1.29 4 billion and a total impact of 20 two dollars per month per average bill. when we move to the west side, we focus on the csd discharges along ocean beach, lincoln way, the 70 -- vicente and merced. we had an average discharge our current of 3 per year to the bathing beaches. in doing these analyses, we focused on utilizing the transport storage boxes, the website pump station, and the existing out hall. we looked at various pop stations to get as to the target of three. you may recall that we

the officers determined the suspect was riding without benefit obtained.he officers escorted the subject off of the vehicle without incident and requested he sit down on one of the benches nearby. mr. harding complied with that request well officer lopez conducted a standard warrant record check. as he heard officers radio transmission, he suddenly leapt to his feet and started to run east across third street into the crowded plaza with officers and foot pursuit. suddenly, and from a distance of 10 feet from the pursuing officers, harding a ride of the northern part of the plaza and reached his right hand under his left arm and then fired several rounds from his handgun at both of the officers. the officers immediately engaged in a firefight with the suspect. he then it fell to the ground, suffering a gunshot wounds. officers approached the suspect to taken into custody and render medical aid. numerous responding officers arrived on the scene and observed the officers surrounded by a mob, many of whom were screaming and provoking hostility towards officers

and that's why we are determined to vindicate their lives. in remembering those we lost on 9/11, we testified to our shared belief that each and every one of them was irreplaceable. we renew our commitment to live lives worthy of their memory. and we pledge once again to do whatever it takes to keep americans safe from those who still wish to do us harm. >> it was 11 years ago today, on a crystal clear morning much like today, that terrorists attacked our nation. but their attack wasn't just on our planes, or our buildings. it was an attack against the american spirit. an assault on freedom and democracy. they were determined not only to take lives, but also to break our nation's will. but although the terrible violence of that day turned our world upside down it also reminded us of our collective strength and power. it brought us together as a nation in the fight against terror. in the years since we've crippled al qaeda, we've brought to justice the world's most dangerous terrorist, osama bin laden, and our nation has begun to heal from the

>> guest: it was of the -- he was determined to act. he was determined to take action. he was determined to ensure that saddam hussein does not give the u.n. and international community run-around anymore. so he was absolutely determined, and also convinced that he was taking the right decision. >> host: was it -- angry? >> guest: no, he was firm. a bit of impatience. but i wouldn't say he was angry in the conversations with me. >> host: let's talk about peacekeeping. it's something you spent a lot of the time in the book on as well and something you spend a lot of time on in your career before you were secretary-general, you were head of the unitees piecekeeping operations. a review of your book by the washington post, david ignatius called your study and failure of a noble idea? is that a fair characterization of the united nations' peacekeeping prognoses. >> guest: some of the points he makes are valid. and perhaps i should ask the question, when we talk of united nations in this context, whom are we talking about? is it the member states who take the decisions, who

"investigators say its still ffr too early to determine how this fire started. despite all the smoke, no one was seriously hurt." and for those who survived.....there's both gratitude and relief... (12:41:21) "i have o think of what might have happened....umm.....god is good...." jeff abell, fox 45, news at five. seven people are home from theehospital ... after an m-t-a bus ran into a bus shelter outside mondawmin mall yesterday. it was a 60 fooo bus with two sections connected in the middle.an m-t-a spokesman says there was a driver on the bus... but she waan't behind the wheel because a shift change was about to take place.there were no passengers aboardd.. still nearby commuters couldnt' believe what happened. 3:08:14 and all of a sudden i seen this bus just going turning into the curb3:17:36 he tore the booth up right there where your waiting for the bus 3:21:57 we'll figure out what exactly happened here cuz safety is our highest priooity the last thing we wann to do is see an accident accidentthe driver has been with the company since 1997. the video from

>> it was that he was determined to act. he was determined to take action. he was determined to ensure that saddam hussein does not give the u.n. and international committee the run around anymore. he was absolutely determined and also convinced that he was taking the right decision. >> host: is a frustrating? was the entry? >> guest: no, he was fair. but i would say that he was angry in the conversations with me hosni mubarak let's talk about peacekeeping. it is something you have spent a lot of time on in the book is well as well and something you have spent a lot of time on in your career before that, you were head of the u.n. peacekeeping resolutions. one has called your book a study in noble ideas of peacekeeping. is that fair? >> guest: i would answer in two different ways. some points he makes are correct, and perhaps i should ask the question, when we talk of united nations in this context, who are we talking about? is it the states who take the decisions and give us a mandate, who give us the resources required to carry out the mandate, or sometimes

today a judge determined that decision was not constitutional and violated the union members rights. >> we are very pleased withed decision because we knew back when the city made the changes to the pension system they were not constitutional so we are pleased the judge's decision because like i said contract is a contract. >> now we received the statement from the city tonight that said in part the city law department is carefully reviewing the ruling and reserves the right to appeal. the mayor remains committed to protecting the city financing and the sustainability of the system. >>> one in four people living in baltimore city is in poverty. that means about 25% of the city makes less than $11,000 a  year for individuals, less than 23,000 for family of four. now it's higher for children. 37% live below the poverty line. that from the latest round of stats the cent sauce bureau. >>> in northeast baltimore neighbors, community leaders and police took to the streets. they came out to remember peter, they came to send a message to the cowards, criminals trying to turn back the progre

those were submitted to get public comment but no action was determined in the ceqa determinations. lastly, 8 washington. as you were aware there were sufficient signatures to qualify the zoning map amendment for consideration by the voters through a referendum. under the referendum process, prior to a vote by the voters, the board of supervisors has an opportunity to reconsider their approval to the ordinance. in their case the vote did not change there was over an hour of public comment and comment by board members themselves were relatively brief. by a vote of 8-3, again, the board chose not to repeal the ordinance. the issue will now proceed to the next available general election, which will likely be november of 2013. so next november. then there was one completely new ordinance introduced this week. i would like to share with you, supervisors kim and weiner introduced a bill requiring monitoring of student house conversions. this would be an annual requirement. it does amend the planning code. as such it will be scheduled for hearing before this body within the next three mont

>> council, in determining whether or not the mayor exercised his discretion in a reasonable manner, can the mayor and for this commission take into account what the elected official did between the time that the alleged misconduct occurred from the time he is suspended from office? >> can the commission take into account the suspending authorities conduct? lpor the removed official -- >> in other words, let's assume in the case of public official, it's an act that would constitute official misconduct, and between the time he commit the act or she commits an act and when the mayor exercises his discretion, can he take into account what happened in between in regard to that public officials conduct relating to the investigation for example? >> i believe the mayor can take into account. he or she can exercise discretion. the question is, is the discretion reasonable? the mayor can take into account any kind of conduct. the question is, was it reasonable or is it reasonable to suspend an elected official for the alleged misconduct? whether it was that misconduct that occurred in one poi

i am not sure the charges contemplate that we determine the ultimate penalty. that is for the board to decide. chairperson hur: i almost read that as suggesting that we should make a recommendation as to removal. anything they have to sustain seems like it should be something we recommend on, although i think it could be read either way. >> it does say that if the board sustains the charges, the officer shall be removed from office. perhaps we are just parsing words. it may be, theoretically, that you think there is a realm of official misconduct that does not justify removal from office. that probably also means you should not sustain the charges. recommending sustaining the charges, it seems to me you are recommending removal from office. t(chairperson hur: are you sayig that we could find official misconduct and recommend the charges not be sustained? >> before tonight, i had not thought of it as a two-step inquiry. before tonight, i thought you would pass that recommendation on to the board and the board would decide whether to sustain the charges. the char

. >> okay, i understand your argument and obviously it's up to us to determine whether it's relevant to what we're hearing tonight which is this permit before us, so do you have anything else to add? >> no, you know, i will -- i totally understand about this is the board decision, board member decision, and i try the best i can to actually make it my case. i understand that there will be at the beginning, there's two permits, and i do try to also look into combining the two, but you know, as i said, as president hwang has been talking about and there's a due process and -- >> okay, thank you. >> thank you. >> okay, thank you, we can hear from the permit holder now. >> good evening, board members, i'm joe al ford, i represent the permit holder, kevin read is also president here today, i will try to be brief. as this board is well aware, there's no jurisdiction here. i understand the appellant would like to challenge all mcd's at any level in any proceeding. i suppose due process allows him to do that no matter how frivolous these appeals may be, in particular here, the appellant is se

. >> well this will be subject to our discussion, i did not think determining constitutionality is what i signed on for as a commissioner, and i do not think we have that authority. i think we have the authority to do something, and whether we can or cannot make a to whether it is fake. -- is vague. so i would really like to know what you think we do today that is related to the vagueness consideration or whether you are alerting us to an argument you made. take the>> well, the charter res the commission to make a recommendation. it does not say which laws you may consider that substantiates or is the basis of recommendation. i would respectfully subject that the commission can take into account its own interpretation of what the lot is, and the facts are to make its recommendation to the board. if that does not involve a finding for conclusion of all as to 15.105 that is certainly with the commission's purview. i believe if wanted to make such a finding or conclusion of all, that would also be in your purview. i would like to move on and wind up here and then turn it over. a few other

as noted in the report of your outside counsel, all final determinations, including celt determinations are properly left to this committee since it's the responsibility of this committee and not your outside counsel to make the ultimate findings and conclusions regarding this matter. we state for the record, mr. chairman, should the committee decide to issue something short of a formal sanction such as a letter of approval, reprove for mr. moore's actions in the matter, we agree with that decision regarding any new evidence, facts presented by mr. moore at today's hearing. mr. chairman, we believe that such action would be consistent with the findings of the report, and i thank you for allowing me the time to present this. >> thank you, mr. martin. mr. moore, at this time, i would ask that you please stand and raise your right hand so that i may swear you in. do you solemnly swear and affirm the testimony you are about to give would be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you god? thank you, and please be seated. for the record, would you please state your full

police determine he was strangled.ld terry pugh doesn't show up for school on january 22nd. a concerned teacher sets out to find him. >> when we got out there to where he lived, somebody told us that he had just got picked up in a car, and we got there a little bit too late. well, he didn't come home that night. as a matter of fact, he didn't come home anymore because they found him dead. >> terry pugh is discovered two days later in a wooded area strangled by a cord. another crime scene without any clues leaves police feeling helpless. >> i was mad because i don't know who the guy is. >> are you scared? >> for the children. not for myself. >> how long has he been missing? >> he didn't go to school today. he stole a car. >> uh-huh. >> tennis shoes. suspect also has long curly hair. >> people are frustrated. they are just as frustrated as we are, if not more. >> you have to realize that the police officers, they also were parents and, therefore, they had a heartful and a senseful mind in trying to do what was right beca

supervisor kim: did mta determine their new site yet? >> they have. they're moving to two different sites. part of it is going to their bancroft facility which they recently required -- which the recently acquired. the other part is going to their marin facility. we checked in with a team looking at the asset management issues and confirmed as of most intelligent places for those two uses to go. that has been reconfirmed and those moves are underway. >> -- supervisor kim: bancroft has been acquired and marin is a lease situation? >> yes. supervisor kim: i know this has come up before, but we have a sense that there are other city properties to determine if technology can move to to save on expenses or is that a priority in terms of what we're doing that search? >> we have looked very hard at any city assets that might work. a couple of the sites we're looking had to afford some opportunities but within the city's inventory, frankly, it is a corporation yard. it is industrial in nature, which is difficult to site and we don't have much in the way of su

what is the thought process to determine between 150 and 200? >> that was a range we were suggesting. it's possible based on how we choose to allocate them, that not all companis will be interested. there are timing issues and this gives us a little flexibility in terms of how these roll out, to stop it at 150 or go to 200. so it was really meant to give some nexibility for flexibility for things that we don't know at this time. >> it will come as no surprise that i support this proposal. that suggested to me it was a longer time commit and would be harder to trench. so to me this is a shorter term, temporary test. i'm not convinced this is the solution. i think the solution may rely in the form of peak -time permitting or combination of full-time madions and peak-time permitting. i think this proposal is short enough on a temporal scope to turn back if it's not the right path and continue with it if it's the right panel. i think it gives us the opportunity to reward good dispatch services and good color schemes. it will promote the gas and gate