i think the difference is that for stella, the devaney is far more acrimonious than in your deal. trying to debate that is showing government has adopted a much more hotline approach than, than using government has adopted. wellington has really worked the phone lines on balance, human rights concerned with economic interests. in essence, new zealand doesn't really want to and up way australia has an up in a spot where it has been economically punished by, by china. or we have this idea that new zealand has, has been soft on china, but in fact, in leland government has spoken out against human rights abuses in express its concerns in hong kong and asia. john, for example, it's just that it's chosen a different approach to do. so. australia, for example, has done it in the context of the 5 by intelligence alliance with u. k, a u. s. u k. canada way as well as for new zealand has off the out of these joint statements and instead has it, should it separate statements of consent. right. so for that it's, it's a bit of criticism from australian u. s. politicians accommodate is in parti