maggie, devin nunes, ranking republican on the house intelligence committee used to be chairman until the democrats took control of congress, in 2018, devin nunes is all over the report and not in his role at ranking republican on the committee. he's in there as, well -- >> we don't know. >> a lot of phone messages to giuliani. phone messages with giuliani's indicted friend lev parnas. >> and we don't know the duration of the calls. they're fairly short but raising questions the republican ranking member on the committee was having discussions with this witnesses about the facts democrats were saying were not real. >> and given how much of a stink was made about a supposed conversation between the whistle-blower and staff to the house intelligence committee, you know, they sort of have thrown that away if lev parnas is off talking to devin nunes repeatedly. >> they are suggesting it's all part of a disinformation campaign? call records show communications between conservative journalist john solomon, an opinion

devin nunes, you should have recused yourself at the outset of the impeachment hearings.>> so laura, when you hear this, lev parnas clearly wants to talk and he knows a lot. he knows a lot about giuliani and perhaps he knows a lot about the president himself because of his conversations with rudy giuliani, and certainly now about devin nunes. how big of a threat could lev parnas be? >> i'm never dismissive of somebody because they may be in a position to be opportunistic and lev parnas who has everything to gain from potentially being cooperative or disclosing information and possibly putting himself in a greater light, but because of the proximity of the powers that be in this case, it may be that he has extraordinary information about the idea of the role. remember what we're here for, though. the role is not about whether devin nunes in particular or rudy giuliani at this time or lev parnas or his associate was the central figure in the coordinated effort. it's whether the buck stopped at the president's door and according to this report, erin, talks about the very coo

>> that's a question for devin, but devin has the right to talk to people.here's nothing wrong that devin has done. congressman mccarthy said history will be very kind to those who oppose impeachment. i think adam schiff will have to answer for a great deal. joining me now is the intelligence committee chairman adam schiff. do you worry that you will have a lot the to answer for? this report for the first time lays out a case against the president accusing him of obstructing the impeachment investigation. >> all right well, i think the president is really the one who has a lot to answer for, and as we laid out in this report, the evidence is quite overwhelming that the president of the united states used the power of his office, $400 million of taxpayer military assistance to help an ally fighting the russians as well as a desperately sought meeting in the white house to coerce an ally into doing his political dirty work, to doing these investigations that he thought would help his re-election. the president will have to answer for that, and we will have to

>> here's devin nunes' own call log. the ones that have been put into the report.n april 1th he talked to lev parnas. >> he's talking to giuliani a lot. also lev parnas who has been indicted. >> indicted for funneling russian money contributing to a trump super pac and a congressman's campaign. why is congressman devin nunes in april before we knew lev parnas' name talking to lev parnas. >> at the risk of quoting hillary clinton and the vast right wing conspiracy, we're finding out that this conspiracy is more vast than we thought and involves devin nunes. you know, i think these -- in some ways, these calls are not surprising. all of the fact witnesses laid out that rudy was running this operation. but what it does is it teases what they would be able to prove and the evidence they'd be able to uncover if the president isn't stonewalling. so i think these calls as much as anything really bolsters the obstruction of congress articles as they go forward. as if look at these calls. if we could get a all of the calls, we'd be able to put all of the pieces together on

from devin nunes on that. is coming up. my blood sugar and a1c. because i can still make my own insulin. and trulicity activates my body to release it like it's supposed to. trulicity is for people with type 2 diabetes. it's not insulin. i take it once a week. it starts acting in my body from the first dose. trulicity isn't for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you're allergic to it, you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have an allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, belly pain, and decreased appetite, which lead to dehydration and may worsen kidney problems. i have it within me to lower my a1c. ask your doctor about trulicity. ♪. liz: joe

>> you know, i'm going to leave that to devin nunes, wolf. this isn't about devin nunes. this is about the president of the united states. it is disappointing though that he used a serious impeachment inquiry to falsely attack adam schiff every single day suggesting that chairman schiff was a fact witness when all along it now seems that devin nunes, in fact, was the fact witness and he was just projecting his own guilt, his own involvement in this shakedown scheme on mr. schiff. but this isn't about devin nunes. as much as he may want it to be. this is about the president's conduct. >> how long have you had the phone records? >> i'll let the chairman speak to that. he drives our investigation. and i think they also speak for themselves in the report. >> what about the records of rudy giuliani's phone calls to the white house and the office of management and budget, will your committee continue investigating those calls? >> yes. and also you can dedeuce that you see the office of management and budget involved. they are the office that made the call that many ambassadors

devin nunes has the right to talk to anybody. they accused devin nunes of going to a country he was not at and as the job of being on the intel committee, he has to travel. adam schiff would know exactly where devon was traveling at that time. to perpetuate a lie is nothing new to adam schiff. perpetuate a lie because he only wants to impeach they have president is something we have come to expect from him. >> he discussed what happened on -- should he discuss what happened on those phone calls? mr. mccarthy: that's a question for devin but he has a right to talk to people. there's nothing wrong that devin has done except once again get accused of something. it is a simple smoke screen. i wish you'd ask the same question, what did adam schiff say to the whistle blow her why did the whistleblower come to adam schiff before he had an attorney? why did adam schiff go to the american public and start this nightmare over the idea that the administration would withhold the whistleblower from coming before the committee and he would fig

you had devin nunes actually criticizing adam schiff because he said he knew the whistleblower, he had met with the whistleblower, all of which was false. and yet it appears that devin nunes was in conversations with lev parnas who is now an indicted individual because he gave foreign money to president trump's political action

corruption case, we'd be opening a case on devin nunes. >> frank, stand by for us. garrett, i appreciate your note about trying to get devin nunes to talk to us. we hope you're successful in that effort. we'll let you go and see if you can find anyone. let me bring into the conversation by phone john brennan, former director of the cia and lucky for us now an nbc news senior national security analyst. let me read you from the report. i'm sure it is a pattern of behavior that is all-too familiar to you. the house intel committee report says this, in making the decision to move forward, we were struck by the fact that the president's misconduct was not an isolated occurrence, nor the product of a naive president. instead the efforts to involve ukraine in our 2020 presidential election were undertaken by a president who himself was elected in 2016 with the benefit of an unprecedented and sweeping campaign of election interference. undertaken by russia in his favor and which the president

our colleagues on the hill caught up with devin nunes earlier today and he refused to comment on this report. other house republicans say they don't have concerns about who devin nunes was talking to and evidence of the sharp split tonight. >> want to go to denny heck. good to talk to you, sir. this is the first time you've spoken out since getting the 300-page report which you've passed on to the committee. what's your reaction of the 300 pages? >> i am very sad. this is the saddest week that i can remember. i'm saddened that we've come to this point and we feel compelled because of the president's behavior to have to pass this report, that he abused his power and he betrayed his oath of office and i'm equally if not more saddened by the fact that my friends across the aisle, many of whom i believe are good people near are abjectly

to know about your fellow member of congress, devin nunes. >> he's not an investigator. it looks like he was in on it. >> expand on that. what do you mean he was in on it? >> well, he had an opportunity for a couple weeks before the american people, as we examine the evidence, to be serious, and you know, really drive to the heart of this case. and instead, he spent most of his time going after chairman schiff and making false accusations against chairman schiff. and now it looks like he was the fact witness. he was asking chairman schiff, you know, to recuse himself, when all along, he had phone calls with an indicted ukrainian american. he was talking to rudy giuliani at the time that ambassador yovanovitch was being smeared and then cleared of her duties. and there was no effort to find the truth. this was just more efforts by devin nunes to protect the president. >> should he in your view pull himself out of all future business on intel going forward until this is resolved? >> you know, brian, he's so

devin nunes is a witness here. the idea he's sitting as a fact finder and has a vote in impeachment, that is astonishing. he could be recused from this and called to testify to find out what on earth he's talking with rudy giuliani and devin nunes. >> ari, you worked in the congress. are you as stunned as i am at the speed, the quality, the length, the detail of this report? >> it's really striking, lawrence. the mueller report was years in the making with professional prosecutors, investigators and a lot of people forced to sing because they were on their way to jail. they had fewer legal weapons here, and they've come up with something that is very substantial. in some ways the mueller report had more depth and legal rigor. it certainly had a constitutional section that was detailed. but i would put this on par with the fact finding section and particularly in regard to the election conspiracy. adam schiff and his team not only say they've found one, they've laid out the evidence from the call notes to an attempt

and the contact with devin nunes and lev parnas.s the ranking member of intelligence who was involved in running the republican response during these hearings, and in these phone records it raises questions whether he was involved with the thing that's being investigating. >> the hypocrisy of devin nunes sitting there in the last few weeks about the righteous dander about everything that's happening. turns out he's a potential fact witness. he's on the phone with players at key moments and the fact he never said anything? i'm not sure why adam schiff and his committee never said anything. maybe it was to save face or hit harder when it did come out. >> points for righteous dander, phrases not used enough. but i don't think his problem is hypocrisy. i think it's a failure to disclosure of involvement. john solomon, the former reporter for "the hill" we know was being created to be used for evidence on why the investigation may be so necessary. there may be something dirty there. "the hill" says they're going to take a look at the art

he accusing devin nunes being complicit in something.n people see how tedious this is. they bring, they go over their skis. they make wild accusations without any support. then don't give the guy a chance to respond? >> amen. they used the power of government subpoena to go after a fellow member of congress to go into his personal information, his personal records. i mean this is getting out of control. i would just tell you, the countries is getting torn apart because of this. for another member to do this to another member of congress, this country is yearning for leadership, say, stand down? we need a job to do for the american people first. rather than playing politics taking each other out here. that is what they're doing to devin nunes. liz: this is really nasty. this is nasty stuff. what is interesting, adam schiff goes after nunes's phone records, doesn't give him a chance to respond, he and democrats refoust to call in the so-called whistleblower to testify even after adam schiff which nobody believed claimed at a hearing he doe

up next, republican devin nunes, the debate is this, is devin nunes right to say adam schiff cannot beed with congressional oversight duties. here is the debate, adam schiff claiming he was quote, unaware of fbi abuses of fisa court when adam schiff who last year led the charge in attacking devin nunes when devin nunes spelled out the problem in his memos, the same problem that the doj watchdog found. that debate coming up. tment opportunities firsthand. like a biotech firm that engineers a patient's own cells to fight cancer. this is strategic investing. because your investments deserve the full story. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. (loud fan noise) (children playing) ♪ (music building) experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list sales event. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down, zero due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment. male anchor: ...an update on the cat who captured our hearts. female anchor: how often should you clean your fridge? stay tuned to find out. male anchor: beats the odds at the box office to become a rare non-f

devin: that's the thing.pical problem when you bring in some from the business world into a government agency -- this is something that has happened at the postal service over the years, but people say this thing needs to be run like a business. let's get some successful corporate executives, so they are bringing them in, but these government agencies are not businesses. there are all sorts of red tape and constraints. [over talk] devin: so the things he could do at delta, and despite the fact they upset people, he could do them, and if you show they worked, people ultimately accepted them. but here, it is a much more complicated thing. as he said, testifying on the hill to people who are upset with him, senators, like look, you are my boss. but, whatever the term is, having all those bosses is not something we guy like richard -- something we like -- something a guy like richard anderson is used to. he is trying to do his best, we will see if it works. this is the first time amtrak has had new ideas ever. ce

did devin nunes know that you-his phone calls? >> yes. and while you were sitting there and he was berating you for being like you secretly know ewho the whistleblower is and you're a secret traitor, did you quietly go i know you with were talking to rudy giuliani and parnas through this whole process? >> no, it's one of those illustrations as how transparent as this process is with televised hearings and we often get the feeling we know everything. and this report comes out today and it just pops with the information we have no idea they-. >> even after all the public hearings and reading all the transcripts, they still-more. and the investigation isn't over and they're still collecting new stuff. and lev parnas is enrolling materials. go. >>> thank you. we'll be joined by psychiatrist to consider what the president of the united states said about our first guest, congressman, adam schiff. it sounded like donald trump was actually talking about himself when he said quote i think adam schiff is a deranged human being. the president said t

devin nunes should recuse to this investigation, and he should recuse when it comes to trump.the rule of law ehe's into the rule of trump. it's a very sad thing and not clear to me how we're ever going to get the independence of the justice department again or work together to establish that with the fbi, a working rapport. >> you can't simply be a republican and it's sort of like trump with things like taxes. you have to go the deep dive with him. you have to say i believe in all the crazy ukrainian theories, i believe in all this stuff, i believe the fbi was spying on trump back in 2016 to use that awful word. you have to buy it all. >> the sessions and tillerson heads are on spikes outside the white house gates to do it the way crow just said. >> there's no cafeteria guys. >> because trump doesn't care about the policy stuff, he cares about the crazy stuff. and the crazy investigation he's doing, which is also in its own way a replay of the ukraine problem because putting pressure on allied governments to join him in fabricating accounts dispashdi disparaging their own peop

devin nunes sat there the whole time through hours and hours of testimony talking about about what a contemperable circus it was while he and his colleagues had the nerve to say adam schiff should be called to testify. here's how chairman schiff explained the revelations in the call logs. >> certainly the phone records show that there was considerable coordination among the parties including the white house. coordination in the smear campaign against ambassador yovanovitch which cleared the way for the three amigos to take over a significant part of ukraine policy. coordination in the execution of that policy, and that that this was indeed a continuum that began even prior to the recall of the ambassador. >> joining now here to help explain what we learned today msnbc's chief legal analyst and host of "the beat" at 6:00 p.m. ari melber. you had this as sort of coming on-air and were pulling out the startling bits. what jumps to you that we learned that we didn't know before today? >> rudy giuliani as you reported quarterbacking the money, seizing u.s. taxpayer dollars to help donald

we'll speak to devin nunez shortly of course.eferred to the nunes memo back in 2018, february of 18, where he wrote out all of the misconduct that took place by that cabal of people. then schiff came out with that correcting the record memo which we know now was wrong, just flat-out wrong. you mentioned some of the wrongdoing. one of them we know from the michael horowitz report was altering of a document by a fbi lawyer. tell me about that. where are you expect accountability, congressman? >> well, as the inspector general's findings outline, what are referred to as errors and omissions are false statements, misrepresentations, destruction or alter ages of documentary evidence. what you have are fbi lawyers literally changing evidence to make false representations to the court to continue this counter intelligence investigation against the president. so you know, it details -- now everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence. democrat never want to give one to donald trump but the inspector general's findings really outlin

giuliani, devin nuÑes, reporter john solomon.ting this as a victory when it is a disgraceful breach of ethical and legal propriety. >> yeah. so state law -- so i'm a californian. for sure, state law you cannot release somebody's phone records. so, for sure, that right has been violated. so we're going to -- but we with also have to look at the constitutional aspects of this and do all the members of congress have a right to privacy, and just one member, because he doesn't like someone and he's a political opponent of someone, can that member just subpoena records and then release to embarrass or to create a distraction or to build whatever fantasyland narrative that they continue to build. because, remember, these guys jumped from one phony narrative to another. okay? i mean, what this finally ended up with was that supposedly me and my staff were trying to get an ambassador fired. now, i'll tell you somethiing if i wanted an ambassador fired, i'd pick up the phone and i'd call the president. and i'm quite sure the president woul

devin nunes got it right, grassley-graham got it right. christopher steele's dirty russian dossier, bought and paid for by hillary clinton and the dnc, according to the report, that dossier, "played a central and a central role in the fisa request against trump campaign associate carter page." pages 120-1:30, you will see, you don't have to dirty dossier, you did not get this patent application in the about that. basically saying, no dirty dossier, no warrant. basically, we have heard reported, steele's intelligence was unverifiable garbage. that is confirmed today. steele told the inspector general that is dossier was not a finished product. remember the interrogatory in great britain, he said i have no idea if any of it is true. mostly based on one single source, a compromised source, a nonreliable source with a massive ego, apparently likes to make things up. it was uncorroborated intelligence, all of it, we now know was unverifiable. but every time, all four of those warrants, three of those jim comey signed, says that out of the fisa

devin nunes doesn't issue subpoenas, he has no power in the committee. the minorities in the house famously don't do much of anything other than protest hearings. so, in that sense, it is a very fascinating matter that will not -- does not turn on where the probe heads. >> another break for us. when we come back, just quick confirmation. the president's news conference that was to happen around 10:00, 10:30 eastern time, has in fact been canceled. it's been an interesting trip for this president, including but not limited to scuffles with canada and france. we'll check in on our traveling president right after this as we continue our run-up to the start of today's hearing. ♪ i thought i was managing my moderate to severe crohn's disease. then i realized something was missing... me. my symptoms were keeping me from being there. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of crohn's disease after trying other medications. and the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief and many achieved remission i

there will be lots of questions between devin nunes. he declined to answer any questions. >> thanks very much in this report. i know you've been going through it in detail. 300 plus pages has a lot of information in there. thank you very, very much. let's go to capitol hill where the impeachment report is up for a vote any moment now. what happens after this vote? >> reporter: members of the intelligence committee are in the room right now. they have started the meeting where they will under all the circumstances matly vote to transmit this report to the house judiciary committee. tomorrow chairman nadler will open the hearing with four constitutional law experts. >> hold on for one moment. hold on for one moment. house republican leadership are speaking right now. i want to hear what they are saying. >> now for several weeks since the impeachment process began. i would ask people to remember that they have failed despite the fact they had a process that basically put everything tilted in their direction. democrats were able to act as j

allegedly devin nunes doing all of that. but, listen, i've got to ask you because -- >> you're a journalist. i'm a commentator. >> you said the water got really high, right? so using that analogy, it's like the ship analogy, the water analogy. the president is clearly steering the ship, but you've got people like -- the report makes it clear -- pence, pompeo, perry, mulvaney. they were all either knowledgeable or active participants. so what happened here? what's going on? >> i was going to say to extend the metaphor, the crew is much more populist than we realize. i think one of the most compelling narratives of this, and i don't mean compelling good, is the sheer number of people who once in the beginning renounced donald trump, who saw him clearly before he won the presidency, who shelved all of their principles just to be near power and just to have some power themselves. and you are seeing person after person, mulvaney, rick perry to a lesser degree, you know certainly pompeo, very striking. you're seeing person after p

tonight, kash patel along with his former boss devin nunes vindicated in this report. what he was saying and was vilified for saying all along. also tonight, karl rove and juan williams. lawmakers are fine-tuning the president's articles of impeachment. jesse watters is here as well. a special maxine waters addition of "wednesdays with waters." first i am joined by trey gowdy. always good to see you. great to have you in new york tonight. what did you think about the fact that places like places like "the new york times" and rolling stone are saying "holy god, what a clown show this whole thing was." >> two years too late. they have vilified everyone. those of us for two years have been saying we like the department of justice. we need a good department of justice. what they did was wrong. i don't know what report comey read. it's the third ig report that's on his conduct to be substandard. if that's a victory lap, if he wants to take a victory lap because he's not indicted, more power to him. don't write anymore books on ethics. don't tell me what the ethical standard

devin nunes, the freedom caucus and we have been telling you on this show. example, fbi, doj did not abuse the fisa process can omit material information or to spy on the trump campaign. horowitz found the exact opposite. and we have identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions on the fisa applications in many additional errors and the procedures. allow your! and it gets more embarrassing for the congenital liar schiff. he actually wrote the doj may "only narrow use of information from steele sources about pages specific activity in 2016" and didn't rely on salacious allegations. again, the exact opposite is true. from horowitz report and i quote "we conclude a crossfire hurricane team's receipt of steele's election report 2019-2016 an essential role in the decision by the fbi to support the fisa surveillance targeting carter page and ultimate decision to seek the fisa order. schiff also wrote "the court approves surveillance of page from allowed fbi to collect notable intelligence. horowitz lays out on page 476, mr. congenital liar, the fbi was no

devin nunes warned us in 2014 that they would.itico tells us in a court decision, they interfered and we need to get to the bottom of that. we don't want to lose the powerful tools of intelligence but if it will be at the risk of those powerful tools, and you lose the constitution and in all sense of equal justice under the law. >> well, you also have to remember the fourth amendment. we have to follow the fourth amendment. the constitution is not a suicide pact in the constitution doesn'tt require us to turn a blind eye to our foreign adversaries. quite to the contrary. we can do those things but we have to do so within the bounds set by the constitution. we need to require people to go to court and presented judge with the statement of probable cause. and not just probable cause of the existence of some tied to a national investigation, but where american citizen is involved, certainly where u.s. presidential campaign is involved or the rights of any american citizen is involved. they need to have probable cause as to that perso

>> that's a question for devin. devin has the right to talk to people. there is nothing wrong with devin talking. except once again, he's trying to get accused of something. it is a simple smoke screen. i wish she would ask the same question, what did adam strip same to the whistle-blower? what are the whistle-blower come to adam schiff before he had an attorney? why don't adam schiff go to the american public and start this nightmare over the idea that the administration was going to withhold the whistle-blower from coming before the committee and he was going to fight so hard to make that happen? the only person that is withholding the whistle-blower from coming forward is adam schiff. this is a man that didn't even take the same rules that has been allotted to anybody else in the same position beard he wrote dominic rewrote the rules only he can pick who comes before the committee. he has tried to design everything he can to get an outcome that he desires but the only problem that he lacks is the truth. it's just one more example of it. thank you. ste

devin nunes uncovered the biggest political scandal in u.s. history. lee smith on why this is such a critical time in our country. judge jeanine: i read your book. i think it's phenomenal. what i would like my viewers to understand, when you talk about devin anyone's, and we have him on the show often. and how he uncovered the big jest scandal in u.s. history. i remember right in the beginning when they started gunning for him and started bringing all kind of complaints against him. i remember saying what is going on. can you tell us the short version of how they tried to take down devin nunes because he was on to something. >> they went after him in a whole bunch of different ways. they filed ethics complaints. they threatened him, they threatened his family. they had an enormous press campaign. judge jeanine: how did they threaten his family. >> they replicated his phone number and they had a phone number that looked like his that was going to family members. his mother and grandmother. when they picked up the phone, it looked like the congressman wa

devin nunes, why are you on call logs with lev parnas? you say the man can't be relied on. why? sit there and say everything is wrong? remember this? >> what was the full extent of the whistle-blower's prior coordination with chairman schiff, his staff, and any other people he cooperated with while preparing the complaint? >> i have no problem with those questions. however, what about your prior knowledge of and your prior contact with allegedly, on this phone log, to the extent it's true? you won't talk to us about it. isn't that something you should have brought up? there's a lot in this 300-page report. you've got credible testimony. you've got hard evidence. this is not a court of law. it is a political process. that's all it's ever been against any president or anyone else who's ever gone through it, ever. so don't compare it to one and say, this isn't as fair. it's never been anything but this. you don't get to ignore that. that's a fact. it matters. don't undermine the process. beat the process. raises the question, if this is what we know, what are we missing? all along

using intel chairman schiff of spying on devin nunes and said i would be an abuse of power. was some glee over the situation in some corners of cable news grade watch this reaction. >> nunez has probably had and deserves about the 24 hours of his life. he has been cabria lee caught up on the phone directory here but what was he doing talking all of these people? i mean it's like picking up the rock as i said it and seeing the bug life under the rock. all of these people working together, i mean, newness, and giuliani it, and john solomon of the hill, all working together in one big network, one big syndicate you might say. >> martha: now, devin nunes, ranking member of the house until committee. you've been accused of a lot of things lately, representative nunes. these phone calls, trips to vienna that you say you can substantiate that you were not there -- what is your reaction? what is her response to greg matthews and what he said about you? >> i'm a little disappointed because just a few months ago, i saw chris matthews in the long white building, it was late at night, i

. >> dana: i'll say this with greg because it's about the media and it's talking about devin nunes whoot really raked over the coals by the media for what he had said in the summer saying that he's owed an apolo apology. >> we all know that devin nunes is a liar. >> carter page-fisa seems irrelevant at this point. >> devin nunes who's been manufacturing scandals. speak of so-called >> devin nunes has been lying this entire time and the entire memo they put out was in bad faith. >> greg: how large must the hallmark apology card be in the media who mocked devin nunes? even people here were like, what does he know? turns out he was right. completely right. and everyone looks kind of silly. people in the media bought that dossier because they wanted to buy it. the story was absurd was on its face. but we shelved our adult sense of b.s. because we actually thought there were hookers in a room copying the obamas or something for it i won't even -- the media loves playing what if pluralists with trump but what if the pee tape led to trump ouf office which would lead to civil disturbances the

are you criminally investigating devin nunes? the other data does committee said on that he has acquired? how did they get to those phone numbers? where is it beyond that? do they get your emails as well? are we going to have committee chairs in congress snooping around reporters emails and phone calls? and then releasing it? >> should congress addresses? >> i think so. >> climate change. -- to know ifknow you think it is a mistake that all republicans are not talking about this issue. with my members on the committee and we had a thorough discussion about climate change. there was not a science denier among us. let's talk about how we deal with it. the democrats are still locked into what? taxation. the great reductions in carbon have occurred in the united states. we did fracking and energy switching. that is a lot of the reductions. we did several things. we tried to advance with nuclear technology. nuclear holds a huge key. in my part of the world hydroelectric power is huge. we know there is an opportunity. we are having an

>> and garrett, there is another rogue operator perhaps, devin nunes. let's watch adam schiff on his role. he shows up in these call logs as well. >> in terms of the ranking member, it won't surprise you i'll reserve comment. it is i think deeply concerning that at a time when the president of the united states was using the power of his office to dig up dirt on a political rival, that there may be evidence that there were members of congress complicit in that activity. >> garrett, what is devin nunes doing in these call logs? >> that is going to be an interesting question to try to find out. we see in the call logs in a nunes takes calls from rudy giuliani going back as far as april, he takes a longer phone call from left are pv parnas. and nunes has not talked about any of this, he is programs the single unfriendliest member of congress when it comes to nonfox news reporters on capitol hill. i don't think that he has taken a question from me since i've been up here. but we'll keep trying. he also has a frosty would be an understatement relationship wi

i'm devin fehely at the fremont bart station, and coming up we'll look at the allegations of iacias anchng new body camera video of what turned out to be a deadly case of mistaken identity. >> get out of the car! >> all right, i'm getting out, i'm getting out. >>> our top story on kpix 5 and streaming on cbsn bay area, a rough start to the holiday get away. good evening, i'm maria medina. >> and i'm ken bastida. heavy fog delayed nearly 300 flights at sfo today. 32 more had to be outright canceled. >> kpix 5's don ford spoke with holiday travelers whose hopes of a clean get away got messy. >> reporter: who in the world would travel on one of the busiest travel days of the year? let me show you. here's some e to get to texas. the line is easily 100 feet long. your flight has been delayed how many times? >> 4 times. >> reporter: 4 times? >> yeah. >> reporter: that sounds like bad! sonya is traveling with a new baby boy. it's his first flight. >> i used to pack just for me. now i e formula and diaper bag. >> reporter: has your family seen him before? >> no, they're meeting him for the first t

especially when it comes to congressman devin nunes.e was killing them during the proceedings, very raichous, they have is all bunk, this former ambassador, nobody was out tho get anybody, theirs no could ball, a foot. he had to know this. >> the allegations are great. him it is i think deeply concerning that at a time when the prz of the to dig up dirt on a political rival, that there may be evidence that they were members of congress complicit in that activity. >> okay. democratic congresswoman jackie spear has called for the republican congressman to be investigated. she joins me now. so happy to have you tonight. >> thank you, chris. >> joel: all of these questions are actually really. i don't know the answer to any of them tonight first of all, these phone logs, why didn't you ask about them did the testimony. i don't understand because they're so useful. >> because the persons that were in the phone logs weren't being viewed act finding that we were doi doing. what's interesting about this, i mean, you can't make this kind of stuf

i'm devin fehely. >> let's get a check of our weather in the weather center with devin. >> sometimes the picture temperatures 1,000 words on the richmond bridge, one being repeated across the bay area and a good example of what is weighing for you if you're about to get on the roads. take a look at that live view right now near the toll booth the plenty of rain having fallen there. another bridge, the bay bridge, that looks even more impressive because there is more rain splattered on it. you get the overview of what happened. about 4:00 a.m. we saw this well organized band of rain for the whole bay area. that is the live radar now as of 6:30. it is centered right over the entire bay area. we're starting to see the showers make it down into the south bay and santa clara county starting to see it, but everyone else has been looking at this for the last hour and a half or wo hours. this is moderate to heavy rain. the bay bridge is covered in that band of orange. you saw how impressive that looked. red showing up on radar as you start to get a little farther off to the east into napa co

on the house intelligence committee, devin nunes. >> if there were members of congress that were also part of that domestic political errand for the president and using tax resources to accomplish it, that's a problem. >> nunes stopping short of denying he spoke with parnas. >> i'll go back and check on my records, but it seems very unlikely i would be taking calls from random people. >> the report also alleging top members of the trump administration, including vice president mike pence, secretary of state mike pompeo, former energy secretary rick perry, and acting chief of staff mick mulvaney were active participants in the trump campaign, the white house dismissing the impeachment report's finding and, again, attacking the process, and trump's allies agree. >> they're having one big problem, a tnds big problem is the president did nothing wrong, and they can't prove it. >> meanwhile house judiciary democrats calling on the republican colleagues to take this morning's session

gregg jarrett is in the studio with me, congressman devin nunes, lee zeldin, all with me on this impeachment farce, and the ig report, and adam schiff expose we have for you. but first, what if congressional leaders could be impeached? that's the focus of tonight's "angle." we've read all of your emails and your tweets about the democrats impeachment of session. this is a general flavor of what i'm reading. why can't they be impeached? why doesn't somebody demand that schiff answer questions under oath? and why is it a sham impeachment and open and shut case of democrats dereliction of duty? in other words, to the country? if it were only that simple. article two, section four of the united states constitution stipulates that the president, vice president, and all civil officers of the united states can be impeached and removed from office on three charges. bribery, treason, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. now, the house has only impeached one member of congress, all right? it was back in 1799. a little history lesson. senator william blount had allegedly conspired to incite native a