>> we have been out on dewolf. we know who is out there. we have a general idea of service needs but we haven't put a lot of resources into trying to provide that assistance and help the folks relocate or come indoors. >> if i could clarify, this maybe gets to director borden's question, our intent would be to the extent this board ever does legislate a restriction, we would not put it into effect until the department of homelessness and supportive housing with the other city agencies are able to do that work. >> i personally would like that would be done in advance and be part of the staff report that brought us consideration. >> yep. >> and i also just wanted to add, related to that, you brought up six or more vehicles as a threshold. yep. >> i think no one mentioned that we didn't have that in our report i don't believe. i don't remember seeing that. i think coming up with a a newr i can threshold talking about an impact to the neighborhood. it's missing in our policy that would make more sense to me and you are starting to capture a pro

and i'm happy to see the dewolf proposal going forward. as you all know i said i think it's very unfair and frankly outrageous that we were holding the wolf street hostage to get a better over all city program. i still feel that but i want to say to the directors board and brinkman personally, your standing up to this issue has brought around a better solution. so, you and the others who joined you took a stand and now we have mr. kasinski and others here to make a better proposal. i would like it would have happened had you not did what you did, but i'm not sure and i'm certainly grateful for what you did. as mr. wiener, said, this is a human problem and i think the solution we have now is now treating it with a lot more humanity when it was an up or down vote premised on neighborhood rights versus the city solving the problem. we're all working together now. my third point, if you want to put into your guidelines schools and parks and places where children are in sight lines and stuff are important, i am ok with that. i don't think that

i'm actually even though we were obviously moving the ball forward with the dewolf, the truth is that it still hasn't happened even though we're scheduled to vote on that today. i personally don't think that's a core part of the policy that that has to happen prior to this. looking at some sort of numeric threshold and looking at the idea around commercial vehicles and whether or not we need to in the future look for solutions there. >> i might have a couple of quick responses to that. the threshold of vehicles makes perfect sense and certainly we've had many cases where there's a guy with a bus on the street. he put up signs. this agency, that's not a good use of our resources, even apart from equity and consistent policy. the notion of here is a location that's bone to large vehicles collecting here, not to be heart less about it but this is a good spot to park. that sort of what we're looking for. it's the characteristic of the street rather than here is a individual that is making the neighbors angry. lead time on bring relev and remedy to regulation. we think agree that no matter

which has to do with establishing an over size vehicle restriction on dewolf street. >> let's go ahead and go directly to public comment on this one. >> anne worth followed by melody. >> thank you. well it's kind of going back to the same problem. if you push people where do they go? when there's an answer to that then you can push people. that's about it. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> melody followed by flow kelly and kelly cut ler. those are the last three people. >> could you please go ahead of melody. >> ms. cutler. >> hi, my name is kelly cutler with the coalition again. so, with banding new streets, i don't think that we're at that point yet. also we have been with a couple of the supervisors we've been meeting, looking at safe parking and actually finding alternatives. this is jumping ahead of the game before we're at that point. there haven't been alternatives yet. let me see what else i missed and i forgot in the last comment i gave. also with having like a community engagement process, we were having a working group for a while. and that has stopped. we really didn't

as i said before, i don't think it's fair to force the neighbors on dewolf street to wait and be held hostage while we come up with a city wide solution. other neighborhoods, other streets have received this accommodation when they have presented it and when our staff has approved it and i think that street and those residents are entitled to the same and equitable treatment here. so i will favor this. i will also note that i think we are considering this request in a very different context than we considered it at the last meeting. we now have a positive and hopeful framework for how we will deal with these requests going forward. i have every confidence to director borden's concern that our staff will do that here to the extent it will work with our partners and other city agencies to do that. i feel -- i was ready to vote for this last time and i feel better about voting for it this time and i do again extend my thanks to my colleagues who forced an issue and put us in a better place here today. >> is that a motion? >> that is. >> second. >> i will just add, i agree with vice-chair

. >> one of my concerns with this policy, and with dewolf is if we accept this policy and we move on dewolf we will see a lot more requests for streets coming to us to ban over size vehicle parking overnight. what what can we do that will help work within the framework while they figure out what is going on the streets and what resources you will be able to point people to. it needs to be six months but a pause would be helpful. we could also if you wanted to do a pre assessment before you made a decision, we can go out and have our team see who is out there and tell you what is going on and come back as you are making those decisions about how to move forward on this. i think that would be very helpful. i would also say to be honest, the thing that would be the most helpful is to address people who are parking and not experiencing homelessness and parking over sized vehicles on the streets. in a way that upsets neighbors. where, you may have three homeless people who are kind of parked amongst like 20 vehicles that -- i'm not an