the headlines here have en about the "affluenza" dfense.here has been much of a case than that. keep in mind this is a record standard and not ntentional. >> the "affluenza" defense, others have set up a meeting. on the psychiatric point of view and then it is junk law. it's never going to be any kind of recognize defense. and she is right. the fact of the matter is that slightly skewed. >> a judge who made a bad decision. the but forget this, it's stupid. and i ersonally prefer this direct plainspoken language. the idea that this dickstein-year-old that age, he had a drivers license, does not? >> that is correct, he did. >> has been accepted by one standard into a highly was optimal position to which h should be held responsible. >> i agree. lou: does the law not make sense to such equations? >> if you're an adult to make sense and he would be based on prison time. >> keep in mind you can get behind the wheel. but he did not intend to harm other people. the recklessness of his behavior negated incarceration. >> but that is too far. lou: th