dh lawrence's novel about a passionate affair between an aristocrat and her husband's gamekeeper. in this television adaptation by richard madden, who recently starred in the hit drama bodyguard. although it was written in 1928, the novel had never been on sale here because of britain's strict obscenity laws. in 1960, penguin tried to publish the book but the company was taken to court in a bid to stop its publication, as this bbc dramatisation of the sensational trial shows. is it a book that you would even wish your wife or servants to read? well, yes, it seems. thejudge's wife marked up the sexually explicit passages of the novel in her husband's copy. she wrote down the page numbers which featured lovemaking, and more lovemaking, as well as sections she considered coarse, on headed notepaper from the central criminal court. and have a look at this. she also hand—stitched a silk bag to conceal the book in. no doubt to prevent the press photographers from capturing an image of thejudge carrying the racy novel into court. the trial itself came to encapsulate the clash between the

dh lawrence's novel about a passionate affair between an aristocrat and her husband's gamekeeper.in 1928, the novel had never been on sale here because of britain's strict obscenity laws. in 1960, penguin tried to publish the book but the company was taken to court in a bid to stop its publication, as this bbc dramatisation of the sensational trial shows. is it a book that you would even wish your wife or servants to read? well, yes, it seems. thejudge's wife marked up the sexually explicit passages of the novel in her husband's copy. she wrote down the page numbers which featured lovemaking, and more lovemaking, as well as sections she considered coarse, on headed notepaper from the central criminal court. and have a look at this. she also hand—stitched a silk bag to conceal the book in. no doubt to prevent the press photographers from capturing an image of thejudge carrying the racy novel into court. the trial itself came to encapsulate the clash between the old establishment and the new wave of liberalisation in britain. and penguin was acquitted. this represents such a key mom

suppressed, that were considered dangerous, in the literary sphere, henry miller, james joyce, dh lawrence, these books had to be published -- these are great books, but they violated the literary public taste of their time and they had to be published in small countercultural houses. in political publishing, there are always two sides. and you have the choice, and you do both, in my experience, of -- you know, you take a position regarding certain principles or certain outlook. you defend it. you criticize it. you argue against the other side. and then as things change, as there are shifts in what people care about and what people arguing about, you move into a new area. i'm not sure i'm answering your question. would you mind restating it? >> give an example of a culture war going on today. >> uh-huh. well, there's a huge culture war about donald trump. and, you know, i was asked not long ago whether the trump boom in publishing was, you know, was going to decline. you know, in my experience as a political editor, you know, most presidencies are two terms. i don't know about donald trump

dh lawrence's novel about a passionate affair between an aristocrat and her husband's gamekeeper.tried to publish the book but the company was taken to court in a bid to stop its publication. as this bbc dramatisation of the sensational trial shows. is it a book that you would even wish your wife or servants to read? well, yes, it seems. thejudge's wife marked up the sexually explicit passages of the novel in her husband's copy. she wrote down the page numbers which featured lovemaking, and more lovemaking, as well as sections she considered coarse, on headed notepaper from the central criminal court. and have a look at this. she also hand—stitched a silk bag to conceal the book in. no doubt to prevent the press photographers from capturing an image of thejudge carrying the book into court. the trial itself came to encapsulate the clash between the old establishment and the new wave of liberalisation in britain. and penguin was acquitted. this represents such a key moment in our recent history, you know, the chatterley trial was such a moment at the opening of the 19605, one of th

lawrence. >> thank you. this committee hearing in march 2017 a former dhs inspector general ross testified that arbitrary personnelractices can have a chilling effect on whistle blowers who would otherwise speak out about security efficiencies and at that hearing i asked the inspector general, quote, if tsa employees are reluctant to raise the security deficiencies they approve, could it put aviation security at risk. inspector general ross answered and i quote, well, that's absolutely the case. so administrator, do you agree with inspector general ross and can arbitrary personnel practices chill whistle blowers and put of a yagsz security at risk? >> i completely agree with him and it can absolutely put aviation security at risk. that's why i am so focused on it. >> so would you agree that it is critical that this nation's security for our nation's security, that the tsa have a personnel system in place that protects whistle blowers from retaliating and protect employees from arbitrary personnel decisions? >> we have the authority alreadiy in law, ma'am, and it's against the law as it is to retail yaet against wh