i am make a motion we ask dhr to move forward with the process. meeting with each us to solicit our opinion. on hashould go in the job description and gather information about places to post it. >> i have a follow up question. >> for sean do you believe a draft can be presented by next meeting? thank you. that is my hope. there are factors. i think that leads to another question that i would hope you can provide me, which is is there a point person i can work with on the board to have discussions and ask questions. and what manner if i am not able to get a hold of member or questions somebody i can have that discussion with? would be helpful and informative. why i'm happy to serve in that capacity. i would recommend that member soo and myself since we were part of the committee and specific low -- member soo did the work. and drafting this and have been doing this work. i think that -- if want to have a point person given the amount of work of creating a work product. i would believe that -- member soo would be the best individual. have a first co

if dhr grants accommodation you can call in remote low. second exception is for members who are on parental leave. following the birth or adoption of a child. i don't know if well is a member on parental leave if somebody is or will be reach out we can talk about limits on how much remote meetings you can attends on parental leave. that is the only exception. krosdz the board, have you to be in person. if you 2 days before the march meeting, if you test positive for covid, and you can't come to the meeting you have to be absent you can't call in and participate remote. >> that's the big the biggest change. all the members have to be in person. members of the public will be able to attend in person also. and remote make public comment in person just like old school 2019 style. the members of the public who have disabilities that restrict their ability to come to city hall and make comment in person can request a reason acomeidation under the ad a to allow them on make remote public comment by call nothing on web explatform like this. and gi

first i want to thank the acting director and dhr representative our liaison with dhr, they work diligent low with cps. and they will during the last few weeks. because their hard workexperien character that we are looking for in the next ed. now we want to make sure that we work with members of the public of stake holders so theyville a chance to meet with us. to share with us what issues they realliment the next ed to be aware of. their interests. the idea originally, and again, i'm open to any amendments, the idea when we discuss third degree was through the search committee that was formed by the chair and the vice chair; the search committee will be able to carry out much of the activities. including meetings with the public, the stake holders. however, there are also opportunity for other members of the commission on who wish to join in certain stake holder meetings that we can make this a formal commission meeting if there are more than 3 members. or we can continue as a search committee with the chair appointing another person or 2 others to replace the chair to replace the existi

then we have to do that with our team and if a city wide example it is sometimes handled by dhr. i would say one things we are doing in case we the do have to review. the innerim for classificatios and a faster way. the hr director in the process of finalizing she has an ambitious goal before the end of john. and so show is wing on how we will get there. and she will be presentlying to you next month. we will have clarity and hopeful low we will update that more in this month before she come back. why on this, how does -- that hr department, how does the preaprentice and the other programs mill immediate with that. >> so that's a great question. the preaprenticeship programs that are our position the 9916th are hired by us and the apprentices are hired as our staff. they will be this hr team will hire those positions they other 9916 preaprenticeship the requiremental service wars the top 1 its is a constant hiring because we have so many employees and then there is in higher than average attrition in the role its it is antireal you know low barrier workforce development position.

but all city departments, plus the city attorney, cmd, controller's office, civil service commission, dhr, hrc, oca, we got a small army of people that deal with city contracting and i'm-and sometimes that achieves more of our goals and sometimes it doesn't and so that's why am suggest a broader review and periodic assessment of those restrictions. to some earlier speakers i wonder if this item proposal has been to small business commission and maybe a report from the office of economic analysis would be useful. thanks for listening. >> thank you. that was our last public commenter for this matter. >> thank you mr. young and with that public comment on item 6 is now closed. i want to-before i hand off to supervisor safai because there are a few more people wept to hear from, i did want to say, i have worked most of my career in city government and have had a lot of frustrations over the years with how cumbersome and expensive the contractor and procurement processes can be and i have been convinced that if san franciscans had any idea how much money we are-of their dollars we are wasting

relaxations reminds you as of match first you need to apore in person unless you have submitted a request to dhr for a disability accommodation if you have not received that from the department of human resource you need to appear in person and remote participation will not be available to you for any reason unfortunately. even though we have the technology. furthermore, you in have the right as a policy body to elect to no longer receive public comment remote low. except for a disability request. will for reason accommendation. so, you all may direct me to no longer provide that access through web ex or phone and for public comment if you choose. if i don't hear anything we will remain with the status quo given people are used to temperature i believe the major's office with the city add administrator's office and board of supervisors the issue direction to commissions such as ours, for consistency but until we hear that, i suggest we just move along as we have been. >> certainly i see handses up and on the comment of remote public access i think it hen successful and i don't think we had obvio