over 700 dhs personnel provided support at our facilities. we expanded our transportation contract and purchased more than 200 buses and vans to expedite transportation of large groups of migrants. we chartered planes and drove bus loads of more than 43,000 people from overwhelmed locations to facilities with more processing capacity. second, even when processing was complete, i.c.e. and hhs had limited capacity to accept aliens which contributed to further overcrowding in border patrol facilities. in march of 2019 border patrol began releasing noncriminal family units directly into the united states rather than transferring them to i.c.e. during fiscal year '19 a total of 145,000 family members were released. cbp rapidly constructed six soft-sided facilities to provide capacity for an additional 6,500 families and adults. by june secretary azar stated hhs shelters were full and they could not accept uacs from border patrol custody. when hhs received supplemental funding in july the number of uacs in our custody quickly dropped from a peak of

the leadership team at dhs is truly outstanding. i get the opportunity to talk about this and they do the real work. whether administrator or tsa, that's where the work of the department is doing. like i said it is fantastic leadership group and i think the country should be proud. >> great, thank you all for coming. [ applause ] over the next couple of hours, we are featuring a number of this year's state of the states speeches. florida governor rwandon desants next. and followed by justine ssenato raimondo. the tactics were remarkable and powerful. the lessons learned from the movement i think you can trace throughout the 20th or 21st century. the movement like many movement broke into different fashion. some were conservatives and some were radical in activists. others felt if it were not then when would women be able to finally get the right to vote? they saw this again throughout the 19th century and 18th century. so they took to the streets. they took to the white house where first of all, standing there everyday, day after da

why they didn't partner with dhs. why they didn't test this before the iowa caucuses. >> what was the response? >> haven't got one yet, just sent it. >> if they sent it or if they tested it with dhs. what would dhs specifically have done testing the app? what are they looking for? >> something that's not widely known, dhs is partnering locally, and as a matter of fact, dhs can help states and help localities, run table top exercises, planned for if the app fails, in this case an alleged coding error that wasn't counting the votes correctly. you know, maybe they could have said, maybe you should have some backup phone calling systems and that's what they didn't do. and that's why we're going to ask questions. and make sure this doesn't happen again. just like the success of 2018. >> rodney davis here taking your calls on election security matters. democrats, 20 -- in iowa we'll start, and you're on, go ahead. >> thanks for taking my call. now, why can't everybody have a centralized electoral voting systems that doesn't

further, crcl directly engaged with dhs components. for example, crcc all is engaging with cbp in the implementation official recognition technology with biometric entry and exit programs. crcl advised an appropriate combinations for individuals wearing religious headwear, for individuals with a sincere religious objection to be photographed, and for individuals who may have a significant injury or disability, and for whom taking photographs may present challenges or not be possible. as dhs and their facial recognition programs, evolve crcl will be collaborative directly with cbp, -- further, see our ceo will engage communities with cbp and dhs snp to inform the public regarding the programs and address potential concerns. finally, we will continue to evaluate any potential alleged violations of civil rights and civil liberties in order to further inform our policy advice and strengthen dhs's facial recognition program. crcl a successful recognition technology requires ongoing oversight and quality assurance. initial validation and reg

they are owned by department of state and other branches of dhs. we match against it and that information back. >> i continue to have once come across my desk of the racial bias. it's my understanding that the technology continues to misrepresent the people of color and women. in my hearing from the majority of the panel but that is not the case? >> because it keeps coming to us so there has to be some validity. >> we do see the graphic effects and differences with regards to race and sex and age and the one to many identification testings that we did with the algorithms of the tested there was a small set of high-performing algorithms that had undetectable differentials, but the majority of the algorithms that exhibits those characteristics. >> can you give a description of it you are who you say you are and it is matched against a gallery of one and matched in the case of cbp applications one to perhaps thousands for the traveling public or one to millions in the case of the law enforcement such as fbi. yothey are saying that the percentage of th

we continue to explore that mainly for dhs facilities. we're working with the department of defense, faa, department of transportation and others, as well as secret service has been using counter uas technology for some time. we're try iing to capitalize on their experience and what they've seen and s & t is building on that with additional research, development and testing to hopefully have capabilities out there in the short term. >> i know you're busy on the southern border and obviously coronavirus and all these important issues. i would like you to come to the northern border. responsibility for 900 miles of border. >> right. >> that station, all the way from the great lakes through most of montana. >> right. >> we also have a very large u.s. operation, northern plains test site there. >> i've been there, senator. >> okay. >> i have. >> great. we would love for to you come back now that you're the secretary. >> you can come to montana, too. >> yeah, tester has a beautiful state he would love to have you check it out, montana as well.

there's the dhs privacy officer. there's dhs counsel. so there's a lot of oversight by dhs already in this process. certainly the rulemakings would go through dhs counsel, dhs policy. so there is a lot of oversight and coordination. >> it's my understanding, though, that there is no centralized body within the department that gives the program a stamp of approval or certifies they're ready for prime time. is that correct? has crcl approved your program? do you know? >> no, they wouldn't necessarily go to them for approval. but there is -- >> well, approval in the sense of maintaining or protecting privacy. >> things are reviewed by them. i'll defer to my colleagues. >> what [ inaudible ] do you have, sir? >> why don't i answer that in a couple of different ways, congressman. let me talk about the first part of your question regarding sort of the enterprise level review. i think one of the ways in which crcl participates in that dialogue is by getting certified by groups across the department, where we actually talking about a lot of thes

in december i had an opportunity to travel to tucson to visit dhs and facilities. service providers told me the migrants returned and are easy targets for criminal organizations in mexico and frankly in the u.s.. in part because they are readily identifiable because they mandate they remove shoelaces when they are in custody. i found that sword o that sort d surprising but i heard it over and over again if you see a family none of whom has shoelaces, you know that they are probably folks that have been recently released from custody and probably very vulnerable. your budget requests 126 million claims that the program offers protections for vulnerable populations in light of the many reports and abuse of these individuals what steps to ensure they are safe as they await their day in court? >> we are taking a number of steps in the program and we had an independent team do a review of the program and these are individuals that have little to do with immigration so they were kind to the system blind and recommended a number of recommendations and some of those we hav

there is the dhs privacy, officer dhs council so a lot of oversight by dhs already in this process. certainly the rule makings we go through dhs council, the dhs policy, so there's a lot of oversight in coordination. >> it is my understanding, though, that there is no centralized body that gives the program a stamp of approval or certifies they're ready for prime time. is that correct? the crcc l approve your program? do you know? >> no, that would not necessarily go to them for approval. >> well, approval in the sense of maintaining objective privacy right. >> things are reviewed by them and i will defer to my colleagues. >> what did i answer that nicola different ways, congresswoman, to let me step back a second, and talk about the first part of your question, regarding the enterprise level review? i think one of the many ways crcc all participates in that dialog is by serving on enterprise level wide working groups across the department that include representatives from cbp, dhs, and he, and the office of biometric identity management where we actually are talking about a lot of

you just can't refuse to walk dhs and expect to get a special program.doesn't work that way. >> great to see you. we appreciate you coming on. thank you. joe biden falling far behind in a no call, one newspaper saying he is mia. is there any hope for joe biden? joe contra is coming up next. ♪ foxbusiness alert the justice department has dropped its antitrust before major automakers involving the deal over fuel efficiency standards. sources are telling "wall street journal" or after examining the geology concluded ford, honda and volkswagen did not engage in conduct that violated u.s. antitrust law. 2020 democrats gearing up for a make it or break it debate in new hampshire tonight. last month before tuesday's primary in the first since the i want disaster, peter is live in manchester new hampshire with the latest. >> most candid are in the general area and getting ready for tonight debate. bernie sanders is already signaling a. >> presidential campaign. we are in a moment were billionaires control not only our economy but are political era. >> there usin

i would like to say, again, i like to talk about the men and women of dhs. every opportunity in many instances, they are unfairly criticized and i think we all can agree that, i keep saying, not only border security but homeland security is national security. my message would be to the men and women of the -- homeland security to do their job every day. considering the noise and the environment that we are in. their job is very difficult it, is very dangerous. whether it is on the border or interior or coast guard ships or everyone anywhere they serve. very dangerous job. i need them focused on their mission every day and not worrying about the noise that the here in the background. again, i thank the men and women to what they do every day. the committee and the resources you provide the department to do our mission and i look for to the continued dialog. >> thank you. if there are no more questions, we are adjourned.

there's a dhs privacy officer and there's a lot of oversight by dhs already in this process. certainly the rulemaking's would go through dhs counsel, the dhs policy so there is a lot of oversight in court nation. >> it's my understanding though that there is no body within the department that gives the program a stamp of approval and certify that o they are ready fr primetime? is that correct? have they approved your program? do you know? >> they would necessarily go to them for approval. >> approval in maintaining and protecting privacy rights. >> things are reviewed by them. >> what authority do you have sir? >> why don't i enter that in a couple of different ways congresswoman. let me step back and talkif abot the first part of your question regarding the enterprise level review. one of the ways in which that dialogue is by serving on enterprise level wide working groups across the department that include representatives of cbp and the office of biometrics identity management where we are talking about a lot of these issues. we don't have a privacy impact model however we

of the shadows and calls dhs' new ban political retaliation. >> this is unbounded arrogance, disrespect of the rule of law. >> reporter: dhs says the new york law creates a security issue, preventing the federal government from tracking down potential criminals. >> we no longer have access to make sure they meet the program requirements, so we need to do our job. >> reporter: some travelers at new york's jfk airport are not happy. >> i think it's a very mean, spiteful way to get back at new yorkers. >> reporter: new york says it's not backing down. >> in all likelihood this dispute will go to the courts, and new york will argue that the federal government has exceeded its constitutional authority. >> reporter: trump officials say any state considering legislation similar to new york's green light law could also lose access to trusted travel programs. one official singling out the state of washington. lester >> erin mclaughlin tonight, thank you >>> up next, serious new safety questions about a popular child booster seat obama: he's been a leader

you just can't refuse to walk dhs and expect to get a special program.n't work that way. >> great to see you. we appreciate you coming on. thank you. joe biden falling far behind in a no call, one newspaper saying he is mia. is there any hope for joe biden? cologuard: colon cancer screening for people 45 plus at average risk. i've heard a lot of excuses to avoid screening for colon cancer. i'm not worried. it doesn't run in my family. i can do it next year. no rush. cologuard is the noninvasive option that finds 92% of colon cancers. you just get the kit in the mail, go to the bathroom, collect your sample, then ship it to the lab. there's no excuse for waiting. get screened. ask your healthcare provider if cologuard is right for you. most insured patients pay $0. ask yourdear humans,provider if cologuard is right for you. ♪ i stand here today not for myself, but, for every tail wager, sloppy kisser and curtain ninja. i stand here for each one of the nearly 4,100 dogs and cats killed in shelters each day, asking you to join our cause and help us make sur

were not shifting any resources from dhs to the border as far as personnel.ill have the same personnel, but new york is not given us the information, we cannot do her job without the information. >> thank you very much. i want to continue on the point about the travel program, capri cafaro here, thank you to the service for this country. i come a much like jonas have an active trusted traveler, global entry and i have gone through the process we have to get fingerprinted, interviewed by federal agents and you have to disclose the amount of countries you have been to in the last five years. if you have to do a face-to-face interview and get fingerprinted, wouldn't that deter any kind of issue -- first of all why would an undocumented individual want to participate when they expose himself. and secondly, wouldn't that process curb the concerns you have in regards to information sharing between new york and custom and border patrol in dhs? >> in the large case, yes, but there still betting process that we have to go to as a border patrol agent, i have to go thro

dhs is also helping the u.s. government's response to the coronavirus. the risk from coronavirus to americans remains relatively low, and we will continue to implement measures designed to keep it that way. dhs has responded with proactive safeguards, including directing all flight from china to preach elected airport for medical screening. the department stood up that medical screening in a very rapid fashion, using contracts and we continue to provide those contracts at those 11 airports. i will now highlight a number of specific priorities included in the fiscal 21 budget, the department must continue to grow our digital defenses, as cybersecurity threats grow in scope and severity. the department maintains inattentive posture on election security to secure our system begins interference of any kind. the president invest 1.7 billion in this cyber security agency to strengthen our cyber and infrastructure mission. this is an increase of roughly 150 million from the president a fly 20 budget request. the security of our budget remains a priority focus f

would it be dhs? guest: we would have the election commission, robustly funded now, we would make sure that our group out here in washington that's going to be tasked with setting the standards would appoint a committee of expert, we would set the standard to make sure that any piece of equipment, just like with valid marking devices and electronic voting machines, they have to reach a set of standards before they could be sold and marketed. was a report that came out in the senate taking a look at the 2016 election and what the obama administration knew about russian interference, saying that there is prolonged inter-agency -- were caught off onrd by russian interference fall of 2016, saying they learned of the hack from the dnc from media reports, as a case of routine xp nosh. -- espionage. sharing, interagency has that improved? would say look at the successes of 2018 with a lack of accusation of foreign interference, there's always room to improve and we can always go back and look at what decisio

again, it restricts information sharing with dhs across the board.'s not only for trusted temporarily programs that we are talking about here. also for customs enforcement and national security and law enforcement purposes. an individual coming into the country cvp officers need this information to determine is this a legitimate person coming in or do we need to take a closer look at that we are only able to do that if we share information. so after 9/11 this is what 9/11 was all about. one of the lessons learned was we need to share information. we need to tear down these silos. we don't need to be building these up to keep information from law enforcement officials. >> ed: we mentioned, pardon me, that the president was tweeting about how he wants to get rid of these lawsuits, new york state coming after him in various ways. the governor did an interview where he went further. and not just attacking the president but going after you. listen. >> >> you are knocking on the door saying i will burn down the house if you don't give me entry? i will give

. >> dhs has an important role to play with regards to public safety.governor cuomo in his press conference last week i said this decision by dhs was eroding public safety. but in order to properly that these applicants, this isn't about politics or a hyperbolic rhetoric, it doesn't matter how far either side comes out of their shoes and coming out with one-liners, at the end of the day dhs has a job to do and in order to do that they have two have access to this record. >> maybe we will give you the information of those who would apply for the trusted traveler program. do you find that legit or somewhat disingenuous. and that's primarily forecast on the immigration law and cutting off access to dmv records, and it also ends up in resulting i.c.e.'s ability to go after drug trafficking and sex trafficking and violent crime that we see and cracking down on ms-13 end of the people who are not supposed to be in our country. so with this narrow offer is being made by governor cuomo, is that going to be enough to allow access to the trusted traveler program

he did not want to give that to dhs, they were not asking for that. you type of situation. >> you feel that there is any broader maybe oh, my god bipartisan consensus about this continue issue of state right versus federal authority. this is one of many of these issues that play out, i remember arizona did not pass martin luther king day in 1991, that ended up being changed because of an nfl boycott because of super bowl, but there is a constant tension between how much federal government can dictate, and states can cut across it. >> i wish there would be i am a big modern federalist, i think we should go back recognize there should be state sovereignty. we basically killed the structure that protected the states from overreach of the feds, 17 amendment, 16 amendment, passed in 1913 they are hugely getmenta detrimentalo preserves states. if removing ewell electoral cole you would get we would not longer have federalism, we would be a national state. >> congressman it seems that reason that cuomo is going to dc to meet with trump, new york's economy th

could make part of border patrol agents to conduct immigration checks, what the new policy is and the dhs's response when we come back. with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa

update and answer our question but we also have testimony from the dhs office of civil rights and civil liberties and to be charged with ensuring the protection of civil rights and civil liberties as it relates to the department's activities. no easy task especially these days. to be sure under my leadership will continue to hold the department accountable for treating all americans equitably and to ensure our rights are protected from my look forward to a robust discussion with all the witnesses and thanked the members for joining us today. >> i will come our panel love witnesses as the deputy executive assistant commissioner for field operations customs border protection and the current role nearly 30000 federal employees and manages the program related to

dhs saved new yorkers from enrollment arguing access to the information was critical.t led to a lawsuit by the new york attorney general who claimed the only retribution for the state's green light law which allows illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses, dhs denies the connection saying these issues have nothing to do with each other and linking them is irresponsible. the new york governor clearly disagrees. >> i will never give them access to the database but for the tpp enrollees on a case-by-case basis it is calling the philosophy because of they don't accept this they are admitting they are playing politics. >> with that is the backdrop cuomo's office confirmed to fox news that under his proposed new arrangement dhs would be granted access to dmv databases for new york residents applying to the program after the feds show cause for needing that information. new york daily news reporting the arrangement was already rejected by dhs but governor cuomo hopes to sway the president. >> todd pyro, thank you. defense secretary mark s burr meeting with nato leaders

lastly, about information sharing with dhs. is orr sharing information about rejected sponsor applicants with ice, dhs? >> so we have shared the names and addresses of 141 individuals who were denied sponsorship due to criminal history or fraudulent representation to orr they have bona fide relationship with the child. no parents were included in that group. whenever -- >> you are prohibited by law from detaining sponsors based on probation that hhs collects a potential sponsors during the vetting process. >> again i don't detaining sponsors. but also the department of homeland security is complying with the legal restraints in the act what this is not parents. this is individuals denied sponsorship due to criminal histories or due to fraudulent representations to orr that they have bona fide relationship with the child. no parents being included in the group. >> can you tell me is orr sharing information with dhs on in adults who does not fall into the categories included in the dhs writer? the prohibition on use of funds to d

records of people that apply for global entry in these programs and he says the administration and dhs accept that it will be clear this is purely political punishment for governor cuomo for being a sanctuary state. what do you think will happen when they meet? >> i don't see a compromise and i don't think one should take place. new york government is making public safety political. the federal government, new york legislature and governor cuomo is making this a political issue. we work daily with our federal partners on investigations, locating fugitives and doing things we do on a day-to-day basis behind-the-scenes the key people safe and we need this information to do that and it is the government of new york that is making this a political issue. >> that is very interesting. >> thanks for joining us. >> my pleasure. jillian: 18 after the are. heads rolling in the hawkeye state, casualties in the wake of the iowa caucuses. >> a heartwarming hug between a little girl and a law enforcement officer, her mom and the hero in uniform join us live with the message everybody needs to hear c

todd: tom homan says the liberal state left dhs with no other option.us live. >> the other state making a bold claim. we are coming right back. todd: one of us is from there. ♪ >> what that law does is prohibit access to ice and cvp. that is from border protection, ice uses that to build cases and investigating criminal networks. they can no longer do that because of what new york did. todd: the head of homeland security suspending global entry and traveler programs for new yorkers won over the state's sanctuary laws. jillian: they enacted this entry greenlight law allowing illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses. tom homan says dhs has no choice, thanks for being here. a lot of people are upset about this. this is something a lot of people paid money for. they spent time to interview for this and all of a sudden because of this new law they can't utilize this anymore. was this the right move? was it necessary? >> absolutely the right move and i salute the acting secretary for doing this. i watched a clip, governor cuomo said this is a political

>> i salute the acting secretary of dhs chad wolf doing this. he doesn't have a choice.this. the trusted traveler program, such as the three programs we talked about, you have got to vet these people. if you will give people entry into the country, expedited processing dhs has to vet them, make sure they know who they are, any criminal histories, is there any derogatory information out there. law enforcement uses dmv databases for decades. new york state, when you give the person a driver's license, this doesn't give them just permission to drive. this lets them open bank accounts, cash checks, get on airlines. this is number one form of identification. melissa: tom, let me ask you, all that is absolutely true, global entry, in order to get global entry, you have to go to the airport, here in new york, go to the customs house. you make an appointment. it takes forever. you have to bring all kinds of documenttation. i don't know how, if they're trying to make sure that you know, you don't have people who already have fake i.d.s or who aren't who they say they are, or aren

what is trusted traveler programs such as global entry, in a letter to dhs the lawmakers said we aretment's policy change maybe improper attempt to use officials dhs policy to punish the people of new york because their state government has a political disagreement with the trump administration over immigration policy. according to customs border protection, 86,000 new yorkers will be immediately affect bid the policy change including those with pending applications to join global entry and other trusted traveler programs. the announcement came a day after president trump called out new york's sanctuary policies during state of the union address and now new york governor andrew cuomo plans to sue the administration arguing the president is targeting his state to score political points but the acting head of dhs says this change has nothing to do with new york sanctuary laws themselves but as a result of the state's new green light law which in part prevents dmv agencies from sharing criminal records of those applying for global entry. >> what they did is they don't allow cdp to check

dhs did offer to screen this app for hacking potential. that offer was not taken up by the idp.they never actually got their hands on it. now, this isn't all that rare. the dhs does not want to be seen as intervening in states elections, they don't want to be seen as interfering too much. so they allow the states to develop and screen and process this type of technology for themselves, often using local assets, local vendors. but the question has arisen as to why no one at the federal level has seen this and so what dhs tends to do is they offer advice, they offer services, they offer technology. in this case, wolf, that was not taken up by the idp. dhs, department of homeland security, did not get to take a look at this app in terms of its vulnerability for hacking. >> thank you very much, good reporting, alex. all right, we're getting very close to when the idp, the iowa democratic party is going to be briefing the campaigns. we'll monitor that. much more of our special coverage right after this. ( ♪ ) only tylenol® rapid release gels have laser drilled holes. they release med

let's work with dhs. dhs offered the democratic party in iowa. a lot of people feel disenfranchised right now today after spending a lot of time and energy working to elect and vote for the candidates that they chose him and they are disappointed today. we've got to do better and we ought to be able to come up with a bipartisan solution like the bill to make that happen. >> is there legislation -- could this have been prevented, what happened in iowa? what do you know about the act and what could have been done? >> they could have worked with dhs. when they offered to test their application, and also run through a tabletop exercise. that would have allowed a dhs to talk about the contingency issues that they may have run through with some other election authorities and localities. the democratic party, and more importantly i think the app developer, i don't think they chose to take advantage of the technical assistance. that's working together. that should have been done. i know the caucuses were different than a primary election. these are party

>> i think what dhs trying to do is trying to put any pressure point and what they can do is camp shut down what they don't have get. they're just trying to put pressure every way possible to get new york to cooperate so they can enforce the immigration foss because without this information without honoring ice containers, it's difficult for immigration offers to do their job and dhs is frustrated. >> there are going to change policies overnight so what can we expect? >> i don't think we're going to see the changes from new york. it's under the current administration that they have there. we are just going to see sliding as long as president trump is in office and if he's reelected, we will see this another five years. we are going to see it going to other states like california and other states for dhs fed up being with the law so they will find ways to change policies whether it be financial or otherwise. >> there's got to be middle ground to avoid this. are seeing a lot more of this kind of behavior. thank you very much. meanwhile, the d.c. gridlock continues. debbie lesko part of t

the programs removing to countries other than their own such as the cooperative agreement how does dhs ensure they would be protected in the destination country? they cannot wash their hands of responsibility for the safety us department the state department has issued advisory warnings against travel to some of these countries cbp mission is not limited to containing and removing migrants from the united states it also includes sharing due process reminders including the opportunity to seek asylum or other forms of relief. cbp should be working harder to balance those priorities. so far cbp and the departments have expedited removal making it harder for migrants to seek asylum and gain access to legal counsel of the united states. so far efforts to address concerns about the safety of civil rights of migrants appear to be more of an afterthought if even addressed at all by dhs additionally the department has provided some information on the mpp program and is provided very little on the new expedited removal programs. we don't even have complete descriptions of how these programs will

in particular the subcommittee we chaired was tasked to provide findings and recommendations on how dhs can best support state and local governments and faith based organizations to keep houses of worship safe, secure, and resilient. our final report, which was released a month ago today, details our findings and recommendations in full. our work was significantly aided by the advice and counsel of representing offices and entities from across all of dhs which has a vast array of highly dedicated men and women and the broader u.s. government, including the doj, the fbi and the united states secret service. as alluded to earlier, i believe notable is that our members took to the field, we went to the field, to the ground, visiting synagogues, mosques, temples and churches, meeting with communities impacted by targeted violent attacks committed by some very heinous violent extremists. these engagements were literally eye opening, even for a very jaded senior former police officer from the state of new jersey. our nation's faith-based communities are one of the few institutions that has th

are supposed to be responsible to acting deputy secretary of homeland security ken cuccinelli says dhs is deciding how to deal with states like california which he says illegally withhold information about undocumented criminals from federal authorities and in 2 cases he says city officials even ward undocumented immigrants about planned ice raids were looking at all our options with respect to sanctuary cities and states because of the harm done to public safety and national security dhs already took action in new york and attorney general william barr filed 3 federal lawsuit against new jersey california and king county in washington state all of them pushing back against sanctuary policies. >>today is a significant escalaon in the federal government effort. >>to confront the resistance of sanctuary cities we're not going to. given to his kind of threats and intimidation, a california doesn't share his form of xenophobia california congressman adam schiff called the attacks on sanctuary policies retribution, but you know the person is always have the attitude of you're either with me

reporter: dhs says they need access to dmv records for national security reasons to keep borders ands spokesperson said in a statement, quote the acting secretary is clear that cpb requires full access to the data fulfill the law enforcement and custom and trade and travel statutory responsibilities. where new york is once again sharing critical law enforcement data with cpb. the governor's office says banning new yorkers from the programs has huge impact on local economy. over 250,000 people have global entry passes in process or about to expire. this ban stalls the passes from going forward. it is not just airports this could impact but also travel across the new york and canada border. the governor's office says under the ban 30,000 drivers lose access to certain features part of the fast program. there are 6500 trips that use the fast program for faster screening and that could stall trips as well. connell: hillary vaughn from the white house. melissa: first of all governor healthcare.gov memo says this has nothing to do with anything, just pure retaliation. your thoughts? >> he

and one of the key recommendations from the report, was that dhs would improve those tracking systems and talk to the other agencies and develop better standards. but to also and i think this is really important that dhs should always consider the best interest of the child and all processing, custody removal and reentry decisions. another key recommendation with the dhs should require the hiring of child welfare professionals at the borders. to oversee away in. so those two like key recommendations from early 2017, of course they did not get implemented. and of course the groundwork for all of the chaos horrific consequences of zero-tolerance. i think it is also important to point out, go back to this a little bit in the panel but even now, after we have been through the horse family separation. we still do not have those standards in place. cdp is still not evaluating the best interest of the child. we don't have to really evaluate the best interest of the child. so we've been through so much litigation but in many ways, very tragically, were kind of back in the same place that we w

but also and i think this is really important, that dhs should also consider the best interest of the child in all processing custody removal and repatriation decisions. another key recommendation was dhs should require the hiring of child welfare professionals to oversee at the border and weigh in on all instances of family separation. so those recommendations, those two recommendations are from early 2017. of course they did not obviously did not get implemented and of course laid the groundwork for all of the chaos and the horrific consequences of zero tolerance. i think it's also important to point out -- and i think i will go back to this later in the panel, but even now after we've been through the horrors of family separation, we still do not have those standards in place. cbp still is not evaluating the best interest of the child. they don't have to evaluate the best interest of the child. we've been through so much litigation, but in many ways, very tragically, we are kind of back in the same place that we were even back in and i'll get 2017. into more detail later. there was

that arrangement is by dhs and cuomo hoping to sway the president.ren: some of the countries give to go schools is china and saudi arabia. the doe said yale fell to report $375 million in foreign transactions and hasn't reported any gifts or contracts for the last 4 years, it has not yet revealed how much harvard might not have report bud just last year after department was arrested to alleged ties to government program, investigators claim executive -- what are they doing now, tracee carrasco with those details. tracee: good morning, democrats say have support which could require congress to authorize military force against iran restricting the president's -- president trump who waged war with iran. authorize a drone strike that killed iran's military leader qassem soleimani. puerto rico has been hit with earthquakes and hurricanes and now according to senior official government lost $1.2 billion falling for fishing scam, unclear whether officials have been able to recover any of the money and what impact the financial loss has on the government's a

the swat like teams will be deployed through may according to dhs. not everyone is happy with the move. for years the mayor of los angeles as well as its police chief saying they will not cooperate with the trump administration on this order. others mayors in sanctuary cities have made similar pledges. wolf says this year his i.c.e. agents were moved to rereinforce with the southern border. jon? jon: thank you. the u.s. and taliban reach a truce in reducing violence in afghanistan, a first step towards a peace deal. top u.s. officials and the afghan president talked about at the security conference this week. if the agreement holds, it paves the way for a deal bringing american troops home. mike tobin is following the story from jerusalem. >> jon, very promising but not without risk. that's what u.s. defense secretary mark esper told the press conference after the u.s. and taliban struck a deal that could ultimately lead to u.s. troops coming home after 18 years of combat. it all happened on the side lines of international security forum in munich, g

>> a great example of why dhs was created.f you think about it, before dhs existed, 23 different agencies with all their capabilities were not coordinated. a football team without a quarterback. now when they have special high-security events like this, they can bring in capabilities from all over the government including, you know, bomb dogs from i.c.e., metal detectors from tsa, secret service collaborates with local law enforcement. such an important event that no single entity in the state can handle alone. leland: we talked about super bowls and other big events. how much different is that for the fans, shall we say, and their experience in coming to a normal, big, american event like the super bowl versus that in the president and. >> what has been great is, the way i like to describe it is, it's almost like the invisible hand of security. the president is there and behind-the-scenes, if they do their job right, most of the fans will not notice a heightened level of security, but i can assure you behind-the-scenes whatev