this one, in order to say the light really needs to be shown on anheuser-busch based in belgium, diagio based in london, all the corporations that aren't even in the u.s. anymore, let alone in california, san francisco. so we totally agree with that philosophy. of course they fight us tooth and nail when it comes to federal excise taxes and state excise taxes and we're in those fights and unfortunately now we're in this one and it's really not where we want to be. it's just that now the city is the one bearing the brunt of the cost and that's why we're here. >> thank you. i do have a question, supervisor. now, what will this fee do to reduce all this alcohol-related expenses? because it's fine we cover and pay for it but is there a plan? if there's not a fan and then this cost keeps going up, then we'll have to hit the fee again, so is there a plan? >> what would the legislation do to reduce -- i'm sorry, i didn't quite -- to reduce >> alcohol-related problems, the revolving door of the alcohol-related problems? >> essentially it's about getting some cost recovery. there could be, as i