diallo regarded gentz as an unreliable witness who told multiple versions of his story.e, she says, points in one direction. to joe gentz, not bob. gentz did this all on his own, and then he made this story up. and you know what? the forensic work really validates that story, doesn't it? it does you a lot of good because forensically, it says, yes, gentz is do in there just exactly what he described. but the forensic techs don't see much sign of bob bashara there. right. he was there as far as being a resident in the house. but what i'm saying for that per. not in the garage when the killings going down, though. there is no forensic evidence that puts him there at that particular time. narrator: aside from that lack of forensics, diallo's overall strategy throughout the trial was to hammer home that her client's sexual behavior may have made for titillating headlines, but it didn't make bob bashara a murderer. let's get the elephant out of the room. all that bdsm. i'm going to tell you, in all my years of living, i had never, never heard of such things. was it relevant t