now, president of belarus alexander lukashenko gave a long interview to ukrainian journalist diana panchenko, the conversation lasted about two hours, and for the most part there were no taboos about ukraine, the topics and questions of the conversation sounded new details and details that had not previously appeared in the media alexander lukashenko gave a full account of the real state of affairs in ukraine and its future, if steps are not taken for the peaceful settlement of the conflict. right now russia will crush you there is manpower and strength and technology. already those motivated ideologically minded nazis, as they were called nationalists? these ideological people are not strong, they are all dead already. those who are fighting here are already those whom you catch on the streets and bring here, they are not prepared. well, and a little military, they will not cope with this machine. russia has rebuilt. russia is at the front today. the newest weapon already grabs the drone already. well, a completely different army and the most dangerous they are again, i don’t know whether t

diana panchenko came as the host of the ukrainian tv channel. first independent now.ctions and wanted in ukraine , a criminal case has been opened against her, because now, according to the motherland, she is a pro-russian propagandist, relations between ukraine and belarus are going through hard times. but the fact that you agreed to this conversation is already encouraging, of course, alexander lukashenko gave more than a dozen interviews on the topic of ukraine thanks to media generosity. journalists do not have a single question without answer, nevertheless , serious preparation is needed and the journalist did an impressive job, before i reviewed a lot of your interviews. and drew attention. how many of your predictions came true in an interview with solovyov a few weeks before the war, you said that you were following me, of course, i prepared very thoroughly for the interview questions in the current situation in ukraine, the journalist collected , among other things, popular myths us there, like a wasp of aggressors and a potential threat, and they say not eve

let's start we with lukashenka or lukashenko e-e gave an interview to the russian propagandist diana panchenko who once she worked in the medvedchuk field, but as she was, she still remains a russian propagandist. she gave a staged interview . simply put, the self-proclaimed president of the republic of belarus offers zelenskiy and the ukrainians to surrender. let's hear what lukashenko said, because usually what lukashenka has on his tongue is what putin has on his mind. they will grind you here and then do what the leadership fears most, they will cut you off to moldova in transnistria , they will cut you off, what will you do later, but here at the end, they will cut you off the west, you will have this piece left, if it remains, this is what will happen to you, and states like ukraine our state with you will not be the native land of yours and mine is already history , this is what you will not stop now, it will happen if you do not sit down at the negotiating table now , russia offers it. and what the hell is their state diana panchenko oleksandr lukashenko ukraine it never was and never

we are with lukashenka or lukashenka, e-e gave an interview to the russian propagandist diana panchenko, who once worked in the medvedchuk field, but how she was still remains a russian propagandist gave a staged interview, i won't tell you everything, the only thing i will say is that lukashenko said that ukraine may lose all its territories if it continues to enter hostilities, and to put it simply, the self-proclaimed president of the republic of belarus offers zelenskiy and the ukrainians to surrender. let's hear it what lukashenko said, because usually what is on lukashenko's tongue is what is on putin's mind. they will grind you here and then do what the leadership fears most. they will cut you off to moldova and transnistria. you will be cut off, what will you do later, but here they cut you, this piece will remain if it remains, this is what will happen to you, and the state like ukraine, our state will not be the native land of yours , and the history of mine is already that you will not stop now это будет если сейчас вы сейчасте вы сейчать на геговоровов Россия проеведь you do

the studio hello elena, the interview of the president of belarus to the ukrainian journalist diana panchenko continues to break internet platforms and social networks, and the geography of views will tell the figure. let's turn the topic around for insiders from our president , the expert community is actively following. what role can play in belarus to stop the bloodshed in ukraine ukrainian politicians ilya kieva from september 1 in our country will increase the salaries of state employees the picture of the day will be supplemented by my colleagues. after the word and the reaction to the interview of our president with a ukrainian journalist, who has not yet watched it, they need to do it for him to finish this topic. belarusian farmers presented a new technology for harvesting peas. k nylon no knows everything about the course of harvesting. peace and crisis away at polarity as new centers form bricks forces, what is assian, why are they attractive for belarus, what place do they occupy today on the political map of the planet? who is against the bearish methods of the west, a detailed b

and acquaintances, i personally do not consider her not about russian , not about putin's diana panchenko in my opinion. very much about the ukrainian journalist, but against zelensky against the authorities that are now leading her native ukraine no longer into the abyss, but to destruction against the puppetry of kiev and against the puppeteers in the face of the united states. this definitely does not oblige her to unconditionally support every decision of the kremlin on ukraine, and it is absolutely difficult for her to tell how ukrainian she is with enthusiasm. successes of the russian army at the front, because with all the guilt of the kiev regime, its fellow citizens are dying. i'm a panchenko girl , to put it mildly, not stupid, but any intelligent person and it doesn't matter at all. from which side of the conflict he is and what views he holds , he will not deny that specifically alexander lukashenko has been out of his skin for many years, out of the woods and climbs so that there is no war on the territory of ukraine, nowhere else among the slavs for 2 hours of interview ques

diana panchenko came as the presenter of the ukrainian tv channel first independent now. she is under sanctions and wanted in ukraine , a criminal case has been opened against her, because now, according to the motherland, she is a pro-russian propagandist of relations between ukraine and belarus are going through hard times. but the fact that you agreed to this conversation is already encouraging, of course, alexander lukashenko gave more than a dozen interviews on the topic of ukraine thanks to media generosity. not a single question of journalists remains unanswered, however, serious preparation is needed and the journalist has done an impressive job, before i reviewed a lot of your interviews. and drew attention. how many of your predictions came true in an interview with solovyov a few weeks before the war, you said that you were following me, of course i am very thoroughly prepared for the interview questions in the current situation in ukraine, the journalist collected, among other things, popular myths, what do they think about us there, as a wasp of aggressors an

recommendations comments and likes of the interview of the president of belarus to ukrainian journalist diana panchenkotinues to break internet platforms and social networks sharp frank conversation only on youtube channels bill tv and radio companies in total watched almost 5.5 million users the most views over the past week on youtube the pages of the satellite tv channel belarus 24 over four and six tenths of a million by geography of the internet of the audience , according to statistics, users from russia show the most interest 55% of ukraine 14% also viewers from kazakhstan germany israel italy canada and other countries. two ukrainian drones were shot down in the moscow region. in one case , debris fell on the garden house, injuring two people, a man being treated in a hospital. the hospitalization woman refused, among other things, in three houses. broken windows in place emergency services are working. lithuania continues to actively arm vilnius must withdraw from the agreement on the ban on cluster munitions in order to be able to acquire and use them, said the minister of defense let me remi

christ the water hello , the interview of the president of belarus to the ukrainian journalist diana panchenko continues to break the internet social networking platforms, and the geography of views will tell the figure. let's turn the topic around for insiders from our president , the expert community is actively following. what role can belarus play to stop the bloodshed in ukraine ? days will be supplemented by my colleagues. after the word and the reaction to the interview of our president with a ukrainian journalist, who has not yet watched it, you need to make this topic. belarusian agrarians presented a new technology for harvesting peas, ilonovy lanets knows everything about the progress of the harvest about 8 million rubles. they sent the trade union organization of belarus to prepare for school last year. we are actively monitoring prices to find out. how much does it cost to prepare a child for the new school year ? melting metal ornaments were found by archaeologists during the reconstruction of the spartak city stadium, the first conclusions of historians in a panorama report. in

military conflict in in our region, an interview of the president of belarus to ukrainian journalist diana panchenko , a conversation without taboo questions on the most pressing topics. what future awaits our southern neighbors, and what else do you need to learn western strong arguments for peace, don't miss it will be very interesting, watch the tv version of the interview today right after the panorama. you said the day before no forbidden questions no forbidden ones, so this war could have been avoided. well, we agreed it was necessary to comply with these low agreements, but they were not respected, which is when we went wrong. zelensky this question you need ukrainians. we need we need peace, everyone needs peace, what will happen to all this without lukashenka zelensky extended the martial law in ukraine for 90 days until november 15 because of this, the elections to the verkhovna rada, which were to be held at the end of october , are canceled and the general mobilization regime, if ukraine faces a real threat of losing statehood , mobilization is inevitable, that is, the fourth wave, such

right now president of belarus alexander lukashenko gave a long interview to ukrainian journalist diana panchenko the conversation lasted about 2 hours and for the most part concerned ukraine there were no taboo topics and questions, although the conversation sounded new details and details that had not previously appeared in the media alexander lukashenko gave a full account of the real state of affairs in ukraine and its future, if no steps are taken in the peaceful settlement of the conflict russia personal relationship with putin lessons learned after the situation with dude wagner and in which case belarus could use nuclear weapons the conversation is worth seeing the tv version is available on the youtube channel news agency alexander lukashenko's interview caused shi public outcry it is actively discussed in media space and so on, if in ukraine there was such a president as dad, then imagine what strength the slavs would have, dad survived and the country will not be offended by a real time-tested politician. how many times did they want to arrange a maidan for him? and no respect. honestl

president of belarus alexander lukashenko gave an interview to the famous ukrainian journalist diana panchenko against her in ukraine , a criminal case was opened under the uniform sanctions. and in the twentieth, she was one of the top most influential women in the country, by the way, the head of state promised this interview 2 years ago during a big conversation. alexander grigoryevich, firstly, thank you for inviting relations between ukraine and belarus are going through hard times. but what you agreed to this conversation already raises hope and separately for the audience, i will say that you said the day before no taboo questions no taboo topics for this special thanks. it's like this is a general formula for dealing with those journalists with whom you talk, whom you invite against us better. why now the conversation about ukraine , namely this topic was the main one, lasted about two hours. all the most interesting on our air today, follow the news of our time and today the international anti-fascist congress starts in minsk. in him more than 30 countries will take part, a forum is b

president of belarus alexander lukashenko gave an interview to the well-known ukrainian journalist diana panchenko against her in ukraine , a criminal case was opened and sanctions were imposed. and also in the twentieth. she was one of the top most influential women in the country, the head of state, by the way, i promised this interview 2 years ago during a big conversation. alexander grigoryevich, firstly, thank you for inviting relations between ukraine and belarus are going through hard times. but the fact that you agreed to this conversation is already encouraging, and separately for the audience, i will say that you said the day before no taboo questions, no taboo topics for this particular one. thank you. this is so this is the general formula of relations with those journalists with whom you are talking, whom you invite against us in case. why now? the conversation about ukraine, namely this topic was the main one , lasted about 2 hours. stay tuned for all the most interesting news on our air today. harvesting continues farmers have already threshed more than 6 million tons of grain, incl

diana panchenko did this in order to end the conflict in 1914. hmm. and if the minsk agreements were implemented today in ukraine, there would be peace in the donbas, moreover, ukraine a. donbass would return to ukraine with the rights of autonomy, of course, lukashenko's role in this is huge, and you know, i think that we should appreciate her work. lukashenka is not only as president. as a diplomat, as a negotiator, as a person of peace, it is probably very important to remember in some years that politics is not a toy, that it is you know, not just there, playing tanks there and shooting beautiful clips. this is a very, very difficult, painstaking work that can be entrusted only to wise people of wise people in politics, not only in ukraine, but in the whole world. now it is very fashionable. theme yes, the theme of degradation. there are not so many elites left and i guess we should appreciate it. bad weather in mexico hurricane hillary flooded the streets in the south of the country, causing flash flooding strong winds, one person was killed by h

peace, the word peace was the key and in an interview with our president, ukrainian journalist diana panchenko, ukraine and the united states, the inhabitants of these countries are on a par with belarus, russia and germany political scientist in the top in views. vadim gigin. i am sure such statistics speak of one thing, the addressee heard the message that was addressed to them. president lukashenko does nothing. just like that, why exactly at this moment of this particular journalist is such an interview, we see a change of stage, obviously the failure of the counteroffensive, the search for ways out of this situation, the preparation of the russian operation. no wonder putin came. e. in rostov, the command, that is, russia is conducting a successful strategic defensive operation, following such an operation, one should attack operation russia is accumulating reserves. here comes something. well, it's not a break. and such is the transitional period, and in this situation, alexander lukashenko turns to the west, turns to the ukrainians. take advantage of this chance, a chance for peace, a c

president of belarus gave a long interview to ukrainian journalism diana panchenko's conversation lastedut 2 hours and mostly concerned ukraine, there were no taboo topics and questions during the conversation, new details were heard details that had not previously appeared in the media alexander lukashenko gave a full alignment, and the real state of affairs in ukraine is its future, if there will be no steps taken on the peaceful settlement of the conflict, russia's personal relationship with putin lessons learned after the situation with the wagner pmc. in which case belarus could use nuclear weapons alexander lukashenko was also drawn the question of whether he is going to participate in the next presidential elections in belarus , this conversation is worth seeing the tv version available on the agency's youtube channel or the news of the interview with alexander lukashenko caused a wide public response to his actively discussing. in the media space, even then it would be nice to listen to a very good interview with ordinary people so as not to fall for this hook. it can be seen in

taboos or taboos, so alexander lukashenko gave an interview to an unknown ukrainian journalist diana panchenko case has been opened and sanctions have been imposed in ukraine, but in 2020 she was on the list of the most influential women in the country. and by the way, our president promised. this interview 2 years ago during a big conversation keeps its word. alexander grigoryevich , firstly, thank you for inviting relations between ukraine and belarus are going through hard times. but the fact that you agreed to this conversation is already encouraging, and separately for the audience, i will say that you said the day before no taboo questions, no taboo topics for this particular one. thank you. this is so this is the general formula of relations with those journalists with whom you talk, whom you you invite against in case. why date? the conversation about ukraine, namely this topic was the main one, lasted about 2 hours. everything, the most interesting show tomorrow. ukraine may lose not only its natural resources , but also part of its land, the price of nato membership for it is territo

uh, including opinion leaders in ukraine uh diana panchenko is certainly one of the brightest ukrainianournalists. yes, of course, he had noticeable differences in positions with the kiev regime. she was now forced to leave ukraine, which does not mean at all that she has lost her audience, so the head of state conveyed the position of our country, but tried to explain the actions of russia and, uh, probably set certain parameters, including future discussions on the restoration of ukraine and peaceful resolution of this bloody fratricidal war, which, let's say, for us for belarusians, as countries that are not participating in this process, but suffering, because this is an inextricable link from our common civilization. eh, this war is necessary. it must end, it must end on terms mutually acceptable to all. well , of course, the interview caused a resonance, informational noise, etc. well, in the end , gregory said a lot of things that have not yet been heard. i have negotiations with ukraine from time to time. well, there are now also about the conditions that were proposed in ukrain

in the full version of the interview of the president of belarus to the ukrainian journalist diana panchenko watch the elena agency's youtube channel guests. nastya is just the second place in the trends of loss in the war. half a million people have already made up in ukraine, a shocking figure is given by the new york times, with reference to sources in us official structures , the contract and estimates may not be accurate, as for the total number of troops, then according to the americans. russia has over a million and 300,000 people. all in all, 500,000 information from the american edition, the british times picked up, but made a strange conclusion that kiev should be given f-16 fighters. lord, is it possible that the sacrifice would be even greater in any case, american -made fighter jets can be delivered to ukraine no earlier than a year later, the dutch media report, while it is highly supported. is that the german concern rain metal, he plans in the coming days to maintain those tanks in ukraine in the plans for the production of these vehicles in the most non-fallow. meanwhile, th

good luck to you, but the personal impressions of the conversation with alexander lukashenko diana panchenkoself, the journalist talked with all the presidents of ukraine and watched hundreds of interviews with politicians, apparently, she did not expect that there were taboo questions for the belarusian leader. no, evaluate the work. lukashenka not only as the president of belarus as a diplomat, as a negotiator as a man of the world with a capital letter. and it will be possible already after, probably, some years. i think today we still don’t fully understand a lot of things we don’t know according to my feelings and based on this information that i have, but it’s not always possible to voice it, how could the word of peace be, perhaps, the key word that sounded and read between the lines in this conversation is a bloody conflict. must be stopped. all sane people understand this. belarus has always been against disagreements between the slavs and minsk agreements confirm this. alexander grigoryevich, in your opinion, it was necessary to avoid this war and it was possible at what moment it

thousands of comments and likes of the interview of the president of belarus , ukrainian journalist diana panchenko to break internet platforms and social network sharp frank conversation only on youtube channels.

community continue to discuss the interview of alexander lukashenko to the ukrainian journalist diana panchenkoe sensational statements of the belarusian leader, which made both western initiators and ukrainian perpetrators of the bloodshed think about what and when went wrong, who should take the first step , to correct the situation and is the current leadership of our southern neighbors capable of doing this ? here he is an actor from this film, but about the president, who is absolutely nothing of himself, as a person he does not represent initially. here is even a trip, about which alexander pavlovich recalled, to bow to the head of the british intelligence service when the president of a sovereign country goes to the office. he does not invite him there, he goes there to coordinate positions or receive instructions; this only says initially that this is a person. she could not and was not able to stop this war and make any decisions. he, most likely, would have been simply destroyed, as, uh, a creature that did not fulfill the instructions to which he was taken, to which he was promoted w

expert community continue to discuss alexander lukashenko's interview with ukrainian journalist diana panchenko conflict relations between people in the fourteenth year consistently trying to be a mediator, then there is to mediate in order to settle, because i think in many ways for him ukraine is a catchy country, like russia, so he would not go to imply this conflict. why the west uh, never like it, the role is not the negotiator. yes, because they themselves are just kind of negotiating , they are for the continuation of the conflict, so they don’t like it, they don’t like it, not the chinese peace initiatives in this, not the peaceful main african country. they don't like anything at all. they like the continuation of total war after the start. not only called zelensky, he also provided belarus as a platform where the first 2 meetings took place. my name is ukrainian russian money , some kind of agreement there. i think that just the same from the point of view of the settlement. uh president of belarus made. it is more than anything on western leaders who are essentially incendiary, the h

it is also important here that the president drew attention to when diana panchenko asked him a questionublic argument that zelensky defended kiev and ukraine organized near kiev and won some kind of victory. the president said that listen , russian troops could, most likely ukraine could, and by the way, i am also convinced of this. i also heard about it and read and analyzed these events. in my opinion military prerequisites. there were no troops to withdraw. that is why the russian negotiators became practically, and the political ones were colonel-general fomin, you want to see, but about putin’s reasoning eh, let's listen. they say they lead out on the streets with direct fire, an ersazo gun. anti-aircraft guns are not only there, tanks are hiding behind kindergartens and hospitals. as he says to fight, uh, according to the military with them. here also speaks, we carry out precisely operation. we are on the outskirts of kiev, we cannot beat them indiscriminately . that is, he was worried that he would have to fight there. so there won't be anything left where the school is, because

region of the interview of the president of belarus to the ukrainian journalist diana panchenko , a conversation without taboo questions on the most sensitive topics. what future awaits our southern neighbors, and what else do westerners need to learn strong arguments for peace, don't miss it will be very interesting, watch the tv version of the interview today right after the panorama. you said the day before no forbidden questions no forbidden ones, so could have been avoided. well, we agreed it was necessary to comply with these minsk agreements, but they were not observed, what and when did not go well with us so. you need to take your head in your hands if they want, volodya zelensky, zelensky will light up and go to these negotiations. you need it ukrainians. we need we need peace everyone needs peace, what will happen to all this without lukashenka american investigative journalists seymour hersh gave birth to another insider, according to his information, the cia warned anthony blinkin that ukraine's counteroffensive would not be successful. it was a show put on by zelensky and some in t

uh, diana panchenko handed over the question to the president, well, the war will end well.he has spread to us, and the president has reflected on this topic. let's listen to us, it seems, the irreconcilable position of ukrainians, there, uh, russians, yes, and belarusians. here are involved in it, but i always give an example. do you remember what the nazis did on the territory and the same bandera khatyns and so on there, but the wounds healed. the soviet union had a good relationship with germany, the collapse of the soviet union and ukraine and belarus, which were practically used up, the face of the earth was erased shot relations from germany why don't we we’ll line up, we’ll shoot, but we need to go towards this, if we talk about it, but we won’t go towards this, it’s unlikely that we will do anything towards this, we need to go, but i want to say that i worked one trace in ukrainian, and it seems to me . i understand a little, but the mentality, at least of the average urban ukrainian class. it seems to me that it will be somewhat easier to heal veterans from ukraine

will talk directly with their participant in the conversation, the ukrainian journalist and diana and panchenkoexander lukashenko lasted about 2 hours. tell us about your impressions. were there forbidden topics, were there new details and details that had not previously appeared in the good evening media, the studio is glad to talk with you, of course, this interview is unconditional. can be called without of superfluous modesty, i will say, probably, one of the brightest informational occasions. eh, last week alexander grigorievich did not give interviews as often as he wanted, perhaps, certainly. i wanted to make this conversation not only rich, not only filled, not only to learn about those things that o, which only lukashenka knows , i also wanted this conversation to be deep. that is why we touched on more fundamental things, mm about why did it happen that a little more than 30 years after the collapse of the soviet union in belarus, stability and peace, thank god, and ukraine has lost part of its territory and is now in a war. why did it happen that the ukrainian economy and industry. u

will talk directly with their participant in the conversation, the ukrainian journalist and diana and panchenkonka lasted about 2 hours. tell us about your impressions. were there taboo topics, were there new details and details that had not previously appeared together? good evening, the studio is happy to talk with you, of course, this interview is unconditional. i can name it not without undue modesty, i will say, probably, one of the most uh, bright u informational reasons, uh, last week alexander grigoryevich does not give interviews as often as he wanted, perhaps, certainly. i wanted to make this conversation not only rich, not only filled not only to learn about those things that, uh, about, which only lukashenka knows , perhaps, i wanted this conversation to be deep. that is why we touched on more fundamental things. e about why it turned out that a little more than 30 years after the collapse of the soviet union and in belarus stability and the glory of god of peace, and ukraine has lost part of the territory and is now at war. and why did it happen that the ukrainian economy and indus

another traitor diana panchenko. by the way, i have a question: where is the reaction of the security service of ukraine, where are the criminal cases against these journalists and people like her who served the interests of russia, and then they swore something in dear ukraine, the armed forces then disappeared. they fled again to russia, to donetsk, somewhere else, and from there they now serve the enemy and the occupier, and then they have apartments , houses in ukraine, live beautifully, some work, and we see people worthy of a pension, and panchenko demands the reaction of the security service to all this, and lukashenko, and i want to say, you are a scoundrel . listen to me. we will find you, we will hang you on a pole, we will show you your effigy to the children so that they see what happens to scoundrels like you, who destroy your own country and destroy our country. you will be responsible for everything, you can only dream of gaga, you will not live to see gaga, please voice of yurchyshyn yaroslav romanovy

the president of belarus gave a long interview to ukrainian journalist diana panchenko, the conversation lasted about 2 hours and for the most part concerned ukraine there were no taboo topics and questions during the conversation, new details and details that had not previously appeared in the media were heard alexander lukashenko gave a full alignment, but the real state of affairs in ukraine and its future, if steps are not taken a peaceful settlement of the conflict russia personally and relations with putin lessons learned after the situation with the wagner pmc and in which case belarus could use nuclear weapons alexander lukashenko was also asked if he was going to participate in next presidential election in belarus this conversation is worth seeing tv version available on the agency's youtube channel or news. now. this third line in the trends of the interview with alexander lukashenko caused a wide public outcry. he is actively discussed in the media space. it would be nice to listen to a very good interview with the common people so as not to fall for this hook. it can be seen

i don't know diana panchenko at this hour.any 12 o'clock in the afternoon there are already more than a million views on different platforms, well, a huge number of views, well, surprisingly , the topic, firstly, worries everyone, not only belarus russia ukraine to europe and not i'm afraid of the word to the rest of the continent in hotels, the president of belarus was still carried away now involved in these events. and, of course, we are interested in finding out some details, for the benefit of the state. in detail, as far as i understand, he can reveal some things about the current situation. uh, gave his opinion on why? it all happened. what mistakes were made that led to the fact that this did not end with, uh, peace negotiations, who is to blame? we can already draw our own conclusions. yes, based on these stories and other information that e came to us, how things are now at the front. what is the prospect of ukraine if there is such a prospect? now it is difficult to talk about it, but the forecasts are more and more

uh, diana panchenko submitted a question to the president about, well, the war will end well. often spread to us and the president thought about this topic? let's listen to us, it seems, an irreconcilable position ukrainians, there, uh, russians, yes, and belarusians. here are involved in it, but i always give an example. do you remember what the fascists did in the territory and the same bandera khatynites and so on there, but the wounds healed. the soviet union had a good relationship with germany , the collapse of the soviet union and ukraine and belarus, which were practically striped and erased from the face of the earth, shot relations with germany. why don’t we line up and shoot? but we have to go towards this, if we talk about it, but don’t go towards it , it’s unlikely that we will do anything towards it i need to go, but i want to say that i worked as a ukrainian for 11 years, and it seems to me. i understand a little, but the mentality of at least the average urban ukrainian class. it seems to me that it will be somewhat easier for veterans to heal from ukraine than

military conflict in our region interview of the president of belarus to ukrainian journalist diana panchenkotaboo questions on the most pressing topics. what future awaits our southern neighbors

ukrainian, yevgeny klimakin, but before that, i i'll just inform you that there is such a girl called diana panchenkost, i can't call her a journalist, but she is. well, now it's fashionable to say propagandist . well, she's more of a propagandist. she communicated with lukashenka. lukashenko doesn't give interviews to anyone, as we all know. and where is people whom he trusts, and apparently this person is the one he trusts. lukashenko wants to participate in the negotiations between ukraine and russia , because he is a co-aggressor in this case, as he said on the other hand, russia will never return the crimea to ukraine. this is what he also said to ms. diana he said a lot, but what is interesting in general, it seems to me that more and more people like putin lukashenko are the servants of putin and lug or lukashenko , psychiatrists should be invited together with journalists because mr. lukashenko well, he is such a bright uncle in this sense, he he lies all the time and it seems to me that he just needs to sleep with a psychiatrist, he forgets what he said yesterday or does he remember what he

of the so-called special military apparatus, in an interview with journalists of the traitor diana panchenkoeclared president of belarus oleksandr lukashenko said in his words, and he repeatedly nalog emphasized that it was his personal private opinion that ukraine would never again behave so aggressively towards russia as it was before and that ukraine would become a different state of power, new people would come, and for this it was necessary to end the war, knowing everything as always , and hryhorovych gave advice that ukraine should to take a step towards peace and without any preconditions well, then his short quote is a classic in any diplomacy , you need to sit down at the negotiating table and discuss everything, and crimea and kherson, zaporizhzhia, donetsk , luhansk, everything there needs to be discussed. let's listen to what he said today in his first direct speech. for today, of course, russia will never go to the extent of returning krym. well, as you say, this will not happen. i still doubt that it is possible to agree on something here in the east, but russia is ready. but

arises if i were this pseudo-journalist who went to lukashenka to look at him with dreamy eyes diana panchenko she seems to sound like i would ask, why should we talk to putin about crimea if he will never give it up here ? i want oleksandr . i understand that he will give you at least other territories. which he never wants to give so well that he would say a hand cut off a stump , he would give it to us correctly, well, you need to talk to oleksandr grigoryovych in simple terms . yes, he does not understand anything, yes, he believes that it is possible to talk and refuse at the same time until the beginning of victory , he simply, i would say, he is being mocked, but there are people lukashenko refers to them, who sincerely treat everyone around them. well, with on the other hand, why doesn't lukashenko treat those around him with respect when he has been raping belarus for 30 years, you understand a rapist with experience, like when the belarusians went out on the streets and when they tried to get rid of this scoundrel, he behaved much less confidently. remember the bigot with a machine g

last week, er, lukashenko gave an interview to er, diana panchenko, such a pro-russian microphone standussian propagandists call a ukrainian journalist, and he said there that he was he is ready to hold elections while the anti-terrorist operation is still being carried out in ukraine , this is before he said that belarusian specialists wrote the draft of the constitution of ukraine . well, maybe then the americans will hold elections for us. if they are such uh, staunch democrats we have our own internal legislation that does not provide for elections during martial law, i.e. but it is necessary to communicate, it is necessary to prove it, and not say it through different mouths. we will win in two weeks and everything will be fine . ukraine remains a democracy, ukraine remains precisely a country of western civilization of the western world, and our values ​​in this direction actually protect europe and protect the lives of its citizens, that's what the matter is, and this should also be conveyed, mr. yevgena thank you for the conversation. ivan marta, the executive director of the in

arises if i were this pseudo-journalist who went to lukashenka to look at him with dreamy eyes diana panchenkoms to her to be a voice of propaganda, i would ask and then why should we talk to putin about crimea if he will never give it here, alexander wants, i understand you and will give at least other territories. the stake he never wants to give, so we will enter into negotiations so that he will say, i will chop off the hand, cut off the stump, he would give it to us correctly, i understand, well, with alexander the winner, you need to talk about simple things. when you talk to him about a hand, a leg, a leg kolya or some other part of the kneeling organism is the only one who understands political logic. and i don’t understand anything. he thinks that it is possible to talk and refuse at the same time until the beginning of the victory. he would simply say that he is being mocked. there are people lukashenko is among them who sincerely treat well, on the other hand, why doesn't lukashenko treat those around him with respect when he has been raping belarus for 30 years, you understand a ra

propaganda media that the day before lukashenko gave a long interview to the pro-russian journalist diana panchenko invasion, separate russian units attacked ukraine from the territory of belarus, here it is necessary . did you watch this interview at all ? andrii, i participated in it . responsibility, but i did not know, he stated that he did not know that there would be such an attack that when the russians sent, he found out about it literally almost at the last moment , almost from his border guards, that is, it is called and i am not me and the house is not mine. yes, putin didn't share it with me. he walked past me and somehow attacked me. this is an attempt to escape responsibility for the self-aggression that was obvious. i am convinced that he lied . such operations are impossible to prepare in a day for two and he was perfectly informed as to what ways a-a the soldiers would go and there everything was prepared for this attack a-a the second er-e it seems to me that he is trying to show that he is really a separate entity from putin that he is such a savior for putin, he putin is literal

experts comment on the main messages of alexander lukashenko’s interview with ukrainian journalist diana panchenkoope that the words of the belarusian leader will be heard ukrainian politicians and, first of all, their curators, the collective west in their telegram channels. in particular, they note that alexander lukashenko is one of those few politicians who deeply understands ukraine and ukrainians, the very ukrainian soul, and also sees the reasons for the collapse of ukrainian statehood in the vicious system of the oligarchy, as for the belarusian position towards ukraine, it is clear and sincere . the belarusian state does not is the aggressor belarusians. they want a world of stability so that the fratricidal war will stop experts comment on interviews. with the approach of the autumn parliamentary elections , the polish authorities are making more and more reckless decisions of our western. neighbors are deploying new military formations near the belarusian borders, conducting more and more military exercises and closing customs crossings in recent years. poland is implementing an unprece

to belarus live hello, the interview of the president of belarus to the ukrainian journalist diana panchenko

a big interview with alexander lukashenko, and my colleague, the famous ukrainian journalist diana panchenkoed out to be extremely relevant, resonant , frank, of course, ukraine was the most striking quote. now they will hear a lot many people are beginning to really evaluate zelensky. that is why he is rushing about calling elections when you have them there in a year or two, or using martial law to postpone them, that is, it is far from a very ambiguous fact that zelensky will win these elections. at least rivet him 90% of the rating there , i’ll tell you complete nonsense if the elections are held in the near future one of the military budans there or someone else becomes president, one of the military, but not him. well, if it’s completely simple, you know how complex things are in simple language explain what and when it went wrong with us when you started to plunder ukraine if you want to maintain integrity on the part of the process of some company, the situation is, uh, to maintain integrity. this should be the unity. this core should be, first of all, the state core , as we always c