>> diego sanchez with the planning department staff. i would just like to add that any position that the planning commission would take regarding shadow under prop k295 would occur after the ceqa analysis and documents are done. so at this point, there is no official stance and nothing has been taken to them formally at this point? >> i am particularly interested in how the planning department is going to think about that and depending on what the board decides today, look forward to another conversation. supervisor kim. >> thank you. actually just to piggy-back on in a one piece and i want to go to jessie square in district 6. so the appellants did imply that you said that that alternative was not feasible. is in a something that was stated in the eir? >> the 351' alternative. >> what the eir states in the context of the 351' alternative, skykomish, excuse me, it would obtain the project objectives and that the sponsor has indicated that the project as it is now envisioned would not be feasible, but under ceqa it does. mitigation of th

>> i will ask diego sanchez to answer that question. he is the shadow specialist in our department. >> good afternoon, diego sanchez with planning department staff. we would do an analysis, shadow staff would do an analysis under prop k and realize there is x amount of shadow and find that not only to be significant, but also adverse to the impact and we would ask there to be some sort of sculpting with the building and some other changes and revisions to the project. while significant because is there is an additional of net new shadow on the park, it would not have an adverse impact given the qualitative standards that the governing memos for prop k provides. >> who has the final say as to any substantive changes that happen at that point? >> that would be the department, would make a recommendation to the planning commission as well potentially to the rec and park commission about whether the project as proposed has an adverse impact on a particular protected practice. >> and does the board of supervisors have a role as well related

this is the design here is from the city from diego sanchez. we have three feet of light well and their side has one feet. right now they claim they have three feet matching well. welcome that as long as we can document that second one is i never claimed i live there. i never claimed my daughter lives there and my intention is my daughter to come there in fall because she's a ucsf student and she will do residence in the area. another question is the extension of the building block our rear side. so the rear setback. sorry. so that's my concern. so all my concern is not preventing them to do the work, but abiding the law. i came from china 30 years ago and in culture revolution, our family's house, 80 percent was occupied by the right guard and the reason is you are a minority, we are a majority and i truly respect our neighbor and i just want to have my concerns voiced and i truly appreciate this opportunity. thank you very much. >> thank you. >> project sponsor you have a two minute rebuttal. >> i think everything is pretty much been said. we